Ronda Davis Member of the NM PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member of PARCC Consortium Math Operational Working Group Math Coach at Highland High School,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Era of the Common Core Standards Network Meeting, January 11, 2012 Silicon Valley Mathematics Initiative Assessment for Learning.
Advertisements

Common Core Mathematical Practices. People who are good in math… Make sense of problems.
Selecting and Assigning Accessibility Features and Accommodated Test Forms in PearsonAccess 1 Accessibility Features and Accommodations.
In Preparation for the PARCC Summative Assessments, Spring 2015
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS (CCSS) PARENT WORKSHOP.
Advances in the PARCC Mathematics Assessment August
Maria J. Ortiz, Principal January 21, 2015 PARCC Parent Meeting.
An Introduction to PARCC Design Principles and Evidence Tables for ELA and Math June 12, 2013 Tennessee Department of Education, Division of Curriculum.
Universal Design Arkansas Department of Education January 2014.
Parent Information Spring EBR Office of Professional Development and Instruction
Classroom Assessment: Performance Based Math in Middle and High School. Understanding and Using the PARCC documents. Ted Coe, Ph.D. Grand Canyon University.
The Parent’s Guide to The Common Core and PARCC Assessment Keansburg School District February 2015.
Illinois State Board of Education A New Vision for Illinois Assessment: Problems Worth Solving Tests Worth Taking October, 2013.
Illinois State Board of Education A New Vision for Illinois Assessment: Problems Worth Solving Tests Worth Taking October, 2013.
Demystifying the Common Core State Standards Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services January 28, 2014.
Understanding PARCC Evidence Statements for Mathematics Part I
Reading the Mathematics Evidence Tables 1. Master Claim: On-Track for college and career readiness. The degree to which a student is college and career.
Aspen Institute/Urban District Leaders Network May 21, 2013 Tampa, FL PARCC: Aligning Assessment Practices.
1. Oklahoma C 3 Standards, Including Common Core 2 The Oklahoma C 3 Standards, including the Common Core, lay the foundation toward ensuring that students.
Kristy Green Debbie Wilson Joan Mattson. Higher Expectations 3 ELA/Literacy Read sufficiently complex texts independently Write effectively to sources.
Ronda Davis Member of the NM PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member of PARCC Consortium Math Operational Working Group Math Coach at Highland High School,
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers PARCC 1.
Secondary PARCC Tests Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
Sub-claim A: Students solve problems involving the major content for their grade level with connections to practices Sub-Claim B: Students solve problems.
Spring 2014 PARCC Field Test: Accessibility and Accommodations.
PARCC Assessment Math Shifts Becky Justus Math Teacher Greene County Tech Junior High PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member.
Reading the Mathematics Evidence Tables 1. Master Claim: On-Track for college and career readiness. The degree to which a student is college and career.
1 Instructional Data Division. 2 3 Outcome Outcome: Participants will be able to: understand PARCC’s historical context define PARCC’s components communicate.
PARCC WORKSHOP Preparing Students for the Call to be College and Career Ready.
Understanding the Evidence Statement Tables for the PARCC Summative Assessments in Mathematics Welcome to the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for.
PARCC: Accessibility Features & Accommodations
Illinois State Board of Education A New Vision of Assessment: Texts Worth Reading, Problems Worth Solving, Tests Worth Taking Overview Presented by:
Assessment Accommodations Andrew R Hinkle. Is There Anything I Need to Know About Testing Accommodations for Online Assessments?
1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.
Get Smarter!. OAKS Transition Calibrate Smarter Balanced to OAKS Option 1 Set achievement level on Smarter Balanced that represents equivalent rigor.
Philomath School District Board of Directors Work Session May 10, 2012.
Launching the Common Core State Standards We need to prepare our students for 21 st Century Learning in an information age with technology innovations.
Ohio’s New Learning Standards English Language Arts Math Science Social Studies Fine Arts World Language Financial Literacy Physical Education Entrepreneurship.
ECD is a deliberate and systematic approach to assessment development that will help to establish the validity of the assessments, increase the comparability.
Advances in the PARCC Mathematics Assessment August
MPs: Math Practice Standards grades 6-8 (CCSS) Welcome…
Achievethecore.org 1 Implementing Standards and Incorporating Mathematical Practices Sandra M. Alberti AMTNJ October 24, 2013.
Common Core and the Community College May 20, 2014.
Ronda Davis Member of the NM PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member of PARCC Consortium Math Operational Working Group Math Coach/Teacher at Highland High.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
PARCC Millville High School. What is PARCC?  Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers  Computer-based assessment  Based on Common.
New Mexico PARCC Tests: What do families need to know? November 2015.
Ronda Davis Member of the NM PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member of PARCC Consortium Math Operational Working Group Math Coach at Highland High School,
Welcome Principals Please sit in groups of 3 2 All students graduate college and career ready Standards set expectations on path to college and career.
Overview Dr Kwaku Adu-Gyamfi Stefanie Smith. 2  Work with your group  Who did you work with?  What did you learn about them?  Their knowledge of.
PARCC Assessments- What Do The Tasks Require Students To Do?
ASSESSMENT UPDATE Literacy Specialists September 10, 2014.
Rhode Island Department of Education Diane Girard & Colleen O’Brien.
Illinois State Board of Education A New Vision of Assessment: Texts Worth Reading, Problems Worth Solving, Tests Worth Taking Overview Presented by:
Illinois State Board of Education A New Vision for Illinois Assessment: Problems Worth Solving Tests Worth Taking November, 2013.
Ronda Davis, Member of the NM PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member of PARCC Consortium Math Operational Working Group APS Math Specialist.
Ronda Davis, Member of the NM PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member of PARCC Consortium Math Operational Working Group APS Math Specialist.
Spring 2015 Verona PARCC Results: Year One Wednesday, March 16 7:00-8:00 p.m. VHS Learning Commons.
Illinois State Board of Education A Vision for Illinois Assessment: Problems Worth Solving Tests Worth Taking.
MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT A Student Focused Community.
Understanding the Mathematics Evidence Tables Presenter: Carrie Piper Former Senior Advisor, PARCC Mathematics.
Irvington Public Schools: PARCC INFORMATION
A Vision for Illinois Assessment: Problems Worth Solving
New Teacher Orientation August 25, 2016
Analyzing PARCC Results to Inform Instruction
Understanding New Expectations for Rigor in Mathematics
Mathematics, Western Illinois University
Presentation transcript:

Ronda Davis Member of the NM PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member of PARCC Consortium Math Operational Working Group Math Coach at Highland High School, Albuquerque Public Schools PARCC Mathematics PARCC: Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Career 14 Facts Every Secondary Math Educator Should Know – Q & A 1/7/2015

I will get all my current questions about PARCC, with respect to mathematics, answered I will have the most up to date information for the math assessments Objectives

PARCC’s Core Commitments to Assessment Quality Focus (Math): where the Standards focus, more time to master concepts at a deeper level Problems Worth Doing (Math): multi-step problems, conceptual questions, applications, and substantial procedures

#1 PARCC Assessment Design Summative Assessments Performance- Based Assessment End-of-Year Assessment  After 75% of the school year  Extended tasks, applications of concepts and skills  Math: Solving multi-step problems requiring abstract reasoning, precision, perseverance and strategic use of tools  All grades and courses, Grades 3 – Algebra 2  Window: March 2 – 27, 2015  After 90% of the school year  Innovative, short-answer items  Math: Short items that address both concepts and skills  All grades and courses, Grades 3–Alg 2  Window: April 13 – May 8, 2015 All students take both components for a final PARCC score

Scheduling PARCC - Unit Times PARCC Unit Times

#2: Students Test By Content – Not Necessarily Grade Level Grades 3 – 8: Take the Test Based on their Enrolled Grade Grades 8 – 12: Take the Test Based on their Enrolled Class Algebra 1 Geometry Algebra 2 NOTE: Per NMPED, Students enrolled in Alg or Geom BELOW grade 8 will take their grade level test

Scoring Will Be Based on Student Work for Hand Scored Items (PBA) Scoring Will Be Based on Correct Work for Machine Scored Items (EOY & PBA) #3: Scoring

Both PBA & EOY will have: Samples of Scoring & Technology Enhancements  equation editor

Multiple Select: 6 th Grade Example

Hotspots: From Algebra 1

In-Line/Drop Down Menus: From Geometry

Drag-and-Drop: From 8 th Grade

Fill-In-The-Blank: From 7 th Grade

Equation Editor: From 7th Grade EOY

#4 PARCC Accessibility Policies Features for All Students Accessibility Features Identified in advance Accommodations Built into the test Available to All Students Example: magnification, highlighting, eliminate answer choices, line reader Available to All Students Must be turned on in Advance Example: answer masking, text-to-speech for mathematics, background/font color Available with IEP/504 Must be identified in Advance Example: Word to word dictionary, small group testing, extended time

PARCC Accessibility parcc.pearson.com

Accessibility Features Identified in Advance Answer Masking Background/Font Color (Color Contrast) General Masking Text-to-Speech for the Mathematics Assessments Headphone will be needed Accommodations for Special Ed Calculators & Extended Time

English Language Learners Extended Time Word-to-Word Dictionary Scribe or Speech-to-Text: Responses Dictated for Mathematics Assessment in English General Administration Directions Read Aloud and Repeated as Needed in Student’s Native Language (by test administrator) General Administration Directions Clarified in Student’s Native Language (by test administrator)

Administrative Considerations Principal’s discretion Must be documented prior to testing Do not require IEP/504 Small group testing Frequent breaks Time of day Separate or alternate location Specified area or seating Adaptive and specialized equipment or furniture

