“Restorative Justice: Justice that Heals” RODOLFO D. DIAMANTE Executive Secretary Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines- Episcopal Commission on Prison Pastoral Care CBCP-ECPPC Asia’s Representative International Commission of Catholic Prison Pastoral Care (ICCPPC) International Prison Chaplains Association (IPCA)

I. Introductory Remarks CBCP-ECPPC Thrusts Plights of Offenders and Victims II. What is Restorative Justice Comparison of 2 Paradigms Scriptural Basis III. Restorative Justice Core Values

IV. Restorative Justice - Fundamental Principles V. The Way Restorative Justice Works VI. Working Together for Restorative Justice VII. Conclusion

CBCP-ECPPC Current Major Thrusts Promotion and Organization of Restorative Justice Advocates Advocacy of Enlightened Legislation Linkages, Networking and Partnerships Deepening Commitment and Understanding of Justice That Heals and Alternatives to Imprisonment 

The Commission in 2000 in celebration of the Jubilee for Prisoners articulated a new vision for Prison Ministry -the Restorative Justice (Justice That Heals)

Plight of Prisoners - Subhuman living conditions- congested and dilapidated jails and prisons, inadequate daily food allowance, beds, toilets and other sanitary facilities. -Human rights violation- Corporal punishment and other acts of humiliation. -Slow judicial process and lopsided administration of justice.

- Lack of rehabilitation program in penal institutions - Failure to attend to prisoners with special needs namely the mentally ill, the handicapped, young, the old and the sick - Inadequate training of underpaid personnel - Graft and Corruption

Plight of Victims Have little say and participation Needs not attended too Denied of power Peripheral in the process Lack of closure

Restorative Justice - process whereby those affected by criminal behavior, victims, offenders, the families involved or the community have a part in resolving the issues which flow from the offending. What is Restorative Justice Restorative justice - a philosophy that embraces a wide range of human emotions - healing, mediation, compassion, forgiveness, mercy and reconciliation

COMPARISON OF 2 PARADIGMS RETRIBUTIVERESTORATIVE An approach focused on determining what law was broken who broke it How they should be punished A valued-based approach focused on determining harm resulting from crime what needs to be done to repair the harm who is responsible for repairing the harm

STATE AND COMMUNITY RETRIBUTIVERESTORATIVE Crime - act against the State, a violation of law Control - lies in the criminal justice system Community- sideline, represented by the State Crime - act against another person and the community Control - lies in the community Community- facilitator in the restorative process

OFFENDER AND VICTIM RETRIBUTIVERESTORATIVE Dependence on proxy professionals Victims - peripheral to the process Focus - establish blame, guilt, on past. Response- focused on offender’s past behavior Direct involvement by participants Victims- central to the process Focus- problem solving, obligations, future Response- focused on consequences of offender’s behavior; emphasis on the future

RELATIONSHIP RETRIBUTIVE RESTORATIVE Emphasis on adversarial relationship Emphasis on dialogue and negotiation

ACCOUNTABILITY RETRIBUTIVERESTORATIVE Crime- individual act with individual responsibility Offender accountability - taking punishment Punishment is effective, deters crime and changes behavior Crime - both individual and social responsibility Accountability - assuming responsibility and taking action to repair harm Punishment - not effective in changing behavior, disruptive to community harmony and good relationships

The concept of lex talionis, the law of proportionality- If property worth 100 gold coins is stolen, then you cannot claim 200 coins in return.. The emphasis in Scripture was on restitution and restoration, not vengeance and punishment. Justice should be based on principles of forgiveness and reconciliation Scriptural Basis

Jesus specifically rejects 'an eye for an eye'. 'If anyone hits you on the right cheek, offer him the other one as well Jesus called on followers to love their neighbors and enemies too. Jesus called for unlimited love and said our forgiveness should be beyond calculation.

Core Values Retributive justice is focused on the offender. Laws and punishment are the core values. Restorative Justice is focused on the offender, victim, and community. Values are: offender- apology or shaming and reintegration victim- opportunity for forgiveness community- relationships.

Restorative Programs Key Values 1. ENCOUNTER : Create opportunities for victims, offenders and community members who want to do so to meet to discuss the crime and its aftermath. 2. AMENDS: Expect offenders to take steps to repair the harm they have caused.

4. INCLUSION: Provide opportunities for parties with a stake in a specific crime to participate in its resolution. 3. REINTEGRATION: Seek to restore victims and offenders as whole, contributing members of society.

Restorative Justice - Fundamental Principles 1.Justice requires that we work to restore those who have been injured: victims, communities and offenders. 2. Those most directly involved and affected by crime should have the opportunity to participate fully in the response if they wish. 3.The government is responsible for preserving a just public order and the community establishes peace.

Community- creates the conditions for the restoration of both offender and victim.. Victim- examines feelings and take full advantage of any support network that will facilitate healing. Restorative Justice Conference (RJC), chaired by a facilitator, to which victims and offenders and appropriate support people are invited Offender - acknowledges responsibility for the crime committed and express honest regret. Way Restorative Justice Works

RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PROGRAMS Victim Offender Mediation Family or Community Group Conferencing Peacekeeping or Sentencing Circles Circle of Support

Working Together for Restorative Justice UN Congress on Crime Prevention and Treatment of Offenders urged all its member nations to increase the use of restorative interventions in addressing the problem of criminality. The CBCP-ECPPC, the Philippine Action for Youth offenders, the Integrated Correctional Association of the Philippines and the Coalition Against Death Penalty are working together to:

disseminate information about restorative justice develop and promote agreed standards and principles for evaluating and guiding restorative justice programs encourage more research on restorative justice programs and their effectiveness Seek alternatives to imprisonment or non-custodial treatment of persons deprived of their liberties

A system that gives a better deal to victims, that promotes apology, healing, understanding, accountability, personal and collective responsibility, forgiveness and even reconciliation. A system that practice compassion and mercy in dealings with one another. A system that uses imprisonment as a final resort. Restorative justice provides of these to happen. The current criminal justice system does not. Conclusion

References:  1. Consedine, Jim, Restorative Justice: A Gospel Response to Crime, Pagkalinga-25 Years of Prison Pastoral Care,2000  2. Cavanagh, Tom, Adopting New Core Values for Justice: Exploring Restorative Values  3. Claassen,Ron, Restorative Justice-Fundamental Principles,1995  4. Van Ness, Daniel and Strong, Karen Heethderks, Restoring Justice, 1997  5. Zehr, Howard, Changing Lenses, 1990  6. Hadley, Michael, The Spiritual Roots of Restorative Justice, 2001  7. McHugh, Gerald Austin, Christian Faith and Criminal Justice, 1978