Transforming Public Awareness into Public Engagement Challenges & Solutions PipelineWatch.com August, 2012 Gary R. White, President & CEO, PI Confluence,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Damage Prevention PHMSA Update Annmarie Robertson PHMSA/Office.
Advertisements

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Safety Damage Prevention Programs Christie Murray Senior.
1 Pipeline Security Presented to: Pipeline Safety Trust New Orleans, Louisiana November 5, 2010.
Interagency Refinery Task Force Gina M. Solomon, M.D., M.P.H. Deputy Secretary for Science and Health California Environmental Protection Agency
Using Mitigation Planning to Reduce Disaster Losses Karen Helbrecht and Kathleen W. Smith United States: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May.
Getting started with the Program Standards David Lawrence EHS III, Fairfax County Health Department Paul Stromp RS/REHS, Lake County General Health District.
State Portal Advisory Committee Kick-Off meeting 12 August 2010 Prepared by: Ivy Hoffman and George Bakolia.
Intentional Adulteration Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
Pipeline Personnel Qualification
1. Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) Presentation to RCC Stakeholders - Webinar Session January 14 th, 2014.
National Association of Pipeline Safety Representatives Robert Miller.
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America INGAA Action Plan to Build Confidence in Pipeline Safety INGAA Integrity Management Continuous Improvement.
Congressional Reauthorization and PHMSA Rulemakings – Enough to avoid future tragedies? Carl Weimer, Executive Director Pipeline Safety Trust.
Fueling business transformation Corporate Blog Strategy & Governance Model Prepared by: Raymond Bordogna Presented to: LiquidHub FTE & W2-Hourly Associates.
Northwestern Collaboration Services Communications & Training Plan
Presentation By: Chris Wade, P Eng. Finally … a best practice for selecting an engineering firm.
1 Webinar on: Establishing a Fully Integrated National Food Safety System with Strengthened Inspection, Laboratory and Response Capacity Sponsored by Partnership.
Helping the people of Canada maintain and improve their health Aider les Canadiens et les Canadiennes à maintenir et à améliorer leur état de santé Path.
ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Darin Burk Pipeline Safety Program Manager.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration San Bruno – Lessons Learned Alan K. Mayberry, P.E. Deputy Associate.
Shoppers Drug Mart: Our Approach to Government Relations Presentation to the Canadian Assistive Devices Association 19 September 2012.
Duke Energy Gas Transmission Communication Program Enhancements Rick Kivela Manager – Operational Compliance Transmission & Storage Operations Rick Kivela.
Julie Halliday, Program Development DOT – PHMSA – OPS November 18, Pipeline Safety Trust Conference Pipeline Safety – Getting to Zero Pipeline.
Lessons Learned….. Were PG&E practices an anomaly or the tip of a bigger problem? How would we know? 2011 Pipeline Safety Trust Conference – Getting to.
LOGO Arizona Corporation Commission Safety Division Robert Miller.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Liquid Pipeline Advisory Committee Meeting Arlington,
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
Insert Title Here Ten “Lessons Learned” From the 2013 Oklahoma Tornadoes That “Up-the-Ante for Public Information NATIONAL COMMUNITY RELATIONS & DEVELOPMENT.
CERTIFICATION In the Electronics Recycling Industry © 2007 IAER Web Site - -
Technical Assistance Grants to Communities Pipeline Safety Trust Conference New Orleans November 20, 2008 Steve Fischer PHMSA/Office of Pipeline Safety.
Risk Management NDS Forum June 23 rd Example safety objective Objective 1: To protect the health, safety & welfare of employees and people at our.
1155 North State Street, Suite 609 Bellingham, WA Website - Facebook -
Track # SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL © 2006 The Shaw Group 4171 Essen Lane Baton Rouge LA USA.
Lesson 3. Communicating In an Emergency
Disaster Recover Planning & Federal Information Systems Management Act Requirements December 2007 Central Maryland ISACA Chapter.
Communications During a Clinical Trial. Overview This session will cover how to: Announce your trial Maintain good communications Communicate with key.
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
America’s Natural Gas Utilities’ Distribution Pipelines November 2, 2006 The Connection To the Customer.
Hawaii Clean Energy Initiative Online Presence. Social Media Best Practices Leverage Networks Generate “noise” Influence Search Expand Reach.
Damage Prevention – Are States as engaged as they need to be ? Pipeline Safety Trust Meeting November 20, 2008 New Orleans, LA Glynn Blanton, PHMSA State.
Analysis & Presentation of Integrity Management Audit Results Western Regional Gas Conference August 21, 2007 Gary R. White.
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
KNPC HSE Management System
2015 Pipeline Safety Trust Conference, November 19, 2015 TURNING TO THE STATES: WOULD MORE STATE AUTHORITY AND OVERSIGHT IMPROVE SAFETY? A Look at the.
1 VGIN’s GIS Strategic Plan Dan Widner VGIN Advisory Board Meeting January 6,
2015 Pipeline Safety Trust Conference November 20 th, 2015 | New Orleans, LA API RP 1175 Pipeline Leak Detection Program Management – New RP Highlights.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1 Mike Israni Senior Technical Advisor Manager: Standards & Committees.
Office of Pipeline Safety Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Integrity Management July , 2002 Houston, Texas Welcome.
U.S. DOT Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Integrity Management Systems November 18, 2015 Chris McLaren - 1 -
Public Awareness Programs for Pipeline Operators WESTERN REGIONAL GAS CONFERENCE August 21, 2007 Presented by: Ross Reineke.
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
1 CIWMB E-Waste Update CIWMB Working Group December 2001.
Pipeline Public Awareness Programs: Lessons Learned November 4, 2010.
Response to Secretary’s Call to Action. NAPSR The National Association of Pipeline Safety Representatives (NAPSR) is a non-profit organization.
Restoring Trust in Pipeline Safety Katie Hansen, Board of Directors Pipeline Safety Trust.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Damage Prevention Update and Damage Prevention Rulemaking Sam.
1 Options Clearing Corporation Encore Data Distribution Services April 22, 2004.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM RECENT PIPELINE INCIDENTS FLORIDA NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION (FNGA) OPERATING & MARKETING CONFERENCE ROD WALKER PRINCIPAL CONSULTANT.
Introduction Pipeline safety awareness meetings in a presentation setting are nearing the end of their lifecycle and usefulness. Pipeline and utility.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
Safety Management Systems Session Four Safety Promotion APTA Webinar June 9, 2016.
Pipeline Safety Trust Public Awareness Issues John W. Pepper Project Manager Office of Pipeline Safety Southwest Region, Houston, Texas.
Presentation to Pipeline Safety Trust Conference November 18 & 19, 2015.
Robert Kahler Branch Chief
Natural Gas is Moving Forward
Moving Forward From Fukushima Near-Term Task Force EP Recommendations
Public Awareness Best Practices Executive Roundtable Presentation PG&E
Jacques LAURELUT GTE First Annual Work Programme Consultation
PHMSA Update for the API RP1162 Rewrite Team
Safe + Sound A year-round campaign to encourage every workplace to have a safety and health program Safe + Sound is a year-round campaign encouraging.
Presentation transcript:

Transforming Public Awareness into Public Engagement Challenges & Solutions PipelineWatch.com August, 2012 Gary R. White, President & CEO, PI Confluence, Inc.

Challenges An Operator’s Perspective Presented by Raymond Stanford SoCal Gas

Challenge #1 - Perceptions and Relationships Public Perception of Pipeline Operators Negative Press Incidents are sensationalized Credibility Issues General lack of confidence in pipeline operational safety Insufficient Information Belief that that they are not sufficiently informed Establishing Relationships No open lines of communication with stakeholders Need to improve stakeholders’ trust No information exchange environment for stakeholders

Challenge #2 - Public Awareness Communications Messaging Making communications easily recognizable Making messages/materials credible, accessible, personal & simple Delivery A competing environment of multiple messages Non-glamorous information Tiered information to cultivate understanding Multiple timing, delivery and content requirements More frequent updates reinforce the key messages Delivery strategies require improvement Information Exchange Platform to facilitate 2-way exchange Anytime / anywhere access Social Media

Challenge #3 - Public Awareness Audits Program Management is a requirement Documentation is demanded Outreach Demonstration of receipt of the messaging Expectation is verified interaction More than “checking a box” Effectiveness Measurement Demonstration understanding of the messaging Followed by changes in behavior Continuous Improvement

Challenge #4 - The Regulatory Environment NTSB Recommendations 2011 following San Bruno The NTSB noted that PG&E did not notify emergency officials that the accident involved the rupture of one of PG&E’s pipelines, even after they had deduced this to be the case. On June 8, 2011, the NTSB made the following recommendations to address these issues. Specifically, the NTSB recommended that the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) do the following: Require operators of natural gas transmission and distribution pipelines and hazardous liquid pipelines to provide system-specific information about their pipeline systems to the emergency response agencies of the communities and jurisdictions in which those pipelines are located

Challenge #4 - The Regulatory Environment New Legislation 2011 to comply w/ NTSB Guidance — Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue guidance to owners and operators of pipeline facilities on the importance of providing system-specific information about their pipeline facilities to emergency response agencies of the communities and jurisdictions in which those facilities are located. Consultation — Before issuing guidance under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consult with owners and operators of pipeline facilities to determine the extent to which the owners and operators are already providing system-specific information about their pipeline facilities to emergency response agencies.

Challenge #4 - The Regulatory Environment NTSB Recommendations 2012 following Enbridge pipeline operators do not provide emergency officials with specific information about their pipeline systems. System-specific pipeline information is critical to the safe response to pipeline incidents. “Had Enbridge operated an effective public awareness program, local emergency response agencies would have been better prepared to respond to early indications of the rupture”

Challenge #5 – Going Forward “Compliance” vs. “Doing the Right Thing” The letter of the rule vs. the intent of the rule The recent drivers lead to the proposed rule making AND the message is clear… Many areas to enhance safety… The Primary Focus in the Immediate Future is on Emergency Responders Got to’ be more than merely checking a box

Information Exchange thru PipelineWatch.com Presented by Gary White

Stakeholder Approach All the features you are about to see will be uniquely applied to each stakeholder group in future releases Emergency Responders will be the initial audience Remaining API 1162 stakeholders to follow Excavators – State based Excavator Excellence program to support states requirement to enforce damage prevention Affected Public – Incentive based interactive offering to support ongoing engagement Public Officials – Approach yet to be determined

According to the American Gas Association’s Emergency Response Technical note dated March, 2012, the key issues for a utility to contemplate in structuring its emergency response plan include: What mechanisms can be used to disseminate pipeline safety and emergency response information? What is the best way to prepare emergency responders for an incident? What is the appropriate way to gauge the effectiveness of the safety communications? How can emergency responders be encouraged to participate in training? What types of information can be and is appropriate to share? Each of these requirements is met by PipelineWatch

The American Gas Association’s Emergency Response key issue #1. What mechanisms can be used to disseminate pipeline safety and emergency response information? This issue is addressed by PipelineWatch.com The Immediate Focus is Emergency Responders

“Ask the Operator” Communications

Forum “Blog” Communications

Social Media Communications

Pipeline Safety Related Information

Pipeline Safety Training

The American Gas Association’s Emergency Response key issue #2 and #3. What types of information can be and is appropriate to share? What is the appropriate way to gauge the effectiveness of the safety communications? You Can’t Manage What you Can’t Measure These issues is addressed by PipelineWatch.com The Immediate Focus is Emergency Responders

Pipeline Safety Training

Mapping Identified Sites

The American Gas Association’s Emergency Response key issue #4. What is the best way to prepare emergency responders for an incident? This issue is addressed by PipelineWatch.com The Immediate Focus is Emergency Responders

Real Time Incident Communications

The American Gas Association’s Emergency Response key issue #5. How can emergency responders be encouraged to participate in training? This issue is addressed by PipelineWatch.com The Immediate Focus is Emergency Responders

Beyond the fact that emergency responders typically are the type of person that “Does the Right Thing”… Most paid firefighters have to pay for their own station supplies. These items might include pots & pans, other cooking items and/or recreational items. PipelineWatch.com has been built to track ALL time spent on the site by page Number of activities completed Scores to the comprehension questionnaires These may be used to reward a friendly competition within a given jurisdiction. As an example, Houston has 21 Divisions with each having 3-4 stations. We are currently in discussion regarding the use of such a contest to reward the stations in the division with the most “Proof of Engagement” with a donation of $500 each, just for completing questionnaires on capabilities.

In Closing Funding – Project funding provided by PRCI and industry for the development and testing of the platform only. Future development will be funded by subscription Timing – PipelineWatch.com will be available September, 2012 with phased rollouts beginning w/ Emergency Responders Participation – Operators of all sizes including those with or without GIS may participate on a subscription basis. Marketing – In conjunction with the ongoing Public Awareness communications, PipelineWatch.com will be marketed through print, association with other industry organizations, social media and word of mouth driven by the rewards program

SUMMARY PipelineWatch.com was developed to support the pipeline operators PipelineWatch.com was designed as an information exchange portal PipelineWatch.com was created to prepare for the upcoming regulations requiring enhance interaction with emergency responders PipelineWatch.com includes a public side and configurable private secure access locations that can be opened up by state, by groups of similar operators or by individual operators

Q UESTIONS P ROVIDE THE K EY TO U NLOCKING OUR U NLIMITED P OTENTIAL For additional information