I. Adlakha 1, K.N. Solanki 1, M.A. Tschopp 2 1 School for Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy Arizona State University www.multiphysics.lab.asu.edu.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FRACTURE Brittle Fracture Ductile to Brittle transition
Advertisements

LECTURER5 Fracture Brittle Fracture Ductile Fracture Fatigue Fracture
3 – Fracture of Materials
Crack Nucleation and Propagation
CREEP FAILURE.
High Temperature Deformation of Crystalline Materials Dr. Richard Chung Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering San Jose State University.
This presentation relies on: 1) 2)
An Experimental Study and Fatigue Damage Model for Fretting Fatigue
MSM Lab . ( Graduate Student )
Deformation & Strengthening Mechanisms of Materials
NOTCH EFFECTS INTRODUCTION OF A NOTCH AFFECTS THE FRACTURE PROCESS Eg: INCREASES THE DUCTILE-BRITTLE TRANSITION TEMPERATURE OF STEEL NOTCH CREATES A LOCAL.
DIFFUSIONLESS TRANSFORMATIONS
CHE 333 Class 14 Plastic Deformation of Metals and Recrystallization.
Basic Mechanisms of Fracture in Metals
Atomistic Mechanisms for Atomistic Mechanisms for Grain Boundary Migration Grain Boundary Migration  Overview of Atomistic Simulations of Grain Boundary.
Princeton University Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Stress-Driven Grain Boundary Migration Effect of Boundary Inclination on Mobility.
MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION OF STRESS INDUCED GRAIN BOUNDARY MIGRATION IN NICKEL Hao Zhang, Mikhail I. Mendelev, David J. Srolovitz Department of Mechanical.
Dislocations and Strengthening
Princeton University Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering The Effect of Inclination on Grain Boundary Mobility Hao Zhang; Mikhail I. Mendelev;
Stress Driven Migration of Flat Grain Boundaries Hao Zhang, Mikhail I. Mendelev and David J. Srolovitz Princeton University.
Atomistic Mechanism for Grain Boundary Migration: Molecular Dynamics Studies Hao Zhang a, David J. Srolovitz a, Jack F. Douglas b, and James A. Warren.
November 14, 2013 Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) Sina Mobasher Moghaddam Ph.D. Research Assistant Effect of Mean Stress on Rolling.
CHARLES UNIVERSITY PRAGUE Department of Physics of Materials In-situ neutron diffraction and acoustic emission investigation of twinning activity in cast.
Lecture # 6 Failure Intended learning Outcomes: 1.Describe the mechanism of crack propagation for both ductile and brittle modes of fracture. 2. Explain.
Early structural concepts  Some of the structures in earlier have endured for ages.  Materials used were brittle type like bricks, stones, mortar: poor.
November 14, 2013 Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) Arnab Ghosh Ph.D. Research Assistant Analytical Modeling of Surface and Subsurface.
Metamorphic Fabric Chapter 13A. Solid-state Crystal Growth Nucleation –Crystallization of new phases Crystal growth –Modification of existing grain boundaries.
Manufacturing, Engineering & Technology, Fifth Edition, by Serope Kalpakjian and Steven R. Schmid. ISBN © 2006 Pearson Education, Inc.,
Andrew Wasylyk UNTF 2011 Andrew Wasylyk UNTF 2011.
1 Strength and Ductility. 2 Determining Tensile Strength from the stress-strain curve is easy. Just locate the highest point on the curve. TS = 82 ksi.
Fatigue Fatigue is the lowering of strength or the failure of a material due to repetitive stress, which may be above or below the yield strength. Many.
AMML Effect of rise, peak and fall characteristics of CZM in predicting fracture processes.
Fracture Mechanic Dr.Behzad Heidar shenas. Course Outline -An overview on the materials characteristics: 1.Types of crystal structures 2. Defects 3.Stress-Strain.
5/6/2002, Monday Summary: What we learned from this course?
Inelastic Deformation in Shock Loaded PETN Reilly Eason and Thomas D. Sewell Department of Chemistry University of Missouri-Columbia Funded by Defense.
Mechanical Behavior, Testing and Manufacturing Properties of Materials
Week 4 Fracture, Toughness, Fatigue, and Creep
Introduction to Materials Science, Chapter 7, Dislocations and strengthening mechanisms University of Virginia, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering.
Registered Electrical & Mechanical Engineer
STRUCTURAL IMPERFECTIONS (DEFECTS) IN CRYSTALLINE SOLIDS
Twinning Studies via Experiments and Theory Huseyin Sehitoglu, University of Illinois, DMR The intellectual focus in this work is threefold. The.
Lecture 22: The mechanism of plastic deformation, part 2
Lecture 20: The mechanism of plastic deformation PHYS 430/603 material Laszlo Takacs UMBC Department of Physics.
Length-scale Dependent Dislocation Nucleation during Nanoindentation on Nanosized Gold Islands Alex Gonzalez Department of Mechanical Engineering University.
Namas Chandra and Sirish Namilae
Non-Metallic Fracture Non Metallic Fractures Ceramic Plastics or Polymers Ceramic Fracture Brittle and with very less toughness This.
Week 4 Fracture, Toughness, Fatigue, and Creep
Microstructure From Processing: Evaluation and Modelling Diffusional growth: Lecture 5 Martin Strangwood, Phase Transformations and Microstructural Modelling,
Nanomechanics Simulation Tool- Dislocations Make or Break Materials Michael Sakano, Mitchell Wood, David Johnson, Alejandro Strachan Department of Biomedical.
Twinning Studies via Experiments and DFT-Mesoscale Formulation Huseyin Sehitoglu, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, DMR Identification.
Materials Science Chapter 8 Deformation and Fracture.
ENT 487 FRACTURE MECHANISMS IN METALS
Simulation methodology
ENT 487 FRACTURE MECHANISMS IN METALS
Yield strength: the elongation of a mat'l
Plastic Deformation of Polycrystalline Metals
CHAPTER 5 : DISLOCATION & METAL STRENGTHENING MECHANISMS
Sal College of Engineering
Dislocations and Strengthening
Fracture Behavior of Interfaces
Molecular Dynamics Study on Deposition Behaviors of Au Nanocluster on Substrates of Different Orientation S.-C. Leea, K.-R. Leea, K.-H. Leea, J.-G. Leea,
Dislocations Dislocations Dislocations
Mechanical Properties: 2
Plastic Deformation of Metals and Recrystallization
Instructor: Yuntian Zhu
Instructor: Yuntian Zhu
Plastic Deformation of Metals and Recrystallization
PLASTIC DEFORMATION & DISLOCATIONS
DR. AL EMRAN ISMAIL FRACTURE MECHANISMS.
CHE 333 Class 18 Fracture of Materials.
Presentation transcript:

I. Adlakha 1, K.N. Solanki 1, M.A. Tschopp 2 1 School for Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy Arizona State University 2 Army Research Laboratory, Weapons and Materials Research Directorate, APG, MD We acknowledge the support of the Office of Naval Research under grant N

multiphysics.lab.asu.eduLAMMPS Workshop /13 Motivation  The role of GB characteristics mentioned below on intergranular fracture  Structural units (SUs)  GB energy  Initial free volume  The slip plane orientation relative to the crack plane and the growth direction.  The slip plane angle relative to the crack plane and the growth direction sufficient to describe the directional crack growth behavior and the ductile/brittle response.

multiphysics.lab.asu.eduLAMMPS Workshop /13 Methodology  Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations were carried out using LAMMPS.  Liu et al.’s semi empirical embedded atom method (EAM) was used for the modeling atomic behavior of Al.  Initially a GB specimen of dimensions 500Å x 500Å x 40Å.  Non-periodic boundary (s) along the X and periodic boundary (p) conditions in the Y and Z.  Energy minimization (NVE) was carried out for 120fs, followed by a pressure relaxation (NPT) for 80fs at 300K.  Initial crack of 2a/W = 0.1 is created in the middle of domain.  Strain rate /s is applied along the Y direction, while performing NVT minimization. The red and blue regions are grains I and II, respectively. The z-axis for both the grains is same i.e. or.

