The U.S. Geographical Indications System: Building GI Brands

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doha's Impact on TRIPS: Balancing Geographical Indications Protection Clark W. Lackert Chair, INTA International Amicus Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
Advertisements

Better GI protection within the WTO framework Stefano Fanti – Managing Director Consorzio del Prosciutto di Parma Geneva, 27 May 2004.
Sui generis system for the protection of non-agricultural geographical indications – the Hungarian example András Jókúti Legal and International Department.
Scope of protection of geographical indications PATENT OFFICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA.
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
International Registration of Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Matthijs Geuze, WIPO National Seminar on the Use of Industrial Property.
International Standards for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights: Trademarks and Geographical Indications Cynthia Henderson, Attorney-Advisor.
Marcus Höpperger Acting Director
1 XI INT. CONGRESS AAAML A comparison of the three GI schemes in the EU A trade mark practioner’s perspective… Benjamin Fontaine Parma, March 2013.
AIPPI-MIE-MSZJF Budapest 2005 “Enforcement of IP Rights in the Enlarged EU" Similarities and differences in the enforcement of trademarks and designations.
DS 174 – Trademarks & Geographical Indications
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
International Intellectual Property Law
Geographical Indications Intellectual Property & Competition Law Presentation By: Brinda Sreedharan Ravi Teja Rethu Kumari.
Geographical Indications (GIs) Global Intellectual Property Academy
Geographical Indications (GIs) in the Implementation of Public Policies: Best Practices and the Socio- Economic Dimension of GIs Presented at the Second.
By Prof. A. Damodaran Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore
Recent Trends in Labeling and Identification of Agrifood Products in North America Bruce A. Babcock Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa.
Trademark Issues in Current Negotiations Prof. Christine Haight Farley American University.
Intellectual Property
Geographical Indications in the WTO and the Doha Negotiations Worldwide Symposium on Geographical Indications WIPO/Italian Foreign Affairs Ministry Parma,
Perspectives for Geographical Indications Teresa Mera June, 2009.
Geographical Indications: Protection through a Trademark System
FUNDAMENTALS OF TRADEMARK LAW THE HONORABLE BERNICE B. DONALD U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN SEPT. 18, 2013 LAHORE, PAKISTAN.
1 Licensing Agreements and the Protection of Intellectual Property Chapter 17 © 2005 Thomson/West Legal Studies In Business.
Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP Geographical Indications: A United States Perspective AIPPI Hyderabad October 14, 2011 Stanton J. Lovenworth Chair,
The Madrid system An update on the latest development Israel February 2012 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal Division, Brands and Designs Sector.
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND COLLECTIVE MARKS
CREATIVITY IN BLOOM A trademark of the Public Education Committee of the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) Trademark Expo 2010.
Presented by: PAMELA C. GAVIN A trademark or service mark is any distinctive word, name, symbol or device, used by a person or entity to indicate.
1 SECURING BRAND PROTECTION FOR FAIR TRADE MAY 25, 2015.
The need for recognition and protection of geographical indications in South Africa Prof Johann Kirsten Head of the Department of Agricultural Economics,
IPO-PAKISTAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION OF PAKISTAN 1 GIs as Economic Tool for SMEs Development: Current Status of Protection in Pakistan; Future.
Annual Exporters Conference 2014
Department of International Relations – Geographical Indications (GIs)
REPUBLIC OF SEYCHELLES WTO ACCESSION Trade Division September 2014.
THE PROTECTION OF PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND THEIR ROLE IN TRADE AND COMMERCE TK.
IPR-INSIGHTS CONSULTING AND RESEARCH 1116 BUDAPEST, KONDORFA U. 10. TEL.: (+36-1) FAX: (+36-1)
Deputy Director (In-charge) IPO-Pakistan Regional Office, Lahore
CAPACITY BUILDING TRAINING PROGRAMME ON IPR, WTO RELATED ISSUES AND PATENT WRITING April 28-May 2, 2008 Session 10 GIs negotiations in the WTO and other.
EPA Negotiations: Intellectual Property and Sustainable Development for ECOWAS Countries By Catherine Grant Director: Trade Policy Business Unity South.
The Protection of Geographical Indications in Brazil Cristina Ninô Biscaia LL.M Munich Intellectual Property Law Center.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Elements for the Organization of Geographical Indications under Article 22.1 of the TRIPS Agreement Warsaw,
World Intellectual Property Organization International Protection of Geographical Indications Overview and Recent Developments Tbilisi, October 28, 2009.
History of the GI system How it all started. History of the GI system Foods have be named after their geographical origin since Antiquity: examples: 5th.
G eographical Indications of Punjab By Ch.Hamid Malhi President, The Heritage Association.
Recently Established Registration Systems for Geographical Indications JAMAICA Loreen Walker Executive Director Jamaica Intellectual Property Office.
WTO and the TRIPS Agreement Wolf R. MEIER-EWERT WTO Secretariat A Business-oriented overview of Intellectual Property for Law Students WIPO, Geneva 20.
CZECH PRESIDENCY HIGH LEVEL CONFERENCE ON THE FUTURE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT QUALITY POLICY Prague, 13 March 2009 DRAFT CONCLUSIONS OF WORKSHOP B: EU.
Milano, TRADEMARK. A trademark is a sign capable of distinguishing the goods or services produced or provided by one company from those of.
SMEs Division Intensive Presentation of IP PANORAMA Eusloo Seo Counsellor Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Division World Intellectual Property Organization.
National Intellectual Property Center of Georgia Sakpatenti Istanbul, Turkey May, 2011 Current Situation on Nation Branding Issues in Georgia.
Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.
World Intellectual Property Organization Geographical indications: the international legal framework; latest developments Bratislava, December 1st., 2009.
Certification and Collective: Indicating Geographic Origin
The Napa Valley Experience in Protecting NAPA VALLEY
Recent Developments at the International Level
Registering your brand
Geographical Indications
Existing Approaches on the National and International Levels
Geographical Indications
Building a Producer Organization for American Origin Products Dr
HOW TO AVOID INVALID U.S. TRADEMARK REGISTRATIONS BY BEING ABLE TO PROVE A BONA FIDE INTENT TO USE IN THE U.S. Presented by Howard J. Shire 13 October.
Session III: Case Studies of GIs
Practices related to geographical indication systems: the european union wipo sct geneva 28 march 2017 Francis FAY Head of Unit ‘Geographical Indications’
Geographical Indications Symposium Beijing, China June 26-28, 2007
Trademark, Patent, or Copyright?
Presentation transcript:

The U.S. Geographical Indications System: Building GI Brands Office Of International Relations United States Patent and Trademark Office Tel: (571) 272-9300

What are Trademarks? Words, designs, numbers, letters, colors, three-dimensional forms, sounds, scents, etc. APPLE, XEROX, IDAHO, FLORIDA, 311, the color pink, shape of a Coke bottle… Trademark laws protect the commercial investment by the trademark owner to associate sign with goods/services in the minds of consumers.

What are Geographical Indications (GIs)? Indications that “identify a good as originating in the territory of a WTO Member where a given quality, reputation or other characteristic of the good is essentially attributable to its geographical origin.” GIs are intellectual property. Therefore, a geographic term is merely a place name and not intellectual property until it is used to identify a good or service with certain characteristics (including origin) rather than merely the place where the goods or services originate, and consumers use that sign as material information when making purchasing decisions.

Trademarks and Geographical Indications Geographical indications and trademarks serve the same functions: source-identifiers quality guarantees business interests …so the United States protects them under the same system – the trademark system – as trademarks, certification marks, or collective marks.

Trademark System Provides Maximum Flexibility and Maximum Protection for GIs Common Law Protection: Rights accrue as soon as the GI is used in commerce on goods or services Federal Registration: provides additional benefits such an evidentiary presumption of ownership, validity, and right to use, border enforcement, right to use ® for notice, and registration can be used as a basis for obtaining registration in foreign countries. U.S. Reg. No. 0987576 SOLINGEN cutlery “COGNAC” common-law certification mark Institut National Des Appellations v. Brown-Forman Corp, 47 USPQ2d 1875, (TTAB 1998)

What do we call GIs in the US? Flexible US system gives you several options: 1) Trademarks - under certain conditions 2) Certification Marks - certifier sets standards that users must meet 3) Collective Marks – used by members of a collective U.S. Certification Mark Reg. No. 1414598 “JAMAICA BLUE MOUNTAIN” U.S. Collective Mark Reg. No. 0889138 Black Rooster design U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 1266492

GIs as Trademarks Geographic designations can be registered as trademarks under certain conditions: 1) not generic; 2) extensive use in commerce on specific goods/services; and/or 3) obscure or remote place that consumers don’t recognize or believe produces those goods Trademark protection provides the flexibility for all kinds of indications of geographic origin to be protected. U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 0178829 (1924) US Trademark Reg. No. 0533033 “TILLAMOOK” cheese U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 1527146

GIs as Certification Marks A certification mark is a type of trademark that can certify: geographic origin (geographic place names can be registered without extensive use, unlike with trademarks); materials used, quality, method of manufacture, and accuracy; or products made under the auspices of, or by members of a specific trade union or organization. Certification mark can be cancelled if the owner discriminately refuses to certify goods/services. U.S. Reg. No. 2853642 U.S. Reg. No. 2448047

Collective Marks A collective mark indicates commercial origin of goods or services in members of a group rather than origin in one party. Geographic terms cannot be registered as collective marks without extensive use in commerce, but other geographical indications can be (e.g., outline of a region or landmark, a fanciful name, or name of the collective). U.S. Collective Mark Reg. No. 0889138 Black Rooster design U.S. Collective Mark Reg. No. 1097779 Frankfurter Äpfelwein

Opposition and Cancellation Available to anyone: 1) domestic or foreign, 2) who would be damaged by the registration, or the continued existence of a U.S. registration. Opposition is used to prevent the issuance of a registration of a mark. Cancellation is used to cancel an existing registration of a mark. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB” or “Board”), of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

Examples of U.S. GIs Protected In the United States Florida Citrus Owned by the State of Florida’s Department of Citrus U.S. Reg. No. 1559414 “The mark certifies that the goods bearing the mark either consist of citrus fruit grown in the State of Florida, under specified standards, or are processed or manufactured wholly from such citrus fruit.”

