Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
Advertisements

Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model Module 5: Reflecting and Adjusting.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Model
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Module 1: System Overview, Expectations, and Goal Setting.
Copyright © 2013 November 2014 LEPG Session 1: Expectations and Goal- Setting.
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Model Module 3: Reflection, Rating, and Planning 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
The Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
RHODE ISLAND MODEL Fall 2013 Evaluation Update. 2 Fall Evaluation Educator Update Agenda 1.RI Model Improvements 2.Support Professionals Overview 3. Questions.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS 3-4-5
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Assessment Literacy Series
Science & Technology Grades Spring 2007
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Student/School Learning Objectives
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model Module 1: Model Overview 1.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 1: MSFE TEPG Rubric.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Rhode Island Innovation Evaluation & Support System (RIIESS) for Support Professionals Fall 2013.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEP 1 1 Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Facilitators: Effectiveness coaches.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Introduction to Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Resources for Science 1.
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Adult Learning.
© 2014, KDE and KLA. All rights reserved. PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND SELF-REFLECTION.
Citywide Expectations for
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Instructional Leadership: Planning for Improvement.
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 3: Observation and Feedback.
© 2012, Community Training and Assistance Center © 2012, Teaching Learning Solutions Linking ISLLC and your Principal Rubrics to a Case.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES)
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
ELA Grade 11/12 Cohort Common Core Transition Training SY March 7, 2014 Professional Development Center (PDC) Judy Henderson, Emily Jimenez, Elizabeth.
Student Growth 2.0 NCESD Fellows November 17 th,
Human Capital Accountability
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Measuring Growth Mindset in the Classroom
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Classroom Video Observation
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Analyze Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
Analyzing Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Strategic Planning Final Plan Team Meeting
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
CLASS KeysTM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010
Teacher Evaluator Student Growth Retraining Academy
Presentation transcript:

Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model Module 3: Reflection and Goal Setting Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1

Module 3: Reflection and Goal Setting Module 1: Model Overview Module 2: Student Learning Objectives Module 3: Reflection and Goal Setting Participants engage in SMART goal development, a process to achieve or maintain effective practice and ensure students meet the rigorous learning targets established through the SLO process. SMART goals help strategically identify specific areas of growth and focus for the school year. Module 4: Evidence, Observation, and Feedback Module 5: Reflecting and Adjusting

Agenda Welcome (5 minutes) Connecting (15 minutes) SLOs and Professional Goals Learning (45 minutes) Sources of Evidence Overview of Self-evaluation and Goal Setting Process Mr. Brown’s Reflection and Self-Evaluation SMARTer Goals Mr. Brown’s Professional Goals Implementing (40 minutes) Practicing Self-evaluation and Goal Setting Reflecting and Wrap-Up (5 minutes) Submitting SLO and Professional Goals for Approval Preparing for Module 4

Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will know and be able to Complete an accurate and evidence-based self-evaluation grounded in the MSFE Rubric Use evidence and the language of the MSFE Rubric to set SMART professional goals grounded in their student learning objectives

Connecting 20 minutes

Connecting SLOs and Professional Goals Learning goals for students Grounded in student data analysis and reflection Focused on instruction and assessment Learning goals for teachers Grounded in reflection and analysis of student needs Focused on adjusting and improving instruction to support student attainment of growth targets

Activity: Supporting Your SLO In pairs, share your SLO: What skills, knowledge, or structures do you need to implement the instructional plan effectively? What skills, knowledge, or structures do you need to support student attainment of growth targets? Identify 2-3 ways you could develop the skills, knowledge, or structures you discuss.

Learning 80 minutes

Evidence Collection Evidence can be collected through a variety of sources Classroom observations (live or through video) Observations of teacher collaboration Feedback conversations (pre- and post-observation) Teacher-collected evidence Student work

Types of Evidence Verbatim: Teacher: Students, please take out your notebooks. Numeric: 5 out of 10 student work assignments involved student choice. Factual summaries: The teacher asked the students to take out their notebooks. Observed aspects of the setting: Rules were posted. Or Slide presentation available on handouts.

