EIA PROCESS in LARGE Hydro Power Projects Critical environmental and social issues Key weaknesses and public concerns.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EURADWASTE 29 March 2004 LOCAL COMMUNITIES IN NUCLEAR WASTE MANAGEMENT THE COWAM EUROPEAN PROJECT EURADWASTE, 29 March 2004.
Advertisements

Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Implementation of waste management plans in Serbia 2013 workshop on Waste Policy Implementation May 2013 Copenhagen.
CONSULTATION AND THE SAFEGUARD POLICIES ECA Safeguard Training for PIUs, May 17, 2011.
Module 4 Planning SP. What’s in Module 4  Opportunities for SP  Different SP models  Communication plan  Monitoring and evaluating  Working session.
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE. 2 Implemented in 12 countries of Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, through IUCN regional.
Environmental Review: NEPA, TEPA and Tribes. NEPA – good and bad for Tribes Tribes can use as tool to slow, examine, participate in process and urge changes.
Outline What is the precautionary principle? Precautionary principle in the context of DSM Obligation to apply the precautionary approach Precautionary.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
Key Stakeholders In Humanitarian Assistance Humanitarian Assistance refers the assistance given to a group of people during/affected by calamity or disaster.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Hydropower Projects The story of the high costs, under performance, violations and inequity South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers & People.
USAID Africa Bureau EIA Procedures for Sub-Projects
1 Procedural Issues: Adoption, Amendment, Enforcement, and Appeals.
Session 2.3: IASC OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES ON THE PROTECTION OF PERSONS IN SITUATIONS OF NATURAL DISASTERS Human Rights and Protection in Natural Disasters.
Review of EIA Quality A formal step in the EIA process Purpose is to establish if the information in the EIA report is sufficient for decision –making.
1 CEER How to balance the public’s concerns and critical infrastructure construction Matti Vainio, Deputy HoU DG ENV – C.5, European Commission.
Engaging with Planning Agents Reform of the Planning System 30 April 2015.
1 Decision Analysis by Dr. AA. 2 Man decides based on what he believes… Man believes what he want to believe…
Dams and Development Prof. Hem Raj Subedee, Ph.D. Conflict, Peace and Development Studies Tribhuvan University Kathmandu
Disclosure and Public Consultation Transparency and Participation in the Application of Safeguard Policies Johnson Appavoo Operations Analyst WB Safeguards.
Disclosure and Public Consultation Transparency and Participation in the Application of Safeguard Policies.
Demystifying the Process: Influencing Social and Economic Decision Making In Oil and Gas Development Pandora Snethkamp, Ph.D Houston, TX 77006
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING
Introduction A GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE WCD FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS & APPLICATION Alex Muhweezi & Chihenyo Mvoyi IUCN Uganda Country Office.
Shelter Training 08b – Belgium, 16 th –18 th November, 2008 based on content developed by p This session describes the benefits of developing a strategic.
City of Tshwane GDS August Reputation promise/mission The Auditor-General of South Africa has a constitutional mandate and, as the Supreme.
1 Support needs of guardians and attorneys in Scotland Jan Killeen, Public Policy Director, Alzheimer Scotland.
Planning appeals Peter Ford Head of Development Management Planning Committee Training – 30 th July 2015.
Procedural Safeguards. Purpose Guarantee parents both an opportunity for meaningful input into all decisions affecting their child’s education and the.
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
Environmental Justice & Air Permitting Training - August 15, 2012 EPA Region IV – Atlanta, Georgia.
1 Public Involvement, Access, and Petitions DJ Law EPA Region 8.
EDAD 520 Legal and Ethical Foundations of Educational Leadership.
Indicators to Measure Progress and Performance IWRM Training Course for the Mekong July 20-31, 2009.
Tier 1 Module 4 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Element 3: Public Participation.
Infrastructure Development Bill [B ] Submission by the Centre for Environmental Rights to Portfolio Committee on Economic Development 14 January.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES Public Involvement EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Environment and Disaster Planning Hari Srinivas, GDRC Rajib Shaw, Kyoto University Contents of the presentation: -What is the problem? -Precautionary Principles.
Participatory Development. Participatory Development-PD Participatory Development seeks to engage local populations in development projects or programs.
1 Integrating Biodiversity Conservation Into Impact Assessment: The Experience of Uganda BERINA UWIMBABAZI.
Rulemaking by APHIS. What is a rule and when must APHIS conduct rulemaking? Under U.S. law, a rule is any requirement of general applicability and future.
LEGAL EMPOWERMENT and ACCESS to JUSTICE as INSTRUMENTS for GOOD LAND GOVERNANCE Christopher Tanner Marianna Bicchieri Margret Vidar.
Disclosure and Public Consultation Transparency and Participation in the Application of Safeguard Policies Presenter: Johnson Appavoo Presentation prepared.
Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool Agnes von Maravic Children’s Rights Division Council of Europe Based on slides prepared by Gerison.
Lecturer: Lina Vladimirovna Zhornyak, associated professor.
Incorporating Road Safety Audit into Development Control Kevin Nicholson Principal Consultant.
Module Land Acquisition and Resettlement Best Practices and Safeguards. Overall Safeguards presentation Jayantha Perera, PhD 1.
Response to an Emergency Training for 211 Staff in Ontario Updated September
Communities, Protected Areas and Prior Informed Consent Anne M. Perrault Center for International Environmental Law.
ISO Session 3 Environmental Management and Ethics in Management.
Environmental Safeguards
EIA approval process, Management plan and Monitoring
Tender Evaluation and Award Process
Stakeholder consultations
STRESS TESTS and TAIWAN PEER REVIEW PROCESS
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TOOLS
Indian Policies and Procedures (IPPs) OASIS December 7, 2017
Relationship between World Bank and Romanian EA requirements
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
EIA- Concept and Practice
H Horse Care H2.7b Improve Practices
Session Law Water Quality Permitting for Composters
UNUSUAL INCIDENT REPORTS AND MAJOR UNUSUAL INCIDENTS
The EU Model of PIC Raymond Hill Team Leader, PIC Task Force
Presentation transcript:

