AIDA Infrastructure for very forward calorimeters 13/11/2012 In collaboration with: François-Xavier Nuiry Andrea Catinaccio Konrad Elsener 113/11/2012AIDA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LINAC 4 Emittance Meter.
Advertisements

Manchester 09/sept/2008A.Falou & P.Cornebise {LAL-Orsay}1 CALICE Meeting/ Manchester Sept 2008 SLAB Integration & Thermal Measurements.
TPC meeting, CERN, 7-8 October 2003Børge Svane Nielsen, NBI1 Status of laser system TPC meeting, CERN, 7-8 October 2003 Børge Svane Nielsen, Niels Lindegaard,
Forward scintillators in ATLAS: cryostat and MBTS CERN Dubna Michigan State University University of Texas-Arlington presented by J. Huston Michigan State.
1 IBL Stave & loading tools University of Geneva: G.Barbier, F.Cadoux, A.Clark, D.Ferrère, C.Husi, P. Iacobucci, M. Weber The main goal for today…  Review.
MP Prototype 2 1IWF-EXP/ÖAW GRAZ  Smaller Size  Outcome of the test results with MP-P1 was the need for a reduced cross section  Rectangular Shaped.
, CLIC Test Module Meeting Status of the DB Quad adjustable support design Mateusz Sosin CLIC Module WG Meeting, 22-May-2013.
Mechanical Status of ECAL Marc Anduze – 30/10/06.
EMCal Meeting CERN – July 2 nd 2007 LPSC Status 1 J-F Muraz LPSC Status LPSC Status.  Assembly Hall. - Removal starts and is in progress. - Main infrastructure.
Zachary Wolf LCLS Undulator October 30, LCLS Undulator Tuning And Fiducialization Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim.
MM mechanical prototype Work progress at CERN MicroMegas General Meeting, CERN, 5-6 November
Operational prototype work at CERN Status report MM Gen. Meeting, 06/11/2013 J. Wotschack1.
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignement team with 3D views and data from Hubert Gerwig, Richard Rosing and Juha Kemppinen Pre-alignment.
MM mechanical prototype Work progress at CERN MMM Rome, 15/07/20131.
HGC4ILD - High Granularity Calorimeters for ILD WS 2-Feb-2015 LLR (Paris) 2-Feb-2015 Enrique Calvo Alamillo.
IBL Mock Up IBL Mock Up MANUFACTURING 2011/04/29 François-Xavier NUIRY Maxence CURDY Andrea CATINACCIO CERN PH/DT/PO 1.
AIDA Infrastructure for very forward calorimeters Design proposal Mechanical support structure Designers:In collaboration with: Eric DavidFrancois-Xavier.
Chiho Wang ATLAS TRT Duke University CERN, Feb TRT Barrel assembly status & schedule Feb. 9, 2005.
AIDA Infrastructure for very forward calorimeters Mechanical design adapted to the existing electronics 6/09/2011 Designers:In collaboration with: Eric.
FCAL mechanics – by (at) CERN Konrad Elsener FCAL HW WG meeting, 9 February
1m 3 SDHCAL Mechanic Structure M.C Fouz 8/10/2010 The 1m 3 prototype Mechanical Structure is financed by: Spanish HEP National Program by the project FPA
Tariq J. Solaija, NCP Forward RPC EDR, Tariq Solaija Forward RPC EDR The Standard RPC for low  regions Tariq J. Solaija National Centre for.
1 CLAS12/Central Tracker review. Saclay 12/09 Stéphan AUNE Central Tracker review Micromegas central & forward tracker  R&D and prototypes  CAD implantation.
13 June 2013Laurent Roy Optical Fibers / Electronics Upgrade -Fibers need for Upgrade -> Installation ? -Two techniques possible for multi fibers installation.
Montpellier, November 12, 2003Vaclav Vrba, Institute of Physics, AS CR 1 Vaclav Vrba Institute of Physics, AS CR, Prague CALICE ECal Status Report.
DBQ support – motorization and performance upgrade Mateusz Sosin EN/MEF-SU.
Update on module mounting on staves and stavelets 13/6/11 1 1) Status of clean room for next assembly kit 2) DC to DC stave.
LNF activities on WPC Panels Construction of prototypes and layout Status of tooling Proto 0, open items, plan,...
Baby MIND coil modules assembly the aluminium folded strip solution 1 Alexey, Philippe, Gabriella, Helder, Herman Baby Mind Magnet CERN June.