Learning Activity 1a: Sources of Evidence Count off and go to the chart indicated by the facilitator Spend 3 minutes at that chart with your group Identify: Evidence statements for the source of evidence included on your chart Reminder: The most accurate evidence is objective, non-biased, and specific. When directed by the facilitator, move to the next chart

Wrap-Up/Debrief From Activity 1a Return to your original chart and determine if the statements of evidence are objective, non-biased, and specific. Read any statements that are not objective, non-biased, or specific to the group.

Self-Evaluation and Goal-Setting Step 1: Expectations and Goal-Setting Step 4: Professional Growth Plans Step 2: Evidence, Feedback, and Growth Fall Spring-Fall Fall-Spring Late Winter-Spring Step 3: Reflection and Rating

Self-Evaluation and Goal-Setting Step 1: Expectations and Goal-Setting Working in Professional Cohorts, teachers use the SLO framework to develop at least one measurable student growth target. Teachers engage in self-evaluation and professional goal setting Teachers seek review and approval of goals and expectations.

Connecting Student Learning and Professional Goals Professional Goal Setting Process Analysis of student data and student needs Student Growth Targets Instruction, (b) Formative Assessment, (c) Instructional Adjustments Professional Growth Goals Self-evaluation and reflection using the MSFE Rubric and evidence

Activity: Mr. Brown’s Reflection and Self-evaluation At your table, assign 1-2 standard indicators to each person (Handout 3). Use the MSFE Companion Guide to answer the following questions for your standard indicators: Are the statements of evidence specific, objective, and non- biased? If not, how would you rewrite them to be? How well does Mr. Brown’s evidence align with the identified standard indicators? How does Mr. Brown use his SLO to inform his reflection? What specific components does he reference? What other evidence or considerations might you recommend he include? What advice would you give Mr. Brown about strengthening his written reflection?

SMART Goals Specific Well-defined, clear outcome Description Questions to ask Specific Well-defined, clear outcome Clear to anyone who does not know anything about the project What do I want to accomplish? Measurable Know when it has been achieved How is achievement measured? How will I know it is accomplished? Attainable Achievable Agreement with stakeholders on what the goal should be How can it be accomplished? Relevant What are the urgent needs? Is the goal aligned with other projects? Is this the right time? Time-bound A specific date is set. Date is realistic. What can I do six weeks from now? The S.M.A.R.T. goal concept was introduced by G. T. Doran, A. Miller, and J. Cunningham in “There’s a S.M.A.R.T. Way to Write Management’s Goals and Objectives,” Management Review 70, no. 11 (1981), 35–36. What Makes a Goal “S.M.A.R.T.”? also draws from the work of Ed Costa, Superintendent of Schools, Lenox, Massachusetts; John D’Auria, a Lennox teacher; and Mike Gilbert, Northeast Field Director, Massachusetts Association of School Committees.

Learning Activity 2: SMART.er Goals Review Mr. Brown’s SMART goals included on Handout 6 With a partner, identify how the goals can be made SMART-er

Wrap-Up/Debrief From Activity 2 How did you and your partner improve the example goals? Goal 1 Goal 2 Goal 3

Implementing 60 minutes

Implementing Activity: Setting Goals Use Handout 1, your SLO, and the Companion Guide to start the self-evaluation and reflection process. Draft a SMART professional practice goal using Handout 2. Ask a partner to provide you with feedback on the quality of your goal. Revise your draft goal.

Share Out Share 1 goal, the feedback you received, and how you modified your goal.

Reflecting and Wrap-Up 10 MINUTES

Reflecting Activity: 3-2-1 On Handout 7, write down 3 ideas you want to remember 2 things you learned today 1 outstanding question you have about the T-PEPG system

Next Steps: Submitting Your SLO and Professional Goals 1. Complete your professional goals, including: Appendix O. Professional Goal Setting Template, Part 2. Implementation Planning 2. Submit your SLO for pre-approval review 3. Submit your pre-approved SLO and professional goals for final approval.

Looking Forward to Module 4 Module 4 will provide details about the observation process, including: The collection and organization of observation evidence The sharing of timely, constructive feedback All participants participate in peer observation, and the module provides information about how to make the process meaningful, collaborative, and constructive.

Presenter name XXX-XXX-XXXX xxxxxxxxxxx@xxx.xxx 1234 Street Address City, State 12345-1234