Negotiating Diverse Contexts and Expectations in Stakeholder Engagement Sue Lin Yee, MA, MPH National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Office of.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Creating National Performance Indicators that are Relevant to Stakeholders: Participatory Methods for Indicator Development, Selection, and Refinement.

Advertisements

Public Health Essential Service #2

U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDAs website for reference purposes only. It.

School Community Councils Tuesday, March 23, 2010.

1 Looking at the TPBs Draft Participation Plan Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board July 18, 2007 Sarah Crawford Transportation Planner Department.

T HE R OAD A HEAD LAC-DPH Strategic Plan Wendy K. Schiffer, MSPH Director of Planning, Evaluation, & Development County of Los Angeles Department of Public.

Empowering tobacco-free coalitions to collect local data on worksite and restaurant smoking policies Mary Michaud, MPP University of Wisconsin-Cooperative.

Understanding Capacity Building Assistance

Overview of Mission Statement & Organization. Development Communication Division External Affairs Vice Presidency DevComm Vision To put communication.

Measuring Value: Using Program Evaluation to Understand What’s Working -- Or Isn’t Juliana M. Blome, Ph.D. , MPH Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation.

HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description

What You Will Learn From These Sessions

Leading the Transformation of the Public Health System: Are “We” Prepared? Dennis Lenaway, PhD, MPH Office of the Chief of Public Health Practice Centers.

Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.

PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Sue Sheridan, Acting Director, Patient.

Community-Based Participatory Research

Coordinating Center Overview November 18, 2010 SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAM FOR INDIANS Healthy Heart Project Initiative: Year 1 Meeting 1.

PPA 502 – Program Evaluation

Working Collaboratively Toward Effective Decision-making Frances D. Butterfoss, PhD, MSEd Center for Pediatric Research James M. Krieger, MD, MPH University.

Intellectual Property and Bilateral Trade Agreements Moving towards effective participation.

Quality Outcomes Ohio Nurses Association and

Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.

University of Wisconsin - Extension, Cooperative Extension, Program Development and Evaluation Unit 3: Engaging stakeholders.

Sustaining Local Public Health and Built Environment Programs Fit Nation NYC November 3, 2011 Annaliese Calhoun.

Why Publish? Public Health Translation Research Eric Tai, MD MS Comprehensive Cancer Control Branch Division of Cancer Prevention and Control Centers for.

Report to Los Angeles County Executive Office And Los Angeles County Health Services Agencies Summary of Key Questions for Stakeholders February 25, 2015.

Evaluation of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (CPCRN) Katherine M. Wilson, PhD, MPH, CHES Cathy L. Melvin, PhD, MPH The findings of.

Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.

Introduction A GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE WCD FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS & APPLICATION Alex Muhweezi & Chihenyo Mvoyi IUCN Uganda Country Office.

From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.

1 By The End of The Workshop, Participants Will Be Able To:  Describe the PDQ methodology  Know when and how PDQ can be used to strengthen quality and.

Office for State, Tribal, Local and Territorial Support (OSTLTS) Update Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office for State, Tribal, Local and.

Affirming Our Commitment: “A Nation Free of Health and Health Care Disparities” J. Nadine Gracia, MD, MSCE Deputy Assistant Secretary for Minority Health.

Techniques in Civic Engagement Presented by Bill Rizzo Local Government Specialist UW-Extension Local Government Center

January 31, 2014 Data Use Information and Guide. Copyright © 2014 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. What is “TELL Oregon” ? TELL Oregon is an anonymous.

Local Government Programming In-service October 22 & 23, 2014 Deliberative Governance: Civil Discourse and Public Engagement Presented by Bill Rizzo Professor.

Canadian Cancer Society Manitoba Division: Knowledge Exchange Network (KEN) & CancerCare Manitoba Manitoba Integrated Chronic Disease Primary Prevention.

Stakeholder Analysis.

William Brown Associate Professor & Director Nonprofit Management Program George Bush School of Government & Public Service Texas A&M University.

State of California Executive Leadership Competency Model January 12, 2011 Presentation for the California Citizens Redistricting Commission.

IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.

Organizational change Lecture 12. Organizational change Substantive modification in some part of the organization; It may include any aspect in the organization:

Gustavo Aquino, MPH Associate Director for Program Integration National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention Program Collaboration.

PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Anne Beal, MD, MPH, Chief Operating Officer.

Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Process of an Integrated Assessment Session 2.

Facilitating UFE step-by-step: a process guide for evaluators Joaquín Navas & Ricardo Ramírez December, 2009 Module 1: Steps 1-3 of UFE checklist.

11 The CPCRN, DCPC, NCI, and the Community Guide: Areas for Collaboration and Supportive Work Shawna L. Mercer, MSc, PhD Director The Guide to Community.

1 Stakeholders involvement in BDP. 2 ContentsContents MRC & Public Participation History, Policy and Strategy BDP & Stakeholder Involvement – Stakeholders:

Developing and Sustaining Partnerships for Community-Based Participatory Research Continuing Education Institute American Public Health Association Conference.

Designing the Evaluation Sonal R. Doshi MS, MPH Program Evaluator CDC/OSTLTS/DPHPI TB Education, Training, and Evaluation Lights, Camera, Action: Setting.

Creating an Integrated Framework for Reducing Disparities in Health Care Quality Francis D. Chesley, Jr., MD Director Office of Extramural Research, Education.

East Hudson Regional Trail Council August 10, 2015.

1 National Indicators and Qualitative Studies to Measure the Activities and Outcomes of CDC’s PRC Program Demia L. Sundra, MPH Prevention Research Centers.

A Retrospective: Eighteen Years of Managing Conflict in The University System of Georgia European Network of Ombuds in Higher Education Oxford, England.

Nevada State Innovation Model (SIM) Delivery System and Payment Alignment May 6,

Loudon County Schools External Review Exit Report February 19-21, 2013.

Contextualizing the Evaluand: Contextual Influences and Constraints on Communicating Findings Kristi Pettibone, PhD The MayaTech Corporation, With CDC’s.

Clarifying the Evaluation Focus in a Complex Program Context Howard Kress, PhD* Natalie Brown, MPH** *Battelle Memorial Institute, with National Center.

Contextualizing the Evaluand: Considering Context in Data Collection and Analysis Jamie Weinstein, MPH The MayaTech Corporation, With CDC’s National Center.

Strategic Objective 2 (SO2) “UN Entities and Partners Use Evaluation in Support of Accountability and Program Learning” Follow-up Webinars Kseniya Temnenko.

A Retrospective: Eighteen Years of Managing Conflict in The University System of Georgia European Network of Ombuds in Higher Education Oxford, England.

Performance Measurement 201: Measuring What Matters and Creating a Legacy (Please Note: Community Engagement 101 a prerequisite for this presentation.)

Karen Cheung, MPH, Pamela Luna, DrPH, MST, Sarah Merkle, MPH American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting November 11, 2009 The findings and conclusions.

GCM Community Involvement Tool Kit Glenburn Lodge, Muldersdrift, South Africa November 27-28, 2007.

Sue Lin Yee, MA, MPH Senior Evaluation Scientist Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) American Evaluation Association Meeting October 25, 2012.

Stages of Research and Development

Aligning for sustainability: Making the most of your resources

Blueprint Outlines practical, consumer-focused, state and local strategies for improving eating and physical activity that will lead to healthier lives.

Jamie Weinstein, MPH The MayaTech Corporation,

Seven Utilization Lessons

Presentation transcript:

Negotiating Diverse Contexts and Expectations in Stakeholder Engagement Sue Lin Yee, MA, MPH National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Office of the Director American Evaluation Association November 13, 2008 The findings of this presentation are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“The most basic question is not what is best but who shall decide what is best.” — Thomas Sowell

Patton’s Levels of Stakeholder Involvement* Inform: Kept informed, disseminate findings, generate interest Consult: Listened to, review & comment, anticipate problems, suggest priorities, enhance credibility of results Involve: Affirm importance, enhance appropriateness, utility, and establish credibility of evaluation *Michael Q. Patton, “Utilization-Focused Evaluation, “ 4 th Edition, 2008

Patton’s Levels of Stakeholder Involvement* Collaborate: Advise and recommend, feedback integrated to greatest extent possible, participate in meaningful decision-making, primary intended users have ownership in evaluation Empower: Direct the evaluation, offered options to inform decisions, use evaluation to build capacity and practice *From Michael Q. Patton, “Utilization-Focused Evaluation, “ 4 th Edition, 2008

Stakeholder Context: Why It Matters Context affects values, perspectives, priorities, expectations, and actions Influence based on varying personal and organizational contexts Stakeholder specific “currencies”

Stakeholder Context: Why It Matters Stakeholder context can influence –Evaluation design –Implementation –Use of findings Benefit is increased understanding of the social and political contexts of program and components

Managing Stakeholder Context Differences can create fear, mistrust, conflicts Explicit identification and discussion of issues can facilitate participation Provide a forum for sharing information about the evaluation Expect that stakeholder engagement may change due to evolution of the evaluation

ICRC Portfolio Evaluation Primary Stakeholders National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC) Office of the Director (OD) Extramural Research Program Office (ERPO) External Peer Review Panel NCIPC Board of Scientific Counselors (BSC)

ICRC Portfolio Evaluation Secondary Stakeholders CDC-funded Injury Control Research Centers (ICRC) NCIPC divisions ICRC Portfolio Evaluation Team –CDC Project Team –MayaTech Corporation

ICRC Portfolio Evaluation Workgroup (IPEW) Guide planning and implementation of evaluation Provide feedback on key documents Suggest strategies on dissemination of information from the evaluation ICRC Evaluation Team reserved the right to make final decisions

Stakeholder Involvement on IPEW ICRC Evaluation Team (E) NCIPC Office of the Director (Varied) Extramural Research Program (Inf) Injury Control Research Centers (Inv) Peer review panel chair person (Ct) Previous portfolio reviews (Inv) NCIPC divisions (Inf) Other CDC center programs (Inv) Other CDC evaluators (Inv)

Guiding Questions What is the value of the ICRC portfolio ? How has the ICRC program built the injury field? Value outside of CDC and ICRCs Advantage of programs vs. grants How has the ICRC program affected injury outcomes? Contributions toward behavioral modification Influences on policy and legislation

Discussion & Questions