MnGeo Statewide Geospatial Advisory Council Hot Topics November 28, 2012 Location Privacy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Law of Government Access to Location Data Nicole A. Ozer, Esq. Technology and Civil Liberties Policy Director ACLU of Northern California Links to.
Advertisements

1 Where does the Exclusionary Rule Not Apply? Civil cases and proceedings Civil cases and proceedings Evidence obtained in a private search by a private.
Teaching American History: Moot Courts and Constitutional Concepts.
HR Public Policy Outlook for the Final Months of the112th Congress “It’s Crunch Time!” Michael Layman and Bob Carragher July 25, 2012.
Monroe vs. Pape Argued: November 8, Decided: February 20, 1961 Kelly Sass.
Balancing Public Safety and Privacy Rights in the Digital Age Benjamin Feist, Legislative Director ACLU of Minnesota Because Freedom Can’t Protect Itself.
Chubaka Producciones Presenta :.
2012 JANUARY Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Slides prepared by Cyndi Chie and Sarah Frye A Gift of Fire Third edition Sara Baase Chapter 2: Privacy.
P Pathophysiology Calendar. SundayMondayTuesdayWednesdayThursdayFridaySaturday January 2012.
The US Constitution. Article 1: The Legislative Branch Makes laws The Senate – 2 Senators from each state – Elected by the House of Representatives (changed.
Chicas, este calendario si es pa' nosotras !!!!!.
Legal Aspects of Criminal Investigation: Arrest, Search and Seizure
Mobile Device Geo-location and Privacy Spencer These slides are available at Securiplay.com.
Privacy Framework for Monitoring Social Media Professor Peter Swire Ohio State University & Future of Privacy Forum National Academy of Sciences Public.
Slides prepared by Cyndi Chie and Sarah Frye1 A Gift of Fire Third edition Sara Baase Chapter 2: Privacy.
What right do you have to keep your stuff private? How does this right change depending on whether you are home or at school? Does it change depending.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved BUSINESS PLUG-IN B21 Mobile Technology.
Slides prepared by Cyndi Chie and Sarah Frye1 A Gift of Fire Third edition Sara Baase Chapter 2: Privacy.
Veteran’s Day Maj. Ian Irmischer Mapping in the US Army Ethics and Mapping Tweetmap assignment.
United States v. Jones Presented by: Rebecca Son.
Computer and Internet privacy (2) University of Palestine University of Palestine Eng. Wisam Zaqoot Eng. Wisam Zaqoot Feb 2011 Feb 2011 ITSS 4201 Internet.
Monday, August 10, 2015  Assessment  Topic Discussion  Research Assignments.
IAPP KnowledgeNet Los Angeles “Thinking Outside the Cookie Jar” The Second Wave of Global Privacy Protection: Why This Year Is Different Peter Swire, Senior.
Search & Seizure Question : Privacy vs. Need for Law and Order.
Search and Seizure. I) Search and Seizure A) The 4 th amendment outlines the rules governing search and seizure.
Crime and Due Process. There is always a question as to how we should deal with “improper evidence” in the courtroom; different nations approach the question.
 What is the exclusionary rule  Explain stop and frisk  What is the plain view doctrine  What did Miranda v Arizona require police to do  What happens.
WORD JUMBLE. Months of the year Word in jumbled form e r r f b u y a Word in jumbled form e r r f b u y a february Click for the answer Next Question.
Kaplan University Constitutional Law Josephine Kerr January 6, 2011.
DATE POWER 2 INCOME JANUARY 100member X 25.00P2, FEBRUARY 200member X 25.00P5, MARCH 400member X 25.00P10, APRIL 800member.
FREEDOM & SECURITY OF THE PERSON Pgs th Amendment  Ended slavery in  States & National Govt. could no longer allow slavery.
Where the Exclusionary Rule Does Not Apply
2011 Calendar Important Dates/Events/Homework. SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January
 The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,
The 4 th amendment. The 4 th amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and requires any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported.
Search and Seizure Checklist Group Discussion. The Checklist Has a Search or Seizure taken place? - Did a government employee or agent conduct the search.
4 th Amendment  “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall.
Patriot Act (2002)Patriot Act (2002) Dylan Plassmeyer-Pd:8.
Lael Echo-Hawk Crowell Law Office – Tribal Advocacy Group e.
July 2007 SundayMondayTuesdayWednesdayThursdayFridaySaturday
| Argentina | Belgium | Canada | France | Germany | Israel | Italy | Luxembourg | Mexico | Morocco | Norway | South Africa | Spain | Switzerland | Tunisia.
4 th Amendment The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not.
PRIVACY Carl Hoppe Ted Worthington. OUTLINE What is privacy? What is privacy? 4 TH Amendment Rights 4 TH Amendment Rights Technology Growth and Privacy.
Lesson # 7 A Practical Guide to Computer Forensics Investigations
What is it and how does it work?
What is it and how does it work?
TIMELINES PHOTOS This is an example text
TIMELINES PHOTOS This is an example text
McDonald’s Kalender 2009.
McDonald’s Kalender 2009.
NC Truck Driver Training SCHOOL
Transportation Automation and Privacy Issues
McDonald’s Kalender 2009.
Lesson Five: Wireless Phone Laws & Etiquette
October 16, 2018 Modern Issues in the U.S. Agenda:
Problem Gambling Clicks to Opgr.org
Shelby, AJ, Austin, Milan, Randy
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
A Gift of Fire Third edition Sara Baase
Teacher name August phone: Enter text here.
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 2
Search laws CLU3ME: Unit #3 - Day Five.
February 2007 Note: Source:.
MONTHS OF THE YEAR January February April March June May July August
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
Habitat Changes and Fish Migration
2015 January February March April May June July August September
Habitat Changes and Fish Migration
Presentation transcript:

MnGeo Statewide Geospatial Advisory Council Hot Topics November 28, 2012 Location Privacy

Four Ideas “Geographer” Paradigm Shifts - Two We Want to Be Tracked vs. We Don’t Want to be Tracked The Big Fat Legal Mess Takeaways

“Geographer” Paradigm Shifts +=GIS 50 years of A Better Understanding of “Where”

+

2005! GIS for the Masses

SmartPhone Mapping and Tracking

Credit: csmonitor.com, July 2012 Drones

Credit: redpepperland.com, August 13, 2012 Facebook Based Recognition

Credit: gpsshoe.com, October 16, 2012 GPS Tracking Devices

Credit: PIPS Technology, November 8, 2012; NDI Recognition Systems Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR)

Credit: wmnf.org, November 8, 2012 Mobile Surveillance Platforms

Credit: Jack Gruber, USA TODAY, November 25, 2012 Hand Scanners

Credit: silver tiger via Shutterstock/Salon, November 27, 2012 RFID School ID’s

= 7 Years of the “Geospatial Revolution” (A better understanding of “Where” you are!) Or The Big Fat Legal Mess “Geographer” Paradigm Shifts

We Want to Be Tracked vs. We Don’t Want to be Tracked ‘Find Friends Nearby’Find My Stolen iPhoneWe Don’t Want No Stinking Drones

Legislation June 14, S. 1212/H.R.2168, “Bipartisan Legislation Provides Needed Legal Clarity for Use of Geolocation Information”. Senator Ron Wyden, Oregon; Representative Jason Chaffetz, Utah. Consumer must give consent before tracking. June 15, 2011 – S. 1223, “The Location Privacy Protection Act of 2011”. Senator Franken, Minnesota. Consumer must give consent before tracking. June 7, S. 3287/H.R. 5925, “Preserving Freedom From Unwarranted Surveillance Act of 2012” Senator Rand Paul, Kentucky, Representative Austin Scott, Georgia. Obtain a warrant before a drone can be used for surveillance activities. June 29, Amendment to H.R. 5972, the Transportation, Housing and Urban Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of Prohibit government of GPS tracking of passenger or commercial vehicles. October 12, GAO Report - Mobile Device Location Data: Additional Federal Actions Could Help Protect Consumer Privacy.

Tracking Technology Examples

Legal Cases September 10, 2008: U.S. District Court of Western Pennsylvania. Police need a warrant before obtaining a history of location information about a suspect from a cell phone provider. January 23, 2012: U.S. Supreme Court. U.S. vs. Jones. Police must obtain a warrant before attaching a GPS to a suspect's car. February 29, 2012: U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit. U.S. vs. Abel Flores-Lopez. OK for a police officer to search a suspect's cell phone in the process of making an arrest. August 14, 2012: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. U.S. vs. Melvin Skinner. Cell phone tower location information of a drug smuggler was admissible in court. September 4, 2012: U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. U.S. Vs. Jones. Again…….

Cell Phone Location Download

Credit: Chicago Tribune: November 12, 2012 Consumer Deals – No Location Tracking Yet……

Questions? Take Aways A second “Geographer” Paradigm Shift is underway The technology is miles ahead of the law and accelerating Attention is going to be needed to straighten this thing out The “Experts” are in this community