New Payment Systems in Oncology: Aligning Incentives for Value and Accountability Linda D Bosserman, MD, FACP Medical Oncologist and President Wilshire.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Advanced Medical Home ACP Attributes of Advanced Medical Home Evidence-based care/clinical decision support Chronic care model approach for all patients.
Advertisements

AHA Annual Meeting AIM Panel April 30, 2013 Laura Mavity, MD, Clinical DirectorKatie Hartley, BSN, CHPN, Administrative Director Centers of Care Advanced.
Update on Recent Health Reform Activities in Minnesota.
Leading and innovating for excellence. Working towards the Best Cancer System in the World.
MEDICAL HOME 1/2009 Mary Goldman, D.O., President of MAOFP.
New Zealand Regional Cancer Networks Improved cancer control through increased regional collaboration.
Tad P. Fisher Executive Vice President Florida Academy of Family Physicians Patient Centered Medical Home A Medicaid Managed Care Alternative.
Cancer Care Delivery Reform: The Payer’s Perspective Quality health plans & benefits Healthier living Financial well-being Intelligent solutions Michael.
Building the Digital Infrastructure for Vermont’s Learning Health System ONC HIT Policy Committee Testimony September 14, 2011 Hunt Blair, Deputy Commissioner.
Shaping a blueprint for cancer Plymouth Cancer Summit Sean Duffy February 2015.
March 3, 2014 IN SIXTY: Cancer Patient Journey. RELEASE AVAILABLE AT:
©2011 Walgreen Co. All rights reserved. Georgia Hospital Association Reducing Readmission Learning Collaborative November 7, 2012.
SAO Steve Barlow CMO SelectHealth September 2012.
2.11 Conduct Medication Management University Medical Center Health System Lubbock, TX Jason Mills, PharmD, RPh Assistant Director of Pharmacy.
Improving Health Care Quality While Slowing Spending Growth: The Alternative Quality Contract (AQC) Dana Gelb Safran, Sc.D. Senior Vice President Performance.
Wednesday, December 17, :00pm-4:30pm EST National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship Post-Training Webinar ©2014 National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship.
HFMA December Attacking Rising Costs 23% of the Medicare population has a chronic condition with 5 or more co-morbid conditions that compel them.
Jan Hull Acting Director of Development
Cancer Program Standards 2012: Ensuring Patient-Centered Care
Physician Leader Perspective of ACO Transition Scott D. Hayworth, MD, FACOG President and CEO Mount Kisco Medical Group, PC.
A Presentation of the Colorado Health Institute 303 E. 17 th Avenue, Suite 930 Denver, Colorado (Twitter)
Evolving the Oncology Medical Home Dr. Michael Kolodziej, National Medical Director, Oncology Solutions, Aetna Kathy Lokay, President and CEO, Via Oncology.
Program Development for Safety Net Institutions Catherine Deamant, MD Director, Palliative Care Services Cook County Health and Hospitals System Coleman.
Deploying Care Coordination and Care Transitions - Illinois
Key Findings : Paying for Self-Management Supports as Part of Integrated Community Health Care Systems July, 2012.
Mary S. McCabe Survivorship Care Planning. National Directions Focus on recurrence Increasing expectations by patients and families Identification of.
Achieving improved cancer outcomes- a pathway approach, engaging primary care and partners Kathy Elliott Programme Director – NHS Improving Quality (Delivery.
Overview Community Care of North Carolina. Our Vision and Key Principles  Develop a better healthcare system for NC starting with public payers  Strong.
Success Principles in Integrated Delivery System.
Health Provider Teams: How you can support cancer survivors after treatment Washington CARES about Cancer Partnership: Survivorship Taskforce June 2012.
The Business Case for Bidirectional Integrated Care: Mental Health and Substance Use Services in Primary Care Settings and Primary Care Services in Specialty.
Community Oncology Conference Thursday April 23 rd, 2015.
Alternative Quality Contract: Improving Health Care Quality While Reducing Spending Growth Alliance for Health Reform Deborah Devaux Monday, August 10,
Organized Diagnostic Assessment Demonstration Projects Organized Diagnostic Assessment Demonstration Projects Grand River Regional Diagnostic Assessment.
Coordinating Care Sierra Dulaney Lisa Fassett Morgan Little McKenzie McManus Summer Powell Jackie Richardson.
Population Health The Road to 2020 & The Path to Value Dr. Matthew Wayne Chief Medical Officer, New Health Collaborative & Summa Physicians September 16,
Practice Transformation: Using Technology to Improve Models of Care and Transitions in Care Mat Kendall, EVP Aledade DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions.
Personalisation in the NHS Giles Wilmore Director NHS England
Payment and Delivery Reform Steve Arner Senior Vice President / Chief Operating Officer June 6, 2013.
Outpatient Services and Primary Health Care Heidi Kinsell Master of Health Administration (MHA) Health Services Research, Management and Policy 1.
The KU Wichita Center for Breast Cancer Survivorship Judy Johnston, MS, RD/LD Research Instructor Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health,
QIPP initiative analysis: summary by PCT by type – shown cumulatively for impact on gap.
Managed Care. In the broadest terms, Kongstvedt (1997) describes managed care as a system of healthcare delivery that tries to manage the cost of healthcare,
Better, Smarter, Healthier: Delivery System Reform U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 1.
Linda Devereux Associate Director Merseyside and Cheshire Cancer Network - why we are here and what’s next!
Cancer Mortality Target Measuring and Monitoring at a National Level Jennifer Benjamin, Department of Health Kathy Elliott, National Cancer Action Team.
Looking at Frailty Through a New Lens John Strandmark, M.D. ©AAHCM.
Department of Vermont Health Access The Vermont Approach to Building an Integrated Health System Creating “Accountable Care Partners” Based on Shared Interests.
Improving Patient-Centered Care in Maryland—Hospital Global Budgets
Mark Clanton, M.D. M.P.H. Deputy Director Cancer Care Delivery Systems Moving Discovery Through to Delivery: A Critical Opportunity for Leadership and.
CANCER IN THE WORKPLACE: HOW EMPLOYERS CAN HELP Lynn Zonakis Principal, The Zonakis Group LLC October 23, 2015.
Transforming Clinical Practice Initiative (TCPI) An Overview Connie K
HOUSTON METHODIST POPULATION HEALTH MANAGEMENT
Screening – a discussion in clinical preventive medicine Galit M Sacajiu MD MPH.
PRACTICE TRANSFORMATION NETWORK 2/24/ Transforming Clinical Practice Initiative (TCPI) Practice Transformation Network (PTN)  $18.6 million –
PREPARED BY Cancer Programme Work Programme 2012/13.
Florida Cancer Plan Phil Roland, MD FACS FACOG Florida State Chair A Commission on Cancer.
The Cancer Registry of Norway Jan F Nygård Head of the IT-department.
11 Kansas Heart & Stroke Collaborative September 22 and 23, 2014.
Survivorship Essentials for Practice Administrators Christina Bach, MBE, MSW, LCSW, OSW-C Carolyn Vachani, MSN, RN, AOCN.
ALAMO FAMILY HEALTH TEAM 1.
IT Solutions – Improving Timely Access to Health Care
Prospects for New Delivery Systems and Reimbursement Models
SNP Alliance Annual Leadership Forum Integrating Policy into Practice
National Academies of Science, Engineering & Medicine
Strategic Use of Data in Wellness Program Integration
Cancer Care Benefit that Uses Evidence-Based Guidelines to Assure Most Efficient Use of Benefit Plan Dollars HR Specialty Products & Services Catalogue.
Achieving World-Class Cancer Outcomes A Strategy for England
Transforming Perspectives
Medicaid Collaboration
Presentation transcript:

New Payment Systems in Oncology: Aligning Incentives for Value and Accountability Linda D Bosserman, MD, FACP Medical Oncologist and President Wilshire Oncology Medical Group Affiliated with US Oncology

Disclosures President and stockholder of Wilshire Oncology Medical Group Consultant for US Oncology Received grant/research support from Pfizer

Pay Differently for Different Outcomes: Aligning Information and Incentives Current System Pays for Volume and Drugs and has inadequate data for meaningful evaluations of care, quality, costs or value New Payment Systems Need to Align Goals: Patients need: Ability to evaluate quality and cost of care by different groups Access to high comprehensive care, clinical research and support services Practices with approaches that achieve high patient satisfaction Lowest costs for best outcomes and choices on how to spend their money Payers need: Lowest Costs for Highest Quality of Care in most appropriate Site Targeted reports on delivered care, outcomes and costs Lower administrative burden for auth and UR, lower MLR Payers needs to work closely with Provider Delivery Network BUT: Payers need new systems and relationships to meet these needs

Pay Differently for Different Outcomes: Aligning Information and Incentives New Payment Systems Need to Align Goals: Oncology Delivery Networks Need: Support tools and engagement by providers Evidence based care prompting at the bedside with warranted variations Clinician leadership for high quality care coordination and documentation for analysis & reporting Comprehensive approaches to lower costs of doing business: supplies, HR management, benefits, networking, contracting, data analysis and business management UR, UM and Authorization functions within the care delivery model

New Payment Systems Need to Align Goals: Clinicians need to Lead the Care Delivery Model Development & Implementation of Evidence based Guidelines and warranted variations (tools and techniques) Coordinate all aspects of cancer-related evaluations and care Lead the delivery team: Mid Levels, RN, MA, Admin Staff Oversee/Coordinate the sites of care: office, urgent care, ER, Hospital, Hospice, Home Care Supported by oncology delivery networks to leverage expertise and cost savings benefits

Hematology & Oncology Challenges Significant growth in cancer incidence expected in next 5 and 10 years CARE COORDINATION NEEDED for complex cancer patients throughout the continuum: Primary care, specialists, infusion, after hours, disability, rehabilitation, urgent care, ER, Hospital, tertiary care, clinical trials, psychosocial support, palliative care & hospice, Prevention, Screening, Diagnosis, Therapy, Support, Recovery, Survival Plans, Palliative Care and Hospice Data Needed to analyze quality, value and care needs Partnership between Payers and Oncology leadership Partnership between patients, payers and providers New Contracting needed to align incentives Cancer Care Management to achieve quality and value

Findings from Milliman Report 1* Cancer patients are less than 1% of a commercially insured population, but they account for over 10% of costs The variation in medical utilization and costs for cancer patients highlights an opportunity for better management In particular, cancer patients receiving chemotherapy have high costs averaging $111,000 annually, approximately 4x the cost of cancer patients not receiving chemo Opportunities for quality and cost improvement for cancer patients on chemo include: Reduction in chemo costs Reduction in chemo sensitive admissions Reduction in ER sensitive admissions * Commissioned by US Oncology 10/09; Source:Milliman Analysis of Medstat 2007, 14 million commercially insured lives

Cancer Costs Are Rising Beyond Inflation, Other Healthcare Costs Cumulative % Increase $55 B $123 B Cancer Medical Cancer Drugs Healthcare US GDP -2.4% 9.2% 15.0% 15.1% Annual Increase $15.5 T $2.5 T $93.0 B $42.0 B 2009 US GDP 1 Healthcare 2 Cancer Medical 3 Cancer Drugs 4 Sources 1 Bureau of Labor and Statistics 2 Kaiser Family Foundation, CMS National Health Expenditures data 3 American Cancer Society, US Oncology data 4 Medco Health Solutions 2009 Drug Trend Report

Oncology Drugs are leading the Drug Development Horizon 400 new oncology drugs in pre-clinical or clinical development 171 in late stage trials Market projected to double from $26 B in 2004 to $55 B in Drugs in Clinical Trials Oncology & Hematology Central Nervous System Cardiovascular Respiratory Infectious Disease

Cancer Incidence Concentrations Vary Significantly: IE: Eastern LA-San Bernardino, & Riverside Counties 10  The 2008 adjusted cancer incidences within defined area is 11,991  The compound annual growth rate of cancer incidence is 2% Adjusted Cancer Incidences by Zip Code: Wilshire Oncology

Cancer Incidence by Cancer Type in Eastern LA, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties 11  Breast, prostate, lung & colorectal cancer incidences represent 54% of all cancer incidences in the Inland Empire region The “Other” cancer category includes all cancer specific ICD-9 codes ( & ), however, is not included within the above cancer definitions, as the majority of these “other” cancers are identified as malignant neoplasms of uncertain behavior whose point of origin could not be determined.

Data to Understand Population What is your Hematology-Oncology population? Prevention and Genetic Risk: Assess and return to primary with care plan Screening Programs coordinated with primary care New abnormalities with possible cancer Initial diagnostic work up with primary and specialists, oversight of tertiary care referrals and care coordination Patients with Cancer or blood diseases Early/Curable Patients Advanced or Recurrent Cancer Patients Patients on follow up Palliative or Hospice Patients

Data for Therapy Population-1 Patient Info Disease, Stage, TNM, Tumor Features, Dx Date Treatment Plan: medical, surgical, XRT, other Performance Status and co-morbidities Therapy Regimens Name, # cycles, Goal, Start/Stop, Guideline compliant, Cost vs. Alternative, Reason for any variances Type and Line of Therapy with goal (cure/palliation) Support Regimens: Nausea and Growth factor Regimen, #cycles, guideline compliant, cost vs. alternative

Data for Therapy Population-2 Adjuvant/Neoadjuvant Therapies Guideline adherence vis a via tumor features ER/PR/Her2 for Breast, OncoDx or MammaPrint risks Adenocarcinoma vs. squamous cell for lung K-ras for Colorectal Metastatic or Recurrence Therapies Cost of regimens Response to regimen Duration of response to regimen Performance status Hospice discussion documented for 2 nd line and beyond Hospice and Palliative care costs and benefit analyses

Data Can Help Us Improve Care Which Patients with which characteristics benefit? How do performance status and co-morbidities factor in? How do we coordinate cost effective prevention strategies? What is cost effective for diagnostic and follow up studies? What are the cost effective evidence-based therapies? What are the cost effective support medication regimens? How are clinical trials integrated and at what cost/benefit? How do we coordinate care cost effectively? Med Onc, Rad Onc, Surgery, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, Support What can be done in office and extended urgent care vs ER and hospital care? How are palliative care and hospice introduced and used?

Tracking Total Cost of Care Track Total Cost of Care for Patients Cost effective prevention and diagnostics Cost effective therapy and support with care coordination Cost effective site of care management Cost effective end of life care management Coordinate and manage out migration to tertiary care Clinical Trials: Integrate in network, track trial patients Regimen standard vs. investigational care given Track savings from free investigational drugs vs. standard Track any ‘extra’ care on trial and ensure billed to trial If metastatic disease Track therapy, PS, lines of therapy and outcomes Discussion of palliative and hospice care, Track time off Therapy and time on Hospice Track time off therapy to death

Oncology Medical Home Pilot Comprehensive Reporting on Accountable Care Demographics, diagnoses, co morbidities, performance status Initial Consult, Prevention, Recurrence, Follow up, Transition back to primary and Hospice-Palliative care Therapy: Cost Effective therapies and supportive care Clinical trials integration Care management: symptoms and side effects Care Coordination: surgery, XRT, tertiary care, others Site Optimization: ER/hospital vs. clinic/urgent care End of Life Care ASCO QOPI quality measures

Oncology Medical Home Pilot Pay differently for Different Outcomes Partnership with payers to understand issues of patients, providers and payers: many challenges Identify key issues, validation needs and costs for both sides Develop incentives to align goals Tiered drug pricing/supports greater Pathways adherence Pilot: Pay for desired services E&M, Therapy, Drugs: oral and IV Care Planning and Care Management Code Payments Management: UM, UR, Authorization and Reporting Track: projected savings from cost effective, coordinated care driven by payment for comprehensive planning and care management

Oncology Payment Pilots United Health Care 5 Sites, bundled payments for Breast, Colon and Lung Evidence based pathways, tracking of care costs/savings Aetna -USON Innovent Via Health: U Pittsburg Pathways P4 Health: drug payment differentials ABC-Wilshire Oncology Comprehensive care delivery and cost reporting Pathways, Care Management, End of Life care Standard payments + Care Management & Care Planning

Health Plan & IPA Support Community Oncology Networks Can: Bring practitioners together for common care pathways Provide evidence based pathways – monitor & measure Support practitioners Regional tumor boards and expert consultations Program and update Oncology EMR for Care Pathways Standardize IPA and health plan reporting and care tracking Regionalize urgent care, hospital and tertiary care referrals Share Clinical trials at regional sites to avoid outmigration Standardize cost effective care and support regimens Standard clinic processes: education, consent, delivery, reporting Lower supply costs by enlarging the specialized network Support Medical Directors and Administrators Financial and Care Delivery reporting for contracting support Utilization management tools

Questions & Discussion