European payment order Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European payment order Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment.
Advertisements

The European Small Claims Procedure and other EU Instruments: Why is it useful to choose the European Small Claims Procedure? Elena DAlessandro University.
International insolvency law – basic principles within the European union.
European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims
The new directive on combating late payment
European Order for Payment Procedure April 22nd, 2008 Mgr. Petra Novotna.
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
Arbitration in Poland Practical issues Monika Hartung Legal Adviser, Partner Warsaw 16 June 2011.
The Brussels II Regulation The jurisdiction of courts.
EU secondary law Regulation 593/2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) Regulation No 864/2007 on the law applicable to non- contractual.
INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Marko Jovanovic, LL.M. MASTER IN EUROPEAN INTEGRATION Private International Law in the.
Unit 8: The European order for payment procedure and the European small claims procedure Dr. Matthias Frey Head of the Municipal Court.
Not legally binding FP7 Rules for Participation and Grant agreement FP7 Helpdesk 
A narrow pathway between fences Seminar on free movement of same sex families in Europe European Parliament, 3 May 2011 Pál Szirányi – Permanent representation.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU European Court of Justice Prof. Dr. Martin Trybus Birmingham.
EU Rome I Regulation Conflict Rules for Contracts.
International Treaty in EU PIL
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
Rome II Regulation Conflict rules for torts. Rome II Regulation The Regulation defines: the conflict-of-law rules applicable to non- contractual obligations.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
Consumer Collective Actions in Cross-Border Claims LAURA CARBALLO PIÑEIRO (USC) 1.- Consumer collective actions: diversity 2.- Problems on recognition.
8-th CIS Local Counsel Forum Kiev-Odessa, June 2013 Recognition and Enforcement of EU Countries Court Decisions in European Union: Illustration –
Judicial Cooperation in civil matters Jurisdiction of courts Brussels I Regulation.
EFFECTS ON OTHER PROCEEDINGS AGAINST OR BY THE DEBTOR CREDITOR RIGHTS DR MAREK PORZYCKI European Insolvency Regulation.
European civil procedure law Judicial cooperation in civil matters
Circulation of authentic instruments under Regulation 650/2012 speaker – Ivaylo Ivanov – Bulgarian Notary Chamber.
Dr Marek Porzycki.  Brussels Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (1968) – Member States of the.
Support of the foreign language profile of law tuition at the Faculty of Law in Olomouc CZ.1.07/2.2.00/
Chapter 26 Chapter 11: Plan Confirmation. Disclosure Statement Hearing The disclosure statement hearing is the first step in the Chapter 11 reorganization.
UNIT 3: The Principle of Mutual Recognition: trust as the pillar of the construction of the Judicial Area. Brussels I: Regulation 44/2001, of 22 December.
European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims JUDr. Radka Chlebcová.
Small claims procedure Regulation (EC) No 861/2007of European Parlament and of the Council of 11 July establishing a European Small Claims Procedure (OJ.
Introduction to EU Civil Judicial Cooperation Dr. Francesco Pesce Assistant Professor in International Law Università degli Studi di Genova (IT)
REGULATION (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure S. Laganovskis.
Service of documents within European Union Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on the service.
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
European civil procedure law Judicial cooperation in civil matters.
Judicial Cooperation in Civil and Commercial Matters Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 of 28th May 2001 And Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European.
First thoughts on an electronic European order for payment procedure Bartosz Sujecki, Molengraaff Instituut, University of Utrecht, Netherlands 5 th eJustice.
The Brussels I Regulation Jurisdiction in matters of insurance, consumers contracts and individual contracts of employment.
The Brussels II Regulation The Council Regulation no 2201/2003 concerning the jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgment in matrimonial.
1 A decade of revisions at UNCITRAL Special Course 6 – James Castello Lecture 3 Arbitration Academy PA R I S SUMMER COURSES
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Private sector interests in legal protection Tomaž Vesel First.
RECOGNITION AND EFFECTIVENESS OF INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS DR MAREK PORZYCKI European Insolvency Regulation.
1 A decade of revisions at UNCITRAL Special Course 6 – James Castello Lecture 5 Arbitration Academy PA R I S SUMMER COURSES
INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION Leonardo Graffi STUDYING LAW AT ROMA TRE FALL SEMESTER 22 October 2010.
“THE UNITARY PATENT AND THE UNIFIED PATENT COURT: A PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW PERSPECTIVE” Prof Dr Paul L.C. Torremans School of Law University of Nottingham.
Dr Marek Porzycki.  the debtor has some assets abroad  the debtor has creditors abroad  the debtor carries out his activities on a cross-border basis.
"Human Rights and the European Union Regulations on Private International Law : the needs to protect the right of family members " Elisabetta Bergamini.
Introduced some basic knowledge of the contract First, what is the contract? Contract, also known as contract. China's definition of the contract, the.
INTERNATIONAL MARITIME LAW SEMINAR 2015 Recent Developments in Maritime Law Around the World – POLAND Bills’ of lading law and jurisdiction clauses from.
CRIMINAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 1 April 2015 THE LISBON TREATY AND CRIMINAL LAW Dr. sc. Zoran Burić Department of Criminal Procedural Law University.
Other amendments. Automatic stay scope 11 U.S.C. § 362(a): Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, a petition...operates as a stay, applicable.
European enforcement order for uncontested claims Regulation n. 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of April
Are Judicial Procedures in the European Union Really Simple? The European Order for Payment (EB Nr.1896/2006) and the European Small Claim (EB Nr. 861/2007)
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 16 – Taxation Bilateral screening:
HOW TO PROTECT YOUR INTEREST IN A SALE CONTRACT Focus on what you “get” when you sign!
Debts Recovery in Romania. INTRODUCTION Recovering a debt can be a complex process everywhere, for every business, regardless of the industry. The Romanian.
Lost in Translations – An Examination of the Legal & Practical Problems Associated with the Implementation (or Non-Implementation) of Directive 2010/64/EU.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 5 – Public Procurement Bilateral screening:
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 29 – Customs union Bilateral screening:
European Small Claim and European Payment Order Procedures: Advantages and Drawbacks Lawyer Dr. Laura Gumuliauskienė.
THE NEW GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION: A EUROPEAN OR A GLOBAL STANDARD? Bart van der Sloot Senior Researcher Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology,
Support of the foreign language profile of law tuition at the Faculty of Law in Olomouc CZ.1.07/2.2.00/
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Arbitral Awards
INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
Function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ):
EUROPEAN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Presentation transcript:

European payment order Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure

General characteristics Payment procedure – within the civil procedure law generally understood as „shorter procedure“ – procedure without oral hearing. The legal force of the decision is contingent on no „negative“ reaction from the defendant.

Historical Background In 1999 in Tampere the Member states expressed they interest in harmonised procedure dealing with uncontested monetary claims. In 2000 joint programme of Council and Commission was adopted. In 2002 Green paper. Regulation adopted in 2006, applicable

Regulation - purpose The purpose of the regulation is: to simplify, speed up and reduce the costs of litigation in cross-border cases concerning uncontested pecuniary claims by creating a European order for payment procedure; to permit the free circulation of European orders for payment throughout the Member States by laying down minimum standards, compliance with which renders unnecessary any intermediate proceedings in the Member State of enforcement prior to recognition and enforcement. The claimant can use another procedure according to national law of the relevant Member state or Community law.

Regulation – scope of application Subject matter: Civil and commercial matter in cross-border cases, whatever the court or tribunal. It shall not extend, in particular, to revenue, customs or administrative matters or the liability of the State for acts and omissions in the exercise of State authority.

Regulation – scope of application Negative regulation: (a) rights in property arising out of a matrimonial relationship, wills and succession; (b) bankruptcy, proceedings relating to the winding-up of insolvent companies or other legal persons, judicial arrangements, compositions and analogous proceedings; (c) social security; (d) claims arising from non-contractual obligations, unless: (i) they have been the subject of an agreement between the parties or there has been an admission of debt, or (ii) they relate to liquidated debts arising from joint ownership of property.

Regulation – scope of application Cross-border cases Cross-border case is one in which at least one of the parties is domiciled or habitually resident in a Member State other than the Member State of the court seised Domicile – interpretation according to Brussels I regulation. Territorial scope of application – all Member states except Denmark.

