IDEA & Section 504: Guidelines for Students at the Borders Sacramento Office 520 Capitol Mall Suite 400 Sacramento California 95814 Tel: 916.443.0000 Fax:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPECIAL EDUCATION Learning Disabilities and the Law:
Advertisements

DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICES PROJECTIONS PREPARED BY KIM CULKIN, DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL SERVICES MARCH 2013.
Somerset Public Schools The Section 504 Plan: The Role of the Teacher.
Section 504 and ADAAA Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
SECTION 504 Rehabilitation Act of 1973 Developed by Contra Costa SELPA
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy IEP vs Section 504 is the part of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 that applies to persons (including students) with.
Transition: Understanding ADA vs. IDEA DRUMMOND WOODSUM Jeanne M. Kincaid.
What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
Legal Update Sacramento Office 520 Capitol Mall Suite 400 Sacramento California Tel: Fax: *Our newest location:
Independent Educational Evaluations Developed by Contra Costa SELPA As Recommended for LEA Board Policy
Surrogate Parent Training Presenter: Title: District: Date: Presented by:
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
ASSESSMENT Developed by Contra Costa SELPA
An Overview of the Law 1 Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)
Accommodation Plans.  Civil Rights legislation for persons with disabilities indicates that schools must afford students with disabilities equal opportunities.
Introduction to Section 504 Produced by: WI FACETS* © 2007 WI FACETS *Produced with private funds.
Function ~ Process ~ Responsibilities
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 Las Cruces Public Schools Technical Assistance Training Department of Learning, Teaching and Research.
Chapter 5 Section 504 and the Americans with Disabilities Act Jacob, Decker, & Hartshorne 1.
1 Section 504 Clarkstown Central School District Office of Pupil Services Dr. Carol Gannon, Associate Superintendent Barbara Auriemma, Office.
2010 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights (OCR)
504, IDEA NEW SCHOOL NURSE ORIENTATION WETHERSFIELD, CT DECEMBER 4, 2014.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Special Education Policies, Practices, and Programs
An Overview. Section 504  Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (ADA Amendments Act of 2008)  Protects qualified individuals from discrimination.
Resource Binder for Special Education Federal and State Regulations Educate all students to achieve excellence Tammie McElaney February 2014.
Special Education Process What are the steps if your child is suspected of having a disability? Mary K. Antonucci EDU 621.
University of Connecticut Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Families As Partners Training Steps in the Special Education Process.
Students with Special Needs What do I do now? Dr. Jeff Allen & Christine Holecek Business & Marketing Conference July 25-29, 2005.
Schools, Families, Communities and Disabilities Rebecca Durban and Jessica Martin.
Special Education Law If you are not in compliance with the law you can lose your teaching license and be subjected to lawsuits! The link below will take.
Section 504 for School Nurses Marie DeSisto RN, MSN Director of Nurses and District 504 Coordinator Waltham Public Schools Waltham, MA.
Section 504 Waltham Marie DeSisto RN, MSN, NCSN Director of Nurses /District 504 Coordinator Waltham Public Schools May 2010.
A Comparison Section 504 and IDEA. Who is an individual with a disability? As defined by federal law: "An individual with a disability means any person.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
Section 504: Implementing Recent Changes through Compliant Procedures Pueblo City Schools January 31, 2012 Kathleen Sullivan Associate Executive Director.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Legal Aspects of Special Education Eligibility and Placement IEP and 504.
Enrollment Determination Colorado Charter School Institute BOOT CAMP September 1, 2015.
Chapter Two Policies, Practices, and Programs. Key Special Education Court Cases  Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas (1954)  PARC v. Commonwealth.
ETHICS AND LAW FOR SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Chapter 5.
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 Purpose Prohibit discrimination against persons with disabilities in programs receiving federal financial.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 17, 2010 Margaret.
Section 504 The Basics for Campus SOP. Definition of 504 Child Find Responsibilities Duty to Evaluate triggers Service Plans.
CHAPTER 15 - SECTION 504 PURPOSE Chapter 15 of Title 22 of the regulations of the State Board of Education addresses the responsibility of school districts.
Section 504 and Conditions That Interfere With Academic Success Presented By: Tarrant City Schools Mrs.Lockett & Mrs. Hill Guidance Counselors Presented.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Section 504 Overview. Section 504 is a part of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 that prohibits discrimination based upon disability Section 504 is an anti-discrimination,
§504 Training Your role in §504. RTI Effort made by student’s teachers to assist a child who struggles. Accommodations and supports that a teacher feels.
Eligibility Protections & Accommodations. Definition Of Disability Under Section With a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits.
Section 504 training.
Steps to Getting a Child Designated as a Student with Disability
Understanding the IEP Process
Understanding the Section 504 Process
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Understanding the Section 504 Process
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act
MODULE: IDEA/504.
Stanislaus SELPA Session 1
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
IEP Basics for Parents and Families
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
A Comparison Section 504 and IDEA Polk,
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Do You Need Help Writing 504 Plans?
Presentation transcript:

IDEA & Section 504: Guidelines for Students at the Borders Sacramento Office 520 Capitol Mall Suite 400 Sacramento California Tel: Fax: *Our newest location:

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 2 Overview IDEA and Section 504 compared Moving between Section 504 and the IDEA Students at the Borders: SLD, ADD, Physical Disabilities

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 3 IDEA vs. Section 504  Eligibility  FAPE  Process & Documents

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 4 IDEA vs. Section 504 Eligibility Under IDEA Two questions: Does the student have a disability in an IDEA eligibility category? Does the student require special education and related services?

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 5 IDEA vs. Section 504 Eligibility Under Section 504 Two questions: Does the student have a physical or mental impairment? Does the impairment substantially limit a major life activity?

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 6 IDEA vs. Section 504 Eligibility Under Section 504 Physical or Mental Impairment: “Any physiological disorder or condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss affecting one or more of the following body systems: neurological; musculoskeletal; specific sense organs; respiratory, including speech organs; cardiovascular; reproductive, digestive, genitor- urinary; hemic and lymphatic; skin; and endocrine; or any mental or psychological disorder, such as mental retardation, organic brain syndrome, emotional or mental illness, and specific learning disabilities.” 34 C.F.R. § 104.3(i). cont.

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 7 IDEA vs. Section 504 Eligibility Under Section 504 If complete medical evaluation is necessary to determine eligibility, parent may be asked to obtain and fund evaluation If parent refuses, district must fund evaluation Compton (CA) Unified School District (OCR 2008) cont.

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 8 IDEA vs. Section 504 Eligibility Under Section 504 Substantially Limits: New definition –Rejection of court’s “severely restricts” –“Substantially limits” to be construed broadly cont. Pub.L. No (September 25, 2008) 122 Stat. 3553; 29 U.S.C. § 705; 42 U.S.C. § 1210

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 9 IDEA vs. Section 504 Eligibility Under Section 504 Episodic Disabilities and Remission: Ask: Would impairment substantially limit a life activity when active? cont. Pub.L. No (September 25, 2008) 122 Stat. 3553; 42 U.S.C. § 1210

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 10 IDEA vs. Section 504 Eligibility Under Section 504 Mitigating Measures: Cannot consider ameliorative effects of mitigating measures (i.e. medication, hearing aids, learned behaviors, modifications) EXCEPT eye glasses and contact lenses cont. Pub.L. No (September 25, 2008)122 Stat. 3553; 42 U.S.C. § 1210

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 11 Practice Pointer Until districts receive further guidance: –If student would be eligible when impairment is active, make the student eligible –Create a plan to address student’s needs when the impairment is active

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 12 IDEA vs. Section 504 Eligibility Under Section 504 Major Life Activities: Under the new law, major life activities include (but are not limited to) –Caring for oneself, performing manual tasks, seeing, hearing, eating, sleeping, walking, standing, lifting, speaking, reading, learning, concentrating, thinking, communicating and working Under the regulations previously developed major life activities included “learning” cont.

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 13 Practice Pointer When determining eligibility under Section 504, determine whether any major life activity is substantially limited Do not limit consideration to “learning”

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 14 Practice Pointer The following behaviors are not themselves a physical or mental impairment: – Lack of motivation – Excessive absences – Early dismissal – Inadequate classroom attendance – Difficulties at home – Incomplete work

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 15 Practice Pointer Be methodical and document your method! Always ask two questions when determining Section 504 eligibility: 1)Does the student have a physical or mental impairment? 2)Does that impairment substantially limit a major life activity? Don’t forget to properly document the responses!

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 16 IDEA vs. Section 504 FAPE IDEA: –Specially-designed instruction –No cost to parent –Meet unique needs of student –Educated in least restrictive environment 20 U.S.C. §§ 1402(29), 1412(a)(5); Board of Educ. of the Hendrick Hudson Central School Dist. v. Rowley (1982) 458 U.S. 176, 200

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 17 IDEA vs. Section 504 FAPE Section 504: –Regular or special education and related aids and services designed to “meet individual educational needs of handicapped persons as adequately as the needs of non-handicapped persons.” –Educated in the least restrictive environment 34 C.F.R. §§ , ; J.D. v. Pawlet School Dist. (2nd Cir. 2000) 224 F.3d 60; 34 C.F.R. Part 104, Appendix A. (Emphasis added)

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 18 IDEA vs. Section 504 FAPE FAPE requirements in IDEA and Section 504 regulations are different Section 504 requires comparison between meeting needs of disabled and nondisabled students IDEA has an absolute standard – providing some educational benefit Mark H. v. Lemahieu (9th Cir. 2008) 513 F.3d 922

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 19 IDEA vs. Section 504 Process & Documents IDEA: Notice of Procedural Rights District must provide notice of rights: –Upon initial referral or evaluation –When a complaint is filed –When disciplinary action taken –At parent request 34 C.F.R. §§ et seq.

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 20 IDEA vs. Section 504 Process & Documents IDEA: Evaluation Evaluate in all areas of suspected disability Adhere to strict timelines Use a variety of assessment tools Evaluations by trained and knowledgeable persons 20 U.S.C. § 1414(b); 34 C.F.R. §

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 21 IDEA vs. Section 504 Process & Documents IDEA: IEP Team Team makes eligibility, placement, and service determinations Required members: –Parent –General education teacher –Special education teacher –Administrator –Individuals who can interpret assessment results –Other individuals with knowledge or special expertise regarding child –When appropriate, the student 20 U.S.C. § 1414(d)(1)(B)

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 22 IDEA vs. Section 504 Process & Documents IDEA: Appropriate Document – IEP Every eligible student must have an IEP Contents of the IEP: –Eligibility –Educational needs –Present levels of performance –Goals/objectives –District’s offer of FAPE 20 U.S.C. § 1414(d)

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 23 IDEA vs. Section 504 Process & Documents Section 504 Required Procedures: Notice Opportunity to examine records Impartial hearing with opportunity for parent to be represented by counsel Review procedure 34 C.F.R. §§ , , ,

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 24 IDEA vs. Section 504 Process & Documents Note: Typically, OCR does not investigate substance of educational decisions Focus is on whether district followed proper procedures

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 25 IDEA vs. Section 504 Process & Documents Section 504: Evaluation School district must develop standards and procedures to ensure that assessment materials are: –Validated –Administered by trained personnel to reflect student’s ability – not impaired skill –Designed to assess specific areas of educational need

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 26 IDEA vs. Section 504 Process & Documents When conducting evaluation, school district must: –Draw upon variety of sources –Create procedures to ensure information is documented and considered –Ensure each placement decision is made by the appropriate team 34 C.F.R. § ; Gloucester County (VA) Public Schools (OCR 2007) cont.

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 27 IDEA vs. Section 504 Process & Documents Section 504: Decision Team Eligibility and placement decisions made by “a group of persons, including persons knowledgeable about the child.”

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 28 IDEA vs. Section 504 Process & Documents District must designate a “Section 504 Coordinator” Colorado Springs (CO) School Dist. #11 (OCR 2008) cont.

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 29 IDEA vs. Section 504 Process & Documents Section 504: Appropriate Document Districts most commonly develop a Section 504 plan May develop an IEP to comply with Section 504’s FAPE requirement

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 30 Practice Pointer A Section 504 plan is not a “consolation prize” Emphasize appropriateness and benefits of Section 504 plan IDEA services may not be appropriate IDEA compliance is one way of meeting section 504

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 31 Moving Between Section 504 and the IDEA

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 32 Moving Between Section 504 and the IDEA What should a district do when a student’s Section 504 plan is no longer appropriate?

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 33 Moving Between Section 504 and the IDEA Consider: –Re-evaluating student –Modifying the Section 504 placement and/or services, or –Convening IEP team meeting to determine IDEA eligibility

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 34 Moving Between Section 504 and the IDEA CAUTION Under Section 504, districts must evaluate prior to initial placement or significant