Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Il Project Cycle Management :A Technical Guide The Logical Framework Approach 1 1.
Advertisements

Results-Based Management (RBM) and the UNDAF Results Matrix.
THE LOGICAL FRAMEWORK APPROACH
PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT (PCM)
Evaluating public RTD interventions: A performance audit perspective from the EU European Court of Auditors American Evaluation Society, Portland, 3 November.
Program Evaluation. Lecture Overview  Program evaluation and program development  Logic of program evaluation (Program theory)  Four-Step Model  Comprehensive.
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
INSTITUTO DE ESTUDIOS POLÍTICOS PARA ÁMERICA LATINA Y ÁFRICA LOGICAL FRAMEWORK APPROACH HUMANA.
Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
Urban-Nexus – Integrated Urban Management David Ludlow and Michael Buser UWE Sofia November 2011.
1 CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT Lecture 5 Monitoring Review Evaluation.
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Developing the Logical Frame Work …………….
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
Objective- and Strategic Analysis
1 CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT Lecture 3 Project management methodologies.
CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.
TACKLING POVERTY TOGETHER Youth Contributing to Poverty Reduction.
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Logical Framework and Indicators.
Lesson 5 – Logical Framework Approach (LFA)
Results-Based Management
Objective-Oriented Project Planning (ZOPP)
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
1 Introduction to Evaluating the Minnesota Demonstration Program Paint Product Stewardship Initiative September 19, 2007 Seattle, WA Matt Keene, Evaluation.
The role of assumptions
IPA Funds Programme Management sept Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.
Developing Indicators
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
Results Based Management: Logical Framework Matrix (LFM) December 30 th, 2009 Abeer Shakweer, Ph.D., Planning and Monitoring Manager Science and Technology.
IPA Funds Programme Management sept Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.
The LOGICAL FRAMEWORK Scoping the Essential Elements of a Project Dr. Suchat Katima Mekong Institute.
Project Management Learning Program 19 – 30 April 2010, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Assumptions and Risk.
An introduction to the Logical Framework Approach (LFA) Identi- fication Development Formulation and appraisal ApprovalInception Implemen- tation Closure.
Mothers unwilling to go to clinics Low staff skills Inadequate number of clinics Shortage of drugs High infant mortality rates Commercial pressure for.
MOD 6050 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND FUND RAISING TOPIC – PROPOSAL WRITING AND FUNDRAISING (WK 6 &8) LECTURER: DR. G. O. K’AOL.
LOGICAL FRAMEWORK by Lorelyn T. Dumaug.
UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.
1 CORAT AFRICA MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP FOR IMBISA/AMECEA COMMUNICATION COORDINATORS, MAPUTO, MOZAMBIQUE.
Promising Ideas and Issues to Consider in Reaching Reading and Literacy Goals Logistics of supervision, training, support to teachers Sakil Malik Director.
MAINSTREAMING MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Can education be effectively managed without an M & E system in place?
SUB-MODULE 5. MEANS OF VERIFICATION RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2)
Participatory Planning Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Project Management Learning Program 7-18 May 2012, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Writing Project Report Multi-Purpose Reporting.
Screen 1 of 22 Food Security Policies – Formulation and Implementation Policy Monitoring and Evaluation LEARNING OBJECTIVES Define the purpose of a monitoring.
Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.
1 Results-based Monitoring, Training Workshop, Windhoek, Results-based Monitoring Purpose and tasks Steps 1 to 5 of establishing a RbM.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
27/04/2017 Strengthening of the Monitoring and Evaluation system for FTPP/FTTP in FAO /SEC December 2015 FTPP/FTFP Workshop, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
Logical Framework Approach 1. Approaches to Activity Design Logical Framework Approach (LFA) – Originally developed in the 1970s, this planning process.
The Logical Framework (Log Frame). Programs & Projects Programs Broad areas of work required to implement policy decisions. Usually focused on a sector.
Logical Framework Approach An Evaluation Toolbox Presentation
Evaluation What is evaluation?
WORKSHOP ON PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT (PCM) Bruxelles 22 – 24 May 2013 Workshop supported by TAIEX.
Building an ENI CBC project
Effective Programming with the Logical Framework (Logframe) Approach
Project Cycle Management
Managing for Results Capacity in Higher Education Institutions
The Logical Framework Approach
Day 2 The LogFrame.
Session 9 Recap on LFM and IL.
Riset dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat: Logical Framework Approach
CATHCA National Conference 2018
WHAT is evaluation and WHY is it important?
Results Based Management for Monitoring & Evaluation
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?
Presentation transcript:

Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach UNITED NATIONS STATISTICAL INSTITUTE FOR ASIA & THE PACIFIC (SIAP) CHIBA, JAPAN Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach

RBM and Logical Framework Approach (LFA) The LFA is an RBM tool used for systematic planning, implementing, monitoring, and evaluating projects/ programmes.

The Logical Framework Approach (i) Features of LFA : stakeholder involvement needs-based approach logical intervention approach framework for assessing relevance, feasibility and sustainability

The Logical Framework Approach (ii) Features of LFA : results-oriented – not activity driven logically sets objectives and their causal relationships shows whether objectives have been achieved: Indicators (for M&E) describes external factors that influence the project’s success: assumptions and risks

LFA Key Features Main steps: Stakeholder Analysis SWOT Analysis Problem Tree Analysis Objective Tree Analysis Logical Framework Matrix Monitoring and evaluation

Stakeholder Analysis Stakeholder is any individuals, group or organization, community, with an interest in the outcome of a programme/project.

