BRAWLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL 2012-13 Conducting Peer Observations with the North Carolina Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) BRAWLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL 2012-13.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Advertisements

Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Performance Based Teacher Evaluation March 10, 2006.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
EVAL and The Evaluation Cycle A Look at the Interaction of District Evaluator/Principal Roles Cathey Frederick eVAL Specialist - ESD 189
1 © 2006 by Smiths Group: Proprietary Data Smiths Group Online Performance Review Tool Training.
Appraisal Process and Forms Probationary – first 3 years of employment Permanent – tenured On or before Oct. 1 – meet, In person, with appraiser to review.
LOGO August The Basics What is the Analysis of Student Work (ASW)? ASW is the process North Carolina has decided to implement in order to obtain.
Guidelines for Claiming Students for Teacher Effect ScoresGuidelines for Claiming Students for Teacher Effect Scores Spring 2014Spring 2014.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
Edgecombe County Public Schools Schoolnet Assessment Training (HOME BASE) November/December 2013 Accountability Services ( ) 1.
What is the Educator Development Suite? Provides teachers with the results of classroom observations and student perception surveys Suggests contextualized.
Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) Facilitated by Kathy Stillerman NCEES Coach for East Middle 2/16/11.
NC Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) Online Tool 1.
NC Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) Online Tool 1.
The North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards (NCPTS) & Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) “ Beginning the School Year” Facilitated by – Dreisa Sherrill.
NC PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS AND EVALUATION PROCESS.
PAS…. The Second Observation Cycle Learning Targets: Administrators will be able to: Understand and Articulate the remaining two Observation Cycles for.
Beginning Teacher Support Program (BTSP) Jed Stus; Executive Director of Professional Development & Support What Mentors Need to Know and Do to Start the.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
State Board Mission, Goals, and Policies
The North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards (NCPTS) & Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) “ Beginning the School Year” Facilitated by Brian Foster.
Learning Centered Conferencing with the Using the Danielson Framework John Hellwich & Michelle Lewis.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction Looking Ahead:
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
User Management: Understanding Roles and Permissions for Schoolnet Schoolnet II Training – September 2014.
OASYS Teacher Evaluation
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
Conducting Peer Evaluations with the North Carolina Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) Iredell-Statesville Schools BMS Training 10/25/2011 by Dreisa.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Secaucus Reflect Live Observation Process Observer Guide.
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
ASU Rosters for Roster Contacts Class Roster ASR Roster Grade Roster Grade Changes.
Baseline Edge Task Force Training
TTI Performance Evaluation Training. Agenda F Brief Introduction of Performance Management Model F TTI Annual Performance Review Online Module.
Teachscape Reflect User Guide Teacher Observation and Evaluation Howard County Public School System.
Evaluating the 21 st Century Educator with Fidelity School Executive Training Beaufort County Schools April 19, 2012.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT: PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction.
HARDING UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL TRANSFORMATION “RAM STYLE”
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Jessica Garner
Welcome to the Educator Evaluation System (EES) in Home Base August, 2013.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Teacher’s PDP for the School Year October, 2012.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS REVIEW Welcome Introductions Agenda.
C OMPREHENSIVE & F OCUSED E VALUATIONS U SING P IVOT CEL5D+ Training Summer 2015 This session will: Give an overview of Comprehensive and Focused Evaluations.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Conducting the performance appraisal
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
NCEES Process: End-of-Year for Teacher Evaluations
Conducting the performance appraisal
Deliberate Practice PGP
Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Steps in the TDES Evaluation Process
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

BRAWLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL 2012-13 Conducting Peer Observations with the North Carolina Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) BRAWLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL 2012-13

Purpose: To ensure that Peer Observers are prepared to conduct the 2nd or 3rd cycle of the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation process for those teachers required to have a peer observation. 2

Session & Follow-Up Outcomes: Peer Observers will understand: Their role in the Evaluation process The 4 components of the of the peer observation process Accessing and using NCEES Observable differences between performance ratings Peer Observers Follow-Up: Review and become familiar with content of Standard 2a and 4a-h

Why the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process? To support and promote effective leadership, quality teaching and student learning. To improve instruction and enhance professional practice through a growth model Based on the Framework for 21st Century Learning and the Standards it is a vehicle to positively impact graduation rates and support student’s 21st century readiness

You might ask yourself: How did I get here? What are the benefits? Selection process Your role as a teacher leader Benefits to Peer Observer Further development of personal professional capacity Opportunity to further assume role of teacher leader A practice that supports higher performance ratings related to teacher leadership on the teacher evaluation rubric Benefits to Learning Organization Quality faculty, and high performing students

