11 Accreditation by ANSI as a Standards Developer Presentation to: ICSP & GMF April 30, 2008 Given by: Anne Caldas.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Establishing a New Accreditation Program in the U.S.
Advertisements

Standards Development: An Overview
1 Standards Development: An Overview Discovery to Delivery Topic Committee Meeting October 30, 2007 Karen A. Wetzel NISO Standards Program Manager
Catholic School Councils A summary of 19 page document listed on school website.
What is GARP®? GARP® is an Acronym for Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles ARMA understands that records must be.
MODULE B - PROCESS B1.ASME Organizational Structure B2.Standards Development: Staff and Volunteer Roles and Responsibilities B3.Conformity Assessment:
MODULE B - PROCESS B1.ASME Organizational Structure B2.Standards Development: Staff and Volunteer Roles and Responsibilities B3.Conformity Assessment:
MODULE B - PROCESS B1. ASME Organizational Structure B2. Standards Development: Staff and Volunteer Roles and Responsibilities B3. Conformity Assessment:
THE STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS STEP 1 PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL STAGE PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL CLOSING DATE FIRST TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING.
Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B5AStandards & Certification Project Management.
Secretarial Duties. The secretary records the minutes of the meetings, maintains a register of members and directors, is responsible for sending out the.
Conference for FOOD PROTECTION Promoting Food Safety Through Collaboration.
Presentation Purpose:  Educate on similarities and differences between standards organizations in North America.  Ultimate goal: Enhance the effectiveness.
Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B5Consensus Process for Standards Development ASME S&C Training Module B5 Consensus Process for.
TIA Engineering Manual 6 th Edition Preview and Overview.
Overview of NSF Standards Process and Joint Committee Formation Sustainable Water Contact Products Stakeholder Meeting October 30, 2012.
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1.Organizational Structure B2.Standards Development: Roles and Responsibilities B3.Conformity Assessment: Roles and Responsibilities.
1 Presented by Name Date. 2 Mission To enhance the global competitiveness of U.S. business and the American quality of life by promoting and facilitating.
ASME C&S Training Module B5 MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1. Organizational Structure B2. Standards Development: Roles and Responsibilities B3. Conformity.
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
April 11, 2007 Prepared by the North American Energy Standards Board 1 North American Energy Standards Board Standards Development Process.
TAC July 2, 2003 Market Design Implementation Process Recommendation.
Codes, Standards & Conformity Assessment GP Russ Chaney CEO, The IAPMO Group
Compliance with the WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and Steps Toward Developing Good Regulatory Practices Bryan O’Byrne Trade Compliance Center.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
Texas Regional Entity Update Sam Jones Interim CEO and President Board of Directors July 18, 2006.
STANDARDS OVERVIEW Wednesday, April 30, 2015 KAREN RECZEK, STANDARDS COORDINATION OFFICE, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY
1 CONSENSUS STANDARDS OIVD WORKSHOP April 22-23, 2003 Rockville MD Ginette Y. Michaud, M.D. OIVD.
Click to add title SABS STANDARDS DIVISION Standards Development Natural Science.
ASME C&S Training Module B7 MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1. Organizational Structure B2. Standards Development: Roles and Responsibilities B3. Conformity.
OVERVIEW OF ENGINEERING MANUAL, Part 1 Susan Hoyler TIA, Director Standards Development and Promotion.
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1.Organizational Structure B2.Standards Development: Roles and Responsibilities B3.Conformity Assessment: Roles and Responsibilities.
1 Leveraging the WTO/TBT Agreement New Delhi, India September 11, 2008 Elise Owen Representative for China and India Affairs American National Standards.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July Supplemental Oversight AS9104/2A & Special.
Information Security 14 October 2005 IT Security Unit Ministry of IT & Telecommunications.
1220 L Street, NW Washington, DC API Standards Development and Pipeline Safety Regulations Restoring Trust in Pipeline Safety Conference.
1 The GCC Metrology Group GULFMET Mohammad Al Mulla GSO - Building for Integration
PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (PPP) FRAMEWORK AND GUIDELINES Syed M. Ali Zaidi, P.Eng. PM(Stanford), Ph.D. Director, Strategic Partnerships Alberta Infrastructure.
CSOC – Certification Structure Oversight Committee Application Guidance October 2015.
PPP Legal & Regulatory Framework. PPP Policy In July 2008 GOK approved the PPP policy directive through which: PPPs are identified as a method for investing.
An Overview of the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments (ACTA) The Federal Communications Commission’s Privatization of 47 CFR Part 68 Presented.
# 1 THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA STANDARDS PROGRAM Paul D. Schomer, Chair ASACOS & Susan Blaeser, Standards Manager Updated Nov
Due Process – ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOVs Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt June 14, 2010.
The NELAC Institute Consensus Standards Development Program Kenneth W. Jackson.
1 May 30, 2007 U.S. – China Symposium on Active Industry Participation in Standardization Overview of U.S. Participation in ISO and IEC.
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
Special Meeting on Procedures for Information Exchange November 7, 2007 Geneva Session 1 Anne Meininger United States USA WTO TBT Enquiry Point.
The IEEE-SA Standards Process Dr. Bilel Jamoussi IEEE Standards Education Committee.
Standards Certification Education & Training Publishing Conferences & Exhibits ISA Standards for Automation An Overview.
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
Page © ASME 2016 Module B – Process B8.ASME International Standards Development Standards and Certification Training.
ISO17799 / BS ISO / BS Introduction Information security has always been a major challenge to most organizations. Computer infections.
The Code of Good Practice and ANSI’s Role in the U.S. Standards System
Standards and Certification Training
Accredited Standards Committee C63® - EMC
Revisions to Codes and Standards
An Overview: The American National Standards Institute, the U. S
Overview of U.S. Participation in ISO and IEC
Michel BRENON IEC ExTAG Secretary
2017 Amendments to the INCITS Organization, Policies and Procedures
Standards Development: An Overview
Standards and Certification Training
Paul Boase, Chair, Transport Canada Jill Collins, CSA Val Todd, CCMTA
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1. Organizational Structure
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1. Organizational Structure
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1. Organizational Structure
The Code of Good Practice and ANSI’s Role in the U.S. Standards System
Sponsor Ballot Comment Resolution
Accredited Standards Committee C63® - EMC
Presentation transcript:

11 Accreditation by ANSI as a Standards Developer Presentation to: ICSP & GMF April 30, 2008 Given by: Anne Caldas

Slide 2 ICSP – GMF Meeting April 30, 2008 Mission To enhance the global competitiveness of U.S. business and the American quality of life by promoting and facilitating voluntary consensus standards and conformity assessment systems and ensuring their integrity.

Slide 3 ICSP – GMF Meeting April 30, 2008 ANSI is… Only accreditor of U.S. Standards Developers Only body that approves standards as American National Standards (ANS)

Slide 4 ICSP – GMF Meeting April 30, 2008 Accredited Standards Developers Currently there are about 212 ASDs Developing standards in virtually all industry sectors  A few examples: medical devices, telecommunications, records management, fire protection, welding, earth-moving machinery, information technology and interoperability, air-conditioning and refrigeration, electrical safety, sunglasses, bicycle helmets, boilers and pressure vessels, metalworking skills assessment, welding skills certification, nuclear equipment operator certification, certification of hazardous waste incinerator operators, etc. Accreditation is distinct from approval of an individual standard as an ANS

Slide 5 ICSP – GMF Meeting April 30, 2008 American National Standards (ANS) Process: Program Oversight Committees Executive Standards Council (ExSC)  Accredits American National Standards Developers  Accredits US Technical Advisory Groups (TAGs) to ISO  Oversees Accredited Standards Developer Audit Program  Maintains most ANSI procedures and policies  Hears appeals and considers complaints Board of Standards Review (BSR)  Approves American National Standards  Hears appeals and considers withdrawal requests ANSI Appeals Board (AB)

Slide 6 ICSP – GMF Meeting April 30, 2008 Standards Developer Accreditation Only ANSI-Accredited Standards Developers may submit their standards through the American National Standard approval process ANSI-accreditation signifies that the standards developer is committed to an open, fair and time-tested consensus process that benefits stakeholders and the American public ANSI-Accredited Standards Developers are accredited to the requirements contained in the ANSI Essential Requirements: Due process requirements for American National Standards (2008)

Slide 7 ICSP – GMF Meeting April 30, 2008 Benefits of ANSI Accreditation as a Standards Developer and ANS approval Public recognition (by industry, government and other interested parties) Hallmarks of the ANS Process  Openness, due process, consensus by a balance of materially- affected interests, consideration of views and objections  Transparency of the process  Fundamental fairness - Ensures level playing field Minimizes some legal risks by requiring procedural safeguards (re: antitrust, product liability/negligence, etc.) Government acceptability (e.g. National Technology Transfer & Advancement Act of 1995) Accreditation is a prerequisite for the National Adoption of an ISO or IEC standard as an ANS

Slide 8 ICSP – GMF Meeting April 30, 2008 ANSI Standards Developer Accreditation Requirements A standards developer’s written procedures for the development and approval of proposed American National Standards must meet ANSI due process and consensus requirements 1. Openness 2. Balance  Discrete interest category definitions 3. Lack of Dominance 4. Public comment opportunity 5. Consideration of Views and Objections

Slide 9 ICSP – GMF Meeting April 30, 2008 ANSI Standards Developer Accreditation Requirements 3. Comment Resolution and Response 4. Recirculation Opportunity 5. Consensus Body Vote 6. Numerical Requirements for Consensus 7. Standards Developer Appeals Process 8. Policy for Retention of Evidence of Compliance 9. Compliance with ANSI’s Patent Policy 10. Compliance with ANSI’s Commercial Terms and Conditions Provisions 11. Interpretations and Metrics Policies

