New iCAP Section from Purchasing, Waste and Recycling SWATeam October 22, 2014 Warren Lavey (chair), Dilip Chhajed, Bart Bartels, Janet Milbrandt, Olivia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of the Draft Regional Master Plan Presented to the Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board October 26, 2011.
Advertisements

Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design for Existing Buildings (LEED-EB): Operations and Maintenance Sustainability Activities by the BUILDING OCCUPANT.
RECYCLING A Rough Guide.
PCC Green Office Program Sustainability Were all about that.
Creating a Zero Waste Campus Arizona State University.
Reducing Paper Use at UL: A Success Story The University of Limerick was assigned the task of identifying a stream of waste and then reducing.
Melissa Cadwell SU Sustainability Division. SU Overview Large Can be 24,000 people on campus Private 4-year, graduate, professional degrees Urban Highly.
Construction and Demolition Waste Management at UVM
Zero Waste OC 2013 Ready for nothing? The time is now. The possibilities exist (or should/could, with our leadership). The reasons are clear. Introduction.
INTEGRATED PLANNING: THE LINKS BETWEEN URBAN WASTE MANAGEMENT, SANITATION AND ENERGY.
University Of Utah Enhanced Recycling Program. Why Recycle? Environmental Stewardship Environmental Stewardship Sustainability Leadership Sustainability.
Worcester State College On Campus Recycling Strategies.
Waste Management & Recycling Estates Management Mark Lindsay, Senior Contracts Surveyor Andy Baillie, Cleaning Services Manager Alan Gray, Procurement.
Helen Lee, LEED GA Zero Waste Coordinator American University 1.
Waste Management Reinis Kalnietis. Today, a very acute problem has become a wide variety of wastes - both municipal waste and chemical and hazardous waste.
Campus Sustainability Jodie Noiles, Sustainability Coordinator COMP Feb 5, 2015.
Sustainability at UCSB Campus Campus Sustainability Plan January, 2006.
S USTAINABLE M ATERIALS M ANAGEMENT EPA Briefing for “Building Innovation Through Partnerships: Apps for the Environment Challenge” Elizabeth Resek, U.S.
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design for Existing Buildings (LEED-EB): Operations and Maintenance Sustainability Activities by the BUILDING OCCUPANT.
Environmentally Preferable Procurement. What is EPP? Environmentally preferable products are goods and services that have a lesser or reduced effect on.
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN Put your school Name and logo here Don’t forget to put in photos of people who did the audit ….. and the date.
Municipal Waste Statistics in Belarus. The owner of municipal waste statistics in Belarus is the Ministry of Housing and Utilities.
WASTE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING CEST WORKING GROUP STRATEGIC PLAN
Title Sub-title PLACE PARTNER’S LOGO HERE European Commission Enterprise and Industry Project BEBB Better Environment – Better Business LOGO HERE.
Developing a Solid Waste Management Strategy for Michigan State University Satish JoshiShaufique Sidique Susan SelkeGaurav Dabholkar Terry Link Pete Pasturez.
SUSTAINABLE PURCHASING (Environmental Preferable Purchasing) Presented by Kathleen Ingleby, C.P.M. 1.Progress the University of Utah has made in Sustainable.
Green Office Certification August 14, Why Become a Certified Green Office? To raise awareness of steps that can be taken in the workplace to reduce.
Moving Toward Zero Waste: Recycling as a Gateway to Sustainable Behaviors CURC Webinar September 2, 2010 Laurie Cousart, Director for Sustainability, Business.
SECRET Green Procurement Office of Greening Government Operations May 4, 2006.
Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Federal Energy Management Program Safe, Secure, and Sustainable Facilities May 13, 2010 Richard Kidd Program.
