CEPEJ Guidelines, Studies and Evaluation Tools. CEPEJ Guidelines.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Judicial Systems 2002 Facts and figures on the basis of a survey conducted in 40 Council of Europe Member States.
Advertisements

Ireland Stat Fiachra Kennedy Central Expenditure Evaluation Unit Department of Public Expenditure & Reform.
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water WMO OMM WMO GFCS Governance proposal Process of development.
Linking NAPs to broader national strategies and processes.
Joint Programme Enhancing judicial reform in the Eastern Partnership countries.
The judicial system in Albania The judicial power is exercised by the courts of first instance, the courts of appeal and the High Court. Courts may be.
COURT PERFORMANCE Why and what to follow. Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes - Different Measures Robert D. Behn Harvard University Public Administration.
Bosnia Statistical Training Prosecution/Courts Session 8, November 23, 2010 European Commission on Efficiency of Justice.
Judicial reform in Montenegro in the scope of the European Union integration process The road forward and the steps taken Ms. Branka Lakočević Deputy Minister.
Science Teaching in Schools in Europe. Policies and Research Nathalie Baïdak EURYDICE The Information Network on Education in Europe
Comprehensive M&E Systems
José Manuel Fresno EURoma meeting Budapest, 8 November 2011.
Enhancing Integrity in Public Procurement OECD Recommendation and Toolbox Elodie Beth Administrator Integrity Public Governance and Territorial Development.
Reflections on using indicators and measuring impact in human rights Juan Carlos Martínez and Juan Salgado Fundar, Centro de Análisis e Investigación.
Efficiency of Justice and Trust in Justice across Europe: the CEPEJ (Eurojustis, Parma, 7 May 2010) François Paychère WORKING GROUP ON QUALITY OF JUSTICE.
European developments in judicial systems Pim Albers Special advisor of the CEPEJ Council of Europe.
CEPEJ European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice Council of Europe.
‘Approaches to programme planning and budgeting’ Experience of Regional Centre for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage in South-Eastern Europe.
Eshboev B.A. Head of the Department for Monitoring of implementation of national development programmes of the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade.
The Aarhus & Espoo Conventions Making implementation work for stakeholders.
OECD RECOMMENDATION ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT STRATEGIES From citizen-centric to citizen-driven approaches Barbara Ubaldi Programme Manager– Reform of the.
Tasks:  analyse the judicial systems in member states  identify the difficulties they meet  define concrete ways to improve the functioning of these.
Dublinbureau Nederland REFORM OF JUDICIARY in Republic of Croatia.
Restorative Justice and mediation in Europe Ivo Aertsen K.U.Leuven European Forum for Victim-Offender Mediation and Restorative Justice Angers, May 6,
CEPEJ Activities on Court Performance. Activities of CEPEJ in the field of… Evaluation of Judicial Systems Evaluation of Judicial Systems Judicial time.
SEILA Program and the Role of Commune Database Information System (CDIS) Poverty and Economic Policy (PEP) Research Network Meeting June 2004, Dakar,
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SECURITY AND CITIZENSHIP JUSTICE
Transregional Workshop – Sofia, October 30, 2008 R4R Tools and Methodologies.
Joint Programme Enhancing judicial reform in the Eastern Partnership countries Judicial component.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND RECOMMEND Final Event, 11 September 2014, Varna EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Jason Martinez.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Event – date, place About INTERREG EUROPE INTERREG EUROPE INTERREG IVC Joint Technical Secretariat.
