Mountaintop Removal Mining Research West Virginia May 2008 Appalachian Voices.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Good Jobs, Green Jobs: Why Workers Rights to Organize are Critical to the Green Economy.
Advertisements

The Institute for Economic and Social Research University of Indonesia
Energy. oil and natural gas  supply 62% all energy consumed worldwide  how to transition to new sources?  use until mc of further use exceeds mc of.
National Rural Health Day (NOTE: INSERT YOUR SORH NAME HERE)
Policymaking for Health Care and the Environment Chapter 19.
Nonrenewable Resources
March, 2010 Public Support for Energy Reform in Colorado Survey Results.
Should drilling be allowed in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge? Carling Spelhaug November 18, 2005 Carling Spelhaug November 18, 2005.
League of Conservation Voters Key findings from survey among likely voters in 11 Senate swing states October 2013 HART RESEARCH ASSOTESCIA Voters’ Attitudes.
Appalachian Tragedy: Mountaintops & Miners. Our Oldest Mountains The Appalachian mountains are ancient They were born some 480 million years as Pangaea.
A North Carolina Green Energy Program What do you think?
SOUTHWEST ASIA (Middle East)
URBAN WATER INSTITUTE California’s Geothermal Resource Capability and Opportunity February 2014.
1. Political Map of Latin America
Economy of the Middle East
Danielle Vaguine Fariha Zaman Harrison Smith. What is Coal? Coal is a fossil fuel formed from the decomposition of organic materials that have been subjected.
Voters’ Views on the Government Shutdown and Investments in National Parks and Public Lands November 2013 – Hart Research for Center for American Progress.
OGT SESSION 1 ECONOMICS.
SOUTHERN AND EASTERN ASIA Economic Understandings.
SS7E7a,b,c.d The student will describe factors that influence economic growth and examine their presence or absence in Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Iran.
POLICY MAKING FOR HEALTH CARE, THE ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY.
Why Wind?.
Optimal Wind Power Sites in Western North Carolina Nicholas Holcomb Christina Mills Jamie Stubson Our Approach:  Imported Federal Land Ownership map (NCOne.
The Third Way: Legacies of the Clinton Administration and Prospects for the Future Tokyo December 12, 2000.
1 Economic Decisions and Systems 1-1 Satisfying Needs and Wants
Lake Research Partners * Voter/Consumer Research 1 Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease A presentation on findings from a nationwide survey of 1,500 likely.
Sustainability: Global Population – History, Changes, Areas of Crisis, Causes, and the Future
Republican Platform Preamble America needs to preserve the traditional independence and rights of the states while having an effective national.
Policymaking for Health Care and the Environment Chapter 19.
Policymaking for Health Care and the Environment Chapter 19.
CHINESE ENERGY POLICY Kohlfürst, Puchtler, Wrann JufzjodoAM4&feature=related.
AP Government Unit 4 – Healthcare & Environmental policy.
Health Care National health insurance considered at time Social Security legislation was passed o AMA strongly opposed it; so it was omitted 1945 Truman.
The U.S. and Global Economies CHAPTER 2 When you have completed your study of this chapter, you will be able to C H A P T E R C H E C K L I S T Describe.
Date: April 14, 2011 Topic: Policy Making for Health Care and the Environment. Aim: How does the government form opinions on health care and the environment?
Economic Contributions of LSOs Area of Study 1. Positive Contributions to the Economy.
Michael McKenna MWR Strategies April 2008
Policymaking for Health Care and the Environment Chapter 19.
America’s Energy Future Presented to: 2006 BIO World Congress America’s Energy Future- Role of Agricultural and Forestry Community July 14, 2006 Toronto,
Australia’s Climate Action Summit Greens NSW MP John Kaye June 2013, Glebe NSW Making NSW renewable : The next steps (politics)
Chapter 2 Economic Resources and Systems. Factors of Production  Just as individuals have to deal with a shortage of resources, so do societies  A society.
Science and the Environment Chapter 1 Section 1: Understanding Our Environment Section 2: The Environment and Society Chapter 1 Section 1: Understanding.
Domestic Policy: Health Care and the Environment.
Chapter 3 Test Review November 23, Part A: Population Growth 1.Birthrate – the average number of births each year per 1,000 population 2.Death Rate.
National survey-1,328 voters, Three focus groups-swing voters September 2007 HART RESEARCH P e t e r D ASSOTESCIA Winning The Battle Of Budget: Framing.
GEOGRAPHY 12 Environmental Project 2010 Athabasca Tar Sands In 2006 the oil sands produced million barrels per day, 62% of Alberta's total oil production,
By: Olivia Santee, Justice Redman, and Cara Baldwin.
Ch. 10:1 – Physical Geography of Northern Europe
Conducted January 3-5, 2000 N = 1,000 Registered “Likely” Voters Nationwide, and n = 250 Hispanic Voters Nationwide With A +3.1% Margin Of Error.
By: Orange Group. Democratic Democratic Served 3 terms representing the 13 th District in the Illinois senate from 1997 to 2004 Served 3 terms representing.
Ch. 10:1 – Physical Geography of Northern Europe
Counterclaims Addressing the other side and how to do it effectively.
Environmental Issues of Canada
Population Growth In 1999, the world population reach 6 billion The world’s population has grown so fast in the last 200 years due to high numbers of.
POLICYMAKING FOR HEALTH CARE AND THE ENVIRONMENT Chapter 19.
SOUTHWEST ASIA (Middle East) Economic Understandings.
Middle East Economics. Israel’s Economic System mixed economy that is technologically advanced Controlled by Israeli government and private Israeli companies.
 1. Acid Rain  2. Pollution of the Great Lakes  3. Extraction and Use of Natural Resources on the Canadian Shield  4. Timber Industry in Canada.
Policymaking for Health Care and the Environment
Bell Work Define what you think an indicator is.
BATTLEGROUND XXVII.
Rebuttals Definition:
Swing State Clean Energy Survey
Canadian Pollution Problems
Canada’s Environmental Issues
Canada’s ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
Policymaking for Health Care and the Environment
The Human and Environmental Cost of Mountaintop Removal
SS6G6 Explain the impact of environmental issues in Canada.
Copyright © 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Presentation transcript:

Mountaintop Removal Mining Research West Virginia May 2008 Appalachian Voices

Figure 1 Appalachian Voices – Mountaintop Removal Mining Research, West Virginia Key Findings WV voters oppose mountaintop removal mining and more likely to support presidential candidate who similarly opposes the method Majorities of two key audiences – Democratic primary voters and Independents – oppose mountaintop removal WV voters reject jobs vs. environment frame of mountaintop removal supporters Renewable energy seen as long-term key to energy security, economic growth, and quality of life of local communities Overwhelming support for Clean Water Protection Act – even after opponents say it will mean an end to mountaintop removal mining in WV

Figure 2 Appalachian Voices – Mountaintop Removal Mining Research, West Virginia Strong Change Dynamic “Generally speaking, do you think that things in West Virginia are going in the right direction, or do you feel things are off on the wrong track?”

Figure 3 Appalachian Voices – Mountaintop Removal Mining Research, West Virginia Bush Broadly Unpopular

Figure 4 Appalachian Voices – Mountaintop Removal Mining Research, West Virginia Support for Coal Interests Net Difference

Figure 5 Appalachian Voices – Mountaintop Removal Mining Research, West Virginia Mountaintop removal mining has a positive impact on the economy in West Virginia. Mountaintop removal mining has an unacceptable cost for West Virginia. Voters See Positive Economic Impact

Figure 6 Appalachian Voices – Mountaintop Removal Mining Research, West Virginia Protecting the environment usually requires some trade-off in terms of jobs and economic growth. We can protect the environment without sacrificing jobs or hurting our economy. But Voters Not Trapped in Jobs vs. Environment Paradigm

Figure 7 Appalachian Voices – Mountaintop Removal Mining Research, West Virginia Coal provides the best choice for meeting our country's long-term energy needs. Renewable energy like wind and solar is the best choice for meeting our country's long-term energy needs. Looking Ahead to a Post-Coal Solution

Figure 8 Appalachian Voices – Mountaintop Removal Mining Research, West Virginia Opposition to Mountaintop Removal Mining in West Virginia All Voters Net Opposition Dem Primary Voters Independents

Figure 9 Appalachian Voices – Mountaintop Removal Mining Research, West Virginia Presidential Politics in West Virginia WV voters closely following presidential race, but more than 3-in-4 say they have not heard enough about coal use and coal mining More than half of Democratic primary voters say attitudes on mountaintop removal will not significantly impact their vote for President, but… Among those focused on this issue, more than 2-in- 3 more likely to support candidate who opposes mountaintop removal mining Issue makes biggest impact among youngest voters – 34% of voters under 30 more likely to support candidate who opposes mountaintop removal, just 6 percent less likely

Figure 10 Appalachian Voices – Mountaintop Removal Mining Research, West Virginia Impact of Opposition to Mountaintop Removal on Presidential Vote All Voters Net Support Dem Primary Voters Independents

Figure 11 Appalachian Voices – Mountaintop Removal Mining Research, West Virginia Messages to Oppose Mountaintop Removal Tier 1 Much more lkly to supp Total more lkly to supp We face a clear choice when it comes to the energy future of our country. Mountaintop removal mining increases pollution and health risks, destroys the economies of local communities, and pollutes our land and water for generations to come. Renewable energy sources such as wind and solar create good-paying jobs, protect our environment, and enable local communities to make the most of their natural resources. It's time to stop selling out to the oil and coal companies and their record profits and to invest in renewable energy sources. West Virginia's natural beauty, rolling mountains, and pristine waterways are at the heart of our area's unique heritage - a tradition that has been passed down for generations. But across our region, mountaintop removal mining is threatening this heritage, destroying millions of acres of forests, burying more than a thousand miles of streams under mining waste, and leveling more than 800 square miles of mountains. We have an obligation to our children and grandchildren to preserve our unmatched natural heritage before it's too late