Energy & Environment Report for 2008 – 2009 Ian Rowe Manager (Health, Safety & Environment)
The UNSW Waste Management Hierarchy …avoiding inefficiencies, reducing bureaucracy, recovering priorities and disposing of myths Paul Osmond and Angus.
Testing of Household Waste Collections Summary of Issues Considered by Member Officer Group on Waste Management.
330 North Wabash EPA’S ENERGY STAR RATING ACHIEVED December, 2009  330’s Energy Performance is in the top 25% nationwide accomplished through:  No Cost.
Carolina Recycling Association 23 rd Annual Conference and Trade Show Myrtle Beach, SC April 12, 2013.
Presentation of Construction ServicesClient Name // date or name of group Client Name or Client logo G REEN T ENANT G UIDE O VERVIEW A PRIL 2011.
NEW RULES NEEDED TO GET TO ZERO WASTE R.V. Anthony Richard Anthony Associates, San Diego, California GRRN Recycling and Zero Waste Conference Devens, Massachusetts.
Roadmap to a Sustainable Waste Management Future Waste Diversion Strategies in the Unincorporated Communities of Los Angeles County Throughout the Region.
Financial Rep Meeting February 17, FSU SUSTAINABLE CAMPUS TREY GOWDY 2.
Greening Government Operations Green Procurement Implementation Tools & Resources Canadian Public Procurement Forum October 1 st, 2007.
Maryland Green Purchasing Committee Maryland Environmentally Preferable Specifications and Reporting.
Solid Domestic Waste By: Laya Bataineh & Yousser Louhaichi.
Performance and Development Sustainable Procurement The path to progress and efficiencies Janet Chapman Sustainable Procurement Officer.
A “Zero Waste” Approach at the Del Mar Fairgrounds Nancy Strauss Resource Conservation Coordinator Del Mar Fairgrounds, Del Mar, CA, USA –
Zero Waste Schools Meeting March 12 th, Envision a world without waste 75% diversion by 2010 Reduce GHG emissions to 25% below 2005 levels by 2025.
OFFICE SUPPLY TOTE PROGRAM A Notre Dame and Office Depot Partnership.
Municipal Solid Waste Generation, Recycling, and Disposal in the U.S. for 2006 U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste November 2007.
Greening Your Lab Responsible Conduct of Research Duke University October 8, 2013.
Michigan State University: Being Bolder by Design Greening the Supply Chain April 21, 2014 Jennifer Battle, Director Office of Campus Sustainability.
Welcome to GREENING your workplace Location or Date.
Roadmap to success Central New Mexico Community College.
Smooth Sailing Ahead Partnering With Sustainability and Waste Compliance & Mitigation Fernando Berton, CIWMB.
Discussion of Priority Activities for Next Eighteen Months Action Plans.
Implementing an Environmentally Preferable Purchasing Policy (EPP) for the City of Richmond.
Tracking and Reporting Electronics Stewardship If You Can’t Count It, It Doesn’t Count Jeff Eagan Office of Environmental Policy and Assistance U.S. Department.
SJC Green Committee 2011 San Joaquin County Annual Green Committee Report.
1 Implementing E.O : Opportunities for Industrial Materials Recycling Implementing E.O : Opportunities for Industrial Materials Recycling Federal.
3 R’s of Sustainability SESSION 1: The What, Why and How of Sustainability PREVIEW ONLY.
Waste Diversion Planning
Why is environmental sustainability important to the University?
Recycling Basics for Memorial Medial Center
Today’s Panelists Chief, Resource Conservation Branch
Putting the ACTION into your Climate Action Plan
WASTEMENEGEMENT IN BUILDINGS
Going Green in a Sea of Orange Clemson’s Experience with Implementation Environmentally Preferred Purchasing Policy.
Making sustainability a reality: materials, energy and value
Maryland Environmentally Preferable Specifications and Reporting
OFFICE OF SUSTAINABILITY
WHAT IS THE SUSTAINABLE OFFICE PROGAM?
Waste Reduction and Energy Conservation
Presentation transcript:

New iCAP Section from Purchasing, Waste and Recycling SWATeam October 22, 2014 Warren Lavey (chair), Dilip Chhajed, Bart Bartels, Janet Milbrandt, Olivia Webb, Liz Shancer, Casey Kozak

Celebrate Reaching iCAP Targets? Target 1: Waste diversion rate of 75% by 2020 – Achieved 84.5% in 2012

Celebrate Reaching iCAP Targets? Target 1: Waste diversion rate of 75% by 2020 – Achieved 84.5% in 2012 Target 2: Develop Zero Waste campus policy by 2011

Celebrate Reaching iCAP Targets? Target 1: Waste diversion rate of 75% by 2020 – Achieved 84.5% in 2012 Target 2: Develop Zero Waste campus policy by 2011

Along the Road to Zero Waste – Disappointing Performance ( ) Total commodity waste 429 tons, 5.6% Landfill 960 tons, 19.5% Recycling 530 tons, 19.2% Commodity waste diversion rate 12.4% --- Only 27.6% in 2012

Along the Road to Zero Waste – Falling Short of Leadership No recycling for many plastics and all glass Deficient availability of and signage for recycling bins Campus units not accountable for waste and recycling Stronger recycling programs at many high schools and peer universities

Along the Road to Zero Waste – Falling Short of Leadership No recycling for many plastics and all glass Deficient availability of and signage for recycling bins Campus units not accountable for waste and recycling Stronger recycling programs at many high schools and peer universities Purchases do not apply environmental standards Weak incentives for campus units to reduce consumption and environmental impacts Some stronger sustainable purchasing practices through State of Illinois Central Management Services

Along the Road to Zero Waste – Many iCAP Strategies Not Implemented Make campus units accountable for disposal costs Use carbon and other environmental indicators for purchasing Develop campus incentives for reducing waste Consider bottle or can deposit program Full-cost accounting and life-cycle analysis for major purchases Set and enforce minimum recycled content standards Work for legislation to enable resale of campus goods to general public

Some Positive Recent Initiatives Methane recovery by landfill EnviroPures Digesters & composting for food waste RecycleMania game day and e-waste events ChemCycle for reuse of lab chemicals Dump and Run for student furniture, furnishings Adding recycling bins on Quad Recycling Nitrile gloves Tomato processing at Sustainable Farm Studies on waste streams in four buildings

Our Team’s View: Zero Waste at UIUC Faces a Long Road Ahead With Steep Hills to Climb

More Detailed iCAP Objectives 1. Reduce purchases, waste, and landfill; increase recycling and other reuse a. By June 30, 2020 I.Divert from landfill 90 percent of all waste (including agricultural and landscaping) II.Divert from landfill 75 percent (or 5 percent more annually) of: commodity waste by category (paper, cardboard, all plastics, glass, metals); food waste; electronics; batteries; and construction/demolition debris III.Reduce purchases of office paper, computers and selected other products by 15 percent (compared to 2014); ban single-use bags and selling bottled water b. By June 30, 2025 i.Divert from landfill 95 percent of all waste (including agricultural and landscaping) ii.Divert from landfill 90 percent (or 5 percent more annually) of: commodity waste by category; food waste; electronics; batteries; and construction/demolition debris iii.Reduce purchases of office paper, computers and selected other products by 30 percent (compared to 2014)

More Detailed iCAP Objectives 2. Apply environmental standards and preferences to reduce the emissions from purchases a. By June 30, 2016, apply standards to all purchases of office paper (at least 30 percent recycled content), cleaning products (Green Seal), computers (EPEAT Silver), other electronics (Energy Star), and freight/package delivery services (EPA SmartWay) (or comparable certifications) b.By June 30, 2020, apply standards to products accounting for 50 percent of purchases c. By June 30, 2025, apply standards to products accounting for 75 percent of purchases

Actionable iCAP Strategies - Broad 1)Measure the performance by campus units (such as specific building, department and auxiliary) on purchasing, waste, landfill, recycling of specific commodities, and other product reuse 2)Develop accountability, training and incentive programs for waste reduction by campus units and students; raise awareness of waste reduction goals through events and communications 3)Apply systems analysis in selecting actions to minimize emissions from purchasing, waste and recycling 4)Engage campus units and vendors to reduce purchases and associated emissions; solicit and apply students’ suggestions on reducing paper and other products used in classes and buildings

Actionable iCAP Strategies - Specific 5) Research and apply environmental calculators to target for reductions products which account for significant emissions from campus purchases a.By June 30, 2016, identify standards for products accounting for 50 percent of purchases b.By June 30, 2020, identify standards for products accounting for 75 percent of purchases 6) Select landfills which effectively capture methane emissions and use them to generate energy. 7) Increase use of recycling bins by increasing number and locations, expanding the recycled products (including all plastics, glass, food waste, electronics, batteries and Nitrile gloves), and implementing uniform signage 8) Increase sorting of recyclables from combined waste at waste sorting station

Actionable iCAP Strategies - Specific 9) Extend the replacement cycles for computers and other products 10) Revise the iBUY and other purchasing systems to curtail purchases of products and services which fail to satisfy selected certified environmental standards and preferences 11) Apply surcharges to encourage environmentally-preferred purchases and recycling 12) Utilize purchasing contracts which apply certified environmental standards and preferences, including contracts available for State of Illinois agencies and collectives of universities 13) Apply sustainable purchasing tools and standards provided by the U.S. GSA, U.S. DOE, U.S. EPA, State of Illinois Central Management Services, and other certifying organizations 14) Expand reuse of durable products on campus through cataloguing system