Study Visit of the Jordanian Justice Delegation March 2014, Bologna and Turin, Italy Present and future challenges to the justice administration.
The European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice and evaluation of legal systems (Council of Europe) Dr. Pim Albers Ministry of Justice of the Netherlands.
Bilateral cooperation between Italy and Turkey FRAMEWORK FOR A MONITORING SYSTEM OF PUBLIC INVESTMENTS.
Eurostat/UNSD Conference on International Outreach and Coordination in National Accounts for Sustainable Development and Growth 6-8 May, Luxembourg These.
Regional Gender Community of Practice Meeting Yerevan, October, 2007 Erika Kvapilova, Programme Specialist, UNIFEM CEE Office Bratislava.
Revisions Proposed to the CIS Plan by the Global Office Misha V. Belkindas Budapest, July 3-4, 2013.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Rapporteurs: Jean-Paul JEAN (France) Ramin GURBANOV (Azerbaijan) Strasbourg, 10 December 2015.
Trends and Successes in Improving Access to Justice Dr. Pim Albers Special advisor.
PROGRAMMING OF INTERNATIOAL ASSISTANCE Donor Sectoral Meeting Ministry of Justice 25 th September, 2007.
1 Quality of justice and courts Checklist Checklist for promoting the quality of justice and the courts.
Progress of Implementation by June 2015 Pre-defined project 2: “Support to the Supreme Judicial Council related to capacity building and improving the.
Evaluation of Structural Fund Programmes – the Swedish experience Implementation of the mid term evaluation - lessons for the future Maria Eriksson NUTEK.
Study session: evaluating activities of courts and judges Moderator: Frans van der Doelen Plenary meeting CEPEJ 7 December 2011.
1 Quality Indicators of Regulatory Management Systems Stéphane Jacobzone, Chang Won Choi, Claire Miguet The views are the author’s responsibility OECD.
Participatory Environmental Governance : Role of Communities in Europe and Asia Jona Razzaque Reader in Law Bristol Law School, UWE, Bristol, UK Bristol.
European Commission 1 An EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies by 2020 An EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies by 2020.
Management Performance Assessment Tool (MPAT) Briefing the Portfolio Committee 05 November 2014.
United Nations Statistics Division Developing a short-term statistics implementation programme Expert Group Meeting on Short-Term Economic Statistics in.
ITC-ILO/ACTRAV Course A Trade Union Training on Occupational Safety, Health & HIV/AIDS (26/11 – 07/12/2012, Turin) Introduction to National Occupational.
What is Planning? a) A detailed proposal for doing or achieve something. b) An intention or decision about what one is going to do. (Oxford Dictionary,
Your partner in service delivery and development
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE Agenda 2030 in the Czech Republic
Herman Smith United Nations Statistics Division
Project Cycle Management
Evaluation : goals and principles
The International Plant Protection Convention
CEPEJ IN TURKEY Ismail Aksel CEPEJ Member of Turkey
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
High level seminar on the implementation of the
Mandate of the Eurostat Working Group
CEPEJ European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice Council of Europe Dear Excellencies, Dear Colleagues and guests!
CEPEJ Guidelines, Studies and Evaluation Tools
OECD good practices for setting up an RIA system Regional Capacity-Building Seminar on Regulatory Impact Assessment Istanbul, Turkey 20 November 2007.
Study session: evaluating activities of courts and judges Moderator: Frans van der Doelen Plenary meeting CEPEJ 7 December 2011.
Draft revision of ISPM 6: National surveillance systems ( )
COURT PERFORMANCE Why and what to follow
European Mediation Development Toolkit Assoc. Prof. Dr
Strategic development goals and priorities of the Republic of Tajikistan . National monitoring and evaluation system for their achievements. Eshboev.
Presentation transcript:

CEPEJ Guidelines, Studies and Evaluation Tools

CEPEJ Guidelines

Guidelines of the CEPEJ CEPEJ(2013)7RevE / 06 December 2013 Guidelines on the Creation of Judicial Maps to Support Access to Justice within a Quality Judicial System CEPEJ(2008)8RevE / 25 September 2013 SATURN guidelines for judicial time management CEPEJ(2009)11E / 17 December 2009 Guidelines for a better implementation of the existing Council of Europe's Recommendation on enforcement CEPEJ(2008)11E / 22 October 2008 CEPEJ Guidelines on Judicial Statistics (GOJUST) CEPEJ-RL(2008)2E / 11 July 2008 Lisbon Network (RL) - Minimum Corpus of the Council of Europe standards CEPEJ(2007)15E / 07 December 2007 Guidelines for a better implementation of the existing Recommendation on alternatives to litigation between administrative authorities and private parties CEPEJ(2007)13E / 07 December 2007 Guidelines for a better implementation of the existing recommendation concerning mediation in penal matters CEPEJ(2007)14E / 07 December 2007 Guidelines for a better implementation of the existing recommendation concerning family mediation and mediation in civil matters CEPEJ-RL(2006)1E / 14 September 2006 Lisbon Network (LN) - Strategy of the Network CEPEJ(2004)19rev2E / 13 September 2005 A new objective for judicial systems: the processing of each case within an optimum and foreseeable timeframe - Framework Programme

CEPEJ Tools Handbook for court satisfaction surveys Compendium of "best practices" on time management of judicial proceedings Time management checklist Checklist for promoting the quality of justice and the courts CEPEJ Studies 18 studies till now

CEPEJ(2008)8RevE / 25 September 2013 SATURN guidelines for judicial time management The 15 Saturn Starting Priorities Guidelines... a)Planning and Collection of data b)Intervention c)Collection of Information d)Continuing analysis e)Establishing targets f)Crisis management g)Timing agreement with the parties and lawyers

SATURN guidelines for judicial time management clear priorities and clear principles – piece of cake „... lenght... should be planned....“ „... estimating the timing needed...“ „... departure from standards (?) and targets (?)...“ „... integral duration... duration of most important steps..“ „... data continualy analysed... and used...„ „... rapidly address the cause of a problem...“ „.. judge reach agreement... on calendar... with the help of ICT...“

SATURN guidelines for judicial time management clear priorities and clear principles – piece of cake WHO and... HOW!?

QUANTITATIVE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Bureaucratic Data Collection Normative Framework (standards and goals) Capacity building Monitoring and Evaluation Accountability and Action

QUANTIATIVE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Bureaucratic Data Collection a) a) Standardised typology of cases throughout the system? b) b) Functioning Case Management System? c) c) Unique case ID? d) d) Overall length of proceedings? e) e) How cases are closed? Transfered to other court ? f) f) (Ac)counting principles? g) g) Data quality checks

QUANTIATIVE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Normative Framework a) a) What do you want to measure? What we REALY measure? b) b) What is measured by others? c) c) Clear timeframes (Norway, USA, Austria, Netherlands…)? d) d) Quality (reversed, revised decisions)? e) e) Cost efficiency –How to fairly distribute funds? f) f) What is program budgeting (Netherlands)? g) g) We need standards! Now, how to set standards?! h) h) Do you set standards through debate, or you need to use some scientific methods? i) i) Where is my strategic plan?

QUANTIATIVE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Capacity building a) a) Who is doing checking of lengths of proceedings (or other elements of normative framework)? b) b) Is the monitoring of the overall length of proceedings centralised or decentralised? c) c) Do you have offices, furniture, ICT system in place for individuals to do a task? Where tasks are being performed?

QUANTIATIVE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Monitoring and Evaluation a) a) Benchmarking? b) b) What will be monitored? Which quantitative indicators? c) c) How often? d) d) Triggers? at court, department, judge level e) e) Who will formulate and recommend policies? f) f) Who will create Strategic Plan? How? What data will be used? g) g) Will the process be centralised?

QUANTIATIVE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Accountability and Action a) a) We need more resources (!), but who needs resources even more? b) b) Who will review policies? c) c) Who will monitor progress and impact (of applied policies, implemented strategic plan, etc.) d) d) Who is supposed to do something? When? e) e) BI and Business Process Management

QUANTIATIVE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Closing remarks Why many countries fail to utilise their ICT capacities in judiciary? IT doesn’t matter? Why some countries are so efficient? Questions?

THANK YOU