Examples of U.S. GIs Protected In the United States Vidalia VIDALIA for onions Owned by the State of Georgia’s Department of Agriculture U.S. Reg. No. 1709019 “The certification mark is intended to be used by persons authorized by certifier, and will certify that the goods in connection with which it is used are yellow Granex type onions and are grown by authorized growers within the Vidalia onion production area in Georgia as defined in the Georgia Vidalia onion act of 1986.”

Examples of U.S. GIs Protected In the United States Napa Valley Owned by the Napa Valley Reserve Certification Board U.S. Reg No. 2853642 “The certification mark, as used by persons duly authorized by Certifier, certifies that the goods meet the Certifier's production specifications and emanate from a specific geographic region, namely, the Napa Valley American Viticultural Area located in California.”

Examples of U.S. GIs Protected In the United States Idaho IDAHO for potatoes Owned by the State of Idaho Potato Commission U.S. Reg No. 2914308 “The Certification mark, as used by authorized persons, certifies that goods identified by the mark are grown in Idaho and that the goods conform to quality, grade and other requirements, pursuant to standards designated by the Applicant.”

Foreign GIs Protected In the United States COMTÉ Owned by Comite Interprofesionnel du Gruyere de Comte U.S. Reg. Nos. 1473687 “The certification mark is used by persons authorized by the certifier to certify that the goods come from the Comté division (an administrative division of France); that the goods are only made from milk that comes only from the Montbeliarde breed of dairy cattle, which are fed fresh grass or dry hay; and that the cheese meets the hygiene, production methods or standards and appearance methods or standards of the certifier.”

“Parma Ham” is also registered in English—U.S. Reg. No. 2014628. Examples of Foreign GIs Protected In the United States Prosciutto Di Parma Owned by Consorzio Del Prosciutto Di Parma Association U.S. Regs. Nos. 2014629; 2014628; 2014627 “The certification mark is used by persons authorized by the certifier to certify the regional origin of the product to which the mark is applied.” “Parma Ham” is also registered in English—U.S. Reg. No. 2014628.

Examples of Foreign GIs Protected In the U. S Examples of Foreign GIs Protected In the U.S. Vino Nobile Di Montepulciano Owned by the Consorzio del Vino Nobile di Montepulciano; U.S. Reg. No. 2251165. “The certification trademark, as used by persons duly authorized by Certifier, certifies the region or origin of the goods as emanating from a specific geographic region, namely, Montepulciano, a region in Italy.”

Examples of Foreign GIs Protected In the U.S. Darjeeling Owned by Tea Board of India U.S. Reg. No. 2,685,923 Word Mark (Word “DARJEELING” protected) “As used by authorized persons, certifies that the tea contains at least 100% tea originating in the Darjeeling region of India and that the blend meets other specifications established by the certifier.”

Examples of Foreign GIs Protected In the United States Roquefort Owned by the Community of Roquefort U.S. Reg. No. 571,798 (Registered March 10, 1953) “The certification mark is used upon the goods to indicate that the same has been manufactured from sheep’s milk only, and has been cured in the natural caves of the Community of Roquefort, Department of Aveyron, France.”

Owned by the Consorzio Vino Chianti Classico Association; Examples of Foreign GIs Protected In the United States –Collective Marks The protected mark is the design incorporating the Black Rooster with the words “Chianti Classico Consorzio Vino ChiantiClassico”; Owned by the Consorzio Vino Chianti Classico Association; U.S. Reg. No. 0889138

Examples of Foreign GIs Protected In the United States Examples of Foreign GIs Protected In the United States Collective Marks “Frankfurter Apfelwein”; Owned by Verband Der Deutschen Fruchtwein-Und Schaumwein-Industrie E.V.; U.S. Reg. No. 1097779; “The mark certifies origin in the city of Frankfurt in the Federal Republic of Germany.”

Exporting U.S. GIs Register TMs and GIs in your export markets! But tread carefully: there is currently no international consensus on how to protect GIs at the national level.

No International Consensus Conflicts between GIs and trademarks: Budvar v. Budweiser Scope of Protection: misleading use or confusing use? Eligible Subject Matter: country names, fanciful terms, logos? Generic Terms: champagne? Territoriality Protection through the Trademark System answers all of those questions!

International Controversy: Agriculture Interest or Intellectual Property? WTO Talks on GIs: AG Committee and TRIPS Council EU CAP Reform Subsidy Shift

WTO Proposals Extension of TRIPS Article 23 beyond wines and spirits International Register of GIs, universal, mandatory effect Claw-back of Generic Terms

USG Efforts Education of U.S. businesses Outreach to foreign governments Free trade agreement negotiations Proposal for Multilateral System Database

Thanks for your attention! For more information, contact: Amy Cotton Office of International Relations United States Patent and Trademark Office Amy.cotton@uspto.gov 571 272-9300 www.uspto.gov To file an application online, go to: http://teas.uspto.gov/