Cost-effectiveness Calculations for Water Savings Measures and Program in the IOU Energy Efficiency Portfolios: Added Considerations for “Embedded” Energy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supporting further and higher education A template for describing instances of (e)learning.
Advertisements

Estimating Key Parameters for the Retail Plug-Load Portfolio (RPP) Program: Recommended Methodological Approaches EM&V, Residential Programs, Products.
SOLVING ENERGY EFFICIENCY FINANCE IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR 100% INTEREST FREE ENERGY EFFICIENCY LOANS Interest Free Financing of Public.
Bob McConnell, EPA Region 1
California Energy Commission Retail Electric Rate Scenarios: Key Drivers and Structure 2015 Integrated Energy Policy Report California Energy Commission.
Paul A. Weghorst Executive Director of Water Policy
1 Total Resource Cost Effectiveness Test Utility Brown Bag Series by Tom Eckman, NWPCC Ken Keating, BPA October 4, 2006.
Cost Allocation: Targeting Cost Effective Partnerships May 4, 2015.
Water Energy Nexus CPUC Cost Allocation Workshop Jarred Ross, Water Energy Nexus Program Manager May 4, 2015.
Addressing Market Transformation Lag Jennifer Anziano Regional Technical Forum May 15, 2015.
R Water-Energy Nexus Workshop on Cost Allocation May 4, 2015 Cynthia Mitchell, TURN Consultant.
UK Energy Efficiency Chris Leigh Household Energy Efficiency and Fuel Poverty Climate Change Group DECC.
Cost-Effectiveness and Solar Water Heating. 2 Why is it important to discuss cost- effectiveness (C-E) of SWH? C-E is a metric by which the CPUC will.
Municipal and Industrial Conservation and Water Reuse Workgroup Elizabeth Lovsted Sr. Civil Engineer Urban Water Institute Annual Water Policy Conference.
CHEAPER AND CLEANER: Using the Clean Air Act to Sharply Reduce Carbon Pollution from Existing Power Plants, Delivering Health, Environmental and Economic.
Washington State Low Income Weatherization Program Evaluation Calendar Year 2011 DRAFT Results Prepared by: Rick Kunkle July 2013.
Knowledge to Shape Your Future Electric / Gas / Water Information collection, analysis and application EE Potential Summary Study Overview CALMAC Meeting.
Technical Considerations on the Quantifiability of Wood Smoke Health Impacts Regional Technical Forum November 18, 2014.
1 Ex Ante Review of the SBD Program Energy Division Staff and Contractors Energy Efficiency Industrial/Agricultural Programs and Portfolio Forecasting.
Knowing what you get for what you pay An introduction to cost effectiveness FETP India.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Direct Use of Natural Gas Economic Fuel Choices from the Regional Power System and Consumer’s Perspective.
California SONGS\OTC Plants Assumptions TEPPC – Data Work Group Call Tuesday, September 15, 2015.
Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California.
1 Overview of the Proposed Energy Education Study Presentation to the LIOB September 26, 2011 Sacramento, California.
California Energy Commission 2015 IEPR Self-Generation Forecast Sacramento, CA 7/07/2015 Asish Gautam Demand Analysis Office Energy Assessments Division.
Air Quality Benefits from Energy Conservation Measures Anna Garcia April 2004.
Energy Analysis Department Cost-Effectiveness Valuation Framework for Demand Response Resources: Guidelines and Suggestions Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley.
1 Modeling Needs and Considerations for Energy Efficiency Ex Ante and Ex Post Savings Estimates Workshop: Energy Modeling Tools and their Applications.
National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency Model Program Evaluation Guide Marian Brown Southern California Edison
Energy Efficiency Action Plan Kathleen Hogan Director, Climate Protection Partnerships Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency NARUC Winter Meetings.
1 Meeting California Policy Goals, Affordable Rates and Why I Volunteered for this Job? Mark Ferron California Public Utilities Commission October 4, 2011.
September 17, 2002 Van Jamison, POWAIR and Global Environment and Technology Foundation POLLUTION PREVENTION TEMPLATES WESTAR Technical Conference Snowbird,
California’s Proposed DR Cost-Effectiveness Framework January 30, 2008.
RTF Update Kevin Smit Kelly Tarp ProCost Version 3.0 Modifications A registered professional engineering corporation with offices in the Seattle,
Electric Utility Perspective on the Water-Energy Nexus Jack Sahl, Director Environment and Resource Sustainability Southern California Edison August 28,
Local and Regional Govt Programs Jeremy Battis Regulatory Analyst, Energy Division May 7, 2015 Existing Buildings Energy Efficiency Workshop California.
Overview of DSM Cost Tests June 25, Background Parties developed demand side resource performance standards for post 1994 program cost recovery.
Evaluation of Wood Smoke Quantification and Attribution RTF PAC October 17, 2014.
EGTEI – Expert Group on Techno-economic Issues Methodology for data collection Presented by Nadine Allemand EGTEI secretariat Workshop to promote ratification.
Guidelines Revisions Defining What RTF Means by “Savings” December 17,
Distribution Efficiency Initiative: Calculator Review April 29, 2008 Regional Technical Forum.
Summary of the current California Public Utilities Commission Energy Efficiency Proceeding (R ) Coordination with UC Davis Center for Water and.
Workshop #2 (Review of ESAP)
Energy Efficiency Forum State of California/Investor Owned Utility Partnership Program Date: September 27, Partnership. A Unique Opportunity.
Commercial Clothes Washer UES Measure Update Regional Technical Forum April 16, 2013.
1 Commissioner Catherine Sandoval California Public Utilities Commission August 28, 2015 Joint Agency Workshop on California’s Drought.
Experience you can trust. Californial Industrial Energy Efficiency Potential CALMAC/MAESTRO Meeting San Francisco, CA July 27, 2006 Fred Coito
Wood Smoke: Monetizing Health Benefits Regional Technical Forum August 23, 2013.
DISPATCHING DIRECT USE Achieving Greenhouse Gas Reductions & Energy Savings.
Draft Seventh Power Plan Meets RTF. Key Finding: Least Cost Resource Strategies Rely on Conservation and Demand Response to Meet Nearly All Forecast Growth.
© 2006 San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. Water Energy Nexus.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of BGE’s DSM Programs Marshall Keneipp, PE Summit Blue Consulting, LLC Prepared for: Energy Efficiency and Conservation Stakeholders.
Regional Planning Policies and Climate Change – Seminar 1 David Payne South East England Regional Assembly.
Energy Efficiency and Conservation Direct Use Program Proposal Washington Gas Light Co. For Discussion with EmPOWER Maryland Stakeholders January 27, 2012.
Understanding the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP 2010 Rev 2)
© 2005 San Diego Gas and Electric Company and Southern California Gas Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved Water Energy Nexus Calculator.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Direct Use of Natural Gas Economic Fuel Choices from the Regional Power System and Consumer’s Perspective.
LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER ENERGY EFFICIENCY POTENTIAL STUDY Demand Analysis Working Group (DAWG) September 25, 2014.
1  Energy efficiency has led to a decoupling of economic and energy growth.  In 2013, OECD energy consumption = 2000 levels, while GDP expanded by 26%.
The future of carbon emission and carbon taxation policies 10 October 2016 Jonathan Graham Head of Policy.
Agenda » General Methodology » Approaches to Key Issues
Strategic Information Systems Planning
Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Restructuring Roundtable March 24, 2017 Boston, MA
Potential and Goals Primer
Water Energy Nexus: Estimating Embedded Water energy reductions FROM An electrical BILLING review January 18, 2016.
Chris Kramer, Energy Futures Group
Regulatory History of Cost Effectiveness
2019 Potential and Goals Study Workshop
EM&V Planning and EM&V Issues
Presentation transcript:

Cost-effectiveness Calculations for Water Savings Measures and Program in the IOU Energy Efficiency Portfolios: Added Considerations for “Embedded” Energy Savings and Delivering a Program in Partnership with a Water Agency Jeff Hirsch, Paul Reeves and Lon House Energy Division Consultants March 21 st, 2013

Cost Effectiveness of Water Use Reduction Measures Which Result in Savings of Embedded Energy in Water Use A procedure was developed in A (the Water-Energy Pilot Program) and adopted in D for use to estimate TRC and PAC values for the range of measures and programs offered in the IOU pilots. Location: ftp://deeresources.com/pub/Water-Energy/ftp://deeresources.com/pub/Water-Energy/ Calculator: WaterEnergy-CEcalculator-v4B_XLS.zip Documentation: WaterEnergy-CEcalculator-v4.pdf Calculation tool was patterned around the EE calculator (to calculate TRC/PAC) with additions related to partnerships with water agencies and using water savings Uses IOU avoided costs for benefits. Allocates costs between IOU and water agency benefits. Uses water agency energy use to convert water savings to energy savings. 2

Technical versus Policy Considerations Technical Energy use to capture, convey, treat and deliver water Water use reductions from installation of measures Attribution of savings to players Costs of programs and measures Policy What perspective to utilize in cost-effectiveness calculations What energy use reductions to include in each perspective What costs and benefits to include in each perspective 3

The Current Calculation Tool What it is now IOU embedded energy and cost effectiveness calculation Details of water end use efficiency improvements Details of fresh and waste water embedded energy Scenario analysis to explore CE results from variations of the above What it is currently not Does not include forecast of changes in embedded energy over time Does not include direct energy savings (done elsewhere) End use efficiency improvements (water heating, etc.) Water system efficiency improvements (pumping, etc.) Water agency cost-effectiveness calculator (IOU/ratepayer focus) Water system avoided costs (benefits) Water system costs (program and admin) 4

Water Energy Measure Calculator Overview 5

6

Water Energy Measure Calculator Issues Currently, only IOU energy saved is considered – are there perspectives that should also be calculated using other elements of water system energy use? Currently there is limited data on water agency energy use such that often average water agency use has been utilized – is it necessary to utilize more agency/location specific data and is the very high cost of obtaining this data justified? Should the energy use for intra-marginal (last source used) or extra- marginal (next source to be used) water source be used rather than the current average energy use for existing water agency mix of sources? Should the calculation include short and long term energy uses to take both these perspectives into account? 7