0 Financial and Market Risks for Space Launch Providers Presented by: Charlie Precourt ATK Aerospace Systems www.atk.com Space Transportation Policy and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2013 Key Issues Review: Enabling Sustained Deep Space Exploration with a Broad Vision Congressional Visits Day Preparatory Briefing Teleconferences February.
Advertisements

Safer Clinical Systems About Safer Clinical Systems June 2011.
Eaton Business System Overview
What is a U Class Payload?
Bridging Industry Best Practices in Project Management and Safety Assurance to Academic Propulsion Research Ahsan Choudhuri, PhD Professor and Chair, Department.
GSFC/Wallops Flight Facility 1 Small Satellite Opportunities at Wallops Flight Facility Dr. John Campbell Director, Wallops Flight Facility.
Line Efficiency     Percentage Month Today’s Date
1 International Space Consultants From Space Station Programs to Commercial Habitation Eric Dahlstrom 16 March 2015 Manfred Lachs Conference Montréal,
Launch & Space Liability Insurance Overview Presentation to COMSTAC
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Crew Initiative Overview and Status to the COMSTAC Philip McAlister NASA Exploration Systems Mission.
Propulsion Engineering Research Center NASA Technology Roadmap: Launch Propulsion Systems Robert J. Santoro The Propulsion Engineering Research Center.
Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport (MARS) 17th Annual Small Payload Rideshare Symposium June 11, 2015 Zigmond “Zig” Leszczynski Deputy Executive Director.
1 Practical use of six-sigma for the IATA Fuel Program Tom Fodor Assistant Director E&M.
Total Quality, Competitive Advantage, and Strategic Management
TVA Generates Power and sends it down Transmission Lines to Newport Utilities Distribution Substations TVA Newport Utilities Substations Distributes the.
Market Analysis & Forecasting Trends Businesses attempt to predict the future – need to plan ahead Why?
© 2012, XL Group plc companies. All rights reserved. MAKE YOUR WORLD GO Yellow R= 255 G= 255 B= 0 Orange R= 244 G= 121 B= 32 Magenta R= 236 G= 0 B= 14-
Time-Series Forecast Models EXAMPLE Monthly Sales ( in units ) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Data Point or (observation) MGMT E-5070.
Welcome to the Symposium on Space Transportation Policy and Market Risks November 16, 2011 Space Policy Institute Elliott School of International Affairs.
DG Information Society Assessment of the competitive situation in the market for broadband access Leo Koolen DG Information Society European Commission.
Copyright © 2008 United Launch Alliance, LLC. All rights reserved. Images Courtesy of Lockheed Martin and The Boeing Company O22P1-478 SPACE Transportation.
This is an example text TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING DecOctSepAugJulyJuneAprilMarchFebJanMayNov 12 Months Example text Go ahead and replace it with your own.
Directorate of Launchers – IX th European Interparliamentary Space Conference page 1 IX th European Interparliamentary Space Conference Rome – 9 October.
03/11/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members. 03/11/022 Systems Definition Spaceport System Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance.
Gwynne Shotwell January 13, Space Exploration Technologies Corporation Spacex.com Bringing Manufacturing Back to the US: 21 st Century Rocket.
Kiyoshi Higuchi Executive Director Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) JAXA Space transportation systems.
11 Space Transportation Policy and Market Risks Panel 5 – International Customers, Competitors and Partners The George Washington University Elliot School.
1 Stan Graves Vice President, Science & Engineering ATK Propulsion Systems March 23 – 24, 2011 NASA Technology Roadmaps.
The SaTH Foundation Trust Programme Deborah Shaw March 29th 2007.
Reusable Launch Vehicle Working Group Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee Presented to COMSTAC Meeting George Whitesides, RLVWG Chairman.
Office of Space Flight Spaceport and Range Technology Development Initiative Al Sofge NASA Headquarters May 15, 2001.
ASTWG Vision Team Group Exercise: Initial Summary of Results.
This is an example text TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING DecOctSepAugJulyJuneAprilMarchFebJanMayNov 12 Months Example text Go ahead and replace it with your own.
ProjectImpactResourcesDeadlineResourcesDeadline Forecast Plan Time Resources Risk 001xx 002xx 003xx 004xx 005xx 006xx 007xx TotalXX Example 1: Portfolio.
Atlas Copco Group Q results July 17, Q2 - highlights  Healthy demand –Organic order intake declined slightly –Stable order intake for small.
Approved For Public Release © The Aerospace Corporation 2009 June 17, 2009 Initial Summary of Human Rated Delta IV Heavy Study Briefing to the Review of.
Safety & Health Considerations in Accommodating Commercial Activties David Loyd, JSC Safety & Test Operations 2013 NASA Safety Directors & Occupational.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Executive Agent for Space Staff 1 Commercial Space Launch Cooperation Legislative Proposal Update.
ISS Commercial Resupply Services Michael Suffredini ISS Program Manager June 17 th, 2009 Augustine Committee UPDATED: Corrected page 10 (replaced “first.
Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 18, Page 2 July 18, 2002www.atlascopco-group.com Contents  Q2 Highlights  Market Development  Business Areas.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 FAA AST Presentation at ESIL-1 October 26, 2011 List of Recent Papers 2011 Overview of the FAA Center of Excellence for.
03/20/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members Organizations that contributed: Air Force NASA NCSS FAA Industry University Etc.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters.
Furniture Prequalification Scheme SCM0771 Briefing 17 th November 2014.
Freight Forum RTC Washoe March 31 st, The reliable, cost effective, and safe movement of goods and products across the State of Nevada and.
City of Bixby, Oklahoma 2008 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
Propellant Depot Bernard Kutter United Launch Alliance
“Falcone - Borsellino Airport”
Average Monthly Temperature and Rainfall
Derivation of the FSOA in Ariane 6 Specifications
Sunnybrook Academic Family Health Team
FY 2019 Close Schedule Bi-Weekly Payroll governs close schedule
PBIS Update November 2005.
PBIS Update December 2005.
2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March
PBIS Update October 2005.
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
PLANNING LOOKING AHEAD…. Long Term Goals (Assigned to…)
Agricultural Marketing
Operations Management Dr. Ron Lembke
Month Rainfall (mm) Temp Jan Feb March 34 April 38 May June July
Scatterplots, Association and Correlation
Agricultural Marketing
379A Scenarios Operations, Energy Retail.
Agricultural Marketing
2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March
PBIS Update January 2006.
Division Chief, Spaceport Management & Integration
Presentation transcript:

0 Financial and Market Risks for Space Launch Providers Presented by: Charlie Precourt ATK Aerospace Systems Space Transportation Policy and Market Risks – Space Policy Institute November 16, 2011 – George Washington University

1 Overarching Considerations for Launchers Physics Very Challenging and Unchanging Operating environments extreme. Temperatures, loads, pressures, and rapid variations of these conditions lead to highly costly systems solutions. Dramatic Advances in propulsion and materials properties elusive, yet necessary to dramatically lower the costs of “managing the physics” Market Relatively Small Flight rates much greater than six per year are rarely achieved for any sizable launch system −Difficult to recoup development costs, resulting in high unit cost in proportion and infrastructure carrying costs high on a per flight basis −Managing market risks exacerbates business model: flight losses, indemnification, payload or system delays/stand-downs, manifesting challenges Broad set of mission requirements – Attributes sought often mutually exclusive LEO vs. GTO design Low payload weight or volume vs. heavy or large volume Low cost: per pound, per flight, or per year –Multiple designs required/emerge to meet the wide spectrum of all customer needs. –Synergies remain a challenge; yet where found and exploited, can reduce LV financial and market risks Customer: government vs. commercial Safety, reliability and availability Cargo/satellite vs. human rated Consequences

2 Launch Industry Snapshot Difficult Business Case Difficult to forecast market Limited customer base Launch and payload schedule slips Limited competition Difficult for new entrants 18 U.S. launches in 2011; only one was commercially-funded Key Yellow – 0-3 month slip Orange – 3-6 month slip Orange – 3-6 month slip Brown – month slip Brown – month slip Red – 1 year or more slip Red – 1 year or more slip DateVehicle MissionLocationFunded U.S. Launches in 2011 Jan. 20Delta IVNROL-49VAFBGov –A.F. Feb 6Minotaur INROL-66VAFBGov – NRO Feb 23ShuttleSTS-133KDCGov –NASA March 4TaurusGloryVAFBGov - NASA Feb. 27ShuttleSTS-134KSCGov - NASA March 5Atlas VOTV 2CCAFSGov – A.F. March 11Delta IVNROL-27CCAFSGov – NRO April 15Atlas VNROL-34VAFBGov – NRO May 7Atlas VSBIRS GEO1CCAFSGov - DoD Jun 10Delta IISAC-DVAFBCommercial June 30Minotaur IORS 1WallopsGov –A.F. July 8ShuttleSTS-135KSCGov – NASA July 16Atlas VGPS 2F-2CCAFSGov –A.F. Aug. 5Atlas VJunoCCAFSGov - NASA Sept 10Delta IIGRAILCCAFSGov - NASA Sept 27Minotaur 4TacSat4KLCGov – ORS Oct 28Delta IINNPVAFBGov - NASA Nov 25Atlas VMSLCCAFSGov - NASA Dec 19Falcon 9Dragon C2CCAFSGov - NASA In 2011 there were a total of 48 international launches (with 3 failures); 10 of those were commercially-funded.

3 Summary U.S. launch industry faces many challenges Industrial base has been dramatically affected by market realities in recent years Opportunities exist for improved business practices to lead to a sustainable launch industry Leverage lessons learned from DoD and NASA development programs Ensure business case closes for new vehicle developments before “launching” into them Leverage existing assets, workforce and infrastructure wherever practical Emphasize the importance of continuous improvement in reliability, safety, manufacturability, performance, launch availability, and system costs 3