Full First Action Interview (FFAI) Pilot Program Wendy Garber Tech Center Director, 2100 United States Patent & Trademark Office.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Enhanced First Action Interview (EFAI) Pilot Program
Advertisements

Speeding It Up at the USPTO
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
The Procedure for Amending the Application under § Presented by Margaret W. Stevens, Head Supervisory Legal Instruments Examiner ;
First Action Interview Pilot Program Overview. Pilot Program Objectives Promote personal interviews prior to issuance of a first Office action on the.
Accelerating Patent Prosecution Thursday, October 18, 2012.
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
Finalizing the IEP Process Consent for Initial IEP PWN following the IEP Copies to Parent IEP Amendments Revocation of Consent West Virginia Department.
UTHSC IRB Donna Hollaway, RN, CCRC 11/30/2011 Authority to Audit 45 CFR (e) An IRB shall conduct continuing review of research covered by this.
Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Meeting October 8, 2002 William F. Smith Administrative Patent Judge Board of Patent Appeals.
1 1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association USPTO Updates Including Glossary Pilot Program Chris Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. IP Practice.
September 14, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
Enhanced First Action Interview (EFAI) Pilot Program Wendy Garber Tech Center Director, 2100 United States Patent & Trademark Office.
Community Patent Robert Clarke – Deputy Director Office of Patent Legal Administration
TC1600 Appeals Practice Jean Witz, Appeals Specialist.
Determination of Obviousness Practice Under the Genus-Species Guidelines and In re Ochiai; In re Brouwer Sreeni Padmanabhan & James Wilson Supervisory.
Green Technology Petition Pilot Robert W. Bahr. 2 Green Tech: Discussion Points 1. Authority and Overview: resources / overview 2.Petition Requirement:
by Eugene Li Summary of Part 3 – Chapters 8, 9, and 10
The Quote Request Model Joanne Woytek. 2 Conference ‘11 Why Use the Quote Request Tool  Only recommended method for: Determining what is available on.
Office of Business Development Training
Appeal Practice Refresher Office of Patent Training.
1 Patent Term Extension under 35 U.S.C. § 156 Mary C. Till Legal Advisor Office of Patent Legal Administration.
July 18, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818/P.L ) Topic: Patent Fees Office of Patent Legal.
Complex Work Unit Pilot Program Lisa J. Hobbs, Ph.D. Project Manager Search and Information Resources Administration Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical.
Ashok K. Mannava Mannava & Kang, P.C. Expedited Examination Programs from the PTO February 12, 2012.
December 8, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818)(upon enactment) and 35 U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by.
2 23,503 hours in FY 2013, compared with 21,273 hours in FY ,651 interview hours in FY 13 have been charged through the AFCP program. Interview.
1 AIPLA Biotech Committee Meeting Washington D.C., October 14, 2004 Anthony Caputa, Ph.D. Technology Center Practice Specialist TC 1600.
Accelerated Examination Program Andrew Faile Director, TC 2600.
1 1 Interview Practice Within the USPTO. 2 2 Topics Effective Interviews Reaching Agreement Requesting Interviews Issues Discussed Documenting Interviews.
FHSAA Eligibility and Compliance Allegations And Investigations Florida High School Athletic Association.
 If the Servicer evaluates the Borrower and determines that the Borrower is eligible for a HAFA Short Sale  The Servicer must comply with the following.
Program Compliance Review Overview IFTA Annual Business Meeting Las Vegas, Nevada July 21-22, 2006 Presented by Dick Beckner Debora Meise Jay Starling.
1 LAW DIVISION PATENT DIVISION TRADEMARK & DESIGN DIVISION ACCOUNTING & AUDITING DIVISION YUASA AND HARA LAW, PATENT, TRADEMARK & DESIGN and ACCOUNTING.
1 Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership June 1, 2010 Valencia Martin-Wallace – Director, Technology Center 2400.
1 EXPEDITED EXAMINATION Bennett Celsa TC1600 Quality Assurance Specialist.
To Restrict or Not To Restrict That Is The Question? Divided We Stand! Or Undivided We Stand!! By Joseph K. McKane SPE, Art Unit 1626.
1 EXPEDITED EXAMINATION. 2 Expedited Examination: Index MPEP § Petition To Make Special (1) Applicant ’s Age or Health (2) Patent Prosecution Highway.
Election of Species Joseph K. McKane SPE, Art Unit 1626 April 27, 2004.
BEIJING BRUSSELS CHICAGO DALLAS FRANKFURT GENEVA HONG KONG LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO SHANGHAI SINGAPORE SYDNEY TOKYO WASHINGTON, D.C. Patent.
1 Rules of Practice Before the BPAI in Ex Parte Appeals 73 Fed. Reg (June 10, 2008) Effective December 10, Fed. Reg (June 10, 2008)
After Final Practice Linda M. Saltiel June 2, 2015.
Claims and Continuations Final Rule Overview Briefing for Examiners 1.
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
Improving Eligibility Documents November, Improving Data Collection The State Office of AIDS (OA) is now working with providers to improve the quality.
QualityDefinition.PPACMeeting AdlerDraft 1 1 Improving the Quality of Patents Marc Adler PPAC meeting June 18, 2009.
FY09 Restriction Petition Update; Comparison of US and National Stage Restriction Practice Julie Burke TC1600 Quality Assurance Specialist
VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION Compliance Surveys October 6, 2015.
Chris Fildes FILDES & OUTLAND, P.C. IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting AIPLA Annual Meeting, October 20, 2015 USPTO PILOT PROGRAMS 1 © AIPLA 2015.
James Toupin – General Counsel February 1, Summary of Proposed Rule Changes to Continuations, Double Patenting, and Claims.
Claims Proposed Rulemaking Main Purposes É Applicant Assistance to Improve Focus of Examination n Narrow scope of initial examination so the examiner is.
Andrew B. Freistein Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P. Learning the ABC’s of Patent Term Adjustment 1 © AIPLA 2015.
First Action Interview Pilot Program Legal Secretaries & Administrators Conference June 18, 2009.
1. Video Conference Interviews 2 Sean Hagan Director of the Midwest Regional United States Patent and Trademark Office Webinar for Knobbe Martens January.
Sudhanshu C. Pathak Resource Supervisor Denver Satellite Office USPTO United States Patent and Trademark Office Examiner Interview Practice NAPP Annual.
Accelerated Patent Examination: Green Technology A Summary of Global Initiatives, with specific discussion of the US Speaker: Matt Prater Preparation help.
1 FY08 Restriction Petition Update and Burden Julie Burke Quality Assurance Specialist Technology Center 1600.
Prosecution Luncheon Patent July 2016
Training Objectives Upon conclusion of this training, you will know the following: Why compliance surveys are conducted When compliance surveys are conducted.
Prosecution Luncheon Patent August 2016
Pre-Issuance (Third-Party) Submissions
Claims and Continuations Final Rule
ENROLLEE DUE PROCESS for Medicaid Managed CARE 42 CFR § 438 et seq.
PATENT LAW TREATY Gena Jones Senior Legal Advisor
Biotech/Chem/Pharm Customer Partnership Meeting, March 15, 2005
DRAFT - FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
First Action Interview Pilot Program
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Full First Action Interview (FFAI) Pilot Program Wendy Garber Tech Center Director, 2100 United States Patent & Trademark Office

