Problem Solving Model Problem Solving Model NC DPI Summer 2010 1 Preparation Preparation & Implementation Implementation North Carolina.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Moving Toward a Problem-Solving Approach that Uses Response To Intervention Data Laura Boynton Hauerwas Kristen Matthes Providence CollegeBarrington Public.
Response to Intervention: A Different Look
Response to Intervention In North Carolina Implementation of a Problem Solving Model Exceptional Children Division NC Department of Public Instruction.
A Problem-Solving Approach to Student Success.  Review of RTI  Definitions  The Problem-Solving Approach  Role of the Three Tiered Intervention System.
A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida Y3D1 SBLT Tier 3 Problem Identification & Problem.
February 2007IDEA Partnership1 Leaving No Child Behind: Response to Intervention Fundamentals for Educators and their Partners.
Goose Creek CISD Response to Intervention Training Part I.
Issue Analyses RtI Yvette Benton Brad Baietto Brad Scarbrough.
Mike W. Olson RTI. RTI is… 2 the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time.
Policy Considerations and Implementation. Overview Defining RtI Where did it come from and why do we need it? Support for RtI in federal law Core principles.
Response to Intervention (RtI) A Basic Overview. Illinois IDEA 2004 Part Rules Requires: use of a process that determines how the child responds.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development October 9, 2009.
July 2007 IDEA Partnership 1 RTI Process What is it?
Today’s Objectives What is RtI and why it is here – Consensus-building Preparation for 2010 Implementation: – Three Tiers of Services – Data Analysis.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
January 2010IDEA Partnership1 Response to Intervention: Basics for families and community members.
“Sorting Out Response to Intervention” Nassau Association of District Curriculum Officials February 26, 2009 Presented by Arlene B. Crandall ABCD Consulting,
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI)
Response to Intervention. Background Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 Changes to align with No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Allows districts.
Problem Identification Activity Handouts (Problem Solving Process) ASPIRE North.
Response to Intervention USING RTI FOR NONACADEMIC INTERVENTIONS: PART II.
University of Rhode Island EDC 452. A process of:  Providing high-quality instruction and intervention matched to student needs and  Using learning.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
1. We can teach all children effectively 2. Intervene early 3. Use a continuum model of service delivery 4. Use a problem-solving method to make decisions.
D62 Response to Intervention
Intervention Team / Tier III Overview Harding University High School
Goose Creek CISD Special Education Districtwide Staff Development Conference February 15, 2013.
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process Jennifer Maichin Patricia Molloy Special Education Teacher Principal IST Chairperson Meadow Drive Elementary.
1 Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI) Problem-Solving Model Tier II North Carolina Department of Public Instruction
Parent Leadership Team Meeting Intro to RtI.  RtI Overview  Problem Solving Process  What papers do I fill out?  A3 documenting the story.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Pitt County Schools’ TAT/PSM Process using Ezrti Sylvia Bjorkman School Psychologist II. TAT/RTI Contact Revised September 9,2011.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result.” Albert Einstein.
Tier III Implementation. Define the Problem  In general - Identify initial concern General description of problem Prioritize and select target behavior.
PLCS & THE CONNECTION TO RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
SIT Professional Development- Defining the Consultation Model Permission to reprint granted with appropriate acknowledgement ©2009 DPS.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
What IS RtI?. National RtI Model “Response to Intervention” –Born out of Reauthorization of Special Ed Law (IDEA 2004) Two Models of RtI: –Problem-Solving.
Addressing Learning Problems in Elementary School Ellen Hampshire.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
1 Average Range Fall. 2 Average Range Winter 3 Average Range Spring.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
School-Based Problem-Solving for Individuals (SBIT)
Tier III Preparing for First Meeting. Making the Decision  When making the decision to move to Tier III, all those involve with the implementation of.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
MTSS MULTI-TIERED SYSTEMS OF SUPPORT A LOOK AT THE SYSTEMS TODAY IN CALIFORNIA GAIL LANCASTER –ASSOCIATE FACULTY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY/FRESNO CAMPUS RESOURCE.
Response to Intervention (RTI)
Teacher-Based Problem-Solving for Groups (TBIT)
Issue Analyses RtI Yvette Benton Brad Baietto Brad Scarbrough.
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Response to Intervention (RtI) What is a Teacher’s Role?
RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Struggling.
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Leaving No Child Behind: Response to Intervention
Presentation transcript:

Problem Solving Model Problem Solving Model NC DPI Summer Preparation Preparation & Implementation Implementation North Carolina

Let’s review….. Two National models of RtI –Problem-solving –Standard Protocol North Carolina’s RtI Model Problem-Solving Model (PSM) Four tiers Assessment Includes Curriculum Based Measurement (CBM) and Formative Assessment (FA) 2

What is a Problem-Solving Model ? Systematic analysis Functional assessment Data Instructional plan Plan implementation Monitoring 3

Why use a Problem Solving Model ? (PSM) ■ Ensure positive student outcomes, rather than determining failure or deviance (Deno, 1995) 4

Problem-Solving Model (PSM) Core Curriculum assessment Meet the needs of diverse learners within school districts Identify and implement best educational strategies for all learners 5

So ……… You’ve assessed your core…. Identified gaps…. Strengthened your curriculum and instruction… Differentiated instruction for all learners……….. AND students are still struggling……… What’s next ? 6

Problem-Solving Model (PSM)  Change in mind-set is necessary for all Student problems are defined Questions drive assessments Engage in instruction that addresses learning Intervention is derived from analysis of baseline data 7

Implementation of a RtI System Seven step cyclical process ■All seven occur throughout the process 8

9 7 Problem Solving (PSM) Process Step 7 Analysis of the Intervention Plan make a team decision on the effectiveness of the intervention Step 1 Define the Problem Develop a behavioral (observable) definition of problem Step 2 Develop an Assessment Plan Generate a hypothesis and assessment questions related to the problem Step 3 Analysis of the Assessment Plan Create a functional and multidimensional assessment to test the hypothesis Step 4 Generate a Goal Statement Specific Description of the changes expected in student behavior Step 5 Develop an Intervention Plan Base interventions on best practices and research-proven strategies Step 6 Implement the Intervention Plan Provide strategies, materials, and resources: include progress monitoring

10 7 Problem Solving (PSM) Process Step 1 Define the Problem Develop a behavioral (observable) definition of problem

Step 1: Define the Problem Essential step Develop a behavioral/academic definition Concrete, Observable and Measurable Stranger test ? Most difficult step ! 11

12 7 Problem Solving (PSM) Process Step 1 Define the Problem Develop a behavioral (observable) definition of problem Step 2 Develop an Assessment Plan Generate a hypothesis and assessment questions related to the problem

Step 2: Develop an Assessment Plan Generate a hypothesis –Why is the problem occurring ? –Formulate predictions of student’s behavior –Formulate assessment questions to confirm / reject hypothesis Procedure (RIOT) –Review –Interview –Observe –Test 13

14 7 Problem Solving (PSM) Process Step 1 Define the Problem Develop a behavioral (observable) definition of problem Step 2 Develop an Assessment Plan Generate a hypothesis and assessment questions related to the problem Step 3 Analysis of the Assessment Plan Create a functional and multidimensional assessment to test the hypothesis

Step 3: Analysis of the Assessment Plan Consider all that are relevant Not required to address all domains each time I Domains that impact learning –Curriculum –Instruction –Environment –Learner Procedure –Review –Interview –Observe –Test 15

16 7 Problem Solving (PSM) Process Step 1 Define the Problem Develop a behavioral (observable) definition of problem Step 2 Develop an Assessment Plan Generate a hypothesis and assessment questions related to the problem Step 3 Analysis of the Assessment Plan Create a functional and multidimensional assessment to test the hypothesis Step 4 Generate a Goal Statement Specific Description of the changes expected in student behavior

Step 4: Generate a Goal Statement Essential step Precise definition Set before plan implementation Goal statement- specific description of desired change in student behavior as a result of an intervention SMART Goal 17

Doran, George T. "There's a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management's goals and objectives." Management Review, Nov 1981, Volume 70 Issue

Three Components of a Goal Statement 19

20 7 Problem Solving (PSM) Process Step 1 Define the Problem Develop a behavioral (observable) definition of problem Step 2 Develop an Assessment Plan Generate a hypothesis and assessment questions related to the problem Step 3 Analysis of the Assessment Plan Create a functional and multidimensional assessment to test the hypothesis Step 4 Generate a Goal Statement Specific Description of the changes expected in student behavior Step 5 Develop an Intervention Plan Base interventions on best practices and research-proven strategies

