The Personal Development Plan (PDP)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project-Based Learning and Performance-Based Assessment.
Advertisements

Confirming Student Learning: Using Assessment Techniques in the Classroom Douglas R. Davenport Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Truman State University.
Deena Sue Fuller Tennessee State University Adapted from a presentation by Brenda Marsteller Kowalewski at Weber State.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
Summer Institute, May16,  Peer review process that evaluates educational programs and services for quality.  Transferability of credit hours.
Catherine Buyarski, University College, IUPUI Susan Kahn, Institutional Effectiveness & ePortfolio Initiative, IUPUI Association of American Colleges and.
The Problem with Reflection: Lessons Learned Alfredo Gaitan University of Bedfordshire Cathy Buyarski
Assessment Consultant to THECB’s Undergraduate Education Advisory Committee (UEAC): Danita McAnally, Chief of Planning and Advancement.
PROFESSIONAL AND PROGRAMMATIC DEVELOPMENT Collaborative Assessment of Student Products.
College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.
Student Assessment CERRA National Board Candidate Support Workshop Toolkit WS
The Academic Assessment Process
Creating a Successful Portfolio to Assess Student Learning Deborah A. ThompsonDeborah A. Thompson.
May 18, Two Goals 1. Become knowledgeable about the QEP. 2. Consider your role in making the QEP a success.
THROUGH AN ONLINE PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP) INDIANA UNIVERSITY-PURDUE UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS OCTOBER 2010 Generating and Assessing Learning.
Cumberland County: May 28 Oak Ridge: June 2 Roane County: June 4 Scott: June 4 Campbell: June 9 Knox: June 10 Loudon: June 11.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
May 8 th Assessment Day 2015 Agenda Introductions Assessment Overview Review General Education Outcomes. Overview of past assessment work. What.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Matthew Wyman and Sarah Longwell, Keele University
Goals of This Session Provide background for program review development Describe document make-up.
The Third Year Review A Mini-Accreditation Florida Catholic Conference National Standards and Benchmarks.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Eportfolio: Tool for Student Career Development and Institutional Assessment Sally L. Fortenberry, Ph.D., and Karol Blaylock, Ph.D. Eportfolio: Tool for.
Electronic Portfolio Home Table of Contents Introduction Program Courses.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
EDU 385 Education Assessment in the Classroom
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Teaching Excellence Project funded by CELT Teaching Economics through Innovative Content and Effective Teaching Methods Necati Aydin,
Navigating the Shoals of Portfolio Implementation Susan Kahn and Lynn Ward Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.
Winter  Provide information and examples of the SLO process to help faculty use assessment to improve teaching and learning  Provide tools and.
Dr. Lorraine Boyle Bemidji State University Bemidji, MN Standards Aligned Curriculum Drive Authentic Tasks Measured through Assessment Processes Presented.
Student Assessment Workshop #5 CERRA National Board Candidate Support Workshop Toolkit WS
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
9 th Grade ICAP Goal Setting. Overview 1.Introduce goals and pathways 2.Introduce post-secondary readiness and evaluate 21 st century knowledge, attitudes,
“Developing an Implementation Map: Mapping / Mapping ” Dr. Ann Johnson
Assessment of Student Learning in General Education AAHE/NCA 2003 Assessment Workshop Omaha, Nebraska ● June 2003.
College of Education Graduate Programs
Surveying the Freshman Class Eva Fernández Center for Teaching & Learning September 16, 2011.
Using Groups in Academic Advising Dr. Nancy S. King Kennesaw State University.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Enterprise Solutions Supporting Student Success Megan May, Enterprise Academic Software David Goodrum, Instructional Technology Systems and Services Lynn.
AAC&U Members on Recent Trends in General Education Design, Learning Outcomes, and Teaching Approaches Key findings from a survey among 325 Chief Academic.
Assessment of Student Learning: Phase III OSU-Okmulgee’s Evidence of Student Learning.
College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.
UK Office of Assessment. The LEARNING Initiative Dual Track Implementation Strategy Completion Dates Not actively engaged in program level assessment.
MT ENGAGE Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment April 27, 2015.
Office of Academic Affairs July 18, 2012 Faculty Focus Newsletter O Purpose: To keep faculty informed about key academic policies and college wide issues,
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Mary Ann Roe e-Colorado Portal Coordinator Colorado Department of Labor and Employment Jennifer Jirous Computer Information Systems Faculty Pikes Peak.
Donna Lipscomb EDU 695 MAED Capstone Common Core Presentation INSTRUCTOR KYGER MAY 21, 2015.
CBU CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Assessment, Accreditation, and Curriculum Office CBU - OIRPA.
ePortfolios and Student Success
ePortfolios and the First-Year
ED 690: Reflecting, Writing, and Reviewing the PDP
Assessment History Since 2013 the department has performed ongoing assessment of RWS 100 & 200 comprised of Internal, department-driven, self-assessment.
The Heart of Student Success
HART RESEARCH A S O T E C I AAC&U Members On Trends In Learning Outcomes, General Education, and Assessment Key findings from online survey among 433 Chief.
Title V Initiatives to Promote Student Success: Capstone Seminar and Student Research With Faculty May 31, 2016.
Physical Therapist Assistant Program School of Science, Health, and Criminal Justice Fall 2016 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Deborah Molnar.
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 3, 2017
The Teacher Work Sample: An Authentic Assessment
Presentation transcript:

The Personal Development Plan (PDP) A COMPASS FOR STUDENT SUCCESS Cathy Buyarski Assistant Dean, University College IUPUI cbuyarsk@iupui.edu

Focus on Learning Liberal Education and America’s Promise (LEAP) of Association of American Colleges and Universities (AACU) The Essential Learning Outcomes The Principles of Excellence

Principles of Excellence Principle Two: Give Students a Compass Focus each student’s plan of study on achieving the Essential Learning Outcomes and assess progress

What is a Personal Development Plan? Personal development planning is a process which will enable students at IUPUI to understand, implement, and mark progress toward a degree and career goal by creating and following a personalized plan that is open to revision and reevaluation every semester in collaboration with an academic advisor or faculty member.

Why are we implementing the PDP? The personal development plan is designed to foster: 1. Goal commitment (student commitment to earning a degree) 2. Academic achievement (through goal setting and planning) 3. Curricular coherence and meaning 4. Each of these goals is a way to foster student development

Five Learning Outcomes for the PDP Self-Assessment: Students identify success-related competencies Exploration: Students research and identify realistic and informed academic and career goals Evaluation: Students analyze their academic progress in terms of progress toward academic and career goals Goal Setting: Students connect personal values and life purpose to the motivation and inspiration behind their goals Planning: Students locate programs, information, people, and opportunities to support and reality test their goals.

In the Beginning… Fall 2008 Assessment Approximately 1250 in 52 sections completed a PDP Assessment: focus groups, student survey, content analysis Assessment Faculty and advisors liked the PDP but worried that it would become “busy work” and the student wouldn’t use it moving into the future Students liked the academic planner and getting to know themselves Content was acceptable but students didn’t present evidence or reflection at the level we had hoped; career-related content was weak

Moving to 2009-2010 Approximately 1800 students completed a PDP Began conceptualizing the PDP as part of an electronic document that a student would carry with them and update as they move through their college experience Committee ePort UITS/CTL Faculty from a variety of schools and first-year seminars Center for Service and Learning

Key Discussion Points How do we create a presentation that students will find engaging and that they will “own”? What can we reasonably expect from first-year students? How can we meet student’s personal and cognitive development but build a framework that will be suitable as they learn and mature? How can we build a framework that may allow other programs to utilize the tool?

My Co-Curricular Experiences Components of “ePDP” About Me Educational Goals Educational Plan Career Goals My Academic Showcase My Co-Curricular Experiences Resume

Demonstration of the PDP

Supporting the use of the ePDP Faculty Development Summer 2010 conducted week long institute for faculty in pilot Technology Scaffolding of curriculum Reflection For Future Faculty Development Faculty development required to use the ePDP the first time Continuous development for “veteran” users Web site with sample ePDPs, resources, video clips for users

Assessment of the ePDP Student course evaluation General questions on course evaluation regardless of completing a paper PDP or ePDP Initial results are showing that students who completed all sections of any PDP (paper or portfolio) had significantly greater outcomes on: Ability to succeed academically Adjustment to college life Understanding the PULs Developing personal goal Feeling connected to IUPUI Feeling able to meet the demands of college

Survey to Students Using the ePDP Survey to students completing ePDP 66% of student respondents indicated that “Understanding Self / Self Awareness” was a specific area of learning that they experienced in completing their ePDP. Within this learning area students also specified the Sub-Categories of: “Identifying Strengths & Weaknesses”, “Understanding Learning Styles / Personality, “Identifying Personal Knowledge, Skills, & Abilities (KSA)”, and “Values & Ethics”.  40% of student participants indicated that the technological processes associated with completing an ePDP were “Easy to Use”. 21% of student participants responded that “More Organization & Improved Process of Completing the ePDP” as a suggestion for improvement.

Content Analysis Formative Assessment to Improve Prompts and Rubrics Conducted workshops with reviewers to enhance inter-rater reliability Distributed sections of the PDPs to at least three reviewers Final meeting to discuss points of divergence with an eye toward fine tuning the prompts and rubrics

Student reactions to the PDP… “I thought the PDP was a great idea. It helps you think about the processes you [use] to study and complete assignments. It helped me to revise my goals and come up with some new ones. The best part was the peak performance plan because it helped map out the future classes so that you know where you need to go and where you have been.”