Grades 3 – 5 – No Calculators Grades 6 – 7: Four Function with Square Root & % Grade 8: Scientific Calculator Algebra 1, Geometry, Algebra 2: Graphing Calculator #5: Calculator Use PARCC Calculator Policy

scientific calculator (Grade 8) Grades Drop Down Calculators Additionally, Students will be allowed to bring their own calculators. (No qwerty or CAS) Grades 3 – 5 No Calculator Grades 6 – 7: Four Function with % and square root key

#6: Math Tools On-Line Grades 3 - 8: Rulers available as on-line tools Grade 3: ¼ inch Grades 4 – 8: 1/8 inch On-Line Grades 4 – 7: Protractors as shown to the right 8 th Grade, Geometry & Integrated Math: Not Provided as On-Line Tools, but...  Schools or Students May Provide: tracing paper, reflection tools, straight edge and compass – think Transformational Geometry Tools Math Tool Policy

#7 – Scratch Paper Test Administrators Must Provide:  Scratch paper – Blank, Lined & Graph  Scratch paper is NOT limited

Think about how to incorporate these into your instruction Will be provided as a dropdown  Hard copies may be provided by schools #8: Reference Sheets Grades Reference SheetHigh School Reference

ECD is a deliberate and systematic approach to assessment development that will help to establish the validity of the assessments, increase the comparability of year-to year results, and increase efficiencies/reduce costs. #9: Evidence-Centered Design (ECD) Claims Design begins with the inferences (claims) we want to make about students Evidence In order to support claims, we must gather evidence Tasks Tasks are designed to elicit specific evidence from students in support of claims ECD is a deliberate and systematic approach to assessment development that will help to establish the validity of the assessments, increase the comparability of year- to year results, and increase efficiencies/reduce costs.

Master Claim: On-Track for college and career readiness. The degree to which a student is college and career ready (or “on- track” to being ready) in mathematics. The student solves grade-level /course-level problems in mathematics as set forth in the Standards for Mathematical Content with connections to the Standards for Mathematical Practice. Sub-Claim A: Major Content 1 with Connections to Practices The student solves problems involving the Major Content 1 for her grade/course with connections to the SMP’s Sub-Claim B: Additional & Supporting Content 2 with Connections to Practices The student solves problems involving the Additional and Supporting Content 2 for her grade/course with connections to the SMP’s. Claims Structure: Mathematics Sub-Claim C: Highlighted Practices MP.3,6 with Connections to Content 3 (expressing mathematical reasoning) The student expresses grade/course- level appropriate mathematical reasoning by constructing viable arguments, critiquing the reasoning of others, and/or attending to precision when making mathematical statements. Sub-Claim D: Highlighted Practice MP.4 with Connections to Content (modeling/application) The student solves real-world problems with a degree of difficulty appropriate to the grade/course by applying knowledge and skills articulated in the standards for the current grade/course (or for more complex problems, knowledge and skills articulated in the standards for previous grades/courses), engaging particularly in the Modeling practice, and where helpful making sense of problems and persevering to solve them (MP. 1),reasoning abstractly and quantitatively (MP. 2), using appropriate tools strategically (MP.5), looking for and making use of structure (MP.7), and/or looking for and expressing regularity in repeated reasoning (MP.8). 12 pts (3-8), 18 pts (HS) 6 pts (Alg II/Math 3 CCR ) 12 pts (3-8), 18 pts (HS) 6 pts (Alg II/Math 3 CCR ) ~37 pts (3-8), ~42 pts (HS) ~37 pts (3-8), ~42 pts (HS) ~14 pts (3-8), ~23 pts (HS) ~14 pts (3-8), ~23 pts (HS) 14 pts (3-8), 14 pts (HS) 4 pts (Alg II/Math 3 CCR ) 14 pts (3-8), 14 pts (HS) 4 pts (Alg II/Math 3 CCR ) ~43% ~24% ~14% ~19%

Question Types & Point Values

Algebra 1

Ca Alg 1 CCSS (continued), and estimate solutions by graphing the equations. Solve simple cases by inspection. For example, 3x + 2y = 5 and 3x + 2y = 6 have no solution because 3x + 2y cannot simultaneously be 5 and 6. CCSS: Calculate and interpret the average rate of change of a function (presented symbolically or as table) over a specified interval. Estimate the rate of change from a graph EOY #10 Evidence Statements Have Useful Clarifications

#11 Securely Held Knowledge Geom

Connecting CCSS to applications, reasoning and modeling #12 C & D Claims are NOT explicitly found in the CCSSM document Geom

mathematics-test-documents PARCC Math Information Guide

Parcc.pearson.com #13 Practice Tests

#14 NMPARCC Results Will Have Meaning Beyond High School

Sign up for PARCC Updates parcconline.org Sign up for PARCC Updates parcconline.org Sign up for the PARCC Updates newsletter Updates and more information

Assessments: the Next Generation: (links to all PARCC practice items, smarter balance, & other good next gen sources)  Basic PARCC implementation Videos:   APS Assessment Information:  Resources

Q & A Do you have any questions? How can you use what you’ve learned today in your work with students and teachers?