Step 5: Develop an Intervention Plan Identify methods, procedures and materials that are research-based Describe plan of action Include specific goals Progress-monitoring plans included 21

22 7 Problem Solving (PSM) Process Step 1 Define the Problem Develop a behavioral (observable) definition of problem Step 2 Develop an Assessment Plan Generate a hypothesis and assessment questions related to the problem Step 3 Analysis of the Assessment Plan Create a functional and multidimensional assessment to test the hypothesis Step 4 Generate a Goal Statement Specific Description of the changes expected in student behavior Step 5 Develop an Intervention Plan Base interventions on best practices and research-proven strategies Step 6 Implement the Intervention Plan Provide strategies, materials, and resources: include progress monitoring

Step 6: Implement the Plan Multiple activities –Fidelity and integrity of intervention –Monitor the Intervention Effect on student performance Integrity of implementation –Make changes as indicated –Decisions ! 23

Progress Monitoring An act of collecting data to determine the effectiveness of an intervention. 24

Intervention Plan Continuation of hypothesis-testing step Evaluate effectiveness of plan Change as needed Reasonable plan for implementation –Clear understanding of implementation –Personnel –Skills and materials **Retention is not a research-based intervention 25

26 7 Problem Solving (PSM) Process Step 7 Analysis of the Intervention Plan make a team decision on the effectiveness of the intervention Step 1 Define the Problem Develop a behavioral (observable) definition of problem Step 2 Develop an Assessment Plan Generate a hypothesis and assessment questions related to the problem Step 3 Analysis of the Assessment Plan Create a functional and multidimensional assessment to test the hypothesis Step 4 Generate a Goal Statement Specific Description of the changes expected in student behavior Step 5 Develop an Intervention Plan Base interventions on best practices and research-proven strategies Step 6 Implement the Intervention Plan Provide strategies, materials, and resources: include progress monitoring

Step 7: Analysis of the Intervention Plan EVALUATE the DATA Progress monitoring is essential –Examine student performance –Evaluate the effectiveness of instruction 27

School-Wide system of support for student achievement should look like this: Intensive Intervention 5% Strategic Interventions 15% Core Curriculum 80%

Tier I Consultation Between Teachers-Parents Tier II Consultation With Other Resources Significance of Need(s) Amount of Resources Required to Address Need(s) Tier III Consultation with the Problem Solving Team Tier IV Consideration for EC referral The NC Problem-Solving Model Identify Area(s) of Need Develop a Plan Implement Plan Evaluate

Tier I Consultation Between Teachers-Parents Tier II Consultation With Other Resources Significance of Need(s) Amount of Resources Required to Address Need(s) Benchmark Strategic Intensive Tier III Consultation With the Problem Solving Team Tier IV Consideration For EC Referral

31

Implementation of a RtI System Tiers I-III call for implementation of PSM and CBM in the general education setting Tier IV represents referral for consideration of Special Ed –the highest level of service intensity 32

Tier I Examine the Core Parent and teacher working together to define the problem What is it? When does it occur? Why is this happening? Analyze baseline data or develop plan for collecting baseline data? 33

Tier II –Repeat steps of cyclical problem-solving model –Additional school personnel are involved as needed Parent Teacher Teaching peer, Counselor, school psychologist, reading teacher, administrator, social worker, nurse, etc. 34

Tier III Steps of cyclical problem-solving model repeat Team members may vary Problem-solving model forms are completed Collect : Baseline, goal setting, and progress monitoring data Data are provided as evidence for need of intervention 35

Tier IV Review all available data and – Continue interventions at Tier III OR – Refer for consideration of special education  If referral is made:  Define the problem  Use progress monitoring data as baseline on IEP IEP (intervention) is developed based on data 36

37 Target Student Discrepancy 1: Skill Gap (Current Performance Level) Avg Classroom Academic Performance Level ‘Dual-Discrepancy’: RTI Model of Learning Disability (Fuchs 2003) Discrepancy 2: Gap in Rate of Learning (‘Slope of Improvement’)

Send us your tired, your hungry, your poor…. Your students who aren’t performing…. Shift from placement to high quality interventions Progress of ALL students 38