Breeding activity of a mixed age group of bulls on extensive pasture J.L. Clavelle, L. Fritz, J.M. Stookey and C. Waltz Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, CANADA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teaching Recommended Beef Production Practices through the Master Cattle Producer Program by Kenneth Sharpe Kenneth Sharpe Livingston, Louisiana.
Advertisements

Controlled Breeding Chandler Akins GJCA Officer Convention Coordinator.
ABSTRACT The objective of this research was to derive factors to predict daily milk yield when milk is sampled once per d for cows milked three times (3x)
Animal Breeding Systems
Estrus Detection Dr. Ray Nebel Dept. of Dairy Science Virginia Tech.
The Design and Evaluation of a Mobile Sensor/Actuator Network for Autonomous Animal Control Presented by Nashwa Ahmed.
Pooling DNA to Investigate Cattle Infertility Tara McDaneld USDA/ARS Meat Animal Research Center Clay Center, NE, 68933, USA.
Animal Behavior and Restraint
BEEF PRODUCTION Beef. Introduction  The beef industry in Ireland is the largest sector of the Irish Agricultural Economy  There are 4.5 million beef.
Dairy Herd Management.  Planning Calving  Calving  After Calving Management  Management of cow in early, mid and late lactation.  Lactation Curve.
BY DR. SOLOMON MENGISTU ADDISU ABERA SOLOMON ABEYI FANTAHUN DEREJE FEAST Beef group presentation.
OST TRIBAL BISON HERD RESEARCH BY DR TRUDY ECOFFEY, WILDLIFE BIOLOGIST OGLALA SIOUX PARKS AND RECREATION AUTHORITY Presentation for ITBC Annual Meeting.
Can You Breed a “Good Breeder” Kristi M. Cammack Department of Animal Science University of Wyoming.
Vocal communication between cows and calves in extensive range conditions J. M. Watts, J. G. Hall, J. M. Stookey, M. R. Arndt and B. Valentine Saskatoon,
Reducing weaning stress in beef cattle Derek B. Haley and Joseph M. Stookey Large Animal Clinical Sciences Western College of Veterinary Medicine University.
Effects of Blindfolding on Behaviour and Heart Rate in Beef Cattle During Restraint Large Animal Clinical Sciences Western College of Veterinary Medicine.
Colorado Agriscience Curriculum Animal Science Unit 4 – Reproduction and Genetics Lesson 6 Heat Detection.
Reproductive Problems 4-H Veterinary Science Extension Veterinary Medicine Texas AgriLife Extension Service College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical.
Reproduction and Palpation 4-H Veterinary Science Extension Veterinary Medicine Texas AgriLife Extension Service College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical.
Reproductive Management of the Cow Herd
1.8 Management Heat Stress 1.9 Reproductive Management of Dairy Cows 1.10 Guide to Good Dairy Farming Practice By: Mohammed Sabah 2014 Ch.1 Dairy cows.
Reproductive cycles and how they relate to breeding systems.
Artificial Insemination
BEEF CATTLE GENETICS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
2003 Paul VanRaden, Melvin Tooker,* Ashley Sanders, and George Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
Mating Programs Including Genomic Relationships and Dominance Effects Chuanyu Sun 1, Paul M. VanRaden 2, Jeff R. O'Connell 3 1 National Association of.
◄ ▼ ► ▲ Figure 2: Percent change ([(P 1 – P 2 )/P 1 ]*100) in pre- to post-step test heart rates in oxygen saturation observed at different elevations.
Economic Impact of Tropical Soda Apple on Cattle Production in Florida by Tajudeen T. Salaudeen Florida A&M University Michael Thomas, Ph.D. Florida A&M.
Beef & Dairy Production. How to decide?? Type of production varies greatly. Depends on: type of animals Location Facilities overall producer goals In.
OARI-BARC ANNUAL RESEARCH ACTIVITIES REVIEW FEBRUARY, 2015 BARC Demonstration of Dairy Technologies in Peri-urban areas of Nekemte, Bako and Gimbi towns,
By: Brendan M. Roth Next Slide?. Animal Breeders work with a bunch of different species. They have a range of things to do including: Caring for animals,
Rural Economy Research Centre AESI Student Day 05/11/2009 Examining the relationship between production costs and managerial ability P. Smyth 1, 2, L.
