City of Alexandria, Virginia AD HOC GROUP ON A-FRAME & DIGITAL SIGNAGE June 3, 2015 7:00 PM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Persistent Title (as needed) Proposed Zoning Regulations Revisions.
Advertisements

CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION.  PURPOSE OF NUISANCE ORDINANCE:  It is the purpose of the nuisance ordinance to establish means whereby the City may remove.
Planning Commission meeting May 10,  Continue reviewing and provide direction on: 1. Hazardous Liquid Pipelines 2. KZC and KMC amendments that.
TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT (TND) ARTICLE City of Columbus
SIGN BY-LAW REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS BUILDING SERVICES/BY-LAW BUILDING SERVICES/BY-LAW.
Draft Zoning Code City Council Work Session June 21, 2007.
Altadena CSD Committee Commercial Recommendations.
City of Waynesboro Entrance Corridor Design Guidelines.
July 2007 Recommended Revisions to the Citywide Sign Ordinance Presentation to the City Planning Commission January 22, 2009.
BCC Worksession Ch.31.5 Sign Code Amendments Zoning Division January 6, 2015.
Planning & Community Development Department 245 South Los Robles Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council December 8, 2014.
Ch. 7 – Parallel Parking NY State DMV.
Sign Regulations Issues and Standards December 16, 2013 City of Duluth Unified Development Code.
PERMITTED SIGNS: COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Height Requirements: A ground sign shall not exceed thirty feet (30') in height, measured.
Criteria for LED / Video Signage in the City of Nanaimo.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING August 21, 2007.
Public Hearing January 8, Case:CDR Project:Waterford Commons Planned Development/Land Use Plan (PD/LUP) - Substantial Change Applicant:Bob.
Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester May 21, 2012.
BCC WORK SESSION OVERVIEW OF ORANGE COUNTY SIGN CODE (PART II) SEPTEMBER 24, 2013.
Amendments to Chapter 30 & 38 (Zoning Regulations) 1 st BCC PUBLIC HEARING April 22, 2008 Amendments to Chapter 30 & 38 (Zoning Regulations) 1 st BCC PUBLIC.
1 R ECOMMENDATION  Add a new subsection to the General Sign Regulations of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance (CZO) to regulate Electronic Variable Message.
Draft Zoning Code Planning Commission Work Session June 20, 2007.
Draft Zoning Code Residential Focus Neighborhood Meeting May 8, 2007.
BCC PUBLIC HEARING CH SIGN CODE ORDINANCE Zoning Division August 4, 2015.
Sign Examples  Official sign City Holiday Sign & DecorationAllowed.
JUNE 19, 2012 BCC APPEAL HEARING ON BZA #SE , April 5, 2012 APPLICANT/APPELLANT: TONY RAHBANY.
Planning & Community Development Department 277 North El Molino Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council Meeting May 5, 2014.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING Lake Avalon Rural Settlement Commercial Design Overlay District March 10, 2009 Board of County Commissioners.
Amendments to Chapter 30 & 38 (Zoning Regulations) BCC ADOPTION PUBLIC HEARING May 13, 2008 Amendments to Chapter 30 & 38 (Zoning Regulations) BCC ADOPTION.
BCC PUBLIC HEARING CH SIGN CODE ORDINANCE Zoning Division September 22, 2015.
Northwest Quadrant Draft Zoning Ordinance NWQ Draft Zoning Ordinance Planning Commission Review February 21, 2006 Phil Carlson, AICP DSU Planning Consultant.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 23, 2009.
ADOPTION PUBLIC HEARING DONATION BIN ORDINANCE Zoning Division June 24, 2014.
FIRST PUBLIC HEARING DONATION BIN ORDINANCE Zoning Division June 3, 2014.
Board of County Commissioners Lake Avalon Rural Settlement Commercial Design Overlay District February 24, 2009 Board of County Commissioners Lake Avalon.
Board of County Commissioners Second Public Hearing August 10, /10/
Design Standards in Saint Paul Proposed Design Standards Zoning Amendments December 16, 2009 Department of Safety & Inspections / Department of Planning.
Design Standards in Saint Paul Proposed Design Standards Zoning Amendments October 16, 2009 Department of Safety & Inspections / Department of Planning.
Historic Review Board Public Hearing: DR – th St. September 15, 2015.
Sign Code City of Meridian Kristy Vigil, Meridian Planning Department.
STAKEHOLDERS MEETING JKV- OAK PARK JANUARY 15, 2016 Orange City Sign Code Review 1.
September Sign Ordinance Meeting. Portable Signs Strip Malls, Downtown, Right of Way.
Planning Commission Second Unit Study Session. Tonight’s Conversation Project Background (10 minutes) Community Process (10 minutes) Council Direction—Ord.
Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts.
CITY OF TEHACHAPI DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION October 2, 2008.
Community Meeting May 22, 2013 City of Richmond Department of Planning & Development Review.
Restricted Working Document – Interim Report Chamber Sign Task Force Fayetteville City Sign Review April 4,
To provide for alcohol-free commercial uses that serve as a transition between commercial districts and one- and two-family residential areas. PURPOSE.
PLANNING COMMISSION ORDINANCE NO 558 SIGN CODE AMENDMENT MAY 4, 2016 Orange City Sign Code Review 1.
Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts.
November 17, 2011 Workshop. 3’ 7’ 8.02 (F) 1: 8.02 (F) 1: Any construction attending to, but not an integral part of the sign, and which may consist of.
The Planning & Zoning Commission and Zoning Board of Adjustment Joint Workshop May 24, 2010 May 24, :00 P.M. 6:00 P.M.
Ordinance 704-E Sign Ordinance Amendments for Readerboard Signs City Council 2nd Reading September 21, 2010.
Land Development Code Update: 3. Commercial & Multifamily Zones.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING Village Planned Development Code (Horizon West) June 2, 2009 Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING.
Community Input Meeting #4 July 8 & 9, Agenda City Staff & Project Team Why we are here Project overview Summary of previous community meetings.
City of East Palo Alto Planning Commission
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS: CLEARING UP THE CONFUSION
Animal Care Facilities
Political & Billboard Signage
Sign Amendment First of two amendments proposed to sign ordinance
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
Proposed Zoning Ordinance
Design of a Commercial Shopping Center
Title 19: Subdivision Code
By Laws/Deed restrictions OPEN HOUSE April 8, 2017
City Commission Workshop
Creating Streetscapes With Conventional Zoning
Land Use 101: What is Zoning?
Section 8: SIGNS.
Presentation transcript:

City of Alexandria, Virginia AD HOC GROUP ON A-FRAME & DIGITAL SIGNAGE June 3, :00 PM

Alexandria’s Signage Regulations  Signs are regulated by the Zoning Ordinance  First regulated in 1951  Most current regulations adopted in June 1992,  Chapter 9 titled Signs, Marquees and Awnings regulates signage

In Most Zones….  Subdivision signs  Church signs  Contractor signs  Curb (address) signs  Real estate (for sale/for rent) signs  Parking and directional signs  Yard sale signs  Warning signs  Multi-family building signs  Identification signs for specific buildings  Political signs * With restrictions Sign Types that Are Allowed*

In Commercial Zones….  Signs allowed in most zones, and…  Business signs  Temporary signs  Awning and marquee signs  Valet parking signs * With restrictions Sign Types that Are Allowed*

Size  Measurement is based on the size of the “rectangle” formed around the elements of the sign  Wall signs (and wall-mounted awnings)  One-story buildings: 1 square foot of area per linear foot of building width  Multi-story buildings: 1 square foot of sign area per linear foot of building width for wall area up to 20 feet high, plus 1 square foot of sign area per linear foot of building width for wall area above 20 feet in height  Window signs  20 percent of glazing area for each window *With Restrictions

Size  Projecting signs (including the sides of wall-mounted awnings or marquees)  Maximum projection is 4 feet  Cannot encroach within 1 foot of a curb  Minimum 8 feet of clearance under the sign above a sidewalk and 14 feet under sign above an alley  Freestanding signs  Only permitted on a lot with more than 100 Ft. of frontage  Property must provide parking  25 foot setback from a side or front lot line is required  Size limit of Sq. Ft. based on the number of businesses on site  Height limit of Ft. based on the number of businesses on site *With Restrictions

Illumination  No illuminated signs above 35 feet  A Special Use Permit CAN be issued to permit an illuminated sign above 35 feet Historic Districts  Signs require Board of Architectural Review or administrative review approval  Real estate signs, contractor signs, temporary window signs, and a single sign smaller than 1 square feet per building are all exempt from the review requirement *With Restrictions

 Billboard signs  Moving/windblown signs  Mobile signs  Motor vehicle signs  Signs violating state law  Signs which are hazardous  Remote signs  Home occupation signs  Roof signs  Signs affixed to infrastructure  Signs not facing a street, alley, or parking lot  Portable signs (with the exception of valet parking and the King Street A-Frame Sign Program)  Animated signs  Flashing signs Sign Types that are Prohibited

