A RE S TAKEHOLDERS R EADY FOR C OMMUNITY L ED L OCAL D EVELOPMENT (CLLD)? - S LOVAKIA C ASE Case study Nitra 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Producing Quality Evidence in a Well Organised Portfolio Doc Ref: 20/04/09-portfolio-quality-evidence.
Advertisements

Framework and Toolkit for UN Coherence, Effectiveness and Relevance at Country Level: Step 2 – Prioritize and set outcomes.
Geographical investigation
Prepared By: Dr. Abdelhafid Bouhraoua Steering to ABET EC 2K: Lab Organization and Instruction By: Dr. Abdelhafid Bouhraoua By: Dr. Abdelhafid Bouhraoua.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation
Business research methods: data sources
1 Outcome-Based Project Management Education for Emerging Leaders A case study of teaching and learning project management Thomas Mengel, PhD Associate.
1 Lecture 6 The Systems Analyst (Role and activities) Systems Analysis & Design Academic Year 2008/9.
Pestalozzi Children‘s Foundation emPower 2012 Monitoring & Evaluation Lecturers: Beatrice Schulter.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
EXTENDED ESSAY IN ECONOMICS An extended essay in Economics provides you with the opportunity to undertake in-depth research in Economics in an area of.
Experiences in Finland on self- evaluation of Local Action Groups Seminar on Monitoring and Evaluation of the LEADER Approach Brussels, 25 September 2005.
James Wolff Monita Baba-Djara March 26,  Course goal: ◦ To prepare students to work in maternal and child health in a developing country setting.
Web Analytics and Social Media Monitoring CAM Diploma in Digital Marketing (Metrics and Analytics) Assignment Briefing December 2013 & March 2014 Papers.
Fostering and adoption
Business research methods: using questions and active listening
Guidelines for the administration of axis 4 LEADER 17th July 2014, Nitra Mgr. Veronika Korčeková, MA Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of the.
Professional Certificate – Managing Public Accounts Committees Ian “Ren” Rennie.
Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
OECD/INFE Tools for evaluating financial education programmes Adele Atkinson, PhD Policy Analyst OECD With the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD Trust.
R EGIONAL PRODUCTS IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT – S LOVAK CASE Case study Nitra 2013.
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION Conditions of Work and Employment Programme (TRAVAIL) 2012 Module 13: Assessing Maternity Protection in practice Maternity.
Ex-ante evaluation for RDPs 4 th International Evaluation Conference Budapest, 26th September 2013 Zélie Peppiette, DG AGRI Rural Development.
Faustino Jerome G. Babate Nursing Research I Brokenshire College SOCSKSARGEN.
2010/12/10 First Skills Council Meeting Brussels, April 14 th 2014 Federico Brugnoli.
National Rural Development Network and experiences with Leader Implementation in Slovakia.
Ex-ante Evaluation of Local Action Group (LAG), Levoca Presented by: Ali, Festus Arroyo, Jose Bhandari, Thaneshwar Laing,Lan Nyoni, Abel Slovak University.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
NAME Evaluation Report Name of author(s) Name of institution Year.
PRESENTATION FOR SENIOR EXECUTIVES Developing empathy.
Professional Certificate in Electoral Processes Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
Peer Learning Event on national Lifelong Guidance Policy Forums 4th-5th of June 2008, Thessaloniki With the support of the Lifelong Learning Programme.
Assessment Formats Charlotte Kotopoulous Regis University EDEL_450 Assessment of Learning.
November 15, 2007 The “ABC” of Effective Field Monitoring & Supervision November 15, 2007.
Guidelines for LDS preparation for Croatian LAG’s Estonian Leader Union Kadri Tillemann and Kristiina Timmo 28 th of September, Zagreb.
Evaluation Seminar Czech Republic CSF and OP Managing Authorities Session 3: Mid-Term Evaluation.
National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee & Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Action Planning Workshop January 2007.
Evaluation of NRNs Andreas Resch, Evaluation Advisor.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Data Collection: Designing an Observational System.
Evaluation of NRNs Hannes WIMMER, Team Leader Andreas RESCH, Evaluation Advisor Nordic-Baltic Rural Network meeting, 6-8 December 2015, Pułtusk.
E X POST EVALUATION OF LEADER APPROACH DELIVERY – S LOVAK CASE Case study Nitra 2014.
What is Social Accountability? “Social Accountability is an approach initiated by the community for collective responsibility of all stakeholders in ensuring.
Fundamentals of Governance: Parliament and Government Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
DISSERTATION WORKSHOP Getting down to work October 10 th 2013 Physics Lecture Theatre (PLT) Alan Bradley
Brussels, 29th September ASSESSMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITIES FROM ABSORPTION POINT OF VIEW Some aspects regarding administrative absorption capacity.
©, Manuel Benito, Paris, Mars 2006 Focusing in the process of building a Virtual Campus as a tool for ODL The experience of the University of the Basque.
Town Centre Healthchecks. Page 1 Introduction “A Health check is the appropriate monitoring tool to measure the strengths and weaknesses of a town centre.
Roadmap & Actions Expert Consultation Health in All Policies.
M & E System for MI’s Training Program & Guidelines for MI’s Completion Report Presented by Monitoring and Evaluation Officer Mekong Institute January.
Jean-Michel Courades, DG AGRI Rural Development Advisory Group 18 December 2006 Rural Development Networking
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
Chapter 10 Understanding and Planning Reports and Proposals 10-1.
Reading Discussion – s519 by Peter Hall – 1/21/09 Ryan, J., McClure, C. R., & Bertot, J. C. (2001). Choosing measures to evaluate networked information.
Improved socio-economic services for a more social microfinance.
PROGRAM EVALUATION A TOOL FOR LEARNING AND CHANGE.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
ECO 365 Week 2 Learning Team Reflection Production and Cost Analysis Discuss this week’s objectives with your team. Include the topics you feel comfortable.
ECO 365 Week 4 Learning Team Public Policy in Economics Discuss this week’s objectives with your team. Include the topics you feel comfortable with, any.
ECO 372 Week 4 Learning Team Weekly Reflection Discuss this week’s objectives with your team. Your discussion should include the topics you feel comfortable.
BPA 303 Week 2 Learning Team Policy Implementation Check this A+ tutorial guideline at Week-2-Learning-Team-Policy-Implementation.
Thematic Working Group no. 3 Guidelines Evaluation of LEADER/CLLD
Component D: Data collection by field surveys
Welcome to Level 3 OF SOTY 2017.
Introduction to Lesson 5 Preparing for interviews
Evaluation tools training
The Estonian experience with ex-ante evaluation – set-up and progress
Guidelines on the Mid-term Evaluation
Internal control quality assessment
Presentation transcript:

A RE S TAKEHOLDERS R EADY FOR C OMMUNITY L ED L OCAL D EVELOPMENT (CLLD)? - S LOVAKIA C ASE Case study Nitra 2015

F IRST WEEK – INTRODUCTION Introduction to the country context Introduction to the EU rural development policies Introduction to Leader approach in the EU rural policy. EU monitoring and evaluation system Leader in SK, Leader guidelines

S ECOND WEEK – STRUCTURING, DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION TOOLS AND OBSERVATION Delivery mechanism in Leader – interactive session Developing evaluation tools: interviews and focus group screenplay Field research with Leader stakeholders – MA, PA and LAGs, Questions to check the tool: If the tool allows to answer EQ If all aspects of CLLD implementation factors are covered It the composition of tool allows its effectiveness

T HIRD WEEK – OBSERVATION AND ANALYSIS Field research in 5 LAGs, Vršatec (Trenčín) LEV (Levoča) Muránska Planina (Brezno, Rimavská Sobota) KRAS (Rožňava) Malohont (Rimavská Sobota)

W HERE DO WE GO ?

F OURTH WEEK – ANALYSING AND JUDGING Synthetizing outcomes, preparing the PPT on outcomes and discussion Conducting the SWOT on readiness of SK for CLLD Conclusions and recommendations in relation to Leader approach delivery in SR Writing the final report Field trip Presentations in closing event of the Case study

O UTCOMES Final Report PPT SWOT and conclusions and recommendations

T HE STRUCTURE OF THE FINAL REPORT Introduction (1 page max reflecting objectives of the case study) The general description of the situation in Leader implementation (MA, PA and LAG level, max 5 pages) Key CLLD implementation factors (max 5 pages) Development of evaluation tools: interview and focus group screenplay (max 6 pages) Analysed and synthetized results of interviews and focus groups (max 10 pages) SWOT analysis of readiness of SK for CLLD (max 4 pages) Conclusions and recommendations for CLLD in programming period of 2014 – Slovakia (max 3 pages)

W HAT IS IMPORTANT FOR MARKING Willingness to learn and develop the topic Ability to work in teams Analytical skills Communication and ability to present research results

H OW WE WILL PROCEED

E VALUATION QUESTION “ To what extent are stakeholders in Slovakia ready to implement the CLLD? (at RDP and LAG level)?”

Collecting information on Leader EU, SK, guidance, EU evaluation Desk research, Defining key CLLD implementation factors Developing evaluation tools: interviews and focus groups Field research, conducting the evaluation, comparing two systems: SK and NR SWOT on delivery mechanism in relation to applicability of CLLD in SK Presentation of evaluation results Conclusions and recommendations