Testosterone, Aggression and a Test of the Challenge Hypothesis in Wild Chimpanzees Authors: M. Muller and R. Wrangham 2004 Presented by Valerie Butler.
Teagasc Presentation (Beef Round Table) Tuesday, 3 rd June 2014 Professor Gerry Boyle Director, Teagasc Pearse Kelly Head of Drystock Knowledge Transfer,
Factors Affecting Cow-Calf Costs, Production, and Profits Clement E. Ward, Professor Department of Agricultural Economics Oklahoma State University.
SUCKLING CONTROL IN PRIMIPAROUS BEEF COWS UNDER RANGE CONDITIONS G. Quintans, C. Jiménez de Aréchaga and A.I. Vázquez National Institute of Agricultural.
Physiology of Reproduction
Continuous Calving: Are Economic Incentives Large Enough to Eliminate the Traditional Practice? by D. Doye and M. Popp INTRODUCTION Why, despite expert.
Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Improving Pregnancy Rates Ontario Association of Bovine Practitioners Reproductive.
MALE REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS IN SOUTHERN ELEPHANT SEALS BEHAVIOURAL ESTIMATES AND GENETIC PATERNITY INTRODUCTION The southern elephant is the species with.
GM Foods: A Nanjing Case Study of Chinese Consumers ’ Awareness and Potential Attitudes Funing Zhong and Yulian Ding College of Economics & Trade Nanjing.
Beef Cattle Production
Factors affecting heifer fertility in U.S. Holsteins M. T. Kuhn* and J. L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service,
Cattle Behavior.
Beef Data & Genomics Programme Information Meetings 2015 Teagasc Beef Specialists.
Factors affecting death rate of lactating cows in Dairy Herd Improvement herds R. H. Miller, H. Duane Norman, M. T. Kuhn* and J. R. Wright Animal Improvement.
Does the Male’s Seductive Song Overpower His Appearance? Sexual Selection in Zebra Finches, Taeniopygia guttata Erin Moore Department of Biology, York.
2003 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluation.
 Milk fat composition varies with the season (summer vs. winter) but also with the milking time (AM vs. PM).  These observations could allow the diversification.
Harry’s Queue Patterns Chris Meyer: Joe Stinolis: Mark Burchnall
 Leslie Abraham & Genna Fanelli.  Background  John Carroll University Initiative o Research Objectives o Methodology o Demographics o Data Collection.
Mating Techniques: Natural Service and Artificial Insemination
Effects of Different Month, Semen and Parity on Bovine Superovulation Traits reporter : Jia-Bao Zhang Xian-Feng Yu College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University.
Spring And Summer Deer Management Original Power Point Created by Andy Harrison Modified by GA Agriculture Education Curriculum Office July 2002.
PERCENT OF TIME SCRATCHING Results Hypothesis 1: males with a shy temperament did not spend more of their time alone compared to males with.
A102 Care and Management of the Stallion. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Sperm Production in the Stallion  Colts do not.
Effects of Prairie Management on Soil Characteristics and Bees METHODS RESULTS  Soil Characteristics Analysis of variance (ANOVA) suggests that there.
Crossbreeding in Beef Cattle Susan Keene A portion of these slides work of: Matthew I. Miller Extension Agent Animal Science This presentation is from.
WLTP-DHC Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data, influence of different parameters By Heinz Steven
Dairy Cattle Production (95314)
Lecture 2   MATING IN BEEF HERD   Mating: It is the physical meeting of the male and female animal for the purpose of parturition or giving birth. Before.
Jason D. Vescovi1 and Todd D. Brown2
WALLACE RESOURCE LIBRARY
Effects of frequent away travel on training loads, recovery and injury in professional Australian soccer players Peter Fowler1, Rob Duffield2, Adam Waterson3.
