Integrating e-government in simplification strategy the Dutch case Milan Jansen 20 June 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Dutch Advisory Board on Administrative Burden (Actal) The Hague March 5, 2008.
Advertisements

1 eGovernment Projects and Perspectives in the Bulgarian Public Administration Nedelcho Nedelchev Advisor to the Minister of State Administration and Administrative.
Public services in the aftermath of the economic crisis: how social dialogue influences changes in public sector employment relations in the Netherlands.
May 2012 All-in-one Permit for Physical Aspects Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment November 3rd 2010.
Administrative Burdens for Citizens and ICT Peter Rem The Hague 5 March 2008.
Information & Communication Technology for Development in Arab Region e-government in the Arab Region Najat Rochdi Regional Coordinator
4/28/ The US E-Government Experience Tony Frater E-Government Portfolio Manager Office of Management and Budget Public FTAA.ecom/inf/135 June 4,
The present and future of the Slovene eGovernment – the Present State of Affairs and Strategy 24th Bled eConference Policy Makers Workshop Bled, 13th of.
The Italian Institutional Design for Administrative Simplification HIGH LEVEL REGIONAL SEMINAR ON “STRATEGIES, TOOLS AND CAPACITIES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE.
Better regulation in Denmark Presentation by Flemming N. Olsen Senior Advisor, Division for Better Regulation Ministry of Finance, Denmark Conference on.
E-Commerce: Definition: E-Commerce refers the use of internet and other online services to be engaged in buying and selling of digital and non digital.
The Danish Approach to Simplification and Better Regulation for Business Eva Meiling, Deputy Director General Ministry of Economic and Business Affairs.
Specifics in the prevention of corruption and ascertainment of conflict of interest through a single body. The experience of Latvia. Jaroslavs Streļčenoks.
Data needs of a donor Rob Swinkels Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Erich Waldecker Federal Ministry of Finance, Austria FTA Taxpayer Services Sub-group Istanbul, October 2006.
E-government and e-services Portal Strategy of e-commerce Action plan e-government gallery.
Ministry of State Administration and Administrative Reform 1 eGovernance LEFIS Workshop 5 th Meeting Sofia 2-3 June 2006 Alexander Ognianov Ministry of.
The SCM – main issues, advantages and challenges of quantification of administrative costs Daniel Trnka Regulatory Policy Division, Directorate for Public.
One stop shop: e-VEM E- extension of the car registration Teja Batagelj Ministry of Public Administration.
The Dutch experience: an efficient solution for business and administration Kornelis Drijfhout (Ministry of Economics) Smart Public Procurement: Efficient.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Administrative Simplification: An overarching policy to maintain.
02/04/06e-Government conference 2006 Wim van ‘t Hof Dutch Ministry of Economic Affiars Electronic Government: - coordination? coordination! - difficult?
The new Services Act in The Netherlands Implementation of the EU Services Directive Jan Leerling, senior Legal Advisor The Netherlands Chamber of Commerce.
The Role of the Fiscal Policy in Poverty Reduction Youngsun Koh Korea Development Institute.
ROSAS CONSULTANCY & MANAGEMENT HOW THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVES ITS CITIZENS THROUGH THE INTERNET ICT SERVICES FOR CITIZENS.
Federal Department of Economic Affairs FDEA State Secretariat for Economic Affairs SECO The Regulatory Checkup Estimating the cost of regulation and identifying.
Communication Paper on Smart Regulation COM(2010) 543, 8 October 2010 Presentation by Savia Orphanidou 3 rd November 2010.
Basic issues of e-government within the EU Elitsa Lozanova-Belcheva, Senior assistant professor, Department of Library and Information Studies and Cultural.
Efficiency, effectiveness and service in public administration IPAM the Dutch Informal Pro-Active Approach Model Lynn van der Velden Ministry of the Interior.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Measuring & Reducing administrative burdens Experience from.
How to communicate on Administrative Burdens? Jacqueline Rutjens.
SESSION III Chair: Mr. V. Suchanek Discussant: Mr. Sergey V. Spiridonov International Workshop of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Working.
; ppt 1 ENTERPRISE AND INNOVATION Entrepreneurial and industrial policies in the Netherlands Luuk Klomp Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs.
The Dutch Approach to Local Climate Policy Robert Salomons René Schellekens.
Reducing regulatory burdens in the Netherlands - using the SCM- Jeroen Nijland / Jerusalem, June 28th, 2011.
Workshop „Involvement of nonprofit organizations” Public involvement and the State Chancellery of the Republic of Estonia Eleka Rugam-Rebane Government´s.
A Danish perspective: Challenges of strengthening e-governance Adam Grønlykke Mollerup The 21st October 2009.
Will wifi infrastructure make a difference to meeting government e-health goals? Lucy Firth University of Melbourne 2006 Taipei Digital Cities Conference.
Ministry of Economic Affairs | 11 April 2013 The Mark of Good Public Services A Uniform Framework for Measuring and Improving Public Services for Businesses.
Ministry of Economic Affairs | 11 April 2013 Stefan Koreneef and Dimitri Verhoeven Ministry of Economic Affairs Directorate-General for Enterprise and.
Dutch Chamber of Commerce – Michael Stoelinga 1 Becoming part of a larger framework From commerce registry to general purpose enterprise registry.
High Level Group on Administrative Burdens Thomas Bustrup 17thoct. 13 Administrative burdens and SMEs State of play and recommendations from a Danish perspective.
Peer Review of E-Government in Arab countries by Marco Daglio, Administrator, Public Governance and Territorial Development Directorate.
Current Landscape in Federal Government Printing and Publishing: Pros & Cons of Digitization and the Impact on Users.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Seminar on Administrative Simplification Seminar on Administrative.
Simplification of administrative procedures: the Administrative Effort Index (AEI - IEB) MINISTRY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONS SPAIN 1 María Ángeles Martínez,
Ministry of State Administration and Administrative Reform, Republic of Bulgaria 18 February 2008 Brdo, Slovenia 18 February 2008 Brdo, Slovenia Contribution.
Ministry of State Administration and Administrative Reform 1 eGovernment International Workshop on e-Government and its Spatial Dimension Sofia 9 June.
Strategic Governance In Hungary Case of Prime Ministers Office Dr. Istvan Stumpf President of Szazadveg Foundation Former Minister.
1 SCM and quality: Better service for citizens Preliminary concept for an adaptation of the SCM for citizens in Austria Oslo, May 15th 2009 Gerald Reindl,
SZW Balance Model Ben van den Brande Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment (SZW) EUPAN Helsinki, 11 april 2008.
Spending Reviews in the Netherlands
Make the Difference A Firm Response to Regional Economic Challenges
Basic issues of e-government within the EU
ADMINISTRATION SIMPLIFICATION FRENCH EXPERIENCE
The ‘costs of compliance’ of benefits and tax credits
FRANCE Wendy Carrara International Relations Department
E-government Working Group
E-government Working Group
Regulatory Burdens for Businesses
E-government Working Group
Theresia Niedermüller
Germany Thomas Nehring Better regulation unit Federal Chancellery.
Malta Marisa Scerri Associate Consultant
Project ‘Reduction of Administrative Burden for Professionals’
E-government Working Group
Cross-border Administrative Burdens Citizens
Estonia Martti Mandel Senior Expert
Administrative Burdens for Citizens
Learning Team Administrative Burden reduction for citizens
Presentation transcript:

Integrating e-government in simplification strategy the Dutch case Milan Jansen 20 June 2007

Dutch programme on AB Citizens Reduction of AB in the Netherlands (since 1999) – Administrative burdens for companies (Ministries of Finance and Economic Affairs) – Administrative burdens for citizens (Ministry of the Interior) Administrative burdens for citizens (since 2003) – Target of the last Cabinet: 25% less between – Focus on target groups (disabled, unemployed, elderly volunteers).

New cabinet (Balkenende IV) New parties in the coalition New programme on the reduction of AB citizens “Critique” on the definition of AB by citizens Citizens see AB as: – Information obligations – Waiting on a decision by the government – Fees of governmental services – Treatment by the civil servants – Uncertainty in rights and obligations

Better governmental services Citizens want: – Easy access to the government – Insight in governmental services – Less administrative burdens – Once off data delivery – “Plain Dutch” – Good treatment of civil servants

Targets The new government has several targets: – Substantial reduction of AB for 10 bottlenecks – 25% reduction of AB municipalities – 25% reduction for each “profile” – 25% reduction of know data – Quality of governmental services rated at least a 7 Two programmes: – AB Citizens – E-governemt

How to reduce AB Use of baseline measurement – Insight in information obligation with high AB Use of ‘complaints office’ / Kafka brigade – Insight in real complaints of actual citizens Use of interest groups – Insight in issues of target groups Use of profiles – Insight in personal burdens of ordinary people

Maria, Bart, Verstappen

Examples (1) E-government had it’s autonomous targets, e.g.: – Improve quality of government services – 65% of forms must be available online at the end of 2007 – Provide e-government ‘buildingblocks’ (DigiD, key-registers, e- forms) Example: E-forms lead to less AB for citizens (one can obtain the forms online which saves time). AB citizens provides the ‘high impact’ forms which should be put online first (e.g. taxforms, crime report)

Examples (2) The e-government key-registers makes once off data available, e.g. – Electronic patients dossier – Digital Work and Income Client Dossier Large AB reductions, but mostly e- government initiated

Examples (3) New development: AB citizens also includes improving governmental services witch brings AB and e-government more together AB citizens sees advantages of e- government and asks new e-products, e.g. – Easy access to income related services in the personal internet page – Insight in waiting times online

Conclusions Integrate e-government in AB: – Use improvement of governmental services and reduction of AB as a common factor – Use profiles and baseline measurements to find possible new e-government services – Use AB to find high impact services which e-government can focus one and get noticeable results – Use AB to get an impulse in the development of e- government applications

Questions? For more questions: Milan Jansen