+ Heidi Redlich Epstein, ABA Center on Children and the Law Ana Beltran, Generations United Donna Sabo, National Association for Regulatory Administration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Advisory Council April 1, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
Advertisements

1 EEC Board Meeting May 10, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
Effective Casework Practice (Foster Care) Ongoing assessment of childs needs and interventions Ongoing assessment and implementation of services/supports.
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
11 Opportunities to Improve Care for Persons with Disabilities: The Community Living Initiative IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL HEALTH REFORM IN A DIFFICULT ECONOMIC.
Understanding Katie A and the Core Practice Model
More About The DDD Assessment “A new way to assess and plan for supports and services for people with developmental disabilities” Aging & Disability Services.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network 1.
Collaborating for Families and Young Children: Part C and CAPTA in South Carolina OSEP National Early Childhood Meeting February 9, 2005 Kristie Musick.
Reproduction of these materials only by author's explicit permission. Risk Assessment Instrument And the Development of Detention Alternatives Primary.
Federation of Chiropractic Licensing Boards 77th Annual Congress Orlando, Florida Accreditation 101 & Panel Discussion Saturday May 3, :00 – 10:00.
Emergency Safety Interventions “What Practitioners Need to Know” 1.
Introduction to the Child & Adolescent Needs and Strengths Assessment (CANS) Our Community. Our Kids. Dr. Gary Buff, Ed.D. President and COO.
1 Agency/Court Collaboration in the CFSR: ENGAGING COURTS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM The National Child Welfare Resource Center For Organizational Improvement.
Healthy Inclusion: Caring for Children with Special Needs in Child Care © The National Training Institute for Child Care Health Consultants,
WELCOME!. INTRODUCTIONS Name Office Location? Program Area Just the Basics…We’ll be getting more info next.
Next Generation Child Welfare Traineeship Program September Colloquium Presentation Friday, September 11, 2009 Whitney M. Young, Jr. School of Social Work.
An introduction to for Caregivers. The Alliance for Child Welfare Excellence is Washington’s first comprehensive statewide training partnership dedicated.
Your Rights and Responsibilities In the Child Nutrition Programs
1 Public Hearings: May , 2013 Child Care Development Fund Massachusetts State Plan Federal Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015.
Youth Protection Wisconsin 4-H Youth Development.
Pennsylvania Child Protective Services Law: Module 4: Reporting and the Role of the Child Welfare Professional Transfer of Learning The Pennsylvania Child.
Common Core 3.0 Content Overview Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
HISTORY, ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES THE LONG-TERM CARE OMBUDSMAN PROGRAM:
Common Core 3.0 Executive Summary Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
Civil Rights Your Rights and Responsibilities In the School Nutrition Programs.
Human Resources Federal Regulations and Review Findings.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
DSDS Quality Assurance Unit State of Alaska, Dept. of Health and Social Services Division of Senior and Disabilities Services (DSDS) Quality Assurance.
Colorado Children and Youth Information Sharing (CCYIS) Educational Stability Summit April 10, 2015.
1 EARLY CHILDHOOD DATA SYSTEMS: ESTABLISHING A POLICY AND LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT October 2011.
Session 5 Integrating CLAS Into Policy and Practice CLAS Training [ADD DATE] [ADD PRESENTER NAME] [ADD ORGANIZATION NAME]
KENTUCKY YOUTH FIRST Grant Period August July
Module 5 Successful Strategies for Promoting Collaboration and Coordinated Service Delivery.
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Updates.
Department of Human Services
ARC Chairperson Training Introduction 1. The Language of Special Education Acronyms 2.
Civil Rights Training. Goals of Civil Rights  Equal treatment for all applicants and participants  Elimination of illegal barriers that prevent people.
DIAKON Lutheran Social Ministries/Family Design Resources Tools That Work Conference 11/03 Implementing Best Practice Standards in Permanency Planning.
Defending Childhood Protect Heal Thrive January 25-27, 2011 Sandra Spencer Executive Director National Federation of Families for Children’s Mental Health.
+ Heidi Redlich Epstein, ABA Center on Children and the Law Joyce DeBolt, National Association for Regulatory Administration Ana Beltran, Generations United.
Civil Rights Training. Goals of Civil Rights Equal treatment for all applicants and participants Elimination of illegal barriers that prevent people from.
Child Placement Conference 11/13/03 Preserving Sibling Relationships Presented by: Melissa Dorris Georgia Supreme Court Child Placement Project.
Civil Rights Your Rights and Responsibilities In the School Nutrition Programs.
Guidance Training CFR §483.75(i) F501 Medical Director.
ICAMA & ICPC Liz Oppenheim Summit of the States on Interstate Cooperation National Center for Interstate Compacts June 1-2, 2006.
Understanding Applicable Laws in Child Protection and Child Welfare Cases: Presentation at TCAP Tribal Courts Conference – Minneapolis August 20, 2015.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
THE LONG-TERM CARE OMBUDSMAN PROGRAM (LTCOP) Overview of the History, Role, and Responsibilities.
11/28/12 1 CALIFORNIA FOSTERING CONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS ACT Version 2.0 Assembly Bill 12.
SRC Participation in Policy Development 1 NATIONAL STATE REHABILITATION COUNCIL FORUM JUNE 25, 2013.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
CAPTA and Beyond: Referrals for developmental screenings for children involved with child welfare Introduction to Frequently Asked Questions Online Resource.
Overview of the NYS Justice Center for the Protection of People with Special Needs NYS Care Management Coalition May 20, 2016.
Closing the Gap for Skipped- Generation Households.
WELCOME!. INTRODUCTIONS Name Office Location? Program Area Just the Basics…We’ll be getting more info next.
Child Safe Standards How effective is your leadership team in promoting a child safe culture in your organisation? 2 June 2016.
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
Panhandle Partnership for Health and Human Services
Office of Child welfare April/May 2018
Foster Care Updates and Issues
LINK and SPARC Webinar 2018 Overcoming Licensing Barriers for Kin
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
House Human Services Committee
Background checks are required by state and federal law prior to CA/DCYF staff authorizing an individual (other than a parent) to have unsupervised access.
Presentation transcript:

+ Heidi Redlich Epstein, ABA Center on Children and the Law Ana Beltran, Generations United Donna Sabo, National Association for Regulatory Administration Joyce DeBolt, National Association for Regulatory Administration NARA Webinar Model Family Foster Home Licensing Standards December 4, 2014

About NARA The National Association for Regulatory Administration (NARA) is an international professional organization dedicated to promoting excellence in human care regulation and licensing through leadership, education, collaboration, and services. NARA represents all human care licensing, including adult residential and assisted living, adult day care, child care, child welfare and program licensing for services related to mental illness, developmental disabilities and abuse of drugs or alcohol. We are human service regulatory professionals, human service providers, university faculty, independent researchers and consultants, allied professions from health, safety and legal disciplines, consumers and all others who share our vision: Consumer Protection Through Prevention.

NARA Membership NARA members have access to our online, searchable Membership Directory, the NARA Newsletter and our members-only policy webinars. They also enjoy reduced rates on all NARA products, services and registrations, including NARA's monthly webinars, and the Annual Licensing Seminar. Check NARA’s website for more information and to Join.

Welcome to the NARA Webinar If you have not already done so, please join us on the teleconference by dialing and entering code followed by the # key. You will be able to download the slides at the end of the presentation or by following the presentation. At the end of the presentation, we’ll have time for Questions & Answers. On the bottom left of your screen, you can type your question in your Chat box and click Send.

