Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, UK SOCIO-ECONOMICS Progress report RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, 17 - 20 May 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Health impact assessment explained
Advertisements

Desert Knowledge Symposium 2008 Marnie Ireland Supervisor: Dr. Fay Rola-Rubzen Sustainable Freight Out Here?
TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR RESEARCHERS. Output 1: Current economic interdependence between the two communities assessed and recommendations for reinforced.
Recommended by the 2010 Duncan Review and subsequently supported by the WA government structured as an overarching aspirational plan for the region Inter-related.
Basic Considerations  outlines the process by which the Government of Kenya will develop its national strategy for participating in an evolving international.
Welcome to the FarmPath Kick-off Meeting! Farming Transitions: Pathways Towards Regional Sustainability of Agriculture in Europe.
European Non-Food Agriculture ENFA FP6 Scientific Support to Policies (SSP 3)
How to prepare better reports
How to prepare better reports
School of Earth and Environment INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE Dr. Nicola Favretto Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis.
© 2003 TranSystems Corporation Advisory Committee Meeting January 19, 2010.
EVALUATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE STRATEGY PRESENTED BY DR SHYAM PATIAR.
Clim-ATIC Climate Change - Adapting to The Impacts, by Communities in Northern Peripheral Regions Main project application to the Northern Periphery Programme.
DISTRIBUTION OF TASKS WORK PACKAGES 1 AND 2 PRESENTED BY DR SHYAM PATIAR.
Ecotourism Badema Dizdar.
Presented by Utsala Shrestha, June 08, 2008 R-2007-COE-01 Department of Environmental science00.
3 September UNDERSTANDING THE SEA 20 th May 2013 Presented by: K. Florence.
PEIP National workshop in Montenegro: developing environmental infrastructure projects in the water sector Feasibility Study Preparation Venelina Varbova.
Implementing the EU’s Raw Materials Initiative across Europe Best practices in minerals planning Corina Hebestreit Athens, 29 February 2012.
Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, UK Opportunities and Conflicts of Commercial Uses of Peatland in Europe Socio-Economic Comparison of Case Studies from.
Work Package 4 Learning Process for Reflective Policy Making 3rd TECHNICAL AND SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE AND STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING 18 Sept – Thessaloniki.
Understanding Territorial Impacts: Tool for Territorial Impact Assessment Bernd Schuh (ÖIR) Karkow, Nov
‘North Hunt’ Sustainable Hunting Tourism – Business Opportunity in Northern Europe Colin Hunter, Geography & Environment, University of Aberdeen.
ESPON 2013 Programme Internal Seminar Evidence-based Cohesion Policy: Territorial Dimensions Kraków, Poland ESPON EU-LUPA.
Climate Change Mitigation and Sustainable Development: A Framework for Integration John Robinson CLA, WGIII July 18, 2001.
WFD, Common Implementation Strategy Water Scarcity and Droughts Expert Group Madrid, February 17, 2010.
‘PPM-Nutrients’ Project Policy and Practice for Management of Nutrients Knowledge, policy and practice for sustainable nutrient management and water resources.
Potential and Pitfalls of Experimental Impact Evaluation: Reflections on the design and implementation of an experimental Payments for Environmental Services.
Presented by CIDA on behalf of the Task Team on Multilateral Effectiveness.
Review Presentation Wafaa Alsaggaf S May
The Commission's Impact Assessment system 18 September 2014 María Dolores Montesinos Impact Assessment unit Secretariat General 1.
DETERMINE Working document # 4 'Economic arguments for addressing social determinants of health inequalities' December 2009 Owen Metcalfe & Teresa Lavin.
Socio-economics consequences of peatland exploitation in Switzerland Froidevaux Viviane European research programm RECIPE Swiss Federal Research Institute.
Assessment of options to streamline legislation on industrial emissions IPPC Review Stakeholder Hearing 4 May 2007 Caspar Corden Entec UK Limited.
Close to Nature Forestry and Forest Policy Challenges in Europe Ilpo Tikkanen, European Forest Institute Zvolen, Slovakia October, 2003 Together.
05/12/2015 EUROMARKET 05/12/2015 Water Liberalisation Scenarios: An empirical analysis of the evolution of the European Water supply and sanitation sectors.
Why integrate the SAP into the social and economic processes and practices of sustainable development To ensure that the countries’ social and economic.
Welcome to the FarmPath midterm meeting!. The FarmPath International Advisory Group Chair: Geoff Wilson, University of Plymouth Members: Ingrid Pettersson,
Sectorial Experience with Natura 2000 By Ben Delbaere, Deputy Director, ECNC 6th Meeting of Natura 2000 Management Working Group - 23rd November 2011 (Brussels)
Fundamentals of Governance: Parliament and Government Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
© Services GmbH Proposal writing: Part B 2/1/ St. Petersburg, May 18, 2011 Dr. Andrey Girenko
Framework and assessment methodology for policy coherence for development: Draft Report for OECD 16 th June, Paris Nick Bozeat.
Optimization for Sustainable Water Resources COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS (WP15) Earth Link and Advanced Resources Development (ELARD) Malta October 28-29, 2004.
Water Efficiency in Buildings Preparations for the Stakeholder and Public consultations Meeting of the Strategic Co-ordination Group Brussels, 8 November.
A.Ricci - 17/02/09 Introduction to NEEDS SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME [6.1] [ Sustainable Energy Systems] Andrea Ricci, ISIS Brussels,
Creating the environment for business Assessment of the Implementation by the Member States of the IPPC Directive Advisory Group Meeting Friday 13 th January.
5 Project funded by the Euro- Mediterranean Regional Programme for Local Water Management of the European Union DEVELOPMENT OF TOOLS AND GUIDELINES FOR.
European Parliament PwC Committee on Transport and Tourism Study on the new regulation on driving and rest time and its impacts regarding the deletion.
@pievents Introduction to Sustainability Eloise Sochanik Positive Impact.
COST Action and European GBIF Nodes Anne-Sophie Archambeau.
Scientific, technical and socio-economic aspects of impacts of, and vulnerability and adaptation to, climate change SBSTA in-session workshop on Scientific,
Energetická náročnost budov
European Topic Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production (ETC/SCP) Lars Fogh Mortensen, Head of Group Sustainable Consumption and Production.
Committee on Transport and Tourism
Rudo E. Makunike (1), Estherine Fotabong (1), Mandivamba Rukuni
Literature review Methods
URBAN STREAM REHABILITATION
WORKSHOP 17th Sept 2008 EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Progress of the preparations for a White Paper on Adaptation to Climate Change Water Directors’ meeting Slovenia June 2008 Marieke van Nood, Unit.
WP7 – COMBINING BIG DATA - STATISTICAL DOMAINS
"Environmental Expenditure Statistics"
Study on non-compliance of ozone target values and potential air quality improvements in relation to ozone.
Main results and conclusions of the
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s Water Resources
LIFE and the implementation of the Water Framework Directive
WFD, Common Implementation Strategy  Water Scarcity and Droughts Expert Group Madrid, February 17, 2010.
LIFE and the implementation of the Water Framework Directive
What is a WebQuest? Guided search for information
Main recommendations & conclusions (1)
Methodology for assessment of Natura 2000 costs
Presentation transcript:

Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, UK SOCIO-ECONOMICS Progress report RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, May 2005

Outline  Workpackage 1  Publications:  Common paper  Tasks ahead RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, May 2005

Workpackage 1 WP1: Socio-economic appraisal of peat exploitation  Divided into two main parts:  Part1: Assessment of socio-economic importance of peat exploitation and alternative peatland uses  Common part of WP1 to compare results between the EU countries  Part 2: Country specific studies analysing in more detail certain specific aspects of peatland utilisation with different methodologies RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, May 2005

Workpackage 1 Part 1: Assessment of socio-economic importance of peat exploitation and alternative peatland uses  Regional distribution of peatland and identification of prevailing types of peat and peatland uses  Policy framework  Peat production  Peat trade  Employment  Differentiation in raw peat and processed peat  Alternative peatland uses focussing on agriculture and conservation concepts RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, May 2005

Workpackage 1 Part 2: Country specific studies  Finland: Based on a semi-structured stakeholder questionnaire, investigation of three main impacts of peat exploitation in Finland: environmental aspects, employment and re-use of peat production areas.  Switzerland: Evaluation of alternative peatland uses concentrating on agricultural land uses and tourism and peatland management using two case study areas, supported by stakeholder interviews on their perception of the different activities RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, May 2005

Workpackage 1 Part 2: Country specific studies  Scotland: Focus on economic evaluation of peat extraction differentiating between different purposes such as whisky production, local usage and peat exports mainly for horticulture.  France: Sociological study of stakeholders perceptions of different peatland uses carried out in three case study areas.  Germany: Focus on the evaluation of the policy framework for peatland management and protection. RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, May 2005

 Finland: Work finished and report available.  France: Part 1 finished; part 2 on-going; report available summer 2005  Germany: Work on-going; report available summer 2005  Scotland: Work finished; report under revision  Switzerland: Part 1 finished and report available; part 2a finished and report available; part 2b on-going report available summer Reports: Workpackage 1 RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, May 2005

Background and focus of the paper:  Focus on peatland rehabilitation not on further peat extraction  Peat extraction provides only economic and social benefits with high environmental costs  But results provide overall little evidence of economic and social benefits of peat extraction, only in Finland some regional importance  Peatland rehabilitation can provide environmental, economic and social benefits Common paper (other country specific paper planned in Finland and Switzerland) Publications RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, May 2005

Publications RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, May 2005 Figure 1: Benefits and costs from peatland utilisation

 To evaluate opportunities and conflicts for peatland utilisation and rehabilitation in Finland, France, Germany, Scotland and Switzerland. Aim: Common paper RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, May 2005 Sub-objectives:  To analyse potential economic and social benefits of different re- use options of exploited peatlands and to compare these with the socio-economic benefits from peat extraction.  To discuss the potential environmental implications of re-use options and identify conflicts for peatland rehabilitation.

1.Introduction 2.Socio-economic importance of peat extraction in the country case studies 3.Peat extraction, re-use of peatland and peatland protection: sustainable utilisation of peatland 4.Socio-economic benefits of different re-use options of peatlands in the country case studies and their implications for peatland rehabilitation 5.Conclusion Preliminary title and structure: Common paper RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, May 2005 Opportunities and conflicts for peatland rehabilitation in Europe: A socio-economic comparison of case studies from Finland, France, Germany, Scotland and Switzerland

 Paper is based on the work already carried out but requires some additional work  In some countries focus has been more on implications of peat extraction, hence, more work on re-use of peatland is needed  Link to WP7: Define (recommend) different re-use and management options for peatland and their socio-economic implications in the country case studies Tasks ahead RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, May 2005

 Do we (RECIPE) focus on re-use options for peatland and their rehabilitation potential (instead of opportunities for peat extraction)?  Does the common paper idea represent the (broad) interests of the whole group?  Future feedback from the whole group:  Implication for possible re-use scenarios and their socio- economic implications (WP7)  information about thresholds beyond which rehabilitation is no longer possible  Future tasks and project resources? Some questions RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, May 2005