 Portable signs  Animated signs  Flashing signs Signs Types that are Prohibited…. Topic of Discussion

King Street A-Frame Program  Special ‘wayfinding’ signage program  Does not permit store operators to put a sign in front of their business  Guides King Street pedestrians to stores and restaurants on side streets  Limits on locations and design Specially Permitted Portable Signs

King Street A-Frame Program (Cont’d)  Established in 2011 and codified in Section (F) of Zoning Ordinance  Established based on 2009 King Street Retail Study Specially Permitted Portable Signs

 King Street Locations - One on each corner (Max. 4 per intersection)  Eligible Businesses - Restaurants and retail uses off of King Street but in the Central Business District, no banks, contractors or offices  Number of Signs - Multiple businesses use one sign, with coordination required among those businesses  Administration – City administrates program King Street A-Frame Program 12

13

Although portable signs are prohibited (except for valet parking and the King Street A-Frame Sign Program), businesses on pedestrian-oriented shopping streets are using these signs to attract customers especially along King Street and Mt. Vernon Avenue A-Frame Sign Issue

The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly….  The Good:  Helps small businesses survive  Helps customers find open stores and restaurants  Can add ‘charming’ street furniture  The Bad:  Can add clutter (along with tree wells, newspaper boxes, other street furniture, etc.)  Possible tripping hazard  Can give area a jumbled appearance A-Frame Sign Issue

The good, the bad, and the ugly…. A-Frame Sign Issue

Other city examples:  Brooklyn, NY recently lifted restrictions on A-Frames on commercial streets  Renton, WA (Seattle) permits A-Frames in front of businesses with special permit. Max size is 32”x36” and min. 4’ sidewalk clearance required.  Beaufort, SC permits A-Frames with restrictions on size and distance from building walls  Lebanon, NH Permits A-Frames with size and placement restrictions  Elizabeth City, NC permits A-Frames with a max size of 30”x54” A-Frame Sign Issue

Other City Examples  Charleston, SC does not permit A-Frames, but enforcement is minimal  Annapolis, MD does not permit A-Frames, but enforcement is minimal  Fairfax (City), VA permits A-Frames in historic district only on private property A-Frame Sign Issue

For Discussion…  Is there confusion from the city allowing side street businesses to jointly use A-Frame signs, but businesses fronting on King Street, Mt. Vernon Avenue, and other shopping streets being prohibited from using these signs?  Can A-Frame signs for individual business co-exist with other sidewalk street furniture without creating tripping hazards and clutter?  Can appropriate design restrictions enable A-Frame signs to be used in historic areas?  Would allowing businesses to place A-Frame signs in front of their businesses create a chaotic effect? A-Frame Sign Issue

Digital or electronic signage is not addressed in the current Zoning Ordinance, but signage technologies are changing, and businesses and institutions are expressing interest in using these signage types. Animated signage and signage using flashing lights are prohibited. Situations have come up with schools and theaters where digital/electronic signs were allowed if the image stays static for a set period of time A clear policy needs to be developed Digital Sign Issue 21

The City currently prohibits animated signs and signs with flashing lights  Animated signs can include ‘chasing’ lights, scrolling messages, video monitors showing movement, and/or neon signs showing an ‘activity’  Signs with flashing lights, such as strobes or chasing lights are also prohibited Digital Sign Issue 22

The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly….  The Good:  Public agencies use electronic/digital signage to convey Up-To-Date information (MetroRail, Parking Garages, Schools)  Increasing popularity with businesses  Gas stations are required by the State to post prices using digital signs, so they are permitted  ‘New version’ of changeable lettering on signs  The Bad:  Flickering lights create glare/distraction  Distracting appearance  Possible traffic hazards  Brightness Digital Sign Issue 23

The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly…. Digital Sign Issue

Other City Examples  Arlington County, VA permits electronic/digital signs by special exception  Osceola, FL permits electronic message centers with a requirement that lights remain static for minimum periods of 8 seconds.  Spokane, WA permits electronic message centers with a requirement for evening dimmers Digital Sign Issue

For Discussion…  Are there beneficial uses for electronic/digital signs in Alexandria?  Can current prohibitions of animated or flashing signs adequately inappropriate versions of these signs?  Are amendments necessary to accommodate institutional uses such as schools, MetroRail, parking garages, etc?  Are there appropriate allowances for businesses to use these signs? Digital Sign Issue