The Chi-Squared Test Learning outcomes
F. Y. Obese, G. B. Martin, M. A. Blackberry, J. K. Damptey and C. M
Mitigation of Stress in Zebrafish (Danio rerio) induced in a Commonly Employed Housing Method for Research Adam Grierson, Charles R. Tyler and Gregory.
Leaving Certificate Agricultural Science
Joyce,. J. R. ¹, Jeffries, B. H. ², Stewart, Jr. R. L. ³, Segers, J. R
Livestock agreements cash lease and share
Presentation transcript:

Breeding activity of a mixed age group of bulls on extensive pasture J.L. Clavelle, L. Fritz, J.M. Stookey and C. Waltz Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, CANADA Jean L. Clavelle University of Saskatchewan Large Animal Clinical Sciences Western College of Veterinary Medicine Introduction A common management strategy during the breeding season is to turn bulls out as a mixed age group, a strategy that is thought to be an inefficient use of bull power (Blockey, M.A., Observations on group mating of bulls at pasture. Appl. Anim. Ethol., 5:15-34). Blockey (1979) found that younger bulls in a mixed age group were at a significant disadvantage because they were more frequently interrupted during mating compared to older (and typically more dominant) bulls and had a higher rate of culling due to injuries and lameness. Objectives 1. Determine breeding activity of bulls of various ages and 2. Compare and correlate dominance rank and breeding activity. Materials and Methods Pasture location Rudy-Rosedale PFRA pasture, 60 km south of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. The pasture was divided into two paddocks (384 and 768 hectares) of primarily native prairie and crested wheat grass. Animals 7 Charolais bulls (aged 4 (n=1), 3 (n=4) and 2 (n=2) years) and 202 cow-calf pairs. Observations were made from May 28 to July 15, There were 2, 7- hour observation sessions: a morning (from 6 am till 1 pm) and afternoon (from 1 pm to 8 pm) period. All focal bulls were observed for both a morning and afternoon period each week for a total of 14 hours of observation. Observations were made from horseback or while leading the horse as this allowed observers to be near cattle without causing agitation or disruption of their normal activity (Fig. 1). General activity was recorded using 5-min interval sampling. Interactions and breeding activity of the focal bulls were recorded with continuous sampling. Results 1. Events were defined in terms of the first 3 weeks (first period) and remaining 4 weeks (second period). A total of 226 and 323 hrs of observation were completed in the first and second periods respectively. 2. Dominance rank tended to be correlated with age (ie. the oldest bulls were most dominant). Fig. 1 Observer with a horse was able to be close to cattle without causing agitation or distress 5. Several breeding strategies were observed: I. High ranking bulls were observed to displace low ranking bulls from estrus females. This may suggest that high ranking bulls use low ranking bulls as ‘heat detectors’ and may explain why low ranking bulls tended to perform more estrus checks. II. Bulls in the lower half of the social hierarchy (bulls ranked 4, 6 and 7) were observed to perform ‘herding’ behaviour (Fig. 4a-f). Bulls would attempt to drive one or several females away from the presence of higher ranking bull. III. Cows that stood to be mated by higher ranking bulls were observed to fervently avoid the lowest ranking bull who would however, breed the cows while running (Fig. 5a-d). Fig. 4a-f Bull herding an estrus cow and her calf away from another bull. Conclusion The bulls in this study did not approach breeding activity in the same manner. Individual bulls utilized several breeding strategies that were in part dependent on their dominance ranking. Acknowledgements This research received financial support from the Agricultural Development Fund. We would like to thank Steve Beck and Peter Gonnett for their assistance in organizing this project. 3. Low ranking bulls tended to perform more estrus checks than high ranking bulls in both periods (Fig. 2). 4. There was no significant difference in the frequency of copulation between high and low ranking bulls in both periods (Fig. 3). Fig. 3a-c Female who had originally stood for high ranking bull ran away from a low ranking bull (a); high ranking bulls follow the low ranking bull as he chases female (b); female mounted by low ranking bull while running (c). Fig. 3 Frequency of copulations in high- and low-ranking males in the first and second observation period. Fig. 2 Frequency with which males check females for estrus in both the first and second observation period. abc e d f abc