European order for payment procedure The European order for payment procedure shall be established for the collection of pecuniary claims for a specific amount that have fallen due at the time when the application for a European order for payment is submitted

European order for payment proceure The claimant raises his claim at a relevant court (jurisdiction is determined in accordance with Brussels I regulation + or by article 6/2 of the EPP regulation). The claim shall be made using form in the Annex of the regulation and contain all the information according to article 7 of the regulation. The application shall be submitted in paper form or by any other means of communication, including electronic, accepted by the Member State of origin and available to the court of origin.

European order for payment procedure Article 7 par 6 states the condition upon which the application may be signed electronically (Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures ) In the application the claimant may indicate to the court that he opposes a transfer to ordinary civil proceedings within the meaning of Article 17 in the event of opposition by the defendant.

European order for payment procedure Article 11 sets down reasons for which the application can be rejected (the application does not meet specific requirements; the claim is clearly unfounded; the claimant fails to send his reply within the time limit when the court asked him for competion or rectification of the application, the claimant fails to send his reply within the time limit specified by the court or refuses the court's proposal, when the requirements of the regulation are met for only part of the claim. If the requirements of the regulation met, the court shall issue, as soon as possible and normally within 30 days of the lodging of the application, a European order for payment using standard form E as set out in Annex V.

European order for payment procedure In the European order for payment, the defendant shall be advised of his options to: (a) pay the amount indicated in the order to the claimant; or (b) oppose the order by lodging with the court of origin a statement of opposition, to be sent within 30 days of service of the order on him. In the European order for payment, the defendant shall be informed that: (a) the order was issued solely on the basis of the information which was provided by the claimant and was not verified by the court; (b) the order will become enforceable unless a statement of opposition has been lodged with the court in accordance with Article 16; (c) where a statement of opposition is lodged, the proceedings shall continue before the competent courts of the Member State of origin in accordance with the rules of ordinary civil procedure unless the claimant has explicitly requested that the proceedings be terminated in that event.

European order for payment procedure The regulation sets down conditions for service of the European order for payment. Article 13 Service with proof of receipt by the defendant Article 14 Service without proof of receipt by the defendant

European order for payment procedure Opposition to the European order for payment The defendant may lodge a statement of opposition to the European order for payment with the court of origin using standard form F as set out in Annex VI, which shall be supplied to him together with the European order for payment. The statement of opposition shall be sent within 30 days of service of the order on the defendant. The defendant shall indicate in the statement of opposition that he contests the claim, without having to specify the reasons for this. The statement of opposition shall be submitted in paper form or by any other means of communication, including electronic, accepted by the Member State of origin and available to the court of origin.

European order for payment procedure Effects of the lodging of a statement of opposition If a statement of opposition is entered within the time limit, the proceedings shall continue before the competent courts of the Member State of origin in accordance with the rules of ordinary civil procedure unless the claimant has explicitly requested that the proceedings be terminated in that event. Where the claimant has pursued his claim through the European order for payment procedure, nothing under national law shall prejudice his position in subsequent ordinary civil proceedings. The claimant shall be informed whether the defendant has lodged a statement of opposition and of any transfer to ordinary civil proceedings.

European order for payment procedure When no opposition has been lodged, the court shall declare the European order for payment enforceable. No declaration of enforceability is required. The enforcement procedure is governed by the national law of the Member state.

European order for payment procedure Review in exceptional cases After the expiry of the time limit the defendant shall be entitled to apply for a review of the European order for payment before the competent court in the Member State of origin where: (a) the order for payment was served by one of the methods provided for in Article 14, and service was not effected in sufficient time to enable him to arrange for his defence, without any fault on his part, or (b) the defendant was prevented from objecting to the claim by reason of force majeure or due to extraordinary circumstances without any fault on his part, provided in either case that he acts promptly. After expiry of the time limit laid down in Article 16(2) the defendant shall also be entitled to apply for a review of the European order for payment before the competent court in the Member State of origin where the order for payment was clearly wrongly issued, having regard to the requirements laid down in this Regulation, or due to other exceptional circumstances.

European order for payment procedure Article 22 – refusal of enforcement. Article 23 – stay or limitaion of enforcement. Article 25 - costs - The combined court fees of a European order for payment procedure and of the ordinary civil proceedings that ensue in the event of a statement of opposition to a European order for payment in a Member State shall not exceed the court fees of ordinary civil proceedings without a preceding European order for payment procedure in that Member State.