Slide 10 ICSP – GMF Meeting April 30, 2008 Standards Developer Accreditation Fees $3,000 Initial Application Fee Annual National Assessment Fee – sliding scale in 2007 from $1,655 for 0-3 ANS to $28,665 for  Includes cost of periodic procedural audit (5 year cycle)

Slide 11 ICSP – GMF Meeting April 30, 2008 Accreditation Process Procedures Review of Due Process Requirements Apply Standards Action Standards Action Standards Action Public Review Accreditation APPROVED

Slide 12 ICSP – GMF Meeting April 30, 2008 Maintenance of Accreditation Procedural audit typically once every 5 years Submission of periodic compliance forms when ANSI’s procedural requirements change Submission of procedural revisions for approval (reaccreditation process: similar to steps in the accreditation process) Payment of ANSI Membership/Maintenance of Accreditation Dues

Slide 13 ICSP – GMF Meeting April 30, 2008 The American National Standard Designation Signifies that standards…  Are developed using fair, open process that ensures a level playing field  Meet the needs of materially affected interests  Are voluntary – compliance is not required unless adopted by regulation or statute

Slide 14 ICSP – GMF Meeting April 30, 2008 Consensus… …means substantial agreement has been reached by directly and materially affected interests categories. This signifies the concurrence of more than a simple majority, but not necessarily unanimity. Consensus requires that all views and objections be considered, and that an effort be made toward their resolution

Slide 15 ICSP – GMF Meeting April 30, 2008 ANS Approval Process  Stage 1: PINS form to ANSI Announcement of project initiation PINS deliberation if claim of conflict or duplication is raised  Stage 2: Approval of draft Consensus body approves text of draft standard Must meet numerical requirements for consensus as described in developer’s accredited procedures (e.g. approval by a majority of consensus body and 2/3 of those voting, etc.)  Stage 3: Public Review BSR-8 form initiates announcement in Standards Action. Developer may also announce in industry publications, etc. (multiple public reviews are possible)

Slide 16 ICSP – GMF Meeting April 30, 2008 ANS Approval Process  Stage 4: Comment resolution Public and consensus body member comments  Stage 5: Recirculation (if applicable) Unresolved negative comments from consensus body members and public review commenters as well as any substantive changes to the text, must be recirculated to the entire consensus body to allow them to vote, reaffirm a vote or change a vote  Stage 6: Appeals at developer level

Slide 17 ICSP – GMF Meeting April 30, 2008 ANS Approval Process  Stage 7: Submittal to ANSI for approval based on procedural compliance – not technical content Submittal of final standard for approval with evidence of consensus (BSR-9 form)  Stage 8: Notification Notification of final approval/disapproval  Stage 9: Appeal at ANSI Hearing is scheduled if appeal is filed

Slide 18 ICSP – GMF Meeting April 30, 2008 Appeals Informal resolutions encouraged Appeals to a developer: in accordance with accredited procedures Appeals to ANSI:  Board of Standards Review (BSR) – ANS  Executive Standards Council (ExSC) – accreditation and procedural compliance issues  Appeals Board – final level after the BSR or ExSC appeal concludes

Slide 19 ICSP – GMF Meeting April 30, 2008 Schedule Audit, Audit Preparation and Data Collection Conduct Audit 1) On site or Mail-In 2) Informal Post Audit Briefing for On-site Audit Post Audit 1) Develop Audit Report 2) Formal Post Audit Telecon 3) Transmit Audit Report Audit Report and Audit Response are Reviewed by Audit Sub-Committee Audit Closed Audit Discussed at ExSC Accreditation Suspended/ Withdrawn Audit Closed Appeal to ANSI Executive Standards Council Special Audit Audit Process – Summary Flow Appeal to ANSI Appeals Board

Slide 20 ICSP – GMF Meeting April 30, 2008 ANSI’s Standards Action Available freely to the public Published every week Includes national and international activity Announces: PINS (project initiation notices); public review periods for American National Standards: accreditations and standards; and final approval decisions. Announces meetings, all actions re: ANS; any proposed revisions to ANSI procedural requirements, etc.

Slide 21 ICSP – GMF Meeting April 30, 2008 Contacts: Procedures & Standards Administration Ms. Anne Caldas, Director, ANSI/PSA Telephone: Mr. Jim Thompson, Manager, Standards Developer & U.S. ISO/TAG Accreditation Programs Telephone: Mr. Jay Moskowitz, Director, ANSI Audit Program Telephone:

Slide 22 ICSP – GMF Meeting April 30, 2008 Information Sources  Public Library  Standards Action  Electronic Standards Store (ESS)