Stakeholder Analysis Purpose: To identify: The needs and interest of stakeholders The organizations, groups that should be encouraged to participate in different stages of the project; Potential risks that could put at risk programme; Opportunities in implementing a programme;

SWOT Analysis (i) Purpose: To assess the performance and capacity of the participating units, divisions of organization. Each participating unit has to undertake SWOT analysis.

SWOT Analysis (ii) SWOT analysis is a tool for institutional appraisal and a brainstorming exercise in which the representatives of the organization participate fully.

SWOT Analysis (iii) SWOT stands for: Strengths - the positive internal attributes of the organisation Weaknesses - the negative internal attributes of the organisation Opportunities - external factors which could improve the organisation’s prospects Threats - external factors which could undermine the organisation’s prospects

Problem Tree Analysis Purpose: - to identify major problems and their main causal relationships. Output: problem tree with cause and effects

Steps in Undertaking Problem Tree Identify the major problems that the project will address. State problems in negative manner. Group problems by similarity of concerns. Develop the problem tree: Select a focal problem from the list and relate other problems to the focal problem. If the problem is a cause of the focal problem it is placed below the focal problem If the problem is an effect of the focal problem is goes above

Problem Tree EFFECT CAUSE

Analysis of Objectives Transforming the problem tree into an objectives tree by restating the problems as objectives. Problem statement converted in to positive statements Top of the tree is the end that is desired Lower levels are the means to achieving the end.

Objectives Tree * Ends Means

The relationship between the problems tree and the objective tree PROBLEM TREE OBJECTIVE TREE Focal problem Project Purpose Effects Overall Objectives Causes Results

Strategy Analysis (i) The aim of strategy analysis is division of the objectives tree into more consistent smaller sub-units that may, compose the core for a project. Each of the sub-units of the objective tree can represent an alternative strategy for the future project. The project objectives set the framework for the strategy of the project.

Strategy Analysis (ii) Criteria for selection of the project strategy: 1. RELEVANCE: the strategy corresponds to the needs of the stakeholders. 2. EFFECTIVENESS: the lower level objectives of the strategy will contribute to achievement of the project purpose 3. EFFICIENCY: cost-effectiveness of the strategy in transforming the means into results. 4. CONSISTENT with development policies 5. SUSTAINABILITY of the project 6. ASSUMPTIONS and RISKS

The Logframe Matrix The main output of the LFA is the logframe matrix. The Logical Framework Matrix is used to present information about project objectives, outputs and activities in a systematic and logical way. The basic Logframe matrix contains 16 cells organized into 4 columns and 4 rows, as indicated in the next slide:

What needs to be fulfilled before activities can start The Logical Framework Matrix Objectives & activities Indicators Means of verification Assumptions Goal (Impact) Purpose/ (Outcome) Outputs Activities Means Cost What needs to be fulfilled before activities can start Pre-conditions

Assumptions (i) Describe necessary internal and external conditions in order to ensure that the activities will produce results Assumptions are risks, which can jeopardize the success of the project Are worded positively, i.e. they describe circumstances required to achieve certain objectives

Assumptions (ii) Should be relevant and probable If an assumption is not important or almost certain: Do not include If an assumption is unlikely to occur: Killer assumption – abandon project

Assumptions (iii) Example of Assumptions for the Goal and Purpose: Political – stability of NSO and government staff Economic – sustainable economy Etc.

Assumptions (iv) Example of Assumptions: Adequate funds materials. Skilled people – training needs. Approvals & contracts – legal, administrative. Participation of stakeholders.

The logical framework Impact Outcome Assumptions Outputs Assumptions Activities

Indicators (i) Indicators measure to verify to what extant the results are achieved. Specify how the achievement of an objective can be verified or demonstrated Provide a basis for Monitoring and Evaluation 3 Dimensions of Indicators Quantity Quality Time

Indicators (ii)

Means of Verification Tools or means to obtain the information required by the indicators Include: project documents field verification ad-hoc studies

Results Chain & Logical Framework Matrix RBM LFA Result Goal/Impact Result Purpose/ Outcome Result Output Result Activities

Monitoring and Evaluation Based on the logical framework Strengthens accountability and transparency Provides information for effective management Helps determine what works well and what requires improvement Builds knowledge

Purpose of Monitoring and Evaluation It is the continuous process of collecting, processing and assessing information about the: Project implementation Project progress Project impact and effects Project environment

Monitoring (i) Continuous function that aims to provide early indications of progress or lack thereof in the achievement of results

Monitoring (ii) Assumes the validity of the existing plan Takes place at project level Is the responsibility of the project management Is based on the indicators defined in the logical framework

Monitoring Responsibility Project Management Activities Output indicators Early outcome indicators Project Target Group Outcome indicators Impact indicators

Evaluation Time-bound exercise to assess the relevance, performance and success of on-going or completed projects Questions the validity of existing planning Is related to the impact of a project Opens the mind for strategic adjustments

Evaluation Quality Criteria Relevance (overall) Efficiency (activities, outputs) Effectiveness (outputs, outcome) Impact (outcome, impact) Sustainability (outcome, impact)