Project Instrument Development funded by the National Science Foundation Paper Presented at the 2009 AERA Annual Meeting by: Dr. Mary Hobbs, P.I. and Amy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements


Developing a Positive Identity
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
University Students with a Disability: The Transition to Inclusion Jennifer Gillies, BA, MA (Waterloo) MA Critical Disabilities Studies York University.
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
PORTFOLIO.
S-1 SUPERVISION. S-2 Instructional Leadership Development Framework for Data-driven Systems QUALITY STUDENT PERFORMANCE ETHICS AND INTEGRITY Curriculum/Instruction/
Collaborative Evaluation Communities in Urban Schools.
Prepared by: Riyadh Bani Younis and Mais Mayyas.
INDEPENDENT LEARNER.
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 1 Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation Charlotte Danielson
1 Core Module Three – The Summative Report Core Module Three: The Role of Professional Dialogue and Collaboration in the Summative Report.
Meeting the Needs of Gifted Students Through the Use of Differentiated Instruction Angela Nicole Flenniken University of Saint Thomas Research Professor:
DED 101 Educational Psychology, Guidance And Counseling
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Data Sources One cohort of middle school science teachers (n=19) who participated in the first year of this PD program focused on developing their understanding.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Action Research: For Both Teacher and Student
An On-line Statistics Course in a Bioethics Curriculum Jane E. Oppenlander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor The Bioethics Program Union Graduate College-Mt.
Principles of Assessment
CYCO Professional Development Packages (PDPs) Teacher Responsiveness to Student Scientific Inquiry 1.
Assessment for Learning
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERS Improving School Programs through Observing.
T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F B R I T I S H C O L U M B I A CAUBO 2005 Performance Planning and Review Science and/or Art? Gina Borza, UBC Kristen Corrigan,
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
Student Retention Plan February 14 & 15, 2011 Mission  To recruit, prepare, and support outstanding teachers, mental health professionals, and administrators.
Scott Lowrey, Ed.D. (OISE/University of Toronto) CCEAM/CASEA 2014.
Welcome to the State of the STEM School Address National Inventor’s Hall of Fame ® School Center for Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
Project I.D. Project Instrument Development Empowerment in Career Science Teachers: Instrument Development for Exploring the Professional Growth Continuum.
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
Secondary CLASS Observation Training
INITIAL TEACHER EDUCATION IN PORTUGAL Escola Básica e Secundária Padre Manuel Álvares Madeira Islands, Portugal Liseth Cristina Andrade Ferreira Physics.
How Principals Build Organizational Capacity to Improve Student Learning Presentation to the Illinois School Leadership Advisory Council January 2015 By:
Intel ® Teach to the Future Pre Service Evaluation across Asia - Gaining the Country Perspective - Deakin University Faculty of Education Consultancy and.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
 Exploring and extending ideas leading to an original or interpretive product or performance.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
1 SHARED LEADERSHIP: Parents as Partners Presented by the Partnership for Family Success Training & TA Center January 14, 2009.
Collaborating Online for Rigor and Relevance Doug Silver, Director of Research, Successful Practices Network Ashley Terwilliger, Member Services Coordinator,
Evaluation of the Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program 2010 NSF Noyce Conference Abt Associates Inc. July 9, 2010.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Blueprint for GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS. The Minister’s reform agenda is based on the following belief: “All students are entitled to an excellent education.
Growth of Empowerment in Career Science Teachers: Implications for Professional Development Presented at the American Educational Research Association.
Webinar NGSS Earth and Space Science: Needs and a Call to Action April 9, pm Eastern | 3pm Central | 2pm Mountain | 1pm Pacific Dr. Ed Robeck, American.
Recent Graduate Interviews: Preliminary Feedback on Teacher Preparation Programs What’s Works/Best Practices Hayley M Cavino, Evaluation Coordinator Office.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
We made it! How to analyze and apply effectiveness data and evidences for growth. May 9 th, 2016.
Researching Teachers, Researching Myself Challenging my teacher educator pedagogy through researching beginning teachers Dr. Monica McGlynn-Stewart George.
Bruna Irene Grimberg, Ph.D. AEA 2013 Annual Conference Washington, D.C. PEER-TEACHER INSTRUCTIONAL COACHING IN K-6 RURAL SCHOOLS.
Defining an Occasion of Sensemaking
Teacher Based Teams Facilitating School Improvement in
EC&I 808 Friday, October 14th.
Pat Conole (315) My Showcase Portfolio Pat Conole (315) t687.
Theoretical Framework
THE JOURNEY TO BECOMING
Creating an Active Learning environment
The Framework for Teaching
Olive Chapman University of Calgary Canada
Empowering Teachers: Implications for Professional Development
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

Project Instrument Development funded by the National Science Foundation Paper Presented at the 2009 AERA Annual Meeting by: Dr. Mary Hobbs, P.I. and Amy Moreland, M.S. The University of Texas at Austin Growth of Empowerment in Career Science Teachers: Implications for Professional Development

Organization 1. Objectives or Purposes 2. Perspectives or Theoretical Framework 3. Methods, Techniques, or Modes of Inquiry 4. Data Sources or Evidence 5. Results, Conclusions, or Points of View 6. Educational or Scientific Importance of the Study

Objectives or Purposes Much of the recent education research has focused on new teachers and why large numbers of teachers are leaving the profession. Few studies have focused on experienced teachers in an attempt to identify factors that may have contributed to their professional growth and retention.

