“Singing in Tune and Staying on Message” A Musical aka Strengthening a Standards-Aligned System For a Statewide System of Support In Alaska.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Vs. Attending a Different Training as a Site Team.

Advertisements

Self-Study Tool for Alaska Schools Winter Conference January 14, 2010 Jon Paden, EED Deborah Davis, Education Northwest/Alaska Comprehensive Center.

Integration of State Planning and Reporting Functions Using Indistar® Indistar® Summit March 24-25, 2014 Office of School Improvement Virginia Department.

Common Ground One Approach, Many Adaptations Juanita Blount-Clark August, 2011.

Rubrics-Based Evaluation of a Statewide System of Support A Tool to Enhance Statewide Systems of Support.

Rubrics-Based Evaluation of a Statewide System of Support A Tool to Enhance Statewide Systems of Support.

Liaison Team - Alaska STEPP Users Communication & Support - Indistar Shepherd.

Schoolwide Planning, Part III: Strategic Action Planning

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.

Coaching Workshop.

Complete puzzle at your table  Discuss with tablemates what is noticeable about the puzzle once it is together.  Do the traits from your puzzle resemble.

CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.

The Role of Assessment in the EdD – The USC Approach.

What is Alaska STEPP ? Alaska STEPP, which stands for Steps Toward Educational Progress and Partnership, is an online, school improvement planning tool.

The Power Of Partnership: Maryland’s Historic Memorandum of Understanding on the Use of Student Learning Objectives Webinar with David Volrath,

May 17, 2010 IES Practice Guide Dropout Prevention Russell W. Rumberger University of California, Santa Barbara.

Evaluating the Outcomes of SSOS: Qualities of an Effective Evaluation Steven M. Ross, Ph.D., Johns Hopkins University.

Please be sure that your audio is working properly. Go to: Tools Audio Audio Setup Wizard Differentiation in the Statewide System of Support Distance Learning.

Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.

1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”

IOWA Department of Education Substantial Deficiency: Fall, Winter, Spring.

Guidance from the CSDE on SRBI Implementation May 14, 2010 CAPSS Assistant Superintendents’ Meeting Mary Anne Butler, Education Consultant Iris White,

The Academy of Pacesetting Districts Introducing...

Indistar-NC Structures and Support George Hancock, School Improvement Grants Coordinator, NCDPI Diane Antolak, School Transformation Coach, NCDPI.

Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.

What is Alaska STEPP Alaska STEPP, which stands for Steps Toward Educational Progress and Partnership, is an online, school improvement planning tool based.

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Hillel Academy April 10 – 13, 2011.

©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 19 Planning Transitions to Support Inclusion.

Overview – Indistar® SSOS Online Web Tool in comparison to the publication “ Evaluating the Statewide System of Support” Assessment Process Planning Process.

Evaluating the Outcomes of SSOS: Qualities of an Effective Evaluation Steven M. Ross, Ph.D., Johns Hopkins University.

REVIEW PROCESS District Capacity Determination:. Review Team Selection Teams will contain geographically balanced representation. Each review team will.

1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.

Banner County Schools Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Amy Trauernicht Stacy McDaniel Troy Lurz Maribeth Moore Kaci Kearns Dan Spatzierath.

Improvement Planning Mischele McManus Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services July 20, 2007

Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.

A Capacity Building Program of the Virginia Department of Education Division Support for Substantial School Improvement 1.

Collaboration and Coalition Building Presented by Prevention Services of ETP Inc. and DMHAS’ Prevention Unit.

Measuring and Improving Child and Family Outcomes Conference New Orleans, Sept 19-21, 2011 Using the Child Outcomes Measurement System (COMS) Self-Assessment.

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.

How the SEA Uses the Data from Indistar to Improve Implementation and Track Results  1:00-2:15.

©2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 19 Planning Transitions to Support Inclusion.

Planning Evaluation Setting the Course Source: Thompson & McClintock (1998) Demonstrating your program’s worth. Atlanta: CDC/National Center for Injury.

Lanphier High School The Future of Our SIG Efforts.

Managing Performance in the System of Support A Guide for Providing Technical Assistance to SEAs for Assessing and Improving their System of Recognition,

1 OPTN Contract Modification - Task 18 Advisory Committee on Organ Transplantation November 17, 2015 Henri Haskell, RN, MSHA, CMQ/OE Director of Member.

