1 Welcome NIH Bethesda Campus Master Plan And Environmental Impact Statement National Environmental Policy Act Scoping Meeting February 28, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
Advertisements

Auditing, Assurance and Governance in Local Government
National Environmental Policy Act of Establishes protection of the environment as a national priority Mandates that environmental impacts be considered.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
Meteorology Combined License NRC Review Process Meteorology Joseph Hoch Physical Scientist U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission June , 2008 Nuclear.
Environmental Review: NEPA, TEPA and Tribes. NEPA – good and bad for Tribes Tribes can use as tool to slow, examine, participate in process and urge changes.
The Role of State, Local and Tribal Governments in the Federal NEPA Process Presented by Susan E. Bromm Director, Office of Federal Activities United States.
Bureau of Land Management Regulations Washington State Association of Counties Cooperating Agency & Coordination Training November 22, 2013 – Vancouver,
Environmental Impact Statement Process Development Services Department Carol Helland, Land Use Director/SEPA Official (DSD) David Pyle, Senior Land Use.
New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road Welcome!.
Welcome NIH Bethesda Campus Master Plan And Environmental Impact Statement National Environmental Policy Act Public Meeting April 8,
Environmental Management Systems An Overview With Practical Applications.
Environmental Justice: Principles, Policies, Guidance, and Effective Practices FTA Region VI Civil Rights Colloquium March 29, 2006.
Foreign Affairs Security Training Center
Lecture(3) Instructor : Dr. Abed Al-Majed Nassar
Purpose of the Standards
Deciding How To Apply NEPA Environmental Assessments Findings of No Significant Impact Environmental Impact Statements.
Negotiating the NEPA Maze: It Really Is Rocket Science Start.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
CUI Statistical: Collaborative Efforts of Federal Statistical Agencies Eve Powell-Griner National Center for Health Statistics.
1 Brace Centre for Water Resources Management McGill University, Sept. 25 François Boulanger, Regional Director The New Canadian Environmental Assessment.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
1 Endowment Overview Division of Finance and Administration Campus Safety Overview Mary Beth Koza Director: Environment, Health & Safety Jeff McCracken.
Barrington Road at Jane Addams Memorial Tollway (Interstate 90) Interchange Improvement Study Hoffman Estates Village Hall June 27, 2012.
Travel Management Rule Implementation
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Making Good Decisions in the Environmental Review Process 2012 Pacific Aviation Directors Workshop.
What does an Environmental Professional Do?
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
State Permitting Issues for Wind Developments Southeast and Mid-Atlantic Regional Wind Summit 19 September 2005 Jennifer A. DeCesaro Energy Policy Specialist.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Concept of Operations for Commercial.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
UNEP Training Resource ManualTopic 1 Slide 1 Aims and objectives of EIA F modify and improve design F ensure efficient resource use F enhance social aspects.
1 Context Sensitive Design CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Howard R. Green Company.
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Maryland State Highway Administration’s Secondary and Cumulative Effects Analysis Guidelines For.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
NOAA Science Advisory Board …advises the Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere on long- and short- range strategies for research, education,
1 Overview of Minerals Management Service’s Alternative Energy Program Ocean Law Conference May 22, 2008 Seattle, WA Walter D. Cruickshank Deputy Director.
Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.
The SSMP Process 1. The Servicing and Settlement Master Plan A plan to encompass the community’s visions and ideas, while approaching planning and servicing.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
What is a Public Health Assessment? “The evaluation of data and information on the release of harmful substances into the environment in order to assess.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVES. --- “The driving impetus for conducting environmental impact studies is to comparatively present the effects of proposed alternatives.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Developing a Purpose & Need Statement. Objectives  Understand when the P&N is developed in the PDP  Understand the importance of a well- written/well-justified.
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation NEPA&CEQ.
LBNE Environmental Assessment NEPA Informational Meeting May 23, 2013 Rod Walton, LBNE NEPA Manager.
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
FTA Real Estate March 26, 2014 Christopher S. Van Wyk Director FTA Environmental Office.
VA Central IRB K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development Department of Veterans Affairs September.
Potomac Hill Campus Master Plan Preliminary Planning Principles “Observing the Past, Planning the Future” Campus Master Plan Potomac Hill.
1 5:00 – 6:00Open House 6:00 – 6:30Presentation 6:30 – 8:00Public Comment Session Agenda PUBLIC MEETING Draft Environmental Impact Statement Sale of Plum.
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
Lecturer: Lina Vladimirovna Zhornyak, Associate Professor.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
The Role of Public Participation in Advancing Environmental Justice.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens.
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) August 6, 2008
Willow Meadows Civic Club Meeting September 13, 2011
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Unit 6 NEPA.
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
Presentation transcript:

1 Welcome NIH Bethesda Campus Master Plan And Environmental Impact Statement National Environmental Policy Act Scoping Meeting February 28, 2012

2 NIH Representatives and Consultants NEPA Management Valerie Nottingham, Chief, Environmental Quality Branch Division of Environmental Protection/ORF/NIH Mark Radtke, Environmental Protection Specialist Division of Environmental Protection/ORF/NIH Facilities Planning Ricardo C. Herring, Director, Division of Facilities Planning /ORF/NIH Phillip Neuberg, Chief, Facility Planning and Programming Branch Division of Facilities Planning /ORF/NIH EIS Consultant Sara O’Neil-Manion, Principal, O’Neil & Manion Architects P.A. Demian Wincele, Senior Project Geologist, ECS Mid-Atlantic, LLC

3 NIH Bethesda Campus Master Plan would guide campus development over a 20-year period. A Plan would assure that research and research support facilities are provided at the appropriate time, as need dictates, and as resources permit, taking into consideration local and community planning objectives. The Master Plan

4 Why Does the NIH Bethesda Campus Need a Master Plan? A Master Plan would establish a physical framework which: Allows NIH to continue to fulfill its biomedical research needs by defining the program based on research goals, and priorities. Results in a consistent and appropriate physical appearance for the site. Is in accord with local and regional planning and environmental objectives. Defines the priorities for new building construction and renovation of current facilities. Ensure accordance with Department of Health and Human Services facility planning policy.