Figure 12 Appalachian Voices – Mountaintop Removal Mining Research, West Virginia Messages to Oppose Mountaintop Removal Tier 2 Much more lkly to supp Total more lkly to supp Clean water is vital to the health of our families and local communities. Mountaintop removal mining is destroying local waterways, with over a thousand miles of rivers and streams buried in valley fills with mining waste. Across our region, more than 40 percent of wells have been found to have concentrations of heavy metals exceeding federal standards - a number that increases to 70 percent near mountaintop removal mines. And a recent major study by West Virginia University found that residents of coal-mining communities are at an increased risk of developing chronic heart, lung, and kidney diseases and that hundreds of residents die each year because of coal-mining pollution. Mountaintop removal mining kills local economies. Because it relies mostly on dynamite rather than miners, it creates very few jobs relative to traditional mining. The damage from blasting and dust is hazardous to other businesses and has devalued homes as much as 90 percent. Surface mining accounts for only 1 percent of the jobs in West Virginia and just two and a half percent of the state's total revenues - a fraction of the jobs and revenue created by tourism. The damage to our local economy, natural resources, and health is too great for such a small economic benefit, especially when tourism and investment in renewable energy sources could provide much greater economic growth and a higher quality of life

Figure 13 Appalachian Voices – Mountaintop Removal Mining Research, West Virginia Messages to Support Mountaintop Removal Tier 1 Much more lkly to supp Total more lkly to supp Coal is the economic engine that keeps West Virginia running. Coal companies employ more than twenty thousand residents, and every coal mining job generates between five and six other jobs in the local economy. More importantly, coal jobs are quality jobs - West Virginia coal miners earn an average of more than fifty thousand dollars a year, more than twice the amount of the statewide average for all workers. Coal mining has been an integral part of our region for more than 100 years and is a vital part of our history and our economy. Those who want to protect our environment must acknowledge the central role that mountaintop removal mining plays and work with the coal companies and local communities to find solutions that work for everyone rather than seeking to outlaw activities that are central to our economy and our way of life

Figure 14 Appalachian Voices – Mountaintop Removal Mining Research, West Virginia Messages to Support Mountaintop Removal Tier 2 Much more lkly to supp Total more lkly to supp Coal companies in West Virginia have invested billions of dollars in the restoration of land and environment once the coal has been extracted. Millions of acres that underwent mountaintop removal mining have been reshaped and naturally restored to provide flat land that is more valuable and provides greater economic opportunities than the land did before mining took place. America's security demands that we free ourselves of our dependence on Middle East oil, but our energy needs are increasing. Coal is an abundant and affordable energy source, and coal from mountaintop removal mining is an important part of America's domestic energy supply. Locally produced coal provides more than 98 percent of the electricity used in West Virginia each year, and the state enjoys the eighth lowest retail electricity rates in the country. Ending mountaintop removal would threaten our energy security and mean higher electricity rates Advances in technology have made mining safer than ever for workers. Mountaintop removal mining relies on state of the art technology to access and mine coal while minimizing the hazards for workers. As a result, coal miners have more than tripled their productivity, and mining now has a lower rate of injuries and illness than the agriculture, construction, or retail trades. 2148

Figure 15 Appalachian Voices – Mountaintop Removal Mining Research, West Virginia Shift in Opposition to Mountaintop Removal Net opposition Pre-Messages vs. Post-Messages Net Shift

Figure 16 Appalachian Voices – Mountaintop Removal Mining Research, West Virginia Shift in Support for Candidate who Opposes Mountaintop Removal Net support Pre-Messages vs. Post-Messages Net Shift

Figure 17 Appalachian Voices – Mountaintop Removal Mining Research, West Virginia 87 9 Support for Clean Water Protection Act “Let me ask you about a related issue. Congress is currently considering the Clean Water Protection Act, a bill that would make it illegal to dump mining waste into rivers and streams. Do you support or oppose passage of the Clean Water Protection Act?”

Figure 18 Appalachian Voices – Mountaintop Removal Mining Research, West Virginia Even if it Means the End of Mountaintop Removal Mining “Opponents of the Clean Water Protection Act say its ban on dumping mining waste into waterways is too strict and would make it impossible for mining companies to continue to perform mountaintop removal mining. Would you support or oppose passage of the Clean Water Protection Act if it meant coal companies could no longer mine in West Virginia using mountaintop removal mining?” Conditional support