Fred Lokken Chair, Instructional Technology Council (ITC) & Associate Dean, WebCollege & ASC Truckee Meadows Community College Reno, Nevada An Update on.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Federal Compliance Expectations for the Periodic Review Report Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Debra G. Klinman – Vice President Middle.
Advertisements

Writing the Team Report Chairs and Evaluators Workshop.
1 Higher Education Opportunity Act: Implications for the PRR Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Barbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President MSCHE PRR Workshop.
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 1 Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the HEOA Barbara Samuel Loftus Vice President, MSCHE.
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 1 Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the HEOA Mary Beth Kait – Senior Director for Policy & Planning,
Pat James Hanz July 6, 2009 For audio call Toll Free and use PIN/code How Do You Know Who Your Students Really Are? Facing Authentication.
Online Instructors Forum May 10, 2013 Agenda Objectives of the Forum Distance Education (DE) At A Glance Accreditation - DE vs. CE What You Can Do Quality.
Standard 13 Related Educational Activities Robert K. Clark Cumberland County College Vineland, NJ.
The importance of a Compliance program is to ensure that our agency meets the highest possible standards for all relevant federal, state and local regulations,
FIPS 201 Personal Identity Verification For Federal Employees and Contractors National Institute of Standards and Technology Information Technology Laboratory.
Understanding Federal Compliance Expectations for the Self-Study Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Debra G. Klinman – Vice President Middle States Commission.
IACRAO 73rd ANNUAL MEETING Students, Records, and All That Jazz!
Hot Topics in Distance Education: Avoiding the Landmines Academic Senate for California Community Colleges Spring Plenary Session April 9, 2015 Stephanie.
TASFAA Annual Conference 2010 Galveston, Texas. So What? The Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, requires an institution of higher education participating.
New Web-Based Course Evaluation Services Available to Schools and Departments Presentation to Faculty Council November 6, 2009.
Landmines in Online Education Academic Senate for California Community Colleges Online Education Regional Meeting March 20/21, 2015 Gregory Beyrer, Cosumnes.
Bronco Bookstore 2009 Update: Course Materials Affordability Issues and Initiatives Presentation to Academic Senate March 11, 2009 Karen Ward, Director.
REGULAR AND EFFECTIVE CONTACT Dolores Davison, Foothill College Michael Heumann, Imperial Valley College Michelle Grimes-Hillman, Mt. San Antonio College.
1 eLearning: China National Policy, and Southwest Normal University Regional Implementation Geping Liu College of Distance Education Southwest Normal University,
Dolores Davison, Foothill College Dustin Hanvey, Pasadena City College Danielle Martino, Santiago Canyon College.
Hot Topics and Accreditation Issues in Distance Education Financial Aid, Correspondence, Authentication…Should We Go On? Dennis Bailey-Fournier, Cabrillo.
Diploma Mills: Don’t Strike Out MASFAP Spring Conference March 24, 2011.
Attendance in Online Courses Draft Resolution. Definition and documentation of attendance in fully online courses significantly impacts students with.
Regular and Effective Contact in Online Education Dolores Davison, Foothill College Wheeler North, San Diego Miramar College Sofia Ramirez-Gelpi, Allan.
Effective Practices for Quality Online Instruction Kale Braden Kale Braden, ASCCC North Representative, Cosumnes River College Eileen Smith, Eileen Smith,
Jamie Edwards Instructional Designer DISTANCE VS CORRESPONDENCE WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE?
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges Western Association of Schools and Colleges December 10, 2012 Quality Distance Education.
The Accreditation: The Policies on Distance Learning.
Fifth Year Interim Reports Texas Association for Institutional Research Ralph Russell Director of Institutional Support Commission on Colleges.
Authenticating Online Students: Practically Speaking Patricia James October 15, 2013 For audio call Toll Free and use PIN/code
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
MCCVLC Distance Learning Administrators Survey Results & Discussion.
Hot Topics and Accreditation Issues in Distance Education Authentication, Substantive Change, Effective Contact … And Lions and Tigers and Bears, Oh My!
Session 5 Integrating CLAS Into Policy and Practice CLAS Training [ADD DATE] [ADD PRESENTER NAME] [ADD ORGANIZATION NAME]
HLC- Regional Reaccreditation Dr. Joseph Frizado Vice Provost for Academic Operations & Assessment Reaccreditation under Open Pathways.
+ What's around the corner? Clarifying Student Authentication in the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008.
1 Effective Senates: The Key Ingredients of Collegial Consultation Angelica Bangle, Chris Hill, Wheeler North, Beverly Reilly, Cheryl Stewart.
Duke Ellington “A problem is a chance for you to do your best.”
MCCVLC Distance Learning Administrators Survey Results & Discussion.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.
ACADEMIC SERVICES WORK GROUP October 18, Review of Charge: To review, develop and recommend to the MnOnline Council, guidelines, policies and procedure.
Academic Senate for California Community Colleges ­– Leadership Institute 2008 Basics for Effective Senates Shaaron Vogel Wheeler North Academic Senate.
Fifth Year Report and Substantive Change Processes Presented by Dr. Belle S. Wheelan, President SACS Commission on Colleges April 29, 2009.
The Impact of Evolving IT Security Concerns On Cornell Information Technology Policy.
Dean Bonnie MacEwan Committee Chairman Ad Hoc Committee to Review and Establish University Policies Regarding Minors (Children) on Campus.
Recognize the practices that have GA and SACSCOC implications Recognize the Substantive Change compliance processes, actions, and timeframes Identify.
Regular and Effective Contact in Online Education Lori Bennett, Moorpark College Dolores Davison, Foothill College Michael Heumann, Imperial Valley College.
Expectations and Accountability in Regional Accreditation Ellie A. Fogarty, EdD – Vice President Debra G. Klinman, PhD – Vice President Middle States Commission.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office Quality Distance Education Webinar Attendance Accounting And Reporting for Distance Education Courses.
ONLINE STUDENT AUTHENTICATION EXAMITY PILOT SPRING 2016.
CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY OPEN SESSION MARCH 25 Higher Learning Commission Re-accreditation.
What to Expect When You’re Expecting… The Visiting Team and Distance Education Review Dolores Davison, Foothill College Tracy Schaelen, Southwestern College.
Poster produced by Faculty & Curriculum Support (FACS), Georgetown University Medical Center Introduction When designing courses for the higher education.
The Infrastructure of Accreditation: The Department of Education and The Regional Accreditors ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Feb , San Diego, CA.
Overview of the Supplemental NPRM: Distance Education.
Dallas County Community College District – The LeCroy Center Taking the Pulse of Online Learning: Using the Quality Score Card in the DCCCD ROOM X2005.
Distance Education Issues
Hot Topics in Distance Education
Wendy Bass, Los Angeles Pierce College
Online Education Regionals 8-9 April 2016
The NEW Distance Education Guidelines
US Department of Education Federal Student Aid (FSA)
AP, CLEP & Transient Permission
The Shifting Sands in Federal, State, & Accreditation Policies
Red Flags Rule An Introduction County College of Morris
Principles of Good Practice for Effective Online Instruction Worksheet
Principles of Good Practice for Effective Online Instruction Worksheet
Evaluation of Distance Education Curriculum
Presentation transcript:

Fred Lokken Chair, Instructional Technology Council (ITC) & Associate Dean, WebCollege & ASC Truckee Meadows Community College Reno, Nevada An Update on the Higher Education Opportunity Act (HEOA):

Relevant provisions of the HEOA Specifics in the HEOA about eLearning (Distance Education) are found in Title I and Title IV of the act

The Higher Education Opportunity Act Background: Reauthorization of the HEA – signed into law on August 14, 2008 as Public Law The bill had languished in committee for nearly six years Strong focus on accountability - the act includes more than 50 new “accountability” requirements for higher education impacting financial aid, accreditation – and yes, Distance Education

HEOA: Distance Education provisions 1.Relevant: Updates definition of distance education, replacing “telecommunications” with “distance education” to read, “the use of one or more technologies to deliver instruction to students who are separated from the instructor and to support regular and substantive interaction between the students and the instructor, either synchronously or asynchronously.“ 2. Not relevant: the Secretary of Education is required to produce an annual report regarding its distance education demonstration projects (no current or future projects are funded).

HEOA: Distance Education provisions 3.Relevant: Regional accreditation agencies must: -1. Demonstrate they have effective standards for evaluating \ program quality. -2. Create review teams that are well-trained and knowledgeable with respect to their responsibilities regarding distance education. -3. Monitor significant growth in distance education enrollment. A review is required if distance education enrollment increases by 50 percent in one institutional fiscal year.

HEOA: Distance Education provisions 4. Not Relevant: The National Academy of Sciences’ National Research Council is asked to compare the of quality of distance education with campus-based courses, however Congress does not providing funding for this report. 5. Relevant: Colleges are required to have “processes” that establish that “the student who registers in a distance education course or program is the same student who participates in and completes the program and receives the academic credit.”

HEOA: Distance Education provisions – role of the ITC Worked closely with US Senate staff from Senator Harry Reid’s office and Senator John Ensign’s office as well as with a lobbyist from the AACC ITC focused on authentication requirement - it was apparent that the intent of the “authentication” provision was limited to the use of a unique username and password solution and was prompted by concerns with “for-profit” DE providers

HEOA Distance Education provisions – Role of the ITC The ITC raised five concerns: 1. Why apply to all institutions? 2. Was there data to validate requirement? 3. Risk of errant applications of the language 4. Anticipated high costs for implementing solutions 5. Protecting the privacy rights of students

HEOA: Clarifying Language "The Conferees expect institutions that offer distance education to have security mechanisms in place, such as identification numbers or other pass code information required to be used each time the student participates in class time or coursework on-line. As new identification technologies are developed and become more sophisticated, less expensive and more mainstream, the Conferees anticipate that accrediting agencies or associations and institutions will consider their use in the future. The Conferees do not intend that institutions use or rely on any technology that interferes with the privacy of the student and expect that students' privacy will be protected with whichever method the institutions choose to utilize."

