Cleanup of Uranium Legacy in Southeastern Utah

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
June 6, 2013 SURFACE RECLAMATION OF THE CAPTAIN JACK MILL SUPERFUND SITE Nick Anton, CDM Smith Todd Bragdon, CDM Smith Mary Boardman, CDPHE Joy Jenkins,
Advertisements

Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_1 Preferred Alternative Recommended by Core Team Environmental Impact Statement.
By Chris Ford and James Hughes ( ) ( )
By: Frank Filas, P.E. Environmental Manager Energy Fuels Resources Corporation 44 Union Blvd., Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado Uranium Development in.
Cottonwood Wash Abandoned Mine Reclamation Project: A Partnership in Watershed Reclamation.
Confined Disposal Facilities and In Situ Capping Site characterization / selection Engineering design Operational considerations Contaminant pathways and.
1 Status of DOE Cleanup in Idaho Presentation to the “LINE Commission” By Rick Provencher Manager, DOE Idaho Operations Office April 7, 2012 Idaho Falls,
1 Best Practices for Risk-Informed Remedy Selection, Closure, and Post-closure Control for DOE’s Contaminated Sites October 30, 2013.
Vermilion County Brownfield Assessment Grant. Overview Brownfield Basics USEPA Brownfield Assessment Grant Vermilion County Assessment Grant Site Selection.
AHMET UCANOK JOHN E. ELVIS Pump and Treat of Contaminated Groundwater at the United Chrome Superfund Site Corvallis, Oregon.
DOE 2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference November 17, 2010 Loren W. Setlow, CPG Office of Radiation and.
U.S. EPA Regulations Review Update: Subpart W NESHAPS (40 CFR 61) Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings (40 CFR Part 192) Andrea Cherepy, Phil Egidi, Reid.
Summitville Gold Mine Disaster
Presented by: Jonathan Silvester Oliver Kiernan. Maxey Flat Site Located in Fleming County, Kentucky Low level Nuclear Disposal Facility o Isolate waste.
Colorado River Protection Activities on the Moab UMTRA Project Ken Pill, Hydrogeologist Technical Assistance Contractor CMU Upper Colorado River Basin.
TIMES BEACH, Missouri Dioxin Contamination. Hazardous Waste “wastes which, by reason of their chemical activity or toxic or other characteristics cause.
1 Long-Term Stewardship of Uranium Mills in the United States – Regulatory Issues Keith McConnell, Deputy Director for Decommissioning and Uranium Recovery.
Location In the mountain of Colorado consist of numerous sites in Denver area which contaminate with radioactive soils and Debris. There are about 65.
Local Control of Mining Rights Counties Often Have Comprehensive Land Use Plans –These may be implemented through zoning –Often require construction permit.
The Role of Health Physicists in Uranium Site Cleanups Alisha Stallard, Environmental Health Physicist Radioactive Materials Division Texas Commission.
Colorado School of Mines Research Institute Site DRAFT REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY AND PROPOSED PLAN.
Gary W. Baughman, Division Director 2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference November 17, 2010.
NUNAVUT TUNNGAVIK INCORPORATED Lands Policy Advisory Committee Draft Uranium Policy.
NAVAJO UMTRA LTSM UPDATE Madeline Roanhorse Navajo AML / UMTRA Department 2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference Grand Junction, Colorado.
Kiggavik Project Final Hearing Presentation
McCoy Field Proposed Keith Middle School Site EPA Proposes Approval of McCoy Field Cleanup Plan.
Tier II: Module 1C CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program.
Legacy Management Strategic Plan 2010 David Geiser Director, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or Department) Office of Legacy Management (LM) November 2010.
Scott Surovchak Rocky Flats Site Manager U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) Cleanup and Remedy Implementation at the Rocky.
CLEAN AIR ACT  This act was passed as an attempt to regulate the amount of harmful pollutants into our air.  The Clean Air act’s goal.
Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining & Safety Idarado Natural Resource Damage Remediation Project CDRMS Office Locations Denver Grand.
Jeopardy $100 Land + SeaTrash/MinesPollutionWater Miscellaneous $200 $300 $400 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100.