+ Heidi Redlich Epstein, ABA Center on Children and the Law Ana Beltran, Generations United Donna Sabo, National Association for Regulatory Administration Joyce DeBolt, The Shelter, Inc. NARA Webinar Model Family Foster Home Licensing Standards December 4, 2014

+ Generations United (GU) National Center on Grandfamilies Generations United is a national membership organization focused solely on improving the lives of children, youth, and older people through intergenerational collaboration, public policies, and programs for the enduring benefit of all. For well over a decade, Generations United's National Center on Grandfamilies has been at the forefront of national efforts to support grandfamilies through federal and state legislative testimony and briefings, publications, training, and technical assistance. For more information, visit 6

+ National Association for Regulatory Administration ( NARA ) In 2012, NARA joined GU, ABA and AECF to work on the model standards. NARA is an international professional organization dedicated to promoting excellence in human care regulation and licensing through leadership, education, collaboration, and services. NARA represents all human care licensing, including adult residential and assisted living, adult day care, child care, child welfare and program licensing for services related to mental illness, developmental disabilities and abuse of drugs or alcohol. For more information, see NARA has adopted the model standards as NARA national standards. 7

+ American Bar Association (ABA) Center on Children and the Law The ABA is the largest voluntary professional association in the world with nearly 400,000 members. The ABA Center on Children and the Law improves children’s lives through advances in law, justice, knowledge, practice and public policy by focusing on child abuse and neglect, child welfare and protective services system enhancement, family preservation, adolescent health and other child protective legal issues. For more information, visit 8

+ Thank you This project has been made possible by the Annie E. Casey Foundation. We thank them for their support and partnership. 9

+ Today’s Agenda Background and research that informed the project Model Family Foster Home Licensing Standards and accompanying documents Questions & Discussion 10

+ Background and Research 11

+ Origins of Project Project started in 2011with the Annie E. Casey Foundation bringing together nonprofits, universities and others to look at family foster home licensing. We began knowing that many children in foster care are in the unlicensed care of their relatives. These children and their relative caregivers are part of the child welfare system and, as such, are subject to rules and restrictions, but they have limited or no support. With a license (“approval” or “certification” in some states): monthly financial assistance support services access to the federal Guardianship Assistance Program (GAP) in 31 states, DC and 4 tribes court and caseworker oversight 12

+ State Licensing Standards Anecdotally, we collectively knew that one of the biggest barriers to not being licensed was due to state licensing standards. Also knew these standards didn’t always lead to safe and appropriate placements in the best interests of the children. 13

+ Federal Licensing Requirements Federal law says little about the actual licensing of foster homes: States must designate a state authority responsible for standards. States have broad flexibility so long as those standards “are reasonably in accord with recommended standards of national organizations concerned with standards for such institutions or homes, including standards related to admission policies, safety, sanitation, and protection of civil rights…” “a waiver of any such standard may be made only on a case-by- case basis for non-safety standards (as determined by the State) in relative foster family homes for specific children in care.” 42 U.S.C. § 671(a)(10). States must periodically review their licensing standards. 42 U.S.C. § 671 (a)(11). 14

+ Federal Licensing Requirements cont. The federal Adam Walsh Act also requires states to conduct criminal background and child abuse registry checks. 42 U.S.C. § 671(a)(20)(A). Finally, Federal law prohibits a two-tiered system of licensing, one for relatives and another for non-relatives. Final rule to the Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA). 15

+ Research Generations United and the ABA Center on Children and the Law conducted 50 state and DC survey of family foster home licensing standards Purpose: identify trends, problematic standards, and barriers specific to relatives Paper summarizing findings: Improving Foster Care Licensing Standards around the United States: Using Research Findings to Effect Change Paper and research available at

+ Research Findings Problematic standards like requiring that applicants be no older than 65. Varying standards among the states for the same type of requirements that should not vary significantly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Model language that was used to develop our model standards. 17

+ Problematic Standards Upper age limits Requirements to have high school diplomas and/or speak English Requirements to own a vehicle Income requirements with limitations on home businesses Potential discrimination on the basis of disability Bias against rural families 18

+ Varying Standards Standards concerning requirements that should not vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction like capacity, child abuse and neglect, and criminal background checks and raise questions: how are standards determined? what are the best standards? 19

+ Model Family Foster Home Licensing Standards 20

+ Draft Model Standards Used model language from states Examined language from accreditation agencies like Child Welfare League of America and the Council on Accreditation Covers family foster home licensing Does not cover: licensing processes or procedures care of children after placement in a licensed home other post-licensing requirements like foster parent recordkeeping and reporting 21

+ Purpose Statement - Summary To fulfill the public policy intent behind licensing standards, which is to ensure that children in foster care have safe and appropriate placements. To fill the previous void in “national standards” by creating clear, practical, common standards that work to ensure that children, regardless of the state in which they live, will be placed in homes that have met the same safety standards. To facilitate the licensing of additional relative and non-relative homes by recognizing and respecting related and non-related foster parents as caregivers who are performing an invaluable service. To reflect community standards and be flexible so children in out of home care are placed in the best homes for them. 22

+ Principles Started work by creating 10 guiding principles. Highlight a few: Each child in state or county custody needs to be in a licensed home. The licensure of family foster homes is typically a distinct process with different standards than the placement of children. These processes must work together to ensure that children are placed in the best homes for them. Family foster home licensing standards must be distinct from licensing standards for child care and adult care settings. Family foster home licensing standards are necessary to promote safety and consistency in licensing assessments and to give licensors the tools to make good decisions. Over regulation should be avoided. 23

+ Categories Covered by Model Standards Definitions Basic Eligibility Physical and Mental Health Home Study Capacity Sleeping Other living space Fire safety/evacuation Additional health & safety Criminal history records check Abuse and neglect records check Assurances Pre-license training Emergency placement 24

+ For example – “Eligibility” All the model standards are pulled from state examples with an eye towards not excluding applicants based on socioeconomic or cultural biases – Consider “Eligibility”: Require functional literacy Ability to communicate with child in his/her language Ability to communicate with service providers and agency (can occur through translators) “income or resources to make timely payments for shelter, food, utility costs, clothing, and other household expenses prior to the addition of a child in foster care” 25

+ Another example – Criminal Background Checks Follow Adam Walsh For other crimes, we used language from Illinois: E. If an applicant was convicted for a crime other than those included in B. and C., the applicant will not be automatically rejected as a foster parent. The agency must consider the following: 1. the type of crime; 2. the number of crimes; 3. the nature of the offenses; 4. the age of the individual at the time of conviction; 5. the length of time that has elapsed since the last conviction; 6. the relationship of the crime and the capacity to care for children; 7. evidence of rehabilitation; and 8. opinions of community members concerning the individual in question. 26

+ Interpretative Guide This tool gives licensors guidelines to implement the standards The guide is organized as follows: The complete standard The ‘intent’ statement or purpose of the standard The guidelines, which include the assessment methods for evaluating compliance with the standards 27

+ Crosswalk Tool 28

+ Implementation questions Where are your state’s family foster home licensing standards compiled? Statutes State policies Regulations Administrative Codes Combination of the above… Other Are your family foster home licensing standards combined with other licensing standards, such as those for child care, institutional care or foster home licensing agencies? How does your state define related and/or relative for purposes of licensing? Are they defined differently in your state’s laws or policies for other purposes? Who reviews and/or modifies your family foster home licensing standards? What is the process for revision? 29

+ Implementation questions cont. When was the last time your family foster home licensing standards were updated? Does your state have a timeline in place that routinely reviews or checks for needed updates related to current best practices and/or law changes? Is your state under any consent decrees, court orders or agreements with regard to any family foster home licensing issues? Does your state grant waivers or variances on a case-by-case basis for non-safety related licensing standards for relative family foster homes? How are changes to your state’s family foster home licensing standards communicated to your providers? Other questions/barriers? 30

+ Next Steps The Model Standards, which are now NARA Standards, have just been released. Attorneys at the ABA and GU are available to provide free technical assistance to states interested in aligning their standards with the model. Contact Ana Beltran at and Heidi Redlich Epstein at NARA also offers agencies in-depth consulting services. See for more information. Together, we will work towards all states incorporating the Model, so that we have uniformity across states and children needing out of home care will have safe and appropriate family foster homes. 31

+ Questions & Discussion On the bottom left of your screen, you can type your question in your Chat box and click Send. Heidi Redlich Epstein, Ana Beltran, Donna Sabo, Joyce DeBolt, 32

NARA is always looking for new topics for the webinar series. If you have a speaker to recommend or a presentation that you’d like to share, please contact NARA at Thank you