LHCf: installation & commissioning Measurement of Photons and Neutral Pions in the Very Forward Region of LHC Oscar Adriani INFN Sezione di Firenze - Dipartimento.
NEW FAST WIRE SCANNER Manufacturing review Emilien Rigutto
LumiCal mechanical & sensors design Wojciech Wierba J.Błocki, E.Kielar, J.Kotuła, K.Oliwa, L.Zawiejski FCAL Workshop, IFJ PAN Cracow,
An Idea of Next Sci-ECAL Prototype for FNAL Beamtest Feb Sci-ECAL meeting S. Uozumi (Kobe)
1 IRL Status and Plans Kurt Francis NICADD/Northern Illinois University AHCAL MEETING DESY, Hamburg December 9, 2013.
We have to fix the design of the flanges on the 1 st horn frame to which the target support beams are attached.
The HCAL barrel absorber structure
Production Readiness Review at PNPI Chamber assembling: Main production and quality control steps 30 January 2004 – G.Alkhazov 1.Input components control.
Possible types of module Si/W CALORIMETER CONCEPT Si/W CALORIMETER CONCEPT G.Bashindzhagyan Moscow State University June 2002 Internal structure (not in.
CLIC Beam Physics Working Group CLIC pre-alignment simulations Thomas Touzé BE/ABP-SU Update on the simulations of the CLIC pre-alignment.
CALICE collaboration CALICE collaboration J-C BRIENT LCWS02 – Jeju Island The CALICE –ECAL Silicon - V. Vrba Very FE - S. Manen Readout/DAQ - P. Dauncey.
The DAMPE STK G. Ambrosi INFN Perugia. The DAMPE Detector Mass: 1480 Kg Power: 600 W Data: 16 Gbyte/day Liftime: 5 years 2.
V. Bobillier1 Cable installation status.
26-Feb-16S.Movchan Straw manufacturing and QC1 Dubna NA62 straw tracker assembly area (milestone) halls plans conclusion Presented by S.Movchan.
VELO Integr - Jan06Jean-Christophe GAYDE TS/SU EDMS n° SURVEY FOR VELO INSTALLATION 1.SURVEY AT GROUND FLOOR - FIDUCIALISATION 2.SURVEY FOR INSTALLATION.
Baby Mind C OIL DESIGN AND ASSEMBLY SCENARIOS Helder Silva Phillipe Benoit Alexey Dudarev Gabriela Rolando Herman ten Kate Etam Messomo Laurent Nicola.
Emulsion Test Beam first results Annarita Buonaura, Valeri Tioukov On behalf of Napoli emulsion group This activity was supported by AIDA2020.
FP420 Hybrid Mechanical Design Ray Thompson / Manchester Manchester Xmas O7 Ray Thompson Julian Freestone, Andy Elvin.
LHC Beampipes Ray Veness / AT-VAC FP XII 08Beam Vacuum- R.Veness.
B [OT - Mechanics & Cooling] Stefan Gruenendahl February 2, 2016 S.Grünendahl, 2016 February 2 Director's Review -- OT: Mechanics &
Baby MIND Scintillator modules 11 November 2015 Revision E. Noah.
Status of the Yoke Interfaces Presented by Evgeny Koshurnikov February 2013.
K.Gadow - DESY 1 The HCAL barrel absorber structure Design Status
A.Ryazantsev, IHEP-Protvino, RussiaPANDA Russia Workshop at Moscow, May 2015 Status on Barrel Mechanics Andrey Ryazantsev on behalf of the IHEP-Protvino.
September 5, Burkhard Schmidt Integration and Installation Outline: Integration and Infrastructure issues -Suspended platforms -Cable chains -Beam.
AIDA Infrastructure for very forward calorimeters
Baby-MIND Modules & Services
Experimental Method: 2 independent detectors on both sides of IP
The EMC cooling F. Raffaelli INFN - Pisa 06/09/2017.
new straw end plug: D=10.6 mm straws support frame Levan option
PANDA Collaboration Meeting , BINP Sergey Pivovarov.
TAS at IP1 Present situation and plans
Low Mass mechanical design
Rod adaptors for module tests Module positioning studies
New Design for Beam Test Structure
LHCf – CSN1 Trieste O. Adriani
AIDA 2020 Tel Aviv group.
Experimental Method: 2 independent detectors on both sides of IP
Ch. Boccard, M. Krupa, G. Schneider, R. Veness, M. Wendt
Neutron guide Shielding Concept
Possible types of Si-sensor: SILICON CALORIMETRY FOR A LINEAR COLLIDER G.Bashindzhagyan, Il Park August Silicon sensor.
Presentation transcript:

AIDA Infrastructure for very forward calorimeters 13/11/2012 In collaboration with: François-Xavier Nuiry Andrea Catinaccio Konrad Elsener 113/11/2012AIDA Presentation François-Xavier Nuiry

Overview Main requirements Global design Metrology with steel plates – Concept validation Tungsten plates (Plansee) Tungsten plates (MG Sanders) Final assembly: mounting on a marble General status 213/11/2012AIDA Presentation François-Xavier Nuiry

Requirements AIDA forward calorimeter Design and manufacturing of a mechanical structure for tungsten plates and silicon sensors. A=3.5mmB=0.32±0.015mmC=2, 1, or 0.5 ±0.05mmD=not really important 60 13/11/2012AIDA Presentation François-Xavier Nuiry3 Other requirements: - Necessity to remove sensors and tungsten in a safe and easy way. -Services have to be held. -W plates are linked to the ground. -An electromagnetic + light shielding has to be provided. -horizontal + vertical position for cosmic muons.

Global design Cradle, combs, permaglass frames + W plates, hood, services supports Able to work with 2mm and 1mm gap between tungsten plates 413/11/2012AIDA Presentation François-Xavier Nuiry

Metrology with steel plates 13/11/2012AIDA Presentation François-Xavier Nuiry5 2 permaglass + steel plates assemblies are mounted in the cradle. Assemblies are installed in 3 different positions: position 1, 16 and 30. Position 1 Position 16 Position 30 We measure the distance between 2 plates: from the back of plate 1 to the front of plate 2. The reproducibility of the plate positioning in the same slot is also evaluated.

Metrology with steel plates 13/11/2012AIDA Presentation François-Xavier Nuiry6 9 points are probed on each plate, with the MMT machine. The distance point-point is measured by the machine. Position 1 Position 16 Position 30

Metrology with steel plates - 2mm gap 13/11/2012AIDA Presentation François-Xavier Nuiry7 Positioning reproducibility Position 1 Mid-distance accuracy Max-distance accuracy 2mm gap - distance accuracy

Metrology with steel plates - 1mm gap 13/11/2012AIDA Presentation François-Xavier Nuiry8 Positioning reproducibility Position 1 Mid-distance accuracy Max-distance accuracy 1mm gap - distance accuracy

Plansee tungsten plates Machined (with some delay…) According to the manufacturer, 4 over 5 are according the technical drawing (roughness issue) 13/11/2012AIDA Presentation François-Xavier Nuiry9

Plansee tungsten plates Theoretically 1 plate (5) is exactly according to what we asked Final metrology tests we did in the frame, with permaglas and combs, were good, and have been realised with the two steel plates which have dimensions close to W Plansee plates. We could have locally some inaccuracies. Globally the distance between 2 plates should be within the +/-50 microns. 13/11/2012AIDA Presentation François-Xavier Nuiry10 PLATESASKED Plansee plate 1 Plansee plate 2 Plansee plate 3 Plansee plate 4 Plansee plate 5 Steel plate 1 Steel plate 2 Flatness plan A 10µm Position opposite plan 40µm