2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference Institutional Controls Featuring the Pinellas Site Jack Craig U.S. Department of Energy Office of.
Denver Federal Center Calibration Silo Removal Plan What are the DFC Calibration Silos? Installed in 1981 by Bureau of Mines Support minerals industry.
Definitions for Environmental Reclamation, Remedy, and Restoration.
New Mexico Uranium Exploration & Mining BLM Uranium Workshop August 12, 2008 Salt Lake City, Utah Holland Shepherd, Program Manager Mining Act Reclamation.
1 Integrated Safety Management Workshop Safety Incentives and Worker Involvement Don Metzler, DOE-EM Federal Project Director Joe Legare, S.M. Stoller.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Summary and Overview of TECDOC Russel Edge Decommissioning and Remediation Unit Division of Radiation,Transport.
Nuclear Waste Storage in Utah!. Clive Storage Facility (Energy Solutions)  In 1990 Energy Solutions was permitted to treat and dispose of Class A low.
Triangle Park Removal Action Area within the Portland Harbor Superfund Site (Portland, Oregon) Jennifer MacDonald Assistant Regional Counsel Office of.
1 Moab Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project Site LTS&M Planning LTS&M Conference Grand Junction, CO November 16, 2010 Donald Metzler U.S.
State and Tribal Government Working Group November 12, 2008 FERNALD NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGES SETTLEMENT.
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
Introduction to a Safe Workplace
By Leor & Gabriel Davoodpour Definition: Removing a mineral deposit from the Earth after removing the layer of earth above it. Techniques: Area Mining.
DOE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP BIOTA PROTECTION Stephen L. Domotor (202)
Mining. It’s a mineral if it… Is naturally occurring Is an inorganic compound Has specific physical and chemical properties (melting point, density, hardness)
Think safe. Act safe. Be safe. LEHR Site Annual Soil Management Plan Training Sue Fields, Environmental Health & Safety Sept,
Environmental Factors In this module, we will discuss: Environmental legislation Environmental hazards Due diligence Conducting an environmental.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)  Founded by U.S. government (under Richard Nixon) in 1970  William Ruckleshaus was first EPA administrator  a.
Office of Legacy Management Land Transfer and Reuse November 2006 Steven R. Schiesswohl Senior Realty Officer, Office of Legacy Management.
Radioactive Materials Licensing Authorizing licenses for: Low-level radioactive waste disposal By-product material disposal Public water system NORM waste.
The Dalles, Industrial Certification Northwest Aluminum Company The Dalles, Oregon Douglas C. MacCourt Ater Wynne LLP US German Bilateral Working.
LAB PROTOCOL – all personal items aside keep a writing implement get your journal.
Global Warming – The Broad Legal Reach of Initiatives to Reduce Carbon Emissions Worldwide Legal Issues Associated with Carbon Capture and Geologic Storage.
 Clean Water Act 404 permit  Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water 401 water quality certification  Ohio Revised Code 6111 – Placement of dredged materials.
GEORGIA PACIFIC WEST PROPOSED INTERIM ACTION Public Meeting & Open House – July 12, 2011.
BROWNFIELDS 2005 Dealing with Unexpected Contamination Lowry Air Force Base Redevelopment Denver, CO Tom Markham, Executive Director, Lowry Redevelopment.
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
Presentation on Livermore Lab Site 300 Superfund Cleanup Peter Strauss, Environmental Scientist, PM Strauss & Assoc. Community-Wide Meeting on
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
Uranium in Colorado: Past, Present, and Potential Future
DOE Consolidated Audit Program
EPA Options for the Federal Regulation of Coal Combustion Waste Lisa Evans Earthjustice October 22, 2010.
Abandoned uranium mine
West Valley Demonstration Project Status Update
Moab UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action
Uranium, Radon, and Radiation Outreach
Moab UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action
Presentation transcript:

Cleanup of Uranium Legacy in Southeastern Utah Donald Metzler Federal Project Director San Juan Mining and Reclamation Conference May 29, 2015

Moab Site Background and History Charlie Steen’s fabled 1952 uranium discovery in Utah Uranium Reduction Company began mill operations in 1956 Atlas Minerals Corporation acquired site and operated from 1962 to1984 Atlas filed for bankruptcy in 1998 Circa 1966

Moab Site Background and History (cont.) Located about 3 miles northwest of Moab, Utah 480-acre site; 130 acres covered by uranium mill tailings pile Largest uranium mill tailings pile (16 million tons) to be relocated in the world Toe of pile is 750 feet from west bank of Colorado River

Regulatory Setting Awareness of potential health risks associated with long-term exposure to uranium mill tailings grew during 1970s Led to passage of Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) of 1978 (Public Law 95–604), requiring cleanup of inactive uranium-ore processing sites In 1983, EPA developed regulations in 40 CFR Part 192 to protect public and environment from potential hazards at sites DOE is responsible for cleaning up UMTRCA Title I millsites, including soils and groundwater, to EPA standards Ownership of Moab millsite transferred to DOE in 2001; DOE responsible for site cleanup and reclamation Moab Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Project Radioactive materials are encapsulated in U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)-accepted disposal cells

Project Scope DOE issued Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision in 2005 Relocate uranium mill tailings and other contaminated materials from Moab site to the Crescent Junction, Utah, location for permanent disposal Predominantly by rail Actively remediate groundwater at the Moab site Remediate properties in vicinity of Moab that exceed EPA standards for radium-226 in soil

Moab Site Features

2 3 Process Cycle Moab 1 (Upper left photo of pile) Tailings are excavated from their position in the tailings pile. Conditioned by mixing sands and slimes, then disking until optimal moisture content is achieved (16 to 18%), and top-loaded into containers. Loaded container is weighed on a certified scale, then driven through lidding facility to receive lid. Truck carrying container moves through wash facility. Container placed on survey rack for visual inspection and radiological release. “Clean” haul truck takes full container up haul road to rail load out where it’s loaded on the train with a gantry crane. Two shifts per day, “done at 1:00” to support rail haul. Full containers transported by rail to Crescent Junction. Reach stacker removes container from train, places on articulated truck, where it is transported to the disposal cell. Tailings dumped through hinged end gate. Gate closed, container and truck decontaminated, and truck returns empty container to rail spur. Tailings are compacted in the cell using a sheep’s foot. At end of shift, empty containers are returned by rail to Moab. 4 5

Process Cycle Crescent Junction 1 Process Cycle Crescent Junction 2 4 3

Rail Bench

November 2014 Rockslide

Rockslide (continued) No injuries 4,500 cubic yards of material Risk analyses Installed radar monitoring unit Phased approach to restarting rail operations

Groundwater Plumes

Groundwater Interim Action and Surface Water Diversion Addresses elevated ammonia and uranium levels to protect side channels that can become suitable habitat Extract groundwater from eight wells closer to toe of tailings pile 221 million gallons extracted, including 846,000 lb of ammonia and 4,350 lb of uranium Evaporation used to eliminate extracted water Inject freshwater into wells along riverbank to create hydraulic barrier Divert surface water into side channels Extent of Tailings Pile Evaporation Pond Groundwater Extraction Interim Action well field primarily designed for ammonia removal 8 Extraction Wells 34 Fresh Water Injection Wells 107 Monitoring Wells (various screened intervals). 42 River Bed Well Points Freshwater Injection Surface Water Diversion

Current Activities with Future in Mind Tamarisk removal Near groundwater well field Erosion control Along hillside up to rail load out area To assist with storm runoff from U.S. Highway 191 and Moab Wash Revegetation of disturbed areas with native species Fauna study: Initial assessment to identify species currently using Moab site Develop habitat model for land use planning and to mitigate habitat loss

End State Vision Mill Tailings Project Future Use Committee Land ownership and use DOE will transfer ownership at completion of cleanup Water rights on Colorado River ―Could be sold separately Want to leave in a park-like setting Mill Tailings Project Future Use Committee Acting as quasi-reuse organization to represent community’s interests Conducted public input process last year and prepared community vision Coordination with other federal agencies Possible land transfer mechanisms and infrastructure and facilities disposition Other federal agencies: National Park Service and Bureau of Land Management

Crescent Junction Disposal Site Cell aligned in a west-to-east direction, about 5,200 feet long by 2,400 feet wide Cell excavated in phases; two phases (~ 45 acres each) have been completed Tailings depth is 50 feet total, 25 feet below grade, 25 feet above 10-foot-thick, multi-layer cover

Status Currently shipping 104 containers per train, one train per day, Monday through Thursday Through mid-May 2015, about 7.5 million tons of mill tailings (47 percent of total) has been shipped and disposed

Importance of Safety Early on in project, safety luncheons held at work sites with safety awards presented Contractor Safety Committee created Effect on safety of employment influx during American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Safety Conscious Work Environment, or SCWE, that encourages employees to raise safety concerns to management without fear of retaliation, through: Employee safety questionnaires Worker engagement Employee Concerns Program 2.3 million safe work hours as of May Days Away from Work, Restricted, and Transferred and Total Recordable Case rates are at zero

Moab Project Information gjem.energy.gov/moab

Questions?