Continuing Education Units To receive 1.0 CEUs for observation process Register for course #1886 in TNL Complete the peer observation training and observations Sign the Peer Observation Completion of Assignment form Administrator has it Form is submitted by June 3rd, 2013 to Teresa Shade

Frequently Asked Questions: Which Teachers Need a Peer Observation? Those teachers with a Probationary Teacher Status (Your Administrator will inform you) When is the Peer Observation conducted? Either for the 2nd or 3rd cycle of observations 2nd cycle: 10/12/12 – 12/21/12 3rd cycle: 12/21/12 – 2/15/13 Who do I contact if I have questions about the evaluation process or NCEES management system? Your site-based NCEES Coach

What is the relationship between Mentors & Peer Observers? A peer observer does not have to be a mentor to conduct a peer observation Mentors are to conduct peer observations on teachers other then their Mentee Recommend that peer observers conduct peer observations on no more then 2 teachers per year

Overview of the teacher observation process conducted by peer observers 4 components to peer observation process: 1. Preparation Familiarization with Standards/Elements 2a, 4a-h, process, performance ratings and NCEES platform 2. Pre-Conference Authentication not required on Record of Teacher Evaluation Activities form (NCEES) 3. Classroom Observation Entered into NCEES during observation or paper process utilized and then entered into NCEES 4. Post-Conference Discuss Observation At conclusion complete digital signature process in NCEES

1. Before Conducting Peer Observation: Review Standard 2a Standard 4 Elements a-h (Could use your own self-assessment rather then print a rubric, or Condensed Peer Observation Rubric.) For each Element What is the main idea(s)? What are the observable teacher behaviors? What does being Proficient look like for each Element? How is Proficient different from Accomplished? Coaching Point: Know your Rubric! Decide if you will use paper or digital process during observation Become familiar with accessing and using NCEES (Addressed later in power point)

2. Pre-Conference Scheduled prior to classroom observation Duration ~1/2 hour Intent for the: Peer-Observer is to communicate their role and what to expect during the classroom visit Teacher is to convey a contextual setting of what the peer evaluator can expect during the observation Do not need to sign off in NCEES that it took place

Pre-Conference Peer Observer Communicates: Teacher Communicates: Role Conduct & follow process Expectations of the observation Focus Standards/Elements 2a & 4 a-h Process Teacher Communicates: Any pertinent information to prepare peer-evaluator for structure of class/lesson: Context of the lesson Challenges/strengths Demographics Assessment data Instructional approach … Collaboratively schedule observation time. Coordinate with administration.

Pre-Conference “Possible Questions” What subject will I be observing? Time of day? Duration? Have you reviewed Standards/Elements 2a 4 a-h? Any questions? Classroom make up? Context of lesson? How is data being used to inform instruction? What does the data tell you? What instructional strategies are being used? Why? How do you communicate learning objective to students How often do you change the methodology during a lesson? Any new practices you are using that I might see? Any concerns/ issues you have about your classroom or lesson? Discuss approach/questions to use with your administrator

3. Classroom Observation Peer-observers schedules with teacher Coordinates with administrator Lasts 45 minutes or duration of lesson Focus is on Standard/Elements 2a & 4 a-h, and all supporting Descriptors Use either: Digital process and NCEES platform Paper process with condensed peer observation rubric then enter into NCEES Might need to get additional information during post-conference to assign a performance rating

Paper template can be accessed: Peer Evaluators can utilize paper version “Condensed Rubric” during Observation. However, Observation needs to be entered into NCEES. Paper template can be accessed: Sign in to iss-schoolwires from ISS homepage Click “Departments Click Human Resources Click Evaluation Resources Click Teachers Click Condensed Peer Observation Rubric

So How Do I Determine and Document Performance Ratings? Made with professionalism & objectivity Are confidential Ratings supported by observable data within the context of the classroom observation through the lens of the Evaluation Rubric (Criteria in Standard, Element and Descriptors) Capture a supporting comment/note for each Element Might need to verify or clarify supporting evidence for a given descriptor before rating at post conference (i.e. 4a)

Performance Rating (cont.) Teachers’ performance will be noted on one of five levels: Not Demonstrated, Developing, Proficient, Accomplished or Distinguished. These levels are cumulative across the rows of the rubric. The developing teacher may exemplify the skills expected of a teacher who is new to the profession or an experienced teacher who is working in a new content area or grade level, or who needs a new skill in order to meet the standard.

