Time of Use Rates Lessons Learned After One Year.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SmartPOWER Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) June 3, 2008.
Advertisements

Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
1 The Potential For Implementing Demand Response Programs In Illinois Rick Voytas Manager, Corporate Analysis Ameren Services May 12, 2006.
A Two-Level Electricity Demand Model Hausman, Kinnucan, and Mcfadden.
October 8, 2013 Eric Fox and Mike Russo. AGENDA »Recent Sales and Customer Trends »Preliminary State Sales and Demand Forecast »Building a No DSM Forecast.
Home Area Networks …Expect More Mohan Wanchoo Jasmine Systems, Inc.
Critical Peak Pricing Gulf Power’s Experience Dan Merilatt, V.P. Marketing Services GoodCents Solutions, Inc. Stone Mountain, GA September 9, 2002.
The ESKOM Pilot Testing and Findings of the Residential Time-of-Use Tariff (Homeflex) Project by Vashna Singh and Marcus Dekenah 17 October 2006.
Smart Meters, Demand Response and Energy Efficiency GRIDSCHOOL 2010 MARCH 8-12, 2010  RICHMOND, VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC UTILITIES ARGONNE NATIONAL.
Energy Efficiency and Demand Response: Separate Efforts or Two Ends of a Continuum? A Presentation to: Association of Edison Illuminating Companies Reno,
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
Electrical Billing and Rates MAE406 Energy Conservation in Industry Stephen Terry.
SmartMeter Program Overview Jana Corey Director, Energy Information Network Pacific Gas & Electric Company.
Solutions to California’s Energy Crisis: Real-Time Pricing by Frank Wolak Chairman, Market Surveillance Committee March 17, 2001.
Developing Critical-Peak Pricing Tariffs with the PRISM Software Ahmad Faruqui May 30, 2007.
TIME OF USE RATES AT THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY Presented at: Connecticut’s Energy Future December 2, 2004 James D. Lundrigan Pricing Manager The.
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REGULATION AND POLICY-MAKING FOR AFRICA Module 14 Energy Efficiency Module 14: DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT.
ANALYZING YOUR ELECTRIC BILL Bob Walker Met-Ed November 7, 2007.
The Efficiency of Energy Efficiency Program Tom Van Paris Vice President-Member Services & Communications October 18, 2012.
Herbert E. Hirschfeld, P.E. and Joseph S. Lopes Applied Energy Group, Inc. Metering America 2005 April 13, 2005 Submetering Case Studies with Load Management.
Presentation Overview
Fortis’ Residential Conservation Rate (RCR) How Rural Customers Are Subsidizing Lower Rates For Urban Customers.
Power Utilities in the Telecom Business in the USA: Past Failures and Future Trends Mike Oldak Vice President & General Counsel Utilities Telecom Council.
California Statewide Pricing Pilot Lessons Learned Roger Levy Demand Response Research Center NARUC Joint Meeting Committee on Energy.
1 SCE – Lessons Learned from Pricing Experiences July 31, 2014.
Big Sandy Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis.
Farmers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Vermont Electric Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Draft Findings April 10, 2006.
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
Honey, I’m Home - How Are Electricity Prices for Tomorrow? Lawrence Kotewa Project Manager, Community Energy Cooperative April 13, 2005 Community Energy.
Energate: Leaders in Consumer Demand Response ENERGATE: AN ONTARIO CASE STUDY A fully integrated 2.0 Smart Grid… with Ontario Consumers.
UGI Utilities – Electric Division Energy Efficiency & Conservation Collaborative Meeting June 9, 2010.
Retail Smart Grid Trends Paul Wattles Senior Analyst, Market Design & Development UT Energy Week: “How Smart Grids Enable Consumers” Feb. 18, 2015.
South Lake Union On-Street Parking Plan November 1, 2005.
Utah Cost of Service and Rate Design Task Force
Retail Competition: Managing a Difficult Transition David L. O’Connor Commissioner Massachusetts Division of Energy Resources (DOER) Presentation to National.
1 New England Demand Response Resources: Present Observations and Future Challenges Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
Grayson Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
© 2012 Portland General Electric. All rights reserved. PGE Schedules 7 & 32 Portfolio Time-of-Use Portfolio Options Committee Meeting February 18, 2014.
The Secrets to Successful AMI Deployment – The Ontario Experience Paul Murphy, President & CEO Independent Electricity System Operator February 19, 2007.
The Annual Analysis of Tax Bill Changes. Prepared by the Bedford Board of Assessors December 30, 2013.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
Demand Response and the California Information Display Pilot 2005 AEIC Load Research Conference Myrtle Beach, South Carolina July 11, 2005 Mark S. Martinez,
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
Management and Organisation of Electricity Use Electrical System Optimisation Belgrade November 2003.
CPUC Workshop on Best Practices & Lessons Learned in Time Variant Pricing TVP Load & Bill Impacts, Role of Technology & Operational Consideration Dr. Stephen.
Idaho Power Company Demand Response & Dynamic Pricing Programs PNDRP December 5, 2008 Darlene Nemnich Pete Pengilly.
Dynamic Pricing Case Studies. Digi International.
Blue Grass Energy Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Licking Valley Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by : East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis.
Utility Benefits of Demand Response Trevor Lauer DTE Energy Marketing Executive Conference Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.
CITY OF LEOMINSTER. Customer Charge The cost of providing customer related service such as metering, meter reading and billing. These fixed costs are.
EmPower MD Act overview and Demand Response Training EmPower Maryland.
Pay-As-You-Go Update November Program Overview Paying advance for electricity Flexibility and Customer benefits Make as many payments as necessary.
Hawai’i Over 77,000 PV systems interconnected or approved statewide. 17% of customers 500+ MW of PV installed Oahu: 32% of single family homes have.
1 City of Palo Alto Utilities Large Commercial Customer Pilot Demand Response Program Customer Meeting March 8, 2012.
2013 Load Impact Evaluation of Southern California Edison’s Peak Time Rebate Program Josh Schellenberg DRMEC Spring 2014 Load Impact Evaluation Workshop.
Advanced Meter School August 18-20,2015 Time of Use and Load Profile Jeremiah Swann.
Pay-As-You-Go Final 2012 Report. Agenda PAYG Refresher Pilot Goals & Overview Voice of the Customer Front Office Impacts Back Office Impacts Financial.
Smart Grid Tariff Changes
SMECO Demand Response filing
Introducing Smart Energy Pricing Cheryl Hindes
Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well
System Control based Renewable Energy Resources in Smart Grid Consumer
Demand Response & RTP Ivo Steklac, Director of Marketing Advanced Services
Presentation transcript:

Time of Use Rates Lessons Learned After One Year

Time of Use - Outline Introduction/History Intended Goal Key Findings & Observations Time of Use Rate Design Guidelines Rate Design Implementation Approach Initial Results Initial Feedback Adjustments One-year Observations Path Forward Phone Survey Data Customer Data

For a market to correctly function, there must be elasticity in the demand curve. With fixed rates customers have no incentive to modify their use of electricity as the price changes on the wholesale market. Aligning the retail price of electricity to the wholesale cost gives those with the ability to shift their electric use an incentive to use electricity when the wholesale price is lowest. If Time of Use Rates are set up correctly, it is hoped that the customer could lower their rates and the utility would lower their generation, transmission and capacity costs. Introduction/History

About Groton, MA Groton, Massachusetts - founded in 1655, has a population of 10,636 (2009 Town Census) and is located in the Nashoba Valley area in northwestern Middlesex County. Groton has an area of square miles. There are 106 miles of plowed or maintained roads within the town. Town Hall is 320 feet above sea level and the highest elevation is Chestnut Hill Road at 516 feet above sea level. The median household income is $82,869.

Intended Goal Groton Electric’s goal with Time Of Use Rates is to create a simple structure where customers will be motivated to shift a portion of their electric use from the high cost peak hours to the lower cost off peak hours saving themselves money and reducing the generation, transmission, and capacity costs of Groton Electric. PEAK USE 11:00 am - 7:00 pm OFF-PEAK USE 11:00 pm - 7:00 am The more customers can shift their electric use from peak to off-peak hours, the lower their average cost per kilowatt-hour

Key Findings and Observations The most encouraging finding after one year is that while the customers voluntarily using the Time of Use rates shifted their use 2.74% from the peak hours to the off peak hours, they reduced their contribution to Groton Electric’s monthly peak hour (which determines transmission costs) by 17%.

Time Of Use Rate Design Guidelines At the end of 2008, Groton Electric completed a 900 MHz two-way communication meter system for residential customers. Since we only have hourly usage data for residential meters, the initial Time Of Use program is only being offered to residential customers. When creating the rates, we had three primary guidelines: Make the Rates Revenue Neutral Keep the Program Simple Align retail price to wholesale price

After looking at rate design guidelines, Groton Electric created a 7-11 rate structure by dividing the day into four segments. The rates were adjusted and placed into three categories to achieve our goals. 11:00 pm – 7:00 amLow (Off-Peak) Rate 7:00 am – 11:00 amMiddle (Mid-Peak) Rate 11:00 am – 7:00 pmHigh (Peak) Rate 7:00 pm – 11:00 pmMiddle (Mid-Peak) Rate After analyzing wholesale market price variation for 2008, Groton Electric designed the three rates with a slight benefit given to the lower rate. An additional concern was factored in because of how we pass our NYPA preference power credit to our customers. This concern was addressed by creating two time-of-use rates - one for customers who use less than 1000 kWh/month and one for customers who use greater than 1000 kWh/month. Rate Design

Residential TOU < 1000 kWh/month Off-peakT1$ Mid-peakT1$ PeakT1$ Residential TOU >1000 kWh/month Off-peakT2$ Mid-peakT2$ PeakT2$ As of May 2010, the rates are expected to remain constant for the near future. Time Of Use Rates Effective January 1, 2009

Implementation Approach After receiving Board approval of the rates, the next challenge was the ability to incorporate the new rate structure into our billing program and to present it in an understandable format on the bill. This was designed, developed and demonstrated during the December 2008 billing cycle. We then recruited Time of Use customers in our January 2009 Newsletter. After one year of analysis, the time of use rates were demonstrated to have the effect of shifting use. A second push for customers to voluntarily join the program was presented in the April 2010 Newsletter.