Objectives or Purposes The researchers in this study used techniques of narrative inquiry, as well as behavior over time (BOT) graphing, to capture the experiences fifty teachers identified as having positively or negatively impacted their feelings of empowerment. For the purposes of this paper, the researchers investigate one particular dimension of empowerment – professional growth – as it is related to overall empowerment and is (occasionally) nurtured by professional development.

Perspectives or Theoretical Framework What is empowerment and why is it important? Empowerment is most often viewed as a process through which people become powerful enough to engage in, share control of, and influence events and institutions affecting their lives. In this study, empowerment was specifically defined as, “the opportunity and confidence to act upon one’s ideas and to influence the way one performs in one’s profession.”

Perspectives or Theoretical Framework Short (1992) presented six empirically derived dimensions underlying the construct of teacher empowerment – autonomy, self-efficacy, decision-making, status, impact, and professional growth. If teacher empowerment is vital to effective schools, then it is important to know how it develops and how it can be nurtured.

Methods, techniques, or modes of inquiry  In this study, data collection was accomplished through the use of one-on-one interviews (Clandinin & Connelly, 2000) in conjunction with the Systems Dynamics (Anderson & Johnson, 1997) technique of utilizing behavior over time (BOT) graphs. The researchers categorized teacher experiences, identified patterns, and examined the data for congruence with the growth of empowerment model developed by Hobbs (2004) during a previous study.

Methods, techniques, or modes of inquiry Atlas TI Qualitative Analysis Software Imported and Coded 50 transcripts Compared Transcripts Transcript Codes Code Frequency Visual Coding Display

Data Sources or Evidence Hobbs’ (2004) original research consisted of fifteen case study interviews with teachers who had from 12 to 31 years of science teaching experience, using strategies taken from both narrative inquiry and systems dynamics. The current research, the NSF-funded Project Instrument Development, duplicates the techniques used in the original study with a larger and more diverse sample of fifty teachers with 7 to 38 years experience from rural, urban and suburban schools.

Results, Conclusions, or Points of View Phases of Teacher Empowerment Phase 1: Initiating Empowerment Phase 2: Growth of Empowerment Phase 3: Sustaining Empowerment

Phases of Teacher Empowerment Phase 1: Initiating Empowerment (years 0-3) Phase 2: Growth of Empowerment (years 4-8) Phase 3: Sustaining Empowerment (9+ years)

Phase 1: Initiating Empowerment (years 0-3) Lack of Preparation for entering the classroom & concurrent lack of awareness of PD opportunities Early experiences with Decision-making Increasing confidence that accompanied student success Critical Element: Awareness of PD opportunities: “Part of what changes during a career is your awareness of these opportunities. I’m certain there were opportunities my first year. I just knew nothing about them.”

Phase 2: Growth of Empowerment (years 4-8) Growing Awareness of PD Increasing Self-Efficacy through student success Challenging contexts - both teaching & personal Maturing sense of Autonomy through involvement in decision-making Critical Element: Professional Growth Opportunities: In this career phase, the teachers began to seek professional growth opportunities designed to improve their instruction.

Phase 3: Sustaining Empowerment (9+ years) Appreciating lifelong learning Redefining Self-Efficacy Valuing relationships with peers Impacting education through group involvement Critical Element: Professional Growth and Lifelong Learning: “I’m still learning. That’s one thing I will say – If you quit learning, it’s not any fun anymore.”

Sample Phase 3 Empowerment Graph Around Year 9, Many teachers’ feelings of empowerment peaked and then leveled off.

Experiences and Patterns 1. Professional growth provided the “mind” – an intellectual remedy for lack of preparation for teaching and challenging teaching contexts – and eventually supported a mature sense of self-efficacy, which was reflected in teachers’ increased confidence in their teaching, involvement in decision-making, and their status as professionals. 2. The professional development needs of the teachers varied as their careers progressed and the context of their assignment changed. 3. The stories told by the teachers as they interpreted their graphs did not reflect a need or quest for control over schools, but focused primarily on their quest for effectiveness as teachers, their need for targeted professional development, and the importance of collegial relationships.

Educational or Scientific Importance of the Study 1.Evidence concerning the appearance and maturation of Short’s six dimensions should be considered in making decisions in regard to how the talents and effectiveness of teachers can be enabled and maximized. 2.The model shows empowerment as a growth process with three phases of development: The Initiating Phase, The Growth Phase, and the Sustaining Phase.

Creating the Conditions for Initiating, Increasing, & Sustaining Teacher Empowerment Phase 1: New teachers should be directed toward targeted professional development opportunities that address individual needs and/or weaknesses. Phase 2: PD should assist teachers in becoming more effective in designing and delivering instruction that meets the needs of their particular student population. Also, many Phase 2 teachers found areas of strong interest that later became the professional focus for their collegial connections beyond their classrooms.

Creating the Conditions for Initiating, Increasing, & Sustaining Teacher Empowerment Phase 3: These teachers recognized the importance of lifelong learning and noted a strong need for collaboration with other professionals who were functioning at their level of competence. School districts should be flexible in allowing these Phase 3 teachers to forego some of the standard offerings and attend, instead, workshops and conferences that meet their individual interests and needs.

Researcher Contact Information Mary E. Hobbs, Ph.D. Coordinator for Science Initiatives Texas Regional Collaboratives The University of Texas at Austin James P. Barufaldi, Ph.D. Principal Investigator Texas Regional Collaboratives The University of Texas at Austin Amy L. Moreland, M.S. Graduate Research Assistant The University of Texas at Austin