Performance Rating (cont.) A “proficient” teacher must exhibit the skills and knowledge described under the “developing” header as well as those under “proficient.” Likewise, a “distinguished” teacher exhibits all of the skills and knowledge described in the descriptors for that element, across the entire row.

Performance Rating (cont.) Occasionally, a teacher might not demonstrate evidence of proficiency on a particular element. In that case the column: “Not demonstrated” would be selected. An observer would use this option if, during an observation, the lesson did not lend itself to demonstration of a particular skill or knowledge. If that column is chosen, then a comment must be made as to why it was selected. (Not Observed) “Not Looked For” must be checked for all Elements other then 2a and 4a-h in NCEES

4. Post-Observation Conference {no later than ten days after the observation (sooner the better)} Purpose is to: Discuss the classroom observation and the associated performance rating through the lens of the rubric And to identify/verify areas of strength and those that could be strengthened Process is collaborative but final decisions on performance rating rests with the peer observer as the end of year summative performance ratings rests with the administrator

Post-Observation Conference (cont.) After review, discussion and finalization of observation entered into NCEES Peer observer digitally signs then Teacher Teacher can attach comments if so desired after signatures are authenticated They login and add comments at end of rubric Email will be automatically sent notifying administrator that comments have been added

Performance Measures Discussions: Not personal Evidence based Within the context of the rubric, “This is what I observed and my data (bulleted comments) to support it is…” Disagreement; you might ask: What data leads you to say that? Within the context of this observation

Post-Conference Conflict You can table post-conference discussion and ask that the administrator mediate the process

Utilizing NCEES to complete Peer Observation process (Required) Following slides provide direction on how to: Access peer evaluation rubric Fill out and complete rubric Digitally sign

*Select School should default to your school 2012-2013 *Select School Year 2012-2013 *Select School should default to your school *Under “Select Teacher” Click on the name of the teacher you will be conducting a peer evaluation on. *Note: You will only be able to see the evaluations you have conducted. You will not be able to see other teachers self-assessments or the principal’s Evaluations.

Then Click If you select the wrong teacher you can delete by closing out of rubric. Clicking on teachers name again and then click on X in front of document’s name

Complete the top section of the rubric as outlined in next two slides

Obtain Status & Year from administrator. Clicking on “Do not allow teacher to view this rubric.” will prevent teacher who is being observed from viewing rubric. When Peer Evaluator is ready to share rubric then uncheck this box.

At Anytime You Can: Save your work with SAVE icon at top of page Spell check with icon at top of page Save and Log-out and return to complete rubric

In Preparation for Observation: Click the “Not looked for” boxes on Elements 1a-e 2b-e 3a-d 5a-c These Elements are not part of the Peer Observation

You can uncheck a Descriptor by simply clicking on the box again.

(After Standard 2 and 4) Area to capture your bulleted comments to support performance ratings is located at end of Standard 2 and 4.

At conclusion of classroom observation Record end time of observation. You can save work at anytime by using the Save icon

To Re-access the Peer Evaluation Rubric you are working on (after logging out): Login to NCEES Enter NCEES Select “More” Select “Rubric for Observing Teachers Select Teacher’s Name Select “Peer Evaluation form…” under Observation Names

Editing Peer Evaluation Rubric; You can edit comments, change performance rating up until you digitally sign the rubric at the Post-Observation Conference Once the Peer Observers signs the rubric it is locked and can not be edited

Ability of Teacher to View Observation In order for teacher to be able to view Peer Observation Peer Observer must un-check box in front of “Do not allow teacher to view this form.”

Post-Conference Observation has been entered into NCEES Top section of rubric completed as outlined earlier Failure to do so will generate a prompt from system to do so during digital signature process Appropriate “Not Looked for” boxes have been checked Content discussed and reviewed Digital signatures are authenticated First by Peer Observer then by Teacher You will need your passwords; UIDs will already be in signature box

Digital Signature Process 1st Peer clicks box under Peer Signature It will ask if you are sure… If you are then proceed When Authentication window opens; enter your password Click Authenticate Then Teacher repeats process

Last steps: Log out Have teacher login and ensure they can view observation Success? Wipe your brow, and smile at a job well done Problems or issues contact your site-based NCEES Coach Notify administrator that peer observation is complete

Know: As we, along with the rest of the districts in North Carolina move forward with the utilization of NCEES there will be challenges and issues that arise as we launch this new platform When or if they do, notify your NCEES coach If they cannot rectify issue or address question they will in turn contact Jed Stus If necessary he will contact McREL (NCEES vendor) or DPI

Thank You! For all you do for the students and teachers of Iredell-Statesville Schools!