Appraising Inundated Properties.  How did we get there?  1. By Choice ◦ Sometimes we choose to take on unusual or unique appraisal assignments.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Over the River, Through the woods, to Great-Great-Great- Grandmas We Go! Val Swift, GISP GIS Administrator Hamilton County Surveyors Office.
Advertisements

Chapter 7 Valuation Using the Sales Comparison and Cost Approaches
Subdivision Plat Submittals Subdivision Plat Submittals
Land or Site Description
 Remember that the whole purpose of this is to come up with an estimated value for the property.  We want to correlate the values indicated from the.
Chapter 3 Size Requirements 1. Overview of Size Requirements Initial qualifying tracts must meet a minimum size requirement Qualifying tracts may contain.
ENFORCING LAKESHORE PROTECTION ORDINANCES IN A REGULATION- ADVERSE ENVIRONMENT.
Land Subdivision and Zoning Unit: Owning Property Lesson: Land Subdivision and Zoning.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION u THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IDENTIFIES PROPERTY IN SUCH TERMS THAT IT CANNOT BE CONFUSED WITH ANY OTHER PROPERTY. u A LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS.
Florida Real Estate Principles, Practices & Law 38th Edition
Land or Site Description Wayne Foss, MBA, MAI, CRE Foss Consulting Group
Valuation Basics and Procedures. “Scope of Work” I. Valuation Procedures a. Analyze typical techniques b. Discuss easement scenarios c. Reporting d. Examples.
BCC PUBLIC HEARING ON BZA #VA , OCTOBER 3, 2013 APPLICANT: YURI FERRO APPELLANT: WILLIAM A DAVIS, SR. and REBECCA M. DAVIS Orange County Zoning.
VALUING THE SITE Chapter 10. CHAPTER TERMS AND CONCEPTS Abstraction method Allocation method Developer’s profit Development method Elements of comparison.
BCC CALLED PUBLIC HEARING ON BZA #SE , DECEMBER 4, 2014 APPLICANT: NORBERTO DUARTE Orange County Zoning Division DATE: March 10, 2015.
Value Point Analysis™ Learn More.... What is Value Point Analysis™? Value Point Analysis™ (VPA): Determines Gross/Net Plantable Acres using a GIS Mapping.
HIGHEST AND BEST USE THE REASONABLE PROBABLE AND LEGAL USE OF VACANT LAND OR IMPROVED PROPERTY, WHICH IS PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE, APPROPRIATELY SUPPORTED,
Chapter 9 Real Estate Appraisal This chapter introduces a central issue in real estate decision making, “What is the property worth?”
FLP: Forest Legacy Program Top 10 Appraisal Issues Ken Daw, RPRA, MAI Senior Review Appraiser Eastern Region Jack McGee Review Appraiser Southern Region.
CONCEPTS of VALUE. FACTORS OF VALUE UTILITY –THE ABILITY OF A PRODUCT TO SATISFY HUMAN WANTS. RELATES TO THE DAMAND SIDE OF THE MARKET. SCARCITY –THE.
Appraisal Reports: An Agents Best Tool Presented By: D. Wade Brown, SR/WA American Acquisition Group, LLC.
Incidence of Environmental Regulations Who pays for environmental regulations, and how much?
Farm Management Chapter 20 Land  Control and Use.
The valuation process I.Defining the problem i.Identification of the real estate to be appraised Address, common name, legal description ii.Identification.
JPEGS\gisdef.gif. Tax map This is a copy of a scanned tax map Paper maps have no data attached to them other than what is written on them.
Real Estate Principles and Practices Chapter 4 Land Use Controls © 2014 OnCourse Learning.
Present-Use Valuation Program Tony Simpson NC DOR Property Tax Division.
Donating Complex Assets to Charity: Case Studies and Best Practices Ryan Boland Fidelity Charitable, Complex Assets Group.
8/29/20151 Docket Z (Easter Mountain, LLC) A Request to Rezone 556 Acres From RU-4 to SR-2 Cochise County Board of Supervisors October 25, 2011.
Summit Urban Farming Initiative Land Access for Urban Agriculture.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT City Council June 3, 2014.
June 12, 2014 Anthony F. DellaPelle, Esq., CRE® McKirdy & Riskin, PA.
