DS 11T Coil #110 – impregnation results CERN, Prevessin B927 19.05.2015 Author / al.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
F. BORGNOLUTTI Oct. 16 th 2012 Winding Test plan for the MQXF Cable.
Advertisements

LQ Reaction & Impregnation Tooling Internal Review F. Nobrega, N. Andreev May 7, 2007.
LHQ Coil 02 Winding and Curing Plan Miao Yu 03/21/13.
EuCARD-HFM ESAC review of the high field dipole design, 20/01/2011, Maria Durante, 1/40 EuCARD-HFM ESAC Review of the high field dipole design Fabrication.
COIL & ASSEMBLY READINESS REVIEW, SEPT 2013 D. Smekens.
Dan Cheng H. Felice, R. Hafalia QXF Structures Video Meeting July 10, 2014 Coil Handling for Magnet Assembly Status Update.
S. Caspi, LBNL HQS Progress Report High Field Nb 3 Sn Quadrupole Magnet Shlomo Caspi LBNL Collaboration Meeting – CM11 FNAL October 27-28, 2008.
IENG 475: Computer-Controlled Manufacturing Systems Lathe Operations
General Design Guidelines
LARP QXF 150mm Structure Mike Anerella / John Cozzolino / Jesse Schmalzle November 15, nd Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting.
SQXF 25 m Cable Practice Winding at LBNL Miao Yu Dan Cheng 10/31/2013.
LHQ Coil Fabrication Experience and Plan Miao Yu 04/08/2013.
Coil Design and Fabrication Miao Yu Outline Introduction Coil Design –Coil Pole –Coil End Parts –Coil Insulation Coil Fabrication –Winding.
Short period wiggler prototype for the CLIC damping ring Alexey Bragin, Denis Gurov, Anatoly Utkin, Pavel Vobly Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk,
Fred Nobrega. 9 Dec 2014 Model Design & Fabrication – FNAL Fred Nobrega 2 Outline Background Mechanical Design Model Magnet Features Coil Technology and.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-0XXXX Section 5.1 Grid Box Design 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope:
FReSCa2 Technical Review, 9 th June 2015, CEA Saclay FReSCa2 Technical Review June 2015 CEA Saclay J.C Perez on behalf of Fresca2 collaboration team.
LQ status and plans – G. Ambrosio 1 LARP Collaboration Meeting - LBNL, April , 2006 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC OUTLINE: Goals, Input and Output Sub-tasks.
MQXF Cable for Q1/Q3 D.R. Dietderich MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
Welding over aluminium: a potential issue?  X-rays show no inacceptable defect on both samples. Further developments in collaboration with EN-MME (Welding,
E. Cavanna, N. Bourcey, P. Ferracin, S. Izquierdo Bermudez, J. Mazet, J. C. Perez, F.O. Pincot, X. Sarasola
DOE Review of LARP – February 17-18, 2014 Coil Design and Fabrication Miao Yu February 17,
Three Dimensional Photonic Crystals Corey Ulmer. Outline What are Photonic Crystals/Why Important? How They Work Manufacturing Challenges Manufacturing.
10/28/2015Pierre Moyret1 Production of SQXF Magnet Components: Return on experience P.MOYRET EN-MME-FS.
11 T Dipole Status at FNAL Fred Nobrega January 21, 2014.
Fred Nobrega, Nikolai Andreev 21 September, 2015.
E. Cavanna, N. Bourcey, P. Ferracin, S. Izquierdo Bermudez, J. Mazet, J. C. Perez, F.O Pincot, X. Sarasola
MQXF support structure An extension of LARP experience Helene Felice MQXF Design Review December 10 th to 12 th, 2014 CERN.
D. Smekens. 2 Coil ID  CableCu DUMMY Cu DUMMY WST DUMMY RRP 54/61 DUMMY RRP 108/127 RRP 108/127 RRP 108/127 RRP 132/169.
F. Savary Question 1 A. Magnet design criteria for the prototype and production magnet to be tested before the installation into the tunnel.
Long Quadrupole – G. Ambrosio 1 LARP Collaboration Meeting – FNAL, Oct , 2008 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Long Quadrupole Giorgio Ambrosio LARP Collaboration.
Helene Felice HQ Test Results Review Thursday December 16 th Overview of HQ coils and Magnet.
WG3 – STRIP R&D ITS - COMSATS P. Riedler, G. Contin, A. Rivetti – WG3 conveners.
LARP Collaboration Meeting Racetrack Coil Fabrication
1 MQXF Workshop on Structure, Alignment, and Electrical QA Feb 2-4, 2016 Options for modifications to parts and procedures Options for modifications to.
QXF Coil Fabrication: Baseline Decisions QXF Coil Working Group Video Meeting (Revised from discussion during presentation) Dan Cheng April 16, 2013.
Collimation in the CERN PS Booster Penny Jackson: John Adams Institute/University of Oxford/CERN This is a feasibility study.
Davide Tommasini EuroCirCol WP5 : Work Distribution June 3 rd, 2015.
MQXFB design, assembly plans & tooling at CERN J.C Perez On behalf of MQXF collaboration team MQXF Workshop on Structure, Alignment and Electrical QA.
Fabrication of test coil for D1 2m model Michinaka SUGANO KEK WP3 meeting 08/10/2014.
DOE Review of LARP – February 17-18, 2014 SQXF Coil Design and Fabrication Winding and Curing Miao Yu February 17,
1 Manufacturing process-1 ( ) Lathe Operations Guided By:Prepared By: Prof. Stany R. Ghadiyali
CERN MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team.
QXF Reaction / Impregnation Fixtures J. Schmalzle 4/9/13.
Dan Cheng 8/27/2015 MQXFS1 Observations and Feedback from the Assembly Processes, Part II.
LHQ Coil Design and Features Miao Yu Fermilab May 09, 2012.
TE-MSC. 07/04/2016 Jose Ferradas TE-MSC-MDT Alejandro Carlon TE-MSC-MDT Juan Carlos Perez TE-MSC-MDT On behalf to MSC-MDT section and Coil working group.
LHQ Coil Fabrication Experience and Plan Miao Yu 04/08/2013.
MQXF Cable for Q1/Q3 D.R. Dietderich MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
1 LHC Hi-Lumi QXF Proposal for Coil Impregnation M. Anerella, J. Schmalzle, P. Kovach June 11, 2015.
IENG 475: Computer-Controlled Manufacturing Systems Lathe Operations
QXF Coil Fabrication & Tooling Reaction / Impregnation
Coil Design and Fabrication
Winding tests on Roebel cables
TQS Structure Design and Modeling
MCBXFB Short Orbit Corrector Prototyping: Presentation to 927 staff
QXF Cable Winding Test and End Parts Design
11T Dipole – Single Aperture 2m Model
FRESCA2 Update on the dipole design and new calculations
Mechanical stability and QXF coil winding
the MDP High Field Dipole Demonstrator
Analytical Cost Model (16 T dipole)
Internal review of the 11T dipole reaction fixture and impregnation mould Outcome of the meeting F. Savary 19 October CERN.
IENG 475: Computer-Controlled Manufacturing Systems Lathe Operations
Fastening devices.
IENG 475: Computer-Controlled Manufacturing Systems Lathe Operations
IENG 475: Computer-Controlled Manufacturing Systems Lathe Operations
CNC Turning Cross 11, Tapovan Enclave Nala pani Road, Dehradun : ,
MQXF quench heaters: tests and investigation (CERN)¶
Fred Nobrega September 4, 2019
Presentation transcript:

DS 11T Coil #110 – impregnation results CERN, Prevessin B Author / al

DS 11T Coil #110 – impregnation results CERN, Prevessin B OUTLINE 300 mm Trials Initial idea Tooling Coil dummies Results 2m Fixture Modification Mechanical Coating Assembly

DS 11T Coil #110 – impregnation results CERN, Prevessin B Disclaimer All the work reported here has been carried out and is to the sole efforts of CERN TE-MSC-MDT : A. Benfkih, S. Clement, R. Gauthier, R. Gavaggio, L. Lambert, G. Maury, J. Mazet, S. Tavares (927, PolymerLab) This presentation is on their behalf.

DS 11T Coil #110 – impregnation results CERN, Prevessin B Impregnation-method Current Standard: Impregnation from Injection Point A to Exit point B. Tested at CERN and US many times (Up to 4m length). The 6m case: Is the potting life too short? What, if there is a blockade? … Decision to look into an alternative tool designs, which lead to multipoint-injection

DS 11T Coil #110 – impregnation results CERN, Prevessin B Experimental planning First trials on 300 mm mock-up: Test different injection schemes Test demoulding Look for major impregnation defaults Investigation of cross section Impregnation of 2m dummy coil from broken cable: Scalability Monitor process and feasibility of demoulding Electrical testing Optical investigation of cross sections

DS 11T Coil #110 – impregnation results CERN, Prevessin B mm Trials Two basic concepts for injection Mandrel modification Baseplate modification

DS 11T Coil #110 – impregnation results CERN, Prevessin B mm Trials Variation of injection schemes MIP1: Chamfer, continous (BNG) MIP2: Grooves, short, long (Gauthier, Lambert, Mazet) MIP3: Grooves, long, cont. (Gauthier, Lambert, Mazet) Depth: max. 0.1 mm !

DS 11T Coil #110 – impregnation results CERN, Prevessin B mm Trials Impregnation coil dummies A first test has been carried out with a 3d-printing material. After the material has proven to be not suited, an aluminium dummy has been machined for the first test. Another trial is to be carried out on a coil-like structure. (Due to oversize 2 layers mid-plane layers removed)

DS 11T Coil #110 – impregnation results CERN, Prevessin B mm Trials Impregnation coil #103 section Impregnation conducted in the Polymer Lab, respecting inclination angle.

DS 11T Coil #110 – impregnation results CERN, Prevessin B mm Trials Impregnation coil #103 section – CUT RESULTS Analysis: Coil has been cut in several positions: Plot and Cote each at Injection and Exit Cut S. Langeslag (MME-MM) No obvious defects at 50-fold magnification

DS 11T Coil #110 – impregnation results CERN, Prevessin B mm Trials Impregnation coil #103 section – CUT RESULTS Higher resolution investigation currently in progress at MME-MM S. Langeslag (MME-MM)

DS 11T Coil #110 – impregnation results CERN, Prevessin B mm Trials Conclusion Injection:Both variants are working; GM preferred, for easier baseplate demoulding. Patterns Hollow grooves of 0.1 to 0.2 mm preferred; so far no difference of Muliple points to continous injection BubblesSo far no bubbles could be found DemouldingGood for multiple point grooves as described above (Auxiliary skrews by J. Mazet) Quality CoilOngoing

DS 11T Coil #110 – impregnation results CERN, Prevessin B Based on the experience gained with 300 mm tooling: Implementation of Mazet-channels like in the last MIP4 Additional threads for removal (pressing against pole) Pocket at arch in order to trap potential bubbles (J. Mazet) Modification of 2m tooling Mechanical LHCMBHST0598, LHCMBHST0599, LHCMBHST0600

DS 11T Coil #110 – impregnation results CERN, Prevessin B Modification of 2m tooling Mechanical

DS 11T Coil #110 – impregnation results CERN, Prevessin B The removal adhesive has been replaced with Teflon-coating: All mandrels on the outer surface, not midplane Inner surface of the seal foil Modification of 2m tooling Surface coating SupplierTYPE Thickness mm Tolerance mm Teflon Adhesive Aerovac / UMECO FF03- PTFE (applied by hand) Teflon coating TTM S.A.PFA2 x 0.042x ( ±0.01 )

DS 11T Coil #110 – impregnation results CERN, Prevessin B Modification of 2m tooling Surface coating

DS 11T Coil #110 – impregnation results CERN, Prevessin B The parameters of the coil and the tooling decide for the quality of the impregnation Modification of 2m tooling Impact on cavity size Coil R60.8Block R Gap0.625 shell film-0.11 Assy gap D. Smekens

DS 11T Coil #110 – impregnation results CERN, Prevessin B Modification of 2m tooling Fixture assembly

DS 11T Coil #110 – impregnation results CERN, Prevessin B Modification of 2m tooling Fixture assembly

DS 11T Coil #110 – impregnation results CERN, Prevessin B Modification of 2m tooling Fixture disassembly

DS 11T Coil #110 – impregnation results CERN, Prevessin B Modification of 2m tooling Fixture disassembly

DS 11T Coil #110 – impregnation results CERN, Prevessin B Conclusions The 300 mm trials showed: the tools work in small scale the impregnated section looks promising The modification of the 2m tooling was successful The Quality of the impregnated coil: See the next talks:

DS 11T Coil #110 – impregnation results CERN, Prevessin B Modification of 2m tooling Fixture disassembly Thank you!