5 Master Planning Process Vision Formulate goals and planning principles Data Data collection Concept Develop Preliminary Master Plan for agency and public review Master Plan Develop Master Plan Issue Draft NIH Bethesda Campus Master Plan for agency and public review Issue Final NIH Bethesda Campus Master Plan

Master Plan/EIS Timeline Assemble planning information on the Bethesda Campus and Winter 2011 project campus population and space Issue Notice of Intent to Prepare EIS and Master Plan Winter 2012 Hold Scoping Meeting to Receive Comments and Concerns February 28, 2012 Comments will also be received during the 45-day public comment period ending March 26, Prepare Draft Master Plan and Draft EIS Spring 2012 Hold Draft EIS Public Meeting Summer 2012 Receive Comments on Draft EIS and Master Plan Prepare Final EIS Fall 2012 Issue Record of Decision Winter 2012/2013 6

7 NIH Mission The NIH mission is to seek fundamental knowledge about the nature and behavior of living systems and the application of that knowledge to enhance health, lengthen life, and reduce the burdens of illness and disability.

8 Master Plan Goals Goal 1: Foster innovative research to improve the nation’s health. Goal 2: Support the evolving requirements for biomedical research Goal 3: Provide secure and supportive campus for staff & visitors Goal 4: Respect the integrity of the surrounding community. Goal 5: Protect the environment of campus and the region. Goal 6: Foster communication about NIH goals and policies. Goal 7: Meet the Federal Real Property Council’s Performance Measures

9 Current Land Use Land UseAcresPercentage of Site Buffer Zone6621% Open Space11537% Sub Total Open Space18158% Parking3210% Roads/Walks/Service5418% Sub Total Circulation8628% Buildings4414% Total Land Area310100%

Potential Areas for Redevelopment 10 Replace Building 31 Adapt and reuse historic laboratories with administrative space Re-locate Building 21 Re-siting the Animal Research Center from south of the Central Utility Plant Replace Building 12 & 12 A with new laboratory and support space Replace old buildings with new laboratories, parking garages and support space Improve pedestrian safety Improve use of mass transit

11 Master Planning Issues The Master Plan will study and address: Campus Development Land Use Compatibility Traffic Parking Security Noise Lighting Utilities Other issues to be determined

EIS Consultants ECS MID-ATLANTIC, LLC 12

Corporate Background and NEPA Experience ECS, Mid-Atlantic, LLC is one of several consulting/contracting firms on subcontract to O’Neil & Manion Architects P.A. Our interdisciplinary team includes scientists, industrial hygienists, engineers, and planners We offer a wide range of NEPA and other environmental services –Federal NEPA Environmental Assessments for construction and demolition projects –Programmatic NEPA support to various federal agencies (DoD, FBI, GSA) –Communications support (public meetings, coordinating public comments) ECS staff have prepared and reviewed several EAs, EISs, and EIRs –Examples include the Federal Reserve Building, University of Mary Washington, and Northern Virginia Community College Campus ECS and other consulting firms will coordinate to perform analyses independently of NIH 13

Scope and Content of an EIS Notice of Intent & Scoping Draft EIS Public Review & Comment Final EIS Public Availability and ROD EIS Content:  Purpose and need  Alternatives being considered  Affected environment  Consequences  Mitigation measures  Cumulative impacts 14

ECS’s Technical Approach for Preparing an EIS Objectively evaluate reasonable alternatives Perform environmental analyses –Use existing, relevant studies and/or data –Conduct site investigations –Apply modeling tools –Consult with subject matter experts –Consult with federal, state, and local agencies Identify mitigation measures to minimize impacts Perform regulatory analyses to identify compliance requirements Consider and respond to public comments 15

16 What is NEPA? National Environmental Policy Act (1969) Defines procedural elements –The NEPA Process –Council on Environmental Quality regulations 40 CFR –Department of Health and Human Services General Administration Manual Chapter 30, Environmental Protection Purpose of this Environmental Impact Statement for the NIH Master Plan is to examine potential impacts and mitigation

17 Why Perform NEPA? It is Federal Law Allows for the agency to consider the environmental impacts of its actions Allows for public participation Ensures the agency makes an informed decision on its action

18 NEPA Process Issue Notice of Intent (NOI) Hold Public Scoping Meeting Issue Draft EIS - Copies of draft are given to the Environmental Protection Agency and a Notice of Availability (NOA) is posted in the Federal Register -There is at least a 45 day comment period on the draft EIS Hold public comment meeting on DEIS Issue Final EIS -The final EIS must respond to relevant comments received from other agencies and the public -The final EIS is given to the EPA and a NOA is published in the federal register -30 day waiting period Record of Decision -Final step for the EIS process

19 Effective Public Commenting You can make a difference Comments may be the most important contribution from citizens Effective Comments: Early in the NEPA process Clear, concise and relevant to the analysis Solution oriented and provide specific examples Suggest additional alternatives Suggest sources of relevant data or information for consideration

How Do I Get Information on the Bethesda Campus Master Plan and Provide Comments on the EIS? Scoping comments should be directed to: Valerie Nottingham Chief, Environmental Quality Branch Division of Environmental Protection National Institutes of Health, ORF B13/2S11, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland telephone