Dorothy Chun UC Santa Barbara INTENT Conference, Léon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tandem learning method for professional training Basic Ideas, Concepts and Methods.
Advertisements

Language Policy for Lansdowne School Beliefs At Lansdowne, we believe that language is a vehicle for transdisciplinary learning. The strands of language.
Being explicit about learning Focusing feedback on improvement Gathering evidence of learning Handing on responsibility for learning Participation Dialogue.
Help! They Don’t Speak English:
Creating Collaborative Models of Course Development and Delivery Inma Álvarez Open Meeting on Less Widely Taught Languages University of London, 15 th.
A PRACTICAL GUIDE to accelerating student achievement across cultures
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Do we need to Assess for Learning? Concordia University Michael Pellegrin, MEESR March 2015.
Online Cafés for Heritage Learners ---- The different parameters The Cultura Project, the Italy-USA Exchange, the USA-Spain exchange NFLRC – University.
Planning for Success What matters in building a successful secondary program in Chinese?
Innovative Uses of Technology in Education IDE 1022 ACADEMIC WRITING COURSE Bilal Can TULUN IDE 1022 ACADEMIC WRITING COURSE Bilal Can TULUN
Australian Curriculum: Languages Draft Shape of the Australian Curriculum: Languages Consultation 31 January to 7 April 2011.
Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
NAEYC Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through Age 8.
The 6 Principles of Second language learning (DEECD,2000) Beliefs and Understandings Assessment Principle Responsibility Principle Immersion Principle.
1-Experiential Learning The World Wide Web makes it possible for students to tackle a huge amount of human experience. In such a way, they can learn by.
Dorothy Chun UC Santa Barbara.  Why do it? 1.To be able to say with greater certainty, beyond anecdotal evidence, that your efforts are having an effect.
Betsy Parrish Hamline University/ATLAS NCTN November 8, 2012.
Education Bachelor’s Degree in Elementary Education Began the Master’s of Special Education program in January of 2011 Professional After graduation Sorensen.
From modules to qualifications – reshaping the languages curriculum at the Open University Dr Uwe Baumann and Dr Elodie Vialleton Reshaping Languages in.
Contribution of a Professional Development Program for Teachers’ Learning Mónica Baptista; Ana Maria Freire
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
RELCAAP National Seminar-Workshop RELCAAP National Seminar-Workshop on Updating Strategies in Communicative Language Teaching: Support to School - Based.
Home, school & community partnerships Leadership & co-ordination Strategies & targets Monitoring & assessment Classroom teaching strategies Professional.
Promoting improvement ITE Thematic dissemination conference: secondary modern languages Hand-out Elaine Taylor HMI, National Lead for Modern Languages.
Promoting improvement ITE thematic dissemination conference: secondary modern languages 26 November 2013 Elaine Taylor HMI, National Lead for Modern Languages.
China 2007 International Conference on Online FLE
Families as Partners in Learning Principals and teaching staff Why are partnerships important?
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
Supporting Learning With Digital Literacy. Goals of Meeting Information tools to share with your staff; launching survey on instruction using technology.
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning. ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Knowledge of content and the structure of the discipline In planning.
NSW Curriculum and Learning Innovation Centre Draft Senior Secondary Curriculum ENGLISH May, 2012.
The Development of Intercultural Dimension in Language Teaching
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
Reading and Writing National Standards workshop phase 2 Term
Ms. Caley Hughes’s Candidate Teaching Presentation Anonymous: Anything your mind can believe, you can achieve. Believe and achieve. Website.
Learners’ Attitudes and Perceptions of Online Instruction Presented by: Dr. Karen S. Ivers Dr. JoAnn Carter-Wells Dr. Joyce Lee California State University.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Assessing General Education Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.
ESL STANDARDS TExES - Texas Examination of Educator Standards NBPT - National Board of Professional Teaching TESOL - Teaching of English to Speakers of.
GETTING HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT’S BUY-IN: Target Language Only Mandarin Chinese Classes.
Presentation to the MS Principals’ Conference April 2009.
Assuring quality for the teaching of intercultural communication in Europe: perspectives and challenges Sharon Millar and Célio Conceição.
Technology as a Tool. In our society which is overfilled with technology, is adding technology to the classroom more helpful or more harmful? Why? Brainstorm.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Semester 2 Situation analysis TESL 3240 Lecture 3.
1 Voluntary Standards for World Languages Workshop for Issaquah School District August 30, 2006 Presented by Michele Anciaux Aoki, Ph.D. Anciaux International.
What should we expect from 2 nd year students? A realistic approach. Tuesday 25 th February 2014 Tutor CPD Seminar.
New Pathways to Academic Achievement for K-12 English Learners TESOL March 26, 2009 Anna Uhl Chamot The George Washington University.
Put Your Classroom On A 21 st Century DI-IT Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated Classroom Environments Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated.
Universal Design for Learning
ENGLISH MEDIA LITERACY: A COLLABORATIVE PROJECT TO TEACHING READING Report Author: Nguyen Van Huy Institution: Hue University-College of Foreign Languages.
 managing self managing self  relating to others relating to others  participating and contributing participating and contributing  thinking thinking.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
Content and Curriculum ….. Information from Chapters 3 and 9 and from the North Carolina Standard Course of Study.
AYP Aigner Allen Shoemaker Elementary  Shoemaker did not make AYP because of the following subjects:  Math  Writing.
YL Material Design & Development Week 2 Life Map Processing Thomlinson.
Competencies for the 21 st Century LEMA VISION MISSION & STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES (SLO)
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
AAPPL Assessment Follow Up June What is AAPPL Measure? The ACTFL Assessment of Performance toward Proficiency in Languages (AAPPL) is a performance-
NEEDS ANALYSIS.
Gretchen Nauman Pennsylvania State University
Learning and Teaching Principles
NJCU College of Education
Institute for English Language Education
Bring the GWP to Your School
National Framework for Languages (NFfL)
Topic Principles and Theories in Curriculum Development
Presentation transcript:

Dorothy Chun UC Santa Barbara INTENT Conference, Léon

Different Goals & Models of Telecollaboration  Goals: global and local Internationalization of education Digital literacies Linguistic, intercultural communicative competence (ICC)  Models Class to class Tandem learning

Cultura Model’s Creators & Goals  Furstenberg, Levet & MIT in 1997  Goals: to make culture (“the silent language,” the “hidden dimension”) visible to help students understand the values, attitudes, beliefs and concepts of another culture

Reasons for Meta Synthesis  Why? To document many different adaptations To provide advice for future exchanges  How? Extensive survey sent to 30 known project leaders Response from 18 (60% return rate)

Research Questions RQ1: What were the goals that led to the adoption of the Cultura model? RQ 2: What were the processes in the implement ation of the project that built towards to goals? RQ 3: What kind of data was gathered in order to determine whether the goals were achieved?

RQ 1 What were the goals that led to the adoption of the Cultura model?

Participant Information Program settingL2 taught 4-year university15 (83%)English8 High school2 (11 %)French2 2-year comm coll1 (6 %)Samoan2 Spanish2 Chinese2 Filipino1 German1 Japanese1

Prior Experience with Cultura

Students’ Proficiency Levels

Reasons for Choosing Cultura External: 1. Opportunity to learn about Cultura 2. Opportunity to participate in a project Internal: 1. Belief or interest 2. Innovation to language program 3. Additional intercultural learning opportunity

Expected Learning Outcomes Language: skills, attitudes Other: sense of learning community Culture: skills, knowledge, attitudes Language skills (15) Language attitudes (2) Culture skills (7) Cultural knowledge (6) Cultural attitudes (13)

Language vs. Culture Learning

Summary: RQ1 (Goals)  External & internal motivations Believed in the model Language skills, confidence, motivation Improvement in cultural knowledge, skills, awareness, and openness to another culture

RQ 2 What were the processes in the implementation of the project that built towards the goals?

Cultura One of Course Activities

Features/Activities Used

Modes of Interaction

L1 and L2 in Interactions

Little Teacher Involvement Online

Roles of the Teacher Online

Summary: RQ 2 (Implementation)  Great variability  Only part of curriculum, sometimes extracurricular  Text-based questionnaires & forums most popular; video chats too  Mixture of L1 & L2 used  Teachers’ participation minimal  Exchanges ranged from 3-24 weeks

RQ 3 What kind of data was gathered in order to determine whether the goals (learning outcomes) were achieved?

Data Gathered for Assessment  Online (9)  Written homework (6)  Survey, interviews (5)  Reflective reports, self- assessment (4)  In class activities (4)

Student Learning Gains Reported LanguageCulture

Mixed Teachers’ Impressions  Positive (10): Culture learning Instructional integration  Negative (2): Student motivation/interest Instructional alignment & integration  Mixed (3) or Neutral (4)

Positive Students’ Reactions  Positive (11): Motivation/interest Learning community Language learning  Negative (1): Lack of partners’ responsiveness  Mixed (3)

Challenges Encountered  Management and logistics (22)  Instructional alignment and integration with curriculum (14)  Student motivation/interest (5)  Technology (4)

Summary: RQ3 Data & LO  Wide variety of data gathered, both online and offline  Learning outcomes: almost as many gains in linguistic areas as in cultural areas  Overall teacher and student satisfaction  Common challenges

Recommendations  1. Set realistic goals Know your learners and their abilities/proficiency Most successful with intermediate and advanced L2 learners Consider both linguistic and cultural gains

Recommendations  2. Planning, planning, planning Close communication Common goals, curricular commitments Model adaptation Appropriate tools and activities Flexibility Buy-in at all levels

Recommendations  3. Follow up on online activities Online interaction does not ensure learning or understanding Misunderstandings could have linguistic or cultural origins (or both) In-depth classroom discussions are essential

Muchas gracias y buena suerte con sus proyectos de futuro!