multiphysics.lab.asu.eduLAMMPS Workshop /13 Overview of STGBs A schematic of GB (Δz * = d - d 0 ) free volume measurement  The maximum stress for GBs with ‘D’ or SF present, such as Σ13 (510) θ=22.6° and Σ97 (940) was lowest.  Σ97 (940) has 25% drop in maximum stress when compared to the Σ5 (210)  The GB energy correlates to maximum stress of GBs, except for Σ97 (940) which has highest GB energy.

multiphysics.lab.asu.eduLAMMPS Workshop /13 Crack growth for STGBs  Growth along the Σ13 (510) differed on each sides, as evidenced by 100 m/s ( ps) along the –X direction and 55 m/s ( ps).  Σ97 (940) has maximum crack growth rate of 45 m/s and 75 m/s along the –X and +X directions.  The interfaces with a higher initial free volume witnessed higher crack growth rates compared to other GBs.

multiphysics.lab.asu.eduLAMMPS Workshop /13  The interface ahead of the crack tip underwent localized atomic shuffling.  The crack along the +X direction fails to nucleate a slip dislocation and grows in a brittle manner, in contrast the –X direction observes a slip nucleation around 3.25 % applied strain.  These events have been identified as the primary cause for the directional crack growth response observed. Crack Growth Asymmetry in Σ97 (940)

multiphysics.lab.asu.eduLAMMPS Workshop /13 Overview of STGBs  White and black denote atoms on different {110} and {220} planes.  D is a SU that typically terminates SF at the GB plane. In the case of Σ3 (111), the {111} are inclined at 39 o forming a coherent twin interface.  E SU is a kite shaped SU consisting of 4 atoms in the description. It plays a important role in the fracture behavior of the interface.  Two distinct sets, i.e., one for GBs with a structural period containing ‘E’ SU and another one for GBs without ‘E’ SU.  Presence of ‘E’ SU lowers the dislocation nucleation stress ahead of the crack tip, thus lowering the maximum strength of the GB interface.

multiphysics.lab.asu.eduLAMMPS Workshop /13 Crack growth for STGBs

multiphysics.lab.asu.eduLAMMPS Workshop /13 Crack Growth Asymmetry in Σ11(113)

multiphysics.lab.asu.eduLAMMPS Workshop /13  Along the –X direction, a steady state crack growth was observed up to an applied strain of 3.5%.subsequently followed by nucleation of an ISF.  The growth along the –X direction between applied strains of % was retarded, primarily due to blunting of the crack tip and due to the high relative angle between the initial slip system and the crack plane ( ) requiring a large amount of energy to propagate the dislocation. Crack Growth Asymmetry contd.

multiphysics.lab.asu.eduLAMMPS Workshop /13  Rearrangement of ‘E’ SU creates an ISF; which acts as a site for a partial dislocation.  The leading partial was trailed by a twin partial dislocation to form the twin embryo.  An interesting feature of plastic events was limited atomic movements for twin deformation. Twin Deformation in STGB

multiphysics.lab.asu.eduLAMMPS Workshop /13  The normal interface strength for GBs containing ‘D’ SU or SF in the GB structural description (Σ13 (510) θ=22.6° and Σ97 (940) θ=47.9°) showed noticeably lower interface strength compared to other GBs.  The stress-strain response for the STGB interface shows presence of two distinct regimes the ‘E’ SU GBs ( ϕ > °) and the remaining GBs ( ϕ < °).  Presence of ‘E’ SU lowers the maximum normal interface strength by an average 35% when compared to other STGBs.  The maximum growth rate witnessed by the GB interface was in correlation with the initial free volume of the GB interface,  The orientation of slip planes relative to the crack plane and the growth direction were found to be a key aspect to inception of directional crack growth response. Conclusion

multiphysics.lab.asu.eduLAMMPS Workshop /13 Thank You