Tungsten plates from MG sanders Current plates from MG Sanders are not delivered according to the specifications: 1113/11/2012AIDA Presentation François-Xavier Nuiry

Proposal if we keep W plates from MG sanders Proposal:  Metrology has to be realised a new time  Shipment to Britte Mustad compagny Grinding process on both sides It seems to be feasible. BUT keep in mind that we needed 3 steel plates to get 2 rights! So 1 or 2 could be wrong even after this process. estimated price: 5 workdays and ~2500 Euros Consequences:  W plate will have a thickness of about 3.2mm  Gap between 2 W plates will be ether 2.3mm ether 1.3mm (Instead of 2 and 1mm)  Mixing it with future Plansee plates is not feasible, except if you accept having sometimes a gap of 2.3mm, then 2mm, etc. 1213/11/2012AIDA Presentation François-Xavier Nuiry

Final assembly: mounting on a marble  3 stainless steel balls and the W plan are parallel and offset.  Araldite 2011 glue is applied in the slit. (parts are protected with teflon tape).  The frame level in controlled during the glue hardening. 1313/11/2012AIDA Presentation François-Xavier Nuiry

GroupTasks / PartsManufacturerStatusDelivery Dates Manufacturing Mechanical frame Subcontractor + CERN100% ManufacturedOK Combs Subcontractor BRITTE100% ManufacturedOK Springs CERNAll springs are manufacturedOK Tungsten frame Subcontractor Resarm + CERN 30 are manufacturedOK Silicon sensor frame CERN5 are manufacturedOK Hood and services support CERNEverything is doneOK Assembly & tests Integration tests with dummy SS plates CERNDoneOK W plates delivery Plansee + MG sandersMG sanders: delivered but wrong Plansee: delivered: under metrology Plansee OK for 4 plates Hood assembly CERN Done OK W & Si frames assemblies CERNSi frames assemblies: trivial W + permaglas assemblies: to be done - 13/11/2012AIDA Presentation François-Xavier Nuiry14 Summary

Appendix 2: Additional information about the frame Tungsten plate 125*145 C=2 A=3.5 Gap=5.5 C=2mm  We work with an offset of 5.5mm C=1mm  We work with an offset of 4.5mm Tungsten plate 125*145 C=1 A=3.5 Gap=4.5 Distance before next tungsten Distance before next tungsten BEAM 1513/11/2012AIDA Presentation François-Xavier Nuiry

C=2mm between each tungsten Tungsten plate 125*145 C=2 A=3.5 Sensor ~10.5  We work with an offset of 5.5mm Gap=5.5 ~2.5 Electronic board Gap=5.5 No sensor In this gap Sensor ~10.5 ~2.5 Electronic board Sensor ~10.5 ~2.5 Electronic board BEAM 16 C=2 13/11/2012AIDA Presentation François-Xavier Nuiry

C=1mm between each tungsten Tungsten plate 125*145 C=1 A=3.5 Sensor ~10.5 Gap=4.5  We work with an offset of 4.5mm Gap=4.5 ~2.5 Electronic board Gap=4.5 No sensor In this gap Sensor ~10.5 ~2.5 Electronic board Sensor ~10.5 ~2.5 Electronic board BEAM No sensor In this gap 1713/11/2012AIDA Presentation François-Xavier Nuiry New set of combs!

Tungsten plate 125*145 A=3.5 Sensor ~10.5  We work with an offset of 5.5mm Gap=5.5 ~2.5 Electronic board Gap=5.5 Sensor ~10.5 ~2.5 Electronic board Gap=5.5 No sensor In this gap C=2 Electronic board Sensor ~10.5 ~2.5 Electronic board BEAM 18 What we can do with C=2mm: Appendix 2: Additional information about the frame 13/11/2012AIDA Presentation François-Xavier Nuiry