EIA PROCESS in LARGE Hydro Power Projects Critical environmental and social issues Key weaknesses and public concerns

Underlying Principles EIA process should be considered a part of the decision making process and not one box to be ticked, as is the case currently Currently, the public hearing process provides the only opportunity for the local community and others to have some role in the whole project cycle. This is not a desirable situation. The only document the enables informed participation by the local community and the others is EIA-EMP, but that is not available in the language they can understand.

Dishonest EIA-EMP-1 Most EIAs fall in this category, unfortunately. Some of the EIA agencies involved in such EIAs include: NEERI, ERM, E&Y, TERI, WAPCOS, North Bengal University, TBGRI, NCAER, ADB. There is no process of punishing an agency for doing a dishonest EIA-EMP. oBias for the project/ project developers oWrong claims (KWP to operate as peaking station) oDevelopment = Dams (e.g. NEERI for KWP) oExaggerate the Power Demand and certify that the project if green, clean, renewable, etc.

Dishonest EIA-EMP-2 oLift paragraphs and sentences from other documents without citing sources. [in some cases whole EIAs are plagiarised.] oContradictory information oInconsistent information and analysis oPoor knowledge of the project area: (ADP EIA says Kol dam is in Beas basin) oUse outdated figures when latest figures are available. oReferences for facts and figures in the EIA not given, so you cannot cross check them.

Incomplete EIA-EMP oImpact study across the year not done. oIncomplete surveys: Non assessment of impacts due to a number of project components like roads, colonies, transmission lines, etc. oUnsubstantiated statements like: “no endangered or rare species”, “no common property resources affected” oImpact with respect to land slides, flash floods, peak precipitation, not assessed. oArbitrary demarcation of EIA study area (e.g. KWP EIA says 5 km on both sides of the river)

Key Problems with EIA-EMP-1 Even if the EIA-EMP is done in all sincerity, (a rare occurrence), there are fundamental flaws in the documents. Little role for the local communities and others in preparation of EIA-EMP. Options assessment is completing missing. It is now there, but only in the name sake. One reason is that there is little role for options assessment in our entire planning and decision making cycle. Compliance is another important that is totally missing. We are possibly too used to making promising, without any intentions of keeping them. But this is too serious a issue to be neglected.

Key Problems with EIA-EMP-2 Downstream impacts & ensure minimum flows Safe dumping of muck Disaster Management Plans Examine track record and ensure addressing outstanding issues, river basin wide or state wide, particularly with respect to the developer in question. Cumulative Impact Assessment is completely missing Carrying capacity studies: not well understood Impact of Climate change There is no lifecycle approach in the EIA. What would be the situation when the project has completed its useful life should also be part of EIA.

Social issues in EIA-EMP-1 The first principle of National R&R Policy (highly inadequate though it is, Feb ’04): “To minimize displacement and to identify non-displacing or least- displacing alternatives.” No EIA_EMP even attempts to show that they have tried to achieve this. No R&R plan with full land availability, housing sites No role for affected people in deciding R&R package or plan or locations. Impact of blasting on:  houses: is it due to project or not?  drinking water sources: is it due to project or not?  Landslides and impacts thereof on people

Social issues in EIA-EMP-2 oImpact on Agriculture due to dust and air pollution: is it due to project or not? oSchedule Areas provisions not including in the EIA or in the decision making process oCultural issues totally neglected oGender issues totally neglected oBig influx of outsiders leads to many problems.

Key problems with PH process-1 Its not sufficient to give notices in newspapers: We have repeatedly found that people do not know about the public hearing till we go and tell them about it. A notice to each panchayat at least a month in advance should be must. The EIA reports are not available at designated places. When available, the officials do not know about the reports and what to do with them. They won’t allow you to take it for photo copy, unless you are ready to bribe them. Its not available in the language that people can read or understand.