US Department of Education Rule- making phase The HEOA requires the regional accrediting agencies to implement key provisions of the HEOA prior to the issuing of rules by the US Department of Education

US Department of Education Has created five functional committees to deal with breadth of issues included in the law Members for each committee recruited via the Federal Registry Committees began meeting in March Committees continue to meet – committee charged with Distance Education completed their work as concerns Distance Education as of May 20 th

Committee Language Application of standards in reaching an accreditation decision. (g) Requires institutions that offer distance education or correspondence education to have processes in place through which the institution establishes that the student who registers in a distance education or correspondence education course or program is the same student who participates in and completes the course or program and receives the academic credit. The agency (1) Requires institutions to verify the identity of a student who participates in class or coursework by using, at the option of the institution, methods such as -- (i) A secure login and pass code; (ii) proctored examinations; and (iii) New or other technologies and practices that are effective in verifying student identification; (2) Makes clear in writing that institutions must use processes that protect student privacy and notify students of projected additional student charges associated with verification of student identity, if any, at the time of registration or enrollment.

Committee Language Definitions Correspondence course: (1) A course provided by an institution under which the institution provides instructional materials, by mail or electronic transmission, including examinations on the materials, to students who are separated from the instructor. Interaction between the instructor and the student is limited, is not regular and substantive, and is primarily initiated by the student. Correspondence courses are typically self-paced. (2) If a course is part correspondence and part residential training, the Secretary considers the course to be a correspondence course. (3) A correspondence course is not considered distance education.

Committee Language Accreditation and preaccreditation standards. (c) If the agency has or seeks to include within its scope of recognition the evaluation of the quality of institutions or programs offering distance education or correspondence education, the agency's standards must effectively address the quality of an institution's distance education or correspondence education in the areas identified in (a) (1). The agency is not required to have separate standards, procedures, or policies for the evaluation of distance education or correspondence education;

Committee Language Correspondence Education means: (1) Education provided through one or more courses by an institution under which the institution provides institutional materials, by mail or electronic transmission, including examinations on the materials, to students who are separated from the instructor. (2) Interaction between the instructor and the student is limited, is not regular and substantive, and is primarily initiated by the student. (3) Correspondence courses are typically self-paced. (4)Correspondence education is not distance education. Distance education means education that uses one or more of the technologies listed in paragraphs (1) though (4) to deliver instruction to students who are separated from the instructor and to support regular and substantive interaction between the students and the instructor, either synchronously or asynchronously. The technologies may include – (1) The internet (2) One-way and two-way transmissions through open broadcast, closed circuit, cable, microwave, broadband lines, fiber optics, satellite, or wireless communications devices; (3) Audioconferencing, or (4) Video cassettes, DVDs, and CD-ROMs, if the cassettes, DVDs, or CD-ROMs are used in a course in conjunction with any of the technologies listed in paragraphs (1) through (3).

Regional Accrediting Agencies Will implement the language drafted by the rule-making committee Separate to this: WCET ( drafted a set of best practices – shared with ITC (its membership) which made several additions – Creative Commons document of Best Practices re authenticationwww.wiche.edu

HEOA: where we are… Some venders have seized the opportunity to take advantage of confusion over what the HEOA requires – But rule-making has ensured institutional flexibility to determine what is appropriate

Impact of the HEOA on Distance Education 1.Campuses will need to establish a unique username/ password solution if they have not already done so (ITC Annual Survey for 2008 found that 96% of institutions report they already do this) 2.Campuses will eventually need to expand beyond this standard based on anticipated accreditation expectations and improving solutions 3. Anticipated increased attention to academic integrity issues

The issue of academic integrity From the ITC Annual Survey 2008: “Clearly, an undercurrent of the discussion is the assumption that fraudulent activity is occurring in online courses. Sadly, there is no definitive national data to confirm or refute this assumption. We know that distance education programs are vigilant in monitoring for fraud and dishonesty -- and based on the realities of the HEOA -- programs will have to redouble efforts going forward to ensure course and program integrity.”

What you can do… 1. Continue to monitor the rule-making process under the auspices of the US Department of Education (recommendation: turn to leading organizations such as the ITC to obtain regular updates) 2.Begin efforts to know where your campus is re academic integrity – do you have a problem? Develop data/evidence regarding practices you have put in place to ensure academic integrity and to minimize fraudulent activity – work with other institutions to pool data/practices

For more information: Websites: HEOA/US Department of Education: WCET website: (WCET has been active on the US Department of Education committee) ITC website: (includes electronic copy of 2008 national DE survey results and a discussion of the HEOA)

My contact information Fred Lokken Associate Dean, WebCollege & ASC Truckee Meadows Community College Reno, Nevada (775)