April 26, Pilot Program Objectives Promote personal interviews prior to issuance of a first Office action on the merits Advance examination of applications once taken up in turn Facilitate resolution of issues for timely disposition of an application Give applicants more options in regards to the amount of notice and procedure needed

April 26, Topics Application Eligibility Criteria Application Requirements Evaluation of Request Pre-Interview Procedures The Interview Post Interview Procedures Review First Action Interview Changes Data from Previous versions of Pilot Program

April 26, Application Eligibility Any utility application

April 26, Application Requirements Must be a non-reissue, non-provisional utility application under 35 USC 111(a) or national stage application under 35 USC 371 Must contain three or fewer independent claims and twenty or fewer total claims Must not contain any multiple dependent claims Must claim only a single invention Must not have a first Office action on the merits as of the date Applicant requests participation in program

April 26, Evaluation of Request Is there a Notice of Non-compliance? –Yes, then determine if Applicant has timely cured the request (either 30 days from notice or a new request before examination) –If Applicant does not timely cure then examination in accordance with standard practices and procedures will result Verify propriety of the Request –No FAOM –No more that 3 independent and 20 total claims –No multiple dependent claims If request is not proper then forward application to the appropriate TSS team leader for generation of a notice of non- compliance

April 26, Pre-Interview Procedures Examiner will: Follow current restriction policy and practice Conduct a prior art search Follow current policy and practice if a determination of allowability is made Issue a Pre-interview Communication (PTOL-413FP) setting a one month (30 day) time period to request or decline an interview The time period to respond to the Pre-interview Communication maybe extended for one additional month (30 days).