Planning Next Year’s Staff Development Beryl Johnson Director of Staff Development City of Sacramento ~ Sacramento START Beryl Johnson Director of Staff.

Implementing & Evaluating a School RTI Framework Shawna Moran, EII, ODE Odyssey - August 2013.

National Quality Program Standards Program. Creators of NQPS NQPS B&I NAAE AAAEUSDE NASAENFFA Council Alumni NFRBMEA PAS NYFEA ACTE.

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style 1/31/20161 If you modify this powerpoint, update the version information below. This.

School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports: New Team Training Evaluation Day 2.

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.

Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.

Institutional and Team Issues. CNI Collaborations among sectors involved in activities related to use of Internet in research and education Institutional.

Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning DeeDee Washington, Associate Superintendent of Academics Elementary.

Quality Review Updates for Presented by Mary Barton, SATIF CFN 204 Assistant Principals’ Conference September 2, 2011.

Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.

Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio

Tactics for improving evidence base. TACTICS OF ALL TACTICS FOR IMPROVING EVIDENCE BASE: YOU, ME, OUR COLLEAGUES If we understand the needs for evidence.

Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.

 A MODEL SCHOOL. The children are the of North Aiken supported by reflective and responsive teachers and staff, devoted parents, a supportive district.

Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum

Jeff McCoy, Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology

SPRING LEADERSHIP WORKING CONFERENCE

Monitoring and Evaluation using the

Monitoring LEA Implementation of SIG Interventions:

Assessing Professional Learning via Data Management Systems

Framework for an Effective Statewide System of Support

Linking Faith and Service

Strategic Plan: Heards Ferry Elementary

Presentation transcript:

“Singing in Tune and Staying on Message” A Musical aka Strengthening a Standards-Aligned System For a Statewide System of Support In Alaska

The Performance: “Alaska STEPP….Steps Toward Educational Progress and Partnership” An ORIGINAL musical based on the book: Evaluating the Statewide System of Support by The Center on Innovation and Improvement Directed, Produced, and Performed by: Alaska Department of Education and Early Development, Statewide System of Support Review by: Alaska Comprehensive Center

Designing Our Performance Our performance framework……. Statewide System of Support Evaluation Rubric Our performance genre…………. Coherent, Continuous Improvement Our performance style……………. Accountability to our consumers

Practicing for Our Performance Reading the script……….. Pacesetter Academy in Princeton, N.J. Summer 2009 “Cold” evaluation of the SSOS Evaluation Rubric Monthly Rehearsals……………… August, 2009 through May, 2010 by SSOS team Identified products, actions, outcomes and quality of such relative to the indicators within the SSOS rubric Transferred information into online version of Indistar, May 2010 Produced Comprehensive Report, June 2010 Included in Alaska Comprehensive Center management plan for ongoing monitoring, June 2010

Dress Rehearsal Fall 2010 Supporting Roles: Identified 11 other SEA department staff Costume Design: Worksheets for Indistar

Act One, Scene One 18 members and supporting members of AK EED and the SSOS team received copies of CII’s “Evaluating the Statewide System of Support” and a letter explaining the plot, setting, characters. Maestro Jon Paden, Administrator of Alaska’s SSOS, is directing the team in re-evaluating key indicators that have products, outcomes, or actions that have not been considered as evidence in current rubric scores. After new scores have been assigned, plans will be developed by the team to improve intensity, duration, and/or quality of specific indicators.

Act One, Scene Two Monitoring Implementation……… This will occur in two ways: Self-monitoring by the SSOS team (monthly) External guidance support from the Alaska Comprehensive Center (quarterly, beginning Winter 2011)

AK STEPP (the future) Future renditions for Act Two and beyond: Analyses of probable “root causes” to identify successful and unsuccessful strategies for SSOS services. Perform rigorous evaluations of selected interventions. Now becoming the longest continuously improving SSOS musical in Alaska!!!

Acknowledgements The Alaska SSOS team and Comprehensive Center Staff want to take this opportunity to express our most sincere and genuine appreciation and gratitude……. To all the CII staff for their knowledge, expertise, support, and guidance. To all our fellow Pacesetter states for their encouragement, willingness to share, and commitment and desire for each of us to succeed.