Key problems with PH process-2 In most cases local people do not know what is this whole process, its significance, the role of various players, their rights and responsibilities. The Public hearing panel also does not know what is their role, nor had they got a copy of EIA-EMP or a chance to go through the same. The report of the public hearing is also most of the time written without their knowledge and sent off without their consent. The presence of big govt officials (even a DM or SDM or tehsildar or MLA is a big man for the local people) is not conducive for the PH. The project authorities or the EIA consultants should not be allowed have much say at the PH, except responding to the issues raised by people.

Key problems with PH process-3 Many of the issues raised by the people at the PH remains unanswered. People do not know what happens to the issues raised by them, nor do they know if the issues raised are reflected in the PH report that goes to MEF, as this report is not in public domain. The project authorities assume that people do not understand EIAs, so they see PH process as advt for the R&R measures and benefits of the project to the local people. If the unanimous or majority view is that the EIA is fundamentally in adequate or the project as it stands is not acceptable, would that affect the decision about the project? Would the EIA redone and then PH conducted again?

Key problems with Post PH process Nobody (outside govt) knows if and how the PH is reflected in the PH report or the EC deliberations or Env clearance decision or env clearance conditions. People do not know what happens to the EMP, to what extent it is implemented or not and what happens when it is not implemented. When people face problems due to the project during project implementation or operation, they have no forum that they can go to. People do not know what happens if the conditions of env clearance are implemented or not, or what happens when they are not adhered to.

What would help-1 EIA-EMP be made available in local language, a copy to each of the gram panchayat, to be made available in the panchayat office for public consultation A process of explaining the contents of the EIA-EMP and the Public hearing and clearance process & the role of various stakeholders there in should be taken up before the public hearing. The public hearing should be conducted by an independent panel that would have the confidence of all concerned. No govt high officials or political heavy weights should be present at the public hearing. The PH panel should give a report (which should be immediately be in public domain) giving their view about the issues raised at the PH and how far the response from the project authorities addressed the issues raised and what needs to be done to address unaddressed issues. The panel report should be binding for all.

Is that Feasible? YES Some elements of these have been implemented in Allain Duhangan HEP in HP Fewer in case of Karcham Wagtoo HEP in HP. DID IT HELP? It did help to some extent. It would have helped much more if all the elements were implemented honestly. HOW WAS IT POSSIBLE? The usual way…..

What would help-2 State level Monitoring & clearance process where the state committee (with at least 50% non govt members) looks at the EIA & the PH report and makes recommendations before the project goes for central clearance. The recommendations of the state should be included in the central clearance letter. The date when the Expert Committee (EC) of MEF examines the project should be declared in advance so that if any one wants to make any representation before the EC, can do it. EC, in its recommendation for the project must say if the EIA is adequate, if EMP is adequate, if the PH has been properly held and so on. The report must refer to the representations it received and how the issues therein have been addressed.

What would help Ensure Compliance A standing project level committee to monitor and ensure implementation of EMP The committee must have at least half the members from local areas or those selected by local communities The committee must have power to inspect all project related documents and project sites The committee should have power to order stoppage of work when the EMP is not being implemented pari passu with the project The standing committee would continue to function during project operation to ensure compliance with the EMP during operation.

Why this is in the interest of the projects Full, proper and participatory appraisals would help identify problems at the outset. It could also help identify unviable projects and same can be rejected at the outset. It could help get crucial inputs from the local people. For example had there been proper appraisal of Nathpa Jhakri project, they would have known the kind and quantum of silt to expect in the river, kind of flash floods that visit Sutlej. If there were proper dumping of muck by the upstream projects like Baspa, Karshong and KWP now, NJP would face less silt problem. Had there been full CAT for Baspa and NJP before commissioning of the project, there could be less silt problem at NJP, less losses. Remember that NJP is a World Bank funded project.

WCD Recommendations Demonstrable Public acceptable of key decisions is essential for equitable and sustainable development. Acceptance emerges from recognising rights, addressing risks and safeguarding entitlements of all groups of affected people, particularly the vulnerable groups: Adivasis, Women, dalits. Informed Participation Free, Prior, Informed consent of tribals where they are affected. Comprehensive Options Assessment, Addressing outstanding issues, Ensuring Complaince

I know we are heading in the other direction The Ministry is changing EIA notification The DM now may decide if appropriate situation does not prevail for public hearing NGOs, others not belonging to local area may not be allowed to participate in the PH There are other retrograde elements in the new notification The business and the World Bank are surely driving this process So much for the democracy….

What we can ensure Local people know the EIA and PH process and their role therein, well in advance of the PH The EIA-EMP and project summary are available as required under the law When not available, people write to the authorities, demanding rescheduling of the PH People get to understand the contents of the EIA-EMP and their inadequacies People participate in the PH in large number to raise necessary issues Invite credible media persons at the PH Video record the PH and write to the concerned about the violations therein Challenge the clearance in the NEAA and courts when it is given in spite of violations People should continue to monitor the project…

Thank you South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers & People September 2006