Data, Data Everywhere…. September 8, 2011 The Coalition for Academic Scientific Computation José-Marie Griffiths, PhD Vice President for Academic Affairs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Culture of Collaboration Cultivating a Campus Environment for Assessment.
Advertisements

Joint CASC/CCI Workshop Report Strategic and Tactical Recommendations EDUCAUSE Campus Cyberinfrastructure Working Group Coalition for Academic Scientific.
Peter Griffith and Megan McGroddy 4 th NACP All Investigators Meeting February 3, 2013 Expectations and Opportunities for NACP Investigators to Share and.
The Changing Research Data Paradigm One agency’s response Changes to Implementation of NSF’s Data Sharing Policy NOAA’s second annual Environmental Data.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
NSD © 2014 DASISH Digital Services Infrastructure for Social Sciences and Humanities WP4 Data Archiving Claudia Engelhardt (UGOE), Arjan Hogenaar (DANS),
Research Issues & Projects On behalf of the Research Team 17 March 2005.
THE JOINED UP WORLD OF E-RESEARCH Professor Neil McLean National Technical Standards Adviser to the Department of Education Science and Training (DEST)
Research Data Service at the IT Pro Forum HEIDI IMKER, DIRECTOR.
Institutional Perspective on Credit Systems for Research Data MacKenzie Smith Research Director, MIT Libraries.
NOAA Metadata Update Ted Habermann. NOAA EDMC Documentation Directive This Procedural Directive establishes 1) a metadata content standard (International.
Data Management Development and Implementation: an example from the UK SLA Conference, Boston, June 2015 Geraldine Clement-Stoneham Knowledge and Information.
Reorganization at NCAR Presentation to the UCAR Board of Trustees February 25, 2004.
William Pooler and Heidi Imker PhD Department of Research Data Service & Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at.
Open for ^ Business Research Data Services & Data Management Planning Ryan Schryver Wendt Commons is our.
Final evaluation of the Research Programme on Social Capital and Networks of Trust (SoCa) 2004 – 2007: What should the Academy of Finland learn.
Overview: FY12 Strategic Communications Plan Meredith Fisher Director, Administration and Communication.
Data Infrastructures Opportunities for the European Scientific Information Space Carlos Morais Pires European Commission Paris, 5 March 2012 "The views.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Designing the Microbial Research Commons: An International Symposium Overview National Academy of Sciences Washington, DC October 8-9, 2009 Cathy H. Wu.
Supporting the local research data environment via cross-campus collaboration and leveraging of national expertise Hannah F. Norton, Rolando Garcia Milian,
Research Data Management Services Katherine McNeill Social Sciences Librarians Boot Camp June 1, 2012.
Managing Research Data – The Organisational Challenge at Oxford James A J Wilson Friday 6 th December,
Managing Data: The Long View FORCE15 – 12 January 2015 Amy Friedlander, Ph.D.
Governor Pat Quinn B UDGETING FOR R ESULTS Budgeting for Results Funding Priorities, Improving Outcomes March
Session Chair: Peter Doorn Director, Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS), The Netherlands.
Institutional Change and Sustainability: Lessons Learned from MSPs Nancy Shapiro & Jennifer Frank CASHÉ KMD Project University System of Maryland January.
Preserving Digital Collections for Future Scholarship Oya Y. Rieger Cornell University
Ensemble Computing in the National Science Digital Library (NSDL)
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
Chapter © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Research Program Overview National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Robert J. Jaeger, Ph.D. Interagency and International Affairs Interagency.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Open Access in Russia (a view from inside Russian Academy of Sciences) Sergey Parinov, CEMI RAS, principal researcher euroCRIS, Board member.
An Environmental Scan for Data Services Trends that are shaping today’s environment for data services.
‘intelligent openness’ The common objective of an RCUK data policy Gregor McDonagh
Dr. Fran Berman, RPI Feedback from BRDI Sponsor Forum 11/11 January 29, 2012 Fran Berman.
32. 2 “The Obama Administration is committed to the proposition that citizens deserve easy access to the results of scientific research their tax dollars.
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
Data Management and Accessibility S.M. Kaye PPPL Research Seminar 12/16/2013.
How Digital Libraries can Create a Culture of Open Access on Campus TCDL 2013.
SHARE (SHared Access Research Ecosystem) Tyler Walters Co-Chair, SHARE Steering Group (a joint committee of the ARL, the AAU, and the APLU) Eric Celeste.
The Role of Academic Libraries in the Digital Data Universe Break-Out Session: New Partnership Models Bob Hanisch and Brian Schottlaender Co-Leaders ARL.
EGovOS Panel Discussion CIO Council Architecture & Infrastructure Committee Subcommittee Co-Chairs March 15, 2004.
Peter Granda Archival Assistant Director / Data Archives and Data Producers: A Cooperative Partnership.
Symposium on Global Scientific Data Infrastructures Panel Two: Stakeholder Communities in the DWF Ann Wolpert, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Board.
Breakout # 1 – Data Collecting and Making It Available Data definition “ Any information that [environmental] researchers need to accomplish their tasks”
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
An Environmental Scan for Data Services Trends that are shaping today’s environment for data services.
ARL Workshop on New Collaborative Relationships: The Role of Academic Libraries in the Digital Data Universe September 26-27, 2006 ARL Prue.
Digital Data Collections ARL, CNI, CLIR, and DLF Forum October 28, 2005 Washington DC Chris Greer Program Director National Science Foundation.
1 Why is Digital Curation Important for Workforce and Economic Development? Alan Blatecky Office of Cyberinfrastructure Symposium on Digital Curation in.
Infrastructure Breakout What capacities should we build now to manage data and migrate it over the future generations of technologies, standards, formats,
Open Science and Research – Services for Research Data Management © 2014 OKM ATT 2014–2017 initiative Licenced under.
Data Infrastructure Building Blocks (DIBBS) NSF Solicitation Webinar -- March 3, 2016 Amy Walton, Program Director Advanced Cyberinfrastructure.
EUDAT receives funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 programme - DG CONNECT e-Infrastructures. Contract No EUDAT Aalto Data.
A Shared Commitment to Digital Preservation and Access.
Fedora Commons Overview and Background Sandy Payette, Executive Director UK Fedora Training London January 22-23, 2009.
Data Stewardship Lifecycle A framework for data service professionals Protectors of data.
Announcing the 2014 National Digital Stewardship Agenda.
PAA on Scientific Data and Information Roberta Balstad Chair, PAA Panel.
January 23,  Balance state’s higher education long range plan and agency operations in the required strategic plan;  Involve agency staff in.
ICPSR Data Fair November 8, 2010 Katherine McNeill, MIT Libraries
RDA US Science workshop Arlington VA, Aug 2014 Cees de Laat with many slides from Ed Seidel/Rob Pennington.
Changing Practices… Changing Values
Scientific Data as Research Infrastructure
Research Data Management
Bird of Feather Session
Presentation transcript:

Data, Data Everywhere…. September 8, 2011 The Coalition for Academic Scientific Computation José-Marie Griffiths, PhD Vice President for Academic Affairs Bryant University, Smithfield, Rhode Island

Concerns of Research Administrators 1.Strong advocates of research and its dissemination to as wide a set of audiences as possible. 2.Most concerns today relate to current economic trends and uncertainties. 3.Long been concerned about overhead costs (which are increasing) and the cap on administrative costs. 2

Concerns of Research Administrators Concerns about policies translating into “unfunded mandates” (like recently proposed financial reporting requirements to track all federal funding). 5.Increasingly concerned about roles, responsibilities, and liabilities. 6.Size matters! 3

Taking AIM at Data Lifecycle Management: A ccess, I ntegrity, M ediation

Data Policy Task Force Established at the February 3-4, 2010 NSB meeting Charge: further defining the issues and outlining possible options to make the use of data more effective in meeting NSF's mission. 5

Data Policy Task Force Strategies Monitor the impact of NSF updated implementation of the Data Management Plan requirement to inform a review of NSF policy Considering issues of data policy, Open Data movements, and related issues, the Task Force will then develop a "Statement of Principles.” Provide guidance to subsequent Board efforts to develop specific actionable policy recommendations focused, initially, on NSF, but that could potentially promulgate through other Federal agencies in a national and international context. 6

NSB Task Force on Data Policy Statement of Principles 1.Openness and transparency are critical to continued scientific and engineering progress and to building public trust in the nation’s scientific enterprise. – This applies to all materials necessary for verification, replication and interpretation of results and claims, associated with scientific and engineering research. 2.Open Data sharing is closely linked to Open Access publishing and they should be considered in concert. 3.The nation’s science and engineering enterprise consists of a broad array of stakeholders, all of which should participate in the development and adoption of policies and guidelines. 7

NSB Task Force on Data Policy Statement of Principles It is recognized that standards and norms vary considerably across scientific and engineering fields and such variation needs to be accommodated in the development and implementation of policies. 5.Policies and guidelines are needed for open data sharing which in turn requires active data management. 6. All data and data management policies must include clear identification of roles, responsibilities and resourcing. 8

NSB Task Force on Data Policy Statement of Principles The rights and responsibilities of investigators are recognized. Investigators should have the opportunity to analyze their data and publish their results within a reasonable time. 9

NSB Expert Panel Discussion on Data Policies March 28-29, 2011 Arlington, VA Participants included: – Over 30 experts/research administrators – 7 NSB members – 4 NSF Directors/Staff 10

A ccess, I ntegrity, M ediation Access – “what goes in must be able to come out!” Integrity – “what goes in must be the same thing that comes out!” Mediation – “what goes in is going to need help coming out!” 11

Key Areas Emerging from the Expert Panel Discussion on Data Policies March, 2011 ACCESS 1.Standards and interoperability enable data-intensive science. 2.Data sharing is an identified priority. INTEGRITY 3.Recognize and support computational and data- intensive science as a discipline. MEDIATION 4.Storage, preservation, and curation of data are critical to data sharing and management (data stewardship). 5.Cyberinfrastructure is necessary to support data- intensive science. 12

ACCESS What goes in must be able to come out! A ccess I ntegrity M ediation 13

Key Areas - National Science Board Expert Panel Discussion on Data Policies March, 2011 ACCESS 1.Standards and interoperability enable data-intensive science. 2.Data sharing is an identified priority. 14

Standards and interoperability enable data-intensive science. Citation and attribution norms – Need new norms and practices – Data producers, software & tool developers, data curators get credit for their work Interoperability standards – To enable sharing & interoperability across disciplines and internationally Development of persistent identifiers – To enable tracking of provenance – Ensure data integrity (see next section) – Facilitate citation & attribution 15

Interoperability - sooner rather than later 16

Data sharing is an identified priority. Must balance privacy concerns and data access for sharing and re-use. Acknowledge disciplinary cultures while establishing a culture of sharing across all research communities. Must promote & reward exemplary data management projects & plans. Data availability must be timely – issues of embargoes and restricted use durations. 17

18

INTEGRITY 19 What goes in must be the same thing that comes out! A ccess I ntegrity M ediation

Recognize and support computational and data-intensive science as a discipline. Recognize & reward computational & data scientists & curators: funding, tenure, etc. Support training in computational science Reward international collaborations to develop cyberinfrastructure, data stewardship, interoperability, international sharing New funding/economic models to support processing, storing, archiving, maintaining data sets. Need to define who is responsible for what – funding agencies/publishers versus research communities 20

Office of Research Integrity, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Key Components of Data Lifecycle Management Guidelines for Responsible Data Management in Scientific Research, ori.hhs.gov/education/products/clinicaltools/data.pdf 21

Planning for Preservation over the Data Life Cycle 1.Anticipate archiving costs and challenges 2.Create a data management plan 3.Follow best practices for data and documentation 4.Manage master datasets and work files 5.Determine file formats to deposit 6.Comply with dissemination standards and formats 7.Set up support for data users Courtesy of Cole Whiteman, ICPSR Proposal Planning and Writing Project Start-up and Data Management Project Start-up and Data Management Data Collection and File Creation Data Analysis Preparing Data for Sharing Depositing Data After- Deposit Archival Activities

Integrity Concerns for Research Institutions What to share - raw, processed, analyzed datasets, instruments, calibration and environmental records, analytical tools, etc. Processes for and costs of long-term curation of data 23

MEDIATION 24 What goes in is going to need help coming out! A ccess I ntegrity M ediation

Storage, preservation, and curation of data are critical to data sharing and management (data stewardship) Funding agencies must commit to ongoing financial support for repositories (no “orphans”) Standardized curatorial mechanisms Strategic partnerships between stakeholder communities and data repositories, supported by funders Define roles of different types of digital repositories Possibly independent auditing of data repositories to ensure data quality, access, interoperability 25

Cyberinfrastructure is necessary to support data-intensive science Geographic distribution of research teams, computing resources and datasets requires robust cyberinfrastructure Must include shared applications for analysis, visualization and simulation Standardization for interoperability & accessibility Need capital investment in cyberinfrastructure Need to define appropriate ratio of infrastructure to research funding 26

Mediation is Needed at Data Collection, Analysis and Use Gio Weiderhold, Stanford: When there is high intensity of interaction with any of these elements, it makes sense to have multiple mediators (e.g. replicate repositories) Collected Research Data Set A Collected Data Set B Repository 2 Repository 1 Repository 3 Use Repository 4 Use Analysis 27

Informal and Formal Mediation Mediation at “Use” level is informal and pragmatic Mediation at “Repository” and “Analysis” level needs to be formal with domain/expert control* Collected Research Data Set A Collected Data Set B Repository 2 Repository 1 Repository 3 Use Repository 4 Use Analysis 28 *Gio Weiderhold, Stanford, 1995

Stakeholders – Multiple Players, Inter-relationships 29

For data to be discoverable, must have a shared overlay of interdisciplinary and technological connections 30

31 This….or….This?

José-Marie Griffiths, Ph.D. Vice President for Academic Affairs Bryant University 1150 Douglas Pike Smithfield, RI (401)