Luis Cadarso(1), Vikrant Vaze(2), Cynthia Barnhart(3), Ángel Marín(1)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment I)
Advertisements

Consequences of constraints on airport choice Dr. Marc Ch. Gelhausen Brussels,
Introduction to TransportationSystems. PART III: TRAVELER TRANSPORTATION.
Objective Our objective is to provide tailored business solutions to Airlines, Airports, Civil Aviation Authorities, and other aviation service providers.
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
1 Material to Cover  relationship between different types of models  incorrect to round real to integer variables  logical relationship: site selection.
Forecasting Traffic and Toll Revenue for Public-Private Partnerships (P3) vs. Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO): A comparison 14 th TRB National.
© 2002 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. Economic Effects of Congestion and Delay Joe Sinnott March 2002.
o & d Forecasting for O & D Control
A System Dynamics Perspective of the Air Transportation Industry Bruno Miller John-Paul Clarke Massachusetts Institute of Technology Joint Universities.
10 December J/ESD.204J Lecture 13 Outline Real Time Control Strategies for Rail Transit Prior Research Shen/Wilson Model Formulation Model Application.
LMI Airline Responses to NAS Capacity Constraints Peter Kostiuk Logistics Management Institute National Airspace System Resource.
Airlines and Linear Programming (and other stuff) Dr. Ron Lembke.
1 Integration as a competitiveness instrument for Public Transport in rural areas Helder Cristóvão, José M Viegas Integration as a Competitiveness Instrument.
Airlines and Linear Programming Dr. Ron Tibben-Lembke.
This Week’s Topics  Review Class Concepts -AC/MC Rules of Overhead -Simple Pricing -Price Elasticity of Demand  Review Homework  Practice Problems.
3rd ARRIVAL Review Meeting [Patras, 12 May 2009] – WP3 Presentation ARRIVAL – WP3 Algorithms for Robust and online Railway optimization: Improving the.
1 A Second Stage Network Recourse Problem in Stochastic Airline Crew Scheduling Joyce W. Yen University of Michigan John R. Birge Northwestern University.
Impact of capacity constraints on airport choice of air travellers Dr. Marc Ch. Gelhausen Paris,
Domestic Tourism Destination Choices- A Choice Modelling Analysis Assignment 3 Group 3 Hari Hara Sharan Nagalur Subraveti Kasun Dilhara Wimalasena Kento.
Airline Fleet Routing and Flight Scheduling under Market Competitions
InMoSion: Science Shop for Innovative Mobility Solutions for Mobility Challenged Europeans 3rd INTERNATIONAL MEETING ANKARA, TURKEY Partnering: Civil Engineering.
Airline Revenue Management
1 Maximizing Revenue with a Leg Revenue Management System E. Andrew Boyd Vice President, Research and Design PROS Revenue Management.
Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II) Saba Neyshabouri.
Market Research and Analysis Demand Forecasting Overview May 30, 2013 Agenda Overview of Demand Forecasting Model Demand Forecasting.
Airline Schedule Planning: Accomplishments and Opportunities Airline Schedule Planning: Accomplishments and Opportunities C. Barnhart and A. Cohn, 2004.
May 2009 Evaluation of Time-of- Day Fare Changes for Washington State Ferries Prepared for: TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003 Transportation Systems Analysis for the SATS Program.
Rail Related Research at IIT Madras
Route Planning and Evaluation
ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK FOR OPERATIONAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT CONGESTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES AT CLUSTERED AIRPORTS Loan T. Le Research Sponsors: NASA ARC, FAA.
Content : 1. Introduction 2. Traffic forecasting and traffic allocation ◦ 2.1. Traffic forecasting ◦ 2.2. Traffic allocation 3. Fleeting problems ◦ 3.1.
Pricing Simulation Proven solutions for open skies
H oppersta d C onsultin g Market/Airline/Class (MAC) Revenue Management RM2003 Hopperstad May 03.
AGIFORS, 5/28/03 Aircraft Routing and Crew Pairing Optimization Diego Klabjan, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign George L. Nemhauser, Georgia.
1 Botond Kovari: Crew Planning 1 st Int. Conf. on Research in Air Transportation - Zilina, Nov 22-24, 2004 Cost Optimisation Methods in Air Crew Planning.
Modelling of Trips using Strategic Park-and-Ride Site at Longbridge Railway Station Seattle, USA, Oct th International EMME/2 Users Conference.
MIT ICAT ICATMIT M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Virtual Hubs: A Case Study Michelle Karow
Workshop PRIXNET – 11/12 Mars CONGESTION PRICING IN AIR TRANSPORTATION Karine Deschinkel Laboratoire PRiSM – Université de Versailles.
Introduction to Network Planning Concepts and Practice Course Outline Dynaston Inc.
H OPPERSTA D C ONSULTIN G Market/Airline/Class (MAC) Revenue Management AGIFORS RM 2003 Hopperstad June 03.
Modeling & Simulation: An Introduction Some slides in this presentation have been copyrighted to Dr. Amr Elmougy.
M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n ANALYSIS OF BARRIERS TO THE UTILITY OF GENERAL AVIATION TROY D. DOWNENR.
PASSENGERS’ CHOICE BETWEEN COMPETING AIRPORTS Radosav Jovanovic Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade.
Timothy L. Jacobs, Elizabeth Hunt and Matt Korol Operations Research and Decision Support American Airlines May 2001 Scheduling and Revenue Management.
Presented to Time of Day Subcommittee May 9, 2011 Time of Day Modeling in FSUTMS.
Route and Network Planning
Outline The role of information What is information? Different types of information Controlling information.
Improving Revenue by System Integration and Cooperative Optimization Reservations & Yield Management Study Group Annual Meeting Berlin April 2002.
Experimental Evaluation of Real-Time Information Services in Transit Systems from the Perspective of Users Antonio Mauttone Operations Research Department,
WHEN TRAINS GO FASTER THAN PLANES: THE STRATEGIC REACTION OF AIRLINES IN SPAIN JUAN LUIS JIMÉNEZ OFELIA BETANCOR IRU OJEDA RAMÍREZ.
Marc IVALDI Workshop on Advances on Discrete Choice Models in the honor of Daniel McFadden Cergy-Pontoise – December 18, 2015 A Welfare Assessment of Revenue.
Hub Location–Allocation in Intermodal Logistic Networks Hüseyin Utku KIYMAZ.
Airline Optimization Problems Constraint Technologies International
Generated Trips and their Implications for Transport Modelling using EMME/2 Marwan AL-Azzawi Senior Transport Planner PDC Consultants, UK Also at Napier.
Responses to Gas Prices in Knoxville, TN Vince Bernardin, Jr., Ph.D. Vince Bernardin, Jr., Ph.D. Bernardin, Lochmueller & Associates Mike Conger, P.E.
U NIT C REWING FOR R OBUST A IRLINE C REW S CHEDULING Bassy Tam Optimisation Approaches for Robust Airline Crew Scheduling Bassy Tam Professor Matthias.
The Impact of Rail Fares Complexity on Demand
T-Share: A Large-Scale Dynamic Taxi Ridesharing Service
A Modeling Framework for Flight Schedule Planning
Project Feasibility Analysis
1.206J/16.77J/ESD.215J Airline Schedule Planning
Consulting Services Aircraft scheduling. Block hour analysis.
1.206J/16.77J/ESD.215J Airline Schedule Planning
1.206J/16.77J/ESD.215J Airline Schedule Planning
Complex World 2015 Workshop
1.206J/16.77J/ESD.215J Airline Schedule Planning
Airlines and Linear Programming (and other stuff)
Stevenson 5 Capacity Planning.
Presentation transcript:

Luis Cadarso(1), Vikrant Vaze(2), Cynthia Barnhart(3), Ángel Marín(1) Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition Effects Luis Cadarso(1), Vikrant Vaze(2), Cynthia Barnhart(3), Ángel Marín(1) (1)Technical University of Madrid (2)Philips Research North-America (3)Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2013 ICSO-HAROSA International Workshop on Simulation-Optimization & Internet Computing July 10-12, 2013, Barcelona, SPAIN

OUTLINE OVERVIEW PASSENGER DEMAND OPTIMISATION MODEL STUDY CASE

Airline Planning COMPETITION COMPETITION Overview Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition… Overview Airline Planning Airline profitability is critically influenced by the airline’s ability to: Estimate passenger demands. Construct profitable flight schedules (the airline schedule planning process). FLEET PLANNING FREQUENCY PLANNING ROUTE EVALUATION COMPETITION TIMETABLE DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE DEVELOPMENT FLEET ASSIGNMENT CREW SCHEDULING AIRCRAFT ROUTING COMPETITION REVENUE MANAGEMENT

Schedule Design & Fleet Assignment Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition… Overview Schedule Design & Fleet Assignment Schedule design: among the most important factors that determine passengers’ choice. Usually decomposed: Frequency planning and Timetable planning. How many departures in each route (schedule displacement)? When to depart? Fleet assignment: cost minimising (or profit maximising) assignment of fleets to scheduled flights. Given: flight schedule; number of aircraft by fleet type; restrictions (flows, noise, maintenance, etc.); costs, potential revenue of flights.

Integrated Planning Integrated Approach PASSENGER USE Overview Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition… Overview Integrated Planning Current practice: sequential solving. Integrated models: better feedback; better choice of schedule and capacity. Joint optimization and planning is a big challenge: little data. Difficult to obtain consistent and detailed demand/cost data; models that capture competitive behaviors. Integrated Approach FREQUENCY PLANNING TIMETABLE DEVELOPMENT FLEET ASSIGNMENT PASSENGER USE

Motivation & Contributions Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition… Overview Motivation & Contributions Traditionally: projected demand fixed. However, it depends on: mode, airline, fare, frequency and the market characteristics. Modes: High speed rail (medium-haul markets) and Air (Legacy and Low Cost Airlines). Estimation of demands associated with schedules using a nested logit model. Generation of schedules and fleet assignments using an integrated schedule design and fleet assignment model: passenger demand competition; and impacts of schedule decisions on passenger demand.

OUTLINE OVERVIEW PASSENGER DEMAND OPTIMISATION MODEL STUDY CASE

Market Share Passenger Demand Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition… Passenger Demand Market Share Airlines compete for passengers: frequency and departure schedule; price charged; quality of service. Discrete Choice Modelling: commonly used to model customer behavior. Four elements (Decision maker, Alternatives, Attributes, Decision rule). Multinomial logit models frequently used (itinerary choice, recapture rate, etc.).

More Attributes & Mode Competition Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition… Passenger Demand More Attributes & Mode Competition Modelling the market share as simply a function of the frequency share is not enough (fares, travel times and passenger types). High Speed Rails have become an important competitor. The choice can be modeled using a nested multinomial logit model. Two levels: mode (air vs. rail) and operator. 9

Model Estimation Passenger Demand Maximum likelihood. Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition… Passenger Demand Model Estimation Maximum likelihood. 728 sets of data: market share, frequencies, itineraries, travel time and price. Significant at the 0.95 confidence level using a classic Student’s t-test. Parameter Estimation Std Error p-value 1.5137 0.009 0.006 -0.4186 0.035 0.008 -1.5050 0.042 0.017 0.8265 0.052 0.023 1.18201 0.021 0.010 -0.9347 0.063 0.012 -1.3251 0.112 1.0853 0.047 0.6583 0.073 0.019 -0.8568 0.129 0.031 0.9195 0.109 0.025 -0.4451 0.093 0.018 -0.8844 0.184 0.037 1.4343 0.152 0.034

OUTLINE OVERVIEW PASSENGER DEMAND OPTIMISATION MODEL STUDY CASE

Optimisation Model Optimisation Model Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition… Optimisation Model Optimisation Model We are integrating several sub-problems: frequency planning; approximate timetable development ; and fleet assignment; all while considering passenger demand variation with schedule. Aim: determine the frequency by fleet type and by time period of the day for all the flights given airport capacities, fleet sizes, average fares, unconstrained demands and competitors’ schedules.  

Air Network & Passenger Demand Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition… Optimisation Model Air Network & Passenger Demand Air network: airports and all feasible airway alternatives. Slot availability is known for each airline. Flight leg (departure airport-time period and arrival airport-time period). Aggregated network (Different discretization: congested vs. non-congested). Unconstrained demand: origin, destination and desired departure time. Fixed and known. Demand captured: competition effects (nested logit model).

Notations Optimisation Model Decision variables: Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition… Optimisation Model Notations Decision variables: : frequency of flight f with fleet type π. : number of planes of fleet type π on the ground at the beginning in airport g. : number of passengers in itinerary i. : frequency value in od pair offered by airline a. Parameters: : fleet size. : cost of assigning fleet type π to flight leg f. : revenue per passenger in market w. Sets: 𝐹: set of flight legs. Π: set of fleet types. 𝐺: set of airports. 𝑂𝐷: set of origin-destination pairs.

Model Formulation Optimisation Model Objective function Demand Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition… Optimisation Model Model Formulation Objective function Demand Flight capacity Frequencies Aircraft count Block time + Slot availability, symmetry, minimum service, fleet size, etc.

OUTLINE OVERVIEW PASSENGER DEMAND OPTIMISATION MODEL STUDY CASE

Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition… Study Case Study Case A simplified version of IBERIAS’s air network: the Spanish network. It is a pure hub-and-spoke network with 23 different airports. Planning period: 7 days. The planning must be periodic. Three different fleet types.

Study Case Study Case We present two different case studies: Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition… Study Case Study Case We present two different case studies: Base case scenario: a measure of how the model solutions fit to the reality. Sensitivity analysis in the maximum allowable load factor: to validate the presented approach; and to verify the robustness of the model formulation. New scenario: the entry of high speed rail in a market (stimulation of demand in the market).

Base Case Scenario Study Case (%) 0.85 12.43 28.10 13.72 0.9 9.72 Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition… Study Case Base Case Scenario (%) 0.85 12.43 28.10 13.72 0.9 9.72 19.45 10.34 0.95 4.05 10.54 6.69 1 3.01 6.21 3.20 1.05 10 4.37 1.1 14.86 5.99 1.15 8.64 20.54 8.09

Base Case Scenario Study Case Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition… Study Case Base Case Scenario Comparison of the frequencies per fleet type given by the model with the airline's actual schedule

Base Case Scenario Study Case Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition… Study Case Base Case Scenario Percentage difference in the air market share in the markets where HSR operates Percentage difference in the fleet utilization with respect to IBERIA's actual values

Impacts of the Entry of High Speed Rail Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition… Study Case Impacts of the Entry of High Speed Rail High speed rails: strong source of competition in Spain developed by the government. High speed rails mean an important loss in the market share for the airlines. The Spanish government is planning high speed rails to Galicia.

Impacts of the Entry of High Speed Rail Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition… Study Case Impacts of the Entry of High Speed Rail Unconstrained demand given and fixed: reasonable when entry of new operators is unlikely. If such an entry occurs: demand stimulation. Model unconstrained demand variation with the frequency (schedule displacement) and average price (no demographic changes, planning period of months). market sizing parameter (constant). price elasticity of demand. average price of travel. time elasticity of demand. average trip time. constant expressed in hours. frequency value. schedule displacement component.

Average load factor predicted by the model in response to HSR entry Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition… Study Case Impacts of the Entry of High Speed Rail Average load factor predicted by the model in response to HSR entry Model's response to HSR

Model's predicted total profit variation in response to HSR entry. Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition… Study Case Impacts of the Entry of High Speed Rail Total profit prediction reaches a constant value (increments in HSR’s frequency value have no effect on IBERIA’s profit). Moderate ticket price reduction (10% and 20%): total profit predicted greater. Aggressive discounts do not result in increases in profit. Model's predicted total profit variation in response to HSR entry.

Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition… Conclusions Tactical competition model for an airline-considering multi-modal competition. Integrated optimization schedule design model: frequency planning; approximate timetable development; fleet assignment; and passenger demand choice. Nested logit model using real data provided by IBERIA. Our integrated optimization model is able to replicate IBERIA's current decisions. Predict response to market changes (competitors and entry of new operators). Hence, proposed modelling approach attractive from the perspective of the operator.

Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition… A Look to the Future Departure time competition (timetable was approximate). Price competition. Game-theoretic models and results that provide insights into equilibrium. Passenger demand fluctuations. Robust plans: connecting passengers. Integrated recovery plans.

A Look to the Future: Other Integrated Airline Scheduling: Considering Competition… A Look to the Future: Other Demand fluctuations arising from stochastic demands in railway planning. Demand choice modelling in railways. Recovery in railways: quality (schedule changes). Control the recovery length. Recoverable robustness in railways: limited effort in the recovery. Robust network design. Recoverable robustness in network design problems.

THANK YOU ANY QUESTIONS? LUIS CADARSO luis.cadarso@upm.es