STABILIZATION STATUS AND PLANS The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission under the FP7 Research Infrastructures.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FINAL FOCUS: COMBINATION OF PRE ISOLATOR AND ACTIVE STABILISATION K. Artoos, C. Collette, R. Leuxe, C.Eymin, P. Fernandez, S. Janssens * The research leading.
Advertisements

STABILISATION WG MEETING th FEBRUARY 2013 CTC SUMMARY The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission under.
Takanori Sekiguchi Italy-Japan Workshop (19 April, 2013) Inverted Pendulum Control for KAGRA Seismic Attenuation System 1 D2, Institute for Cosmic Ray.
Alignment of DB and MB quadrupoles Hélène MAINAUD DURAND 17/11/2011 With a lot of input from Sylvain GRIFFET.
Development of a mover having one nanometer precision and 4mm moving range Y. Morita, S. Yamashita ICEPP, University of Tokyo Y. Higashi, M. Masuzawa,
Workshop TS May 2008 GENERAL CLIC ALIGNMENT Progresses and strategy. Hélène MAINAUD DURAND, TS/SU/MTI.
Vibration Stabilization Experimental Results CLIC Main Beam and Final Focus Magnet Stabilization A.Jeremie LAPP: A.Jeremie, S.Vilalte, J.Allibe, G.Balik,
Luminosity Stability and Stabilisation Hardware D. Schulte for the CLIC team Special thanks to J. Pfingstner and J. Snuverink 1CLIC-ACE, February 2nd,
STABILIZATION FOR LHC INNER TRIPLETS S. Janssens, K. Artoos, M. Guinchard NOT for Distribution.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Stability Workshop April , 2007 NSLS-II Electrical Systems G. Ganetis NSLS-II Electrical Systems NSLS-II.
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignement team with 3D views and data from Hubert Gerwig, Richard Rosing and Juha Kemppinen Pre-alignment.
STABILISATION WP STATUS CTC DECEMBER 2012 The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission under the FP7 Research.
CERN VIBRATION SENSOR PROPOSAL The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission under the FP7 Research Infrastructures.
STUDY OF THE HYBRID CONTROLLER ELECTRONICS FOR THE NANO-STABILISATION OF MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS OF CLIC QUADRUPOLES P. Fernández Carmona, K. Artoos, C.
Concepts for Combining Different Sensors for CLIC Final Focus Stabilisation David Urner Armin Reichold.
Techniques to approach the requirements of CLIC stability K. Artoos, O. Capatina (speaker), M. Guinchard, C. Hauviller, F. Lackner, H. Schmickler, D. Schulte.
1 Ist Virgo+ review Cascina H. Heitmann Alignment: Virgo+ changes.
Quad-to-quad correlated motion in FLASH Ramila Amirikas, Alessandro Bertolini DESY Hamburg XFEL beam dynamics meeting, February 25 st 2008.
Friedrich Lackner (TS-SU) CLIC08 Workshop. CLIC Main Beam Quadrupole Magnet The Alignment Concept Expected Properties of a the Support Structure Foreseen.
CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) Jürgen Pfingstner Orbit feedback design for the CLIC ML and BDS Orbit feedback design for the CLIC ML.
QD0 stabilization L. Brunetti 1, N. Allemandou 1, J.-P. Baud 1, G. Balik 1, G. Deleglise 1, A. Jeremie 1, S. Vilalte 1 B. Caron 2, C. Hernandez 2, (LAViSta.
LINAC STABILISATION (INCLUDING FF) MECHANICAL STABILISATION AND NANO POSITIONING WITH ANGSTROM RESOLUTION The research leading to these results has received.
1 Nanopositioning of the main linac quadrupole as means of laboratory pre-alignment David Tshilumba, Kurt Artoos, Stef Janssens D. Tshilumba, CERN, 03.
CLIC QD0 Stabilization J. Allibe 1, L. Brunetti 1, J.-P. Baud 1, G. Balik 1, G. Deleglise 1, A. Jeremie 1, S. Vilalte 1 B. Caron 2,C.Hernandez 2 1 : LAPP-IN2P3-CNRS,
CLIC MDI stabilization update A.Jeremie G.Balik, B.Bolzon, L.Brunetti, G.Deleglise A.Badel, B.Caron, R.Lebreton, J.Lottin Together with colleagues from.
STABILIZATION ACHIEVEMENTS AND PLANS FOR TDR PHASE CLIC MAIN BEAM QUADRUPOLE MECHANICAL STABILIZATION K. Artoos, C. Collette, P. Fernandez Carmona, M.
R&D ON STABILIZATION MBQ: FROM CDR TO TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION PHASE K. Artoos, C. Collette **, P. Fernandez Carmona, M. Guinchard, C. Hauviller, S. Janssens.
MECHANICAL STABILIZATION AND POSITIONING OF CLIC (MAIN BEAM) QUADRUPOLES WITH SUB- NANOMETRE RESOLUTION K. Artoos, C. Collette **, M. Esposito, P. Fernandez.
New in-air seismic attenuation system for the next generation gravitational wave detector M.R. Blom, A. Bertolini, E. Hennes, A. Schimmel, H.J. Bulten,
CLIC Module WG 20/07/2009 H. MAINAUD DURAND, BE-ABP/SU Pre-alignment system and impact on module design.
Hard or Soft ? C. Collette, K. Artoos, S. Janssens, P. Fernandez-Carmona, A. Kuzmin, M. Guinchard, A. Slaathaug, C. Hauviller The research leading to these.