April 26, Applicant will: Follow current restriction policy and practice –Except that applicant must elect without traverse to stay in the program Timely respond to the Pre-Interview Communication –A single one month (30 days) extension is available –A failure to timely respond is treated as a request not to have the interview Properly respond to the Pre-Interview Communication by filing one of the following: –Request not to have the interview; –“Applicant Initiated Interview Request” form (PTOL-413A) along with a proposed amendment and/or arguments via EFS-Web, and conduct the interview within 60 days from the filing of the Applicant Initiated Interview Request; or –Request not to have the interview AND submit a reply in accordance with 37 CFR Pre-Interview Procedures

April 26, The Interview Conducted in accordance with current policy and practice (See MPEP 713): –Assisting the examiner in obtaining a better understanding of the claimed invention –Establishing the relevant state of the art –Discussing all relevant prior art teachings –Focusing on what claimed features establish patentability over the prior art –Discussing proposed amendments or remarks –Applicant may request waiver of the First Action Interview-Office Action and enter a proposed amendment that complies with 37 CFR 1.111

April 26, Interview Produces Agreement on Allowability Examiner will: Document the substance of the interview and reasons for allowance on interview summary (PTOL- 413) Note and attach all relevant amendments and/or arguments Generate a notice of allowability (PTOL-37), if applicant requests an unofficial courtesy copy. Attach a copy of a completed copy of the Applicant Initiated Interview Request form Make all documents and forms of record Perform an updated search and interference review before issuing an official notice of allowability

April 26, Interview does not Produce Agreement on Allowability Examiner will: Document all requirements, objections and rejections in a First Action Interview Office Action (PTOL- 413FA) Complete an interview summary (PTOL-413) Note and attach all relevant amendments and/or arguments Attach a copy of a completed copy of the Applicant Initiated Interview Request form Make all documents and forms of record Upon request provide unofficial courtesy copies Upon request for waiver of the First Action Interview Office Action enter a proposed amendment that complies with 37 CFR 1.111

April 26, Post Interview Procedures Applicants must timely respond to all outstanding issues in accordance with current policies and practice Applicants must make the substance of the interview of record when filing a timely response Examiners must proceed in accordance with current examination procedures and also insure the substance of the interview made of record by applicants is accurate

April 26, Key Change in FFAI Pilot All utility applications are now eligible

April 26, Flowchart of EFAI Procedure

April 26, Results FAI Pilot Results as of April 21, 2011 Total OverallOriginalEnhanced Applicants have joined the pilot program Pre-interview Communications (PFA OA) have been mailed Pre-interview Communication (MPICO) have been mailed Interviews have been conducted First Action Interview Office Actions have been mailed Final Rejection mailed with No FAI Office Action Allowances Allowed after pre-interview communication but before FAI office action Allowed after the FAI office action Allowed without/before pre-interview communication 33.5%25.2%41.4%First Action Allowance rate

April 26, Contact Information Pilot Program Points of Contact: –For EFS-Web questions contact the EBC at –For Notice/Legal questions contact Joseph Weiss OPLA or

April 26, Contact Information (cont.) –For Program questions contact : Tech Center 1600 – Johann Richter or Tech Center 1700 – Patrick Ryan or Tech Center 2100 – James Trujillo or Tech Center 2400 – John Follansbee or (cont on next slide)

April 26, Contact Information (cont.) Tech Center 2600 – Nick Corsaro or Tech Center 2800 – Darren Schuberg or Tech Center 3600 – Vic Batson or Tech Center 3700 – Linda Dvorak – or

April 26, Thank You Questions?