Chapter 10 APPRAISAL BASICS 339. I. WHAT IS AN APPRAISAL? 339.
Rural Residential Zoning District & Subdivision Exemptions Southampton County Board of Supervisors Presented by Jay Randolph November 28, 2005.
TOPICS IN LAND SURVEYING: SUBDIVISIONS TREC #7220 TIM HOWELL, RLS TREC INSTRUCTOR #1556.
Chapter 5 Sound Management 1. Sound Management Defined Sound management is a program of production designed to obtain the greatest net return from the.
PROPERTY INSPECTION AND ANALYSIS: THE SITE Chapter 6.
Chapter 12: Sales Comparison Approach. The Sales Comparison Approach is Useful When:  An active market exists  Comparable sale are highly similar to.
DNRC Lease Lot Survey Conducted by Lessees As of 10pm, September 17, 2009.
MAY 8, 2012 BCC PUBLIC HEARING ON BZA # SE , Nov. 03, 2011 APPLICANT: CHANTEL PRESTON APPELLANT: SHAWN R.H. SMITH, Esq., (AGENT FOR CHANTEL PRESTON)
April 17, 2007 BCC Called Public Hearing on BZA #VA February 1, 2007 Applicant: Towanda Hannah.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Planning & Land Development Regulation Board May 21, 2014.
February 20, 2007 Macon County Planning Board. Structure Height Ordinance Allows construction to 4 stories or 48 feet, whichever is greater Measured from.
Real Estate Principles and Practices Chapter 4 Land Use Controls © 2010 by South-Western, Cengage Learning.
Cumberland Park CCB Project Virginia Department of Environmental Quality October 9, 2007.
Community Development Department Variance Length of Dock Roof 2 Cardinal Court.
APPRAISAL ACTIVITIES 1. COLLECTION OF PERTINENT DATA. 2. INSPECTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, COMPARABLE SALES, THE AREA AND NEIGHBORHOOD. 3. ORGANIZATION.
Recent auctions 2/26; Hardin co. 80Ac.; 84.9 CSR; fairly uniform, 3 soils – $7,50 per acre; $83.04/CSR point 2/26; Story Co., 64 Ac; 86.3 CSR; fairly uniform,
Chapter 13: Site Valuation. Approaches to Site Valuation  Direct sales comparison approach  Extraction method  Development approach  Capitalization.
1. Land Conservation Act (LCA) * Public Agency Webinar Public Acquisition Notification Procedure – A Step by Step Guide * LCA, also known as the Williamson.
Dockets R-11-06;07;09 Zoning Regulation Amendments Proposed Amendments to the Cochise County Zoning Regulations regarding Lot Development Administrative.
Valuing The Site Basic Real Estate Appraisal: Principles & Procedures – 9 th Edition © 2015 OnCourse Learning Chapter 10.
TOPICS IN LAND SURVEYING: SUBDIVISIONS TREC #7220 TIM HOWELL, RLS TREC INSTRUCTOR #1556.
Community Development Department APPLICATION 2922 VARIANCE TO REDUCE LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
Community Development Department Variance to 20 ft. Street Side Setback 1 Windsor Place APP. NO Variance to 20 ft. Street Side Setback 1 Windsor.
Public Hearing Seattle Ridge Preliminary Plat/ Planned Area Development PP December 18, 2013.
ANNEXATION Statutory Overview July 19, 2011 David L. Yearout, AICP, CFM.
4650 Alhambra Circle Building Site Separation. Request: The applicant is requesting consideration of a building site separation in accordance with Section.
VILLA AMADOR VICINITY MAP. CASE SPECIFICS Subject properties encompass ± acres –Entails 10 parcels of land –Located south of Amador Avenue, west.
Valuation Based on Zoning
Proximity Prepared for the Appraisal Institute Symposium 6/3/2015
Overview of Land and Site Valuation
Chapter 4 Ch 4: The Valuation Process NOTE: read the ebook, Ling-Archer ch 7 first, then the Handbok Ch 4.
9 Site Valuation Vacant land Vacant site
Property Disposition Public Information Session
Public Information Session
Subdivision Applications
Ohio Department of Natural Resources Office of Coastal Management
Washoe County Board of Adjustment October 4, 2018
12 D. Variance Request – 211 Jennifer Lane
Presentation transcript:

Appraising Inundated Properties

 How did we get there?  1. By Choice ◦ Sometimes we choose to take on unusual or unique appraisal assignments.

 2. By Surprise ◦ Sometimes the client doesn’t know (or doesn’t want to tell you!)  This can happen with award of multiple projects and the agency who has awarded them is busy or confused, or unclear about the properties. As we become more insulated from our clients due to new lending regulations, we are receiving information that is lacking (in quantity and quality).

 What do I need to complete the assignment competently? ◦ “Do we have all the information available and required upon accepting the assignment to complete the appraisal correctly?”

Despite our best efforts, some projects (due to client ignorance or misinformation, or a lack of due diligence by the appraiser) leave us “up $h!t creek without a paddle”.

 October 6 th, 2012 – Submitted a bid for appraising 11 tracts of land.  Awarded in Mid March of 2011  Information received for each parcel ◦ Legal description ◦ Acres ◦ Date acquired and acquired by whom (Clue #1 that something was amiss – the property had reverted back to State ownership due to back taxes) ◦ Parcel number ◦ Plat Map (seemed typical) ◦ Conditions or restrictions (none stated)

 Each consist of 1 parcel of land.  Located on the shore of Indian Lake, in Harrison Beach.  Harrison Beach consists of small summer cottages with a few year-round residences.

 County Equalization survey  (was not available)  Request a survey be completed  (was refused)  GIS – If available  (was not available)  Aerial Photos  Google Earth, MapCard, Web Soil Survey, etc.  Contacted a several local surveyors  Located one with a plat with the revised shoreline

 Lake erosion has significantly impacted the integrity of the lots along the eastern side of the lake.  Visual inspection and a copy of a local survey of the tract indicated that the majority or the entire tract has eroded away and is inundated.  It is the appraiser’s recommendation that a survey be completed to determine the exact boundary of the subject property.

HBU  Legal Permissibility ◦ Zoning states:  Minimum Lot Size: 30,000 sq.ft.  Minimum Lot Width: 100 ft  Waterfront Setback: 50 ft  Physical Possibility ◦ Underwater!  Financial Feasibility ◦ Seasonal ice fishing?!  and Maximum Productivity ◦ Excess or surplus land for adjacent lots

Excess land (excellent) - Regarding vacant site: land not needed to accommodate the site's primary highest and best use. Such land may be separated from the larger site and have its own highest and best use, or it may allow for future expansion of the existing or anticipated improvement. Surplus land (sucky) - Land not necessary to support the highest and best use of the existing improvement but, because of physical limitations, building placement, or neighborhood norms, cannot be sold off separately. Such land may or may not contribute positively to value and may or may not accommodate future expansion of an existing or anticipated improvement.

 Is it possible that the parcel will not be inundated in the future?  The parcel is inundated due to erosion because of strong westward winds, not because of rising water levels.  Due to waterfront improvement restrictions and zoning requirements it is unlikely that the erosion can be corrected or that the property can be improved to create a building site or useable land.

◦ The entire site has physical limitations. ◦ Though the market recognized a demand for lakefront property building sites, the parcel is not of sufficient size or suitable characteristics for improving. ◦ The site is most valuable as surplus land. ◦ If the parcel is to remain under water it is unlikely to increase value through assemblage, however the most likely potential buyers are still owners of adjacent properties.

Landlocked sales considered “Surplus Land”  # acre parcel of land; ◦ landlocked; ◦ HBU of “surplus land” ◦ Sold to adjacent land owner for $.02/sqft  #2 – 3.03 acre parcel of land; ◦ landlocked (part of abandoned railroad); ◦ HBU of “surplus land” ◦ Sold to adjacent land owner for $.01/sqft

 Comparative analysis provides value indications for the subject site ranging from a low of $.01/square foot to a high of $.28/square foot.  All, or the majority, of the subject property is inundated. Use is extremely limited, even to the adjacent landowner, as they already have lake frontage and assemblage to their current parcel would have minimal, if any economic benefit. It the parcel is totally inundated, they already would have benefit of the parcel. Therefore, a point near the lower end of the range is considered to be the best indication of value, ie, $.02 square foot supported by sales #1269 & #1268.  Consequently, I concluded a value of $.02 per square foot. Any Questions?