CLIC Workshop th -17 th October 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC 1 CLIC Main Linac Quadrupoles Preliminary design of a quadrupole for the stabilization.
B. Caron, G. Balik, L. Brunetti LAViSta Team LAPP-IN2P3-CNRS, Université de Savoie, Annecy, France & SYMME-POLYTECH Annecy-Chambéry, Université de Savoie,
PROGRESS ON THE CLIC MBQ STABILIZATION R&D K. Artoos, C. Collette **, M. Esposito, P. Fernandez Carmona, M. Guinchard, S. Janssens*, R. Leuxe, R. Morón.
1 ATF2 Project Meeting December 2006 Ground Stabilisation with the CERN STACIS 2000 Stable Active Control Isolation System LAViSta Laboratories in.
Main beam Quad Stabilisation: Status of the stabilisation test program at CERN CLIC-stabilization day S. Janssens Contribution to slides by:
Passive isolation: Pre-isolation for FF quads A. Gaddi, H. Gerwig, A. Hervé, N. Siegrist, F. Ramos.
STABILISATION WG MEETING 11 The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission under the FP7 Research Infrastructures.
LHC-CC Validity Requirements & Tests LHC Crab Cavity Mini Workshop at CERN; 21. August Remarks on using the LHC as a test bed for R&D equipment.
RECENT EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS ON NON- MAGNETIC VIBRATION ISOLATION Christophe Collette Credits to: David Tshilumba, Stef Janssens,
STABILISATION AND PRECISION POINTING QUADRUPOLE MAGNETS IN THE COMPACT LINEAR COLLIDER S. Janssens, P. Fernandez Carmona, K. Artoos, C. Collette, M. Guinchard.
CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.
NANO-POSITIONING POSSIBILITIES FOR FUTURE ACCELERATOR MAGNETS K. Artoos, 28 November 2014 K. Artoos, C. Collette, M. Esposito, P. Fernandez Carmona, M.
Superconducting final doublet Support A.Jeremie. SC magnet steps Motivation: have an active stabilisation as planned in ILC and CLIC => need to evaluate.
CLIC requirements on Warm Magnets (for CLIC Modules mainly) 1 M. Modena, CERN TE-MSC 13 April 2011 CERN-UK Collaboration Kick-off Meeting.
Beam Physics Issues of Main Beam Stabilisation A.Jeremie (LAPP) C.Hauviller (CERN)
SAT Plans for System R&D Signal Recycling Construction and A&I Short Suspension Upgrade Roberto Passaquieti Università di Pisa and INFN-Pisa AdV Review.
CERN, 27-Mar EuCARD NCLinac Task /3/2009.
STATIC AND MODAL BEHAVIOUR OF THE CLIC MAIN BEAM BPM SUPPORT M. Esposito, EN-MME The research leading to these results has received funding from the European.
Alignment system and impact on CLIC two-beam module design H. Mainaud-Durand, G. Riddone CTC meeting –
FP7: EuCARD after a year of preparation… A.Jeremie.
ATF2: final doublet support Andrea JEREMIE B.Bolzon, N.Geffroy, G.Gaillard, J.P.Baud, F.Peltier With constant interaction with colleagues from KEK, SLAC.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Keeping Nanometer Beams Colliding Vibration Stabilization of the Final Doublet Tom Himel SLAC NLC MAC review October.
IoP HEPP/APP annual meeting 2010 Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales: maintaining luminosity at future linear colliders Ben Constance John Adams Institute,
Test plan for CLIC MB linac quad LAPP option A.Jeremie.
QD0 stabilisation in CLIC CDR A.Jeremie with LAViSta team.
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignement team QD0 and BDS pre-alignment.
EuCARD NCLinac 9.3 Linac and FF Stabilisation A.Jeremie.
PACMAN : technical objectives Hélène Mainaud Durand.
STABILISATION AND PRECISION POINTING QUADRUPOLE MAGNETS IN THE COMPACT LINEAR COLLIDER S. Janssens, P. Fernandez Carmona, K. Artoos, C. Collette *, M.
BRAINSTORMING ON LASER BASED SOLUTIONS FOR CLIC PRE-ALIGNMENT INTRODUCTION Hélène MAINAUD DURAND, BE/ABP/SU, 09/02/2010 Status of the study CLIC pre-alignment.
Summary of Presentation 1. Tolerances i. Vertical tolerances on BPMs (rf-BPM: ± 0.2μm, user BPMs: ±0.1μm, and X-BPMs: ± 0.1μm) ii. Tolerances on magnets’
QD0 Stabilisation L. Brunetti 1, J. Allibe 1, J.-P. Baud 1, G. Balik 1, G. Deleglise 1, A. Jeremie 1, S. Vilalte 1 B. Caron 2, A. Badel 2, R. Le Breton.
Phase Feed-Forward Piotr Skowroński (CERN)
CLIC magnets precise positioning
CLIC MBQ: from CDR to technical implementation phase CLIC Main beam quadrupole Mechanical stabilization S. Janssens*, K. Artoos, C. Collette**, P. Fernandez.
Need for Alignment Position of off-momentum proton w.r.t. beam
Background With new accelerators delivering beams always smaller and more energetic, requirements for very precise beam alignment become more and more.
CLIC-ILC BDS & MDI work.
The Superattenuator upgrades and the SAFE Project
Presentation transcript:

STABILIZATION STATUS AND PLANS The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission under the FP7 Research Infrastructures project EuCARD K. Artoos, C. Collette, R. Leuxe, C.Eymin, P. Fernandez, S. Janssens *

Outline 2  Requirements  Review status 2012  Plans for 2013, objectives  Manpower & collaboration status

Requirements Stability (magnetic axis): Nano-positioning 3992 CLIC Main Beam Quadrupoles: 3 Type 4: 2m, 400 kgType 1: 0.5 m, 100 kg A. Samoshkin Main beam quadrupoles Final Focus Vertical 1.5 nm > 1 Hz Vertical 0.2 nm > 4 Hz Lateral 5 nm > 1 Hz Lateral 5 nm > 4 Hz  Ground motion  External forces  Flexibility of magnet

Other requirements 4 Available space Integration in two beam module 620 mm beam height Accelerator environment - High radiation -Stray magnetic field Positioning -Steps of tens of nm +/- 1 nm Stiffness-Robustness Applied forces (water cooling, vacuum, power leads, cabling, interconnects, ventilation, acoustic pressure) -Compatibility alignment -Transportability/Installation

5 Review status 2012 MBQ Stabilisation Type 1 Collocated pair X-y proto Seismometer FB max. gain +FF (FBFFV1mod): 7 % luminosity loss (no stabilisation 68 % loss) Courtesy J. Snuverink, J. Pfingstner et al. Main linac Req.: 1.5 nm r.m.s.

Inertial Reference mass 6 No stabilization68% luminosity loss Inertial ref. mass 1Hz (V3mod)11% Inertial ref. mass 1Hz + HP filter (V3)3% Inertial ref. mass 7 Hz (V3 mod 1)Orbit fb optimised V3: 0.7% Courtesy J. Snuverink et al. Stef Janssens C. Collette “Comparison of new absolute displacement sensors”, C. Collette et al., ISMA 2012

X-y prototype: Nano positioning Resolution, precision, accuracy 7 Capacitive sensor 3 beam interferometer Optical ruler Actuators equipped with strain gauges

X-y positioning: Study precision, accuracy and resolution 8 The precision required (0.25 nm): demonstrated with optical rulers in a temperature stable environment for simultaneous x and y motion. Absolute accuracy: calibrated within m Tests in a temperature unstable environment will be made (ISR re installation)

X-y Positioning: roll 9 1&2 Parasitic roll 2 legs 3 d.o.f. > parasitic roll Measured with 3-beam interferometer ~3 μm lateral movement > ~7 μ rad rotation Early simulations suggest~100 μ rad/0.5% luminosity loss (J. Pfingstner)

Build three “best available design” MBQ modules Functional performance testing + development time: Study and try assembly Requires controlled stable environment (Temperature, Vibrations, Access) Demonstration feasibility + ultimate performance Water cooling + powering magnet Test module location not adapted for this. Magnetic measurements and fiducialisation Type 1 Test module with dummy magnet Integration in test module, connections to other modules, robust show case, transport, … Demonstration alignment and stabilization but not representative for CLIC tunnel Type 1 ISR Type 4 ISR Type 1 CLEX Type 4 Test module MBQ modules upgradable (bolted together, no welds). K.Artoos, Stabilisation WG, 21th February 2013

Type 1 and Type 4 mechanical design 11 FE simulations are done expected (good) results Production plans finished end of next week K. Artoos, R. Leuxe, C. Eymin Lateral mode: ~139 Hz Vertical mode: ~315 Hz

12 Combination of fast positioning and stabilization Combining positioning and stabilization: Making error to requested position R as small as possible Additional displacement measurement for low frequency to DC Sensors separated in bandwidth integrator at low frequency to eliminate drift Simulations function > To be implemented on x-y prototype Stef Janssens

13 Communication with Control Center Labview communication program between magnet and simulated control room Signals out: Geophone/position signals SDI signal for DIG_POTS Signals in: CS signals for DIG_POTS CLK signals for DIG_POTS New position X/Y Signals out: New position Gain FF/FB Filter positions Signals in: Transfer function (every 5 s) Rel./abs. Position Error signals

Preparation test modules and CLEX: Two type 1 MBQ and one Type4 14 Flexural joints machined. Actuators with amplifiers and sensors delivered January Electronic boards under construction, Design Type 1 and type 4 mechanical support ongoing (80% ready) Demonstrators T1 and T4 planned for April Issue: Reduction manpower stabilisation MME in 2013 EUCARD deliverable

Manpower + collaboration status 15 CERNS.Janssens (PhD > Fellow) 100% K.Artoos (100% > 50%) M. Esposito (50%, 12/2012) P. Fernandez Carmona (August 12) Designers: R. Leuxe, C. Eymin (jobs) MBQ stabilisation + nano-pos. Sensor development  CERN Networking with NIKHEF (PhD Stef, TNO, MI Partners, TU Delft,…) Synergy sensor development with LIGO, VIRGO. Contact Christophe Colette Action CLIC : new collaboration agreements + K contracts

Build and test 3 MBQ modules with controller hardware Type 1 ISR + CLEX (precursor PACMAN) Type 4 ISR + Test module Type 1 Test module X-Y guide: Continue tests stopped in 2012 Test absolute sensors Develop and test positioning controller Test inertial sensors prototypes + stabilisation controller Vibration measurements module + pulsed dipole correctors Outsource: Construction of adapted sensors (transfer function, AE compatible, noise level) Collocated sensor-actuators If time permits: Ground motion measurements around CMS 16 Objectives 2013 at CERN

SPARES 17 S. Janssens, CLIC Workshop, January 2013

Controller Electronics 18 Hybrid Second generation  2 d.o.f.  Position input terminal  Switchable (displacement/velocity)  Manual or Digital gain/filter control  FPGA control digital part started  Improved radiation hardness (choice components  Tested for SEU and induced noise at H4HIRRAD P. Fernandez Carmona H4IRAD test stand No damage nor SEU after 18 Gy Test not complete Report to be finalized Piezo amplifier not radhard

CERN “team”: Build and test 3 MBQ modules Type 1 ISR + CLEX (precursor PACMAN) Type 4 ISR + Test module Type 1 Test module Outsource: Construction of adapted sensors (transfer function, AE compatible, noise level) (in progress) High stiffness actuators (done) Collocated sensor-actuators Characterization existing systems ? Study pre-isolator Final Focus (Model (almost) done=>Test beam simulations) High load high range high resolution actuators Construction electronics (in progress (soldering components)) Implementation of custom digital slow control (in progress) Construction mechanics: flexural joints, monolithic, machining, assembly,… Displacement sensors and their implementation (in progress) Development Radiation hard components 19 Objectives 2013

20 Stabilization with Interferometer based geophone Interferometer based geophone built and tested: -Very high sensitivity, high resolution -Wider bandwidth -Proof of concept Issue: Due to higher bandwidth, actuator slew rate gives instabilities in the loop -> New batch of actuator amplifiers have a higher slew rate Measured open loop on x-y guide Stef Janssens

Comparison sensors 21 SensorResolutionMain +Main - Actuator sensor0.15 nmNo separate assemblyResolution No direct measurement of magnet movement Capacitive gauge0.10 nmGauge radiation hardMounting tolerances Gain change w.  Orthogonal coupling Interferometer10 pmAccuracy at freq.> 10 HzCost Mounting tolerance Sensitive to air flow Orthogonal coupling Optical ruler0.5*-1 nmCost 1% orthogonal coupling Mounting tolerance Small temperature drift Possible absolute sensor Rad hardness sensor head not known Limited velocity displacements Seismometer (after integration)< pm at higher frequenciesFor cross calibration S. Janssens, CLIC Workshop, January 2013

Five R&D themes : 22 S. Janssens, CLIC Workshop, January Performance increase → Reach requirements from higher background vibrations + include direct forces → Increase resolution (Final focus) 2.Compatibility with environment → Radiation, magnetic field, Operation, Temperature 3.Cost optimization → Standardize and optimize components, decrease number of components, simplify mounting procedures,… 4.Overall system analysis → Interaction with the beam-based orbit and IP feedback to optimise luminosity Integration with other CLIC components → Adapt to changing requirements 5.Pre-industrialization → Ability to build for large quantities

23 Extra slide: Measured slew rate of actuator S. Janssens, CLIC Workshop, January 2013

24 Bill of Materials  Amplifiers  LMP2022MA: Zero Drift, Low Noise, EMI Hardened Amplifier  AD8230YRZ: Zero-Drift, Precision Instrumentation Amplifier  AD8691AUJZ: Low Cost, Low Noise, CMOS Rail-to-Rail Output Operational Amplifier  Power regulator ICs: TPS76550, REG , TPS72325, UCC284-5  FLASH Digital potentiometers: AD5231, AD5204  Diodes: BAV199  Capacitors: Tantalum  Resistors: Thin film 1%  Potentiometers: Cermet  Digital slow control  National Instruments PXI with DAQmx card  FPGA: Spartan 6 evaluation board (under development) S. Janssens, CLIC Workshop, January 2013

25 Controller electronics: Hybrid 2 analogue chains + positioning offset Local electronics ADCs digitize signals For remote monitoring Communication to remote control center with optical fiber S. Janssens, CLIC Workshop, January 2013 SPI P. Fernandez Carmona (until end of August)

26 Inertial reference mass proto (v3): With interferometer/with capacitive gauge S. Janssens, CLIC Workshop, January 2013

Active Stabilization 27 B10 No stab.53%/68% Current stab.108%/13% Future stab.118%/3% Luminosity achieved/lost [%] Machine model Beam-based feedback Code Typical quadrupole jitter tolerance O(1nm) in main linac and O(0.1nm) in final doublet Final Focus QD0 Prototype Close to/better than target

3D simulated Kinematics 28 M. Esposito, IWAA 2012 Fermilab PITCHYAW T1 MBQ T4 MBQ No loss of translation range for T4 About 25% of loss of vertical translation range for T1 pitch About 80% of loss of lateral translation range for T1 yaw

Roll simulations 29

S. Janssens, CLIC Workshop, January  The influence of the orbit feedback is in general small. For the main linac the tolerance for 0.5% lumi loss is about 100urad (already provided by Daniel before). Including also the BDS without the final doublet, since not actuated by the tripot, (dashed pink curve), the tolerance is about 1um.