Initial Results Percentage of customers signing up Within a relatively short period of time we had one percent of our customers enrolled in the program. Customer Mix At the one year mark, 79% of the time of use customers were in the rate class for residential customers who use less than 1000 kWh per month. Groton has a significant number of large homes that use a higher-than-average amount of electricity, but at this time the large residential customers have not shown much interest in this program. Average usage After one year, the profile of the average customer using time of use rates is very close to the average residential customer in Groton. Groton average residential customer uses 859 kWh/month Groton average time of use customer uses 836 kWh/month The average Time of Use customer shifted 2.74% of their use from the higher cost peak rate period to the lower cost off-peak rate period in 2010.

Initial Feedback Enthusiasm 25% of the customers in the program were very conscious about their use and successfully shifted between 4.3% and 9.8% of their use from peak hours to off peak hours. Disappointment One lesson learned was that customers who have considerable air conditioning use will probably see their total bill increase under the Time of Use rate. Initial screening should discourage customers with significant air conditioning from signing up for the program, or at least explain to them what may happen to their bills during the summer months. In the first year of the program this group of customers was not happy as soon as the warm weather hit. By the end of the summer many of them had dropped out of the program.

Feedback Cost / Benefit analysis One customer who was very successful at shifting electric use and reducing the cost of electricity during 2009, decided to withdraw from the program in March of 2010 because shifting their electric use was too stressful and they wanted to enjoy the summer.

Weekends Initially implemented the Time of Use rate schedule Sunday – Monday to ensure the lowest rate possible during the 11:00 pm – 7:00 am off-peak time slot Results and customer feedback encouraged Groton Electric to consider lowering the weekend peak rate to the mid-peak rate so customers could do their household chores during weekend days After seeing that shifting use was actually lowering Groton Electric’s costs, the Board approved reducing the weekend peak rate to the mid-peak rate. Adjustments

Time of Use Rates TIME-OF-USE PERIODS OF THE DAY OFF-PEAK MID-PEAK PEAK

One-year Observations After one year, we have observed that it is difficult for the average residential customer to shift a large portion of their use. We have a small number of customers who have put timers on their hot water heaters and are passionate about only running their appliances from 11:00 pm to 7:00 am. The clear winners in the time of use rate class are customers who have pool pumps AND who also do not use a significant amount of air conditioning. We have seen that a small shift in use (2.7%) has translated into a significant reduction in those customer’s contribution to Groton Electric’s peak hours (17%).

One-year Observations The savings we realized in reduced capacity and transmission costs were able to be returned to the customers in this class by the reduction in weekend peak energy costs. We will continue to monitor this program and hopefully this summer we will have a significant heat wave, to test our results under real peak conditions. Usage changes As a class, the total shift for all customers in the time of use rate category was 2.4%. When their use change was weighted by their average load, the time-of-use customers as a whole successfully shifted their use 2.7%. This indicates that customers with larger loads were able to shift a larger percent of their use than customers with smaller loads.

Path Forward Groton Electric has started deploying commercial smart meters capable of time of use billing and plan to have all commercial customers deployed by the end of This will enable Groton Electric to analyze hourly load data to determine a rate structure that will be revenue neutral for a voluntary commercial time of use rate class.

Phone survey data One customer shifted their use 9.8% They accomplished the shift by having a general awareness and changing their habits. They consciously avoided doing certain things between 11:00 am and 7:00 pm; they also put their pool pump on a timer. One customer stopped using the clothes dryer At least one customer put a timer on the hot water heater Many customers mentioned they put effort into running appliances off- peak Most of the customers who had significant shifting used a pool pump timer

DATA As shown below, this time of use customer who entered the voluntary rate on January 1, 2009 was successful at shifting their electric use. In addition to increasing their off-peak use from 23% to 32%, they decreased their electricity use during the peak period from almost 38% to under 32%. TOU customer # kWh 2008 kWh Total 1-1 to , %13,557.8 Total 11pm - 7am4, ,173.7 percent of Off-Peak use32.4% 23.4% Total 11am - 7pm4, ,109.1 percent of Peak use31.4% 37.7%

DATA A spreadsheet with the hourly usage data for all customers in our time of use rate classes is available with identifying information eliminated. If you would like this file, please contact Tammi Lemire at The file can be opened by Excel 2007 or Open Office and is currently 11.2 Mb so it may not make it through many systems. If your can not handle a file of that size, please include ftp information or mail a usb drive to: Groton Electric Light Tammi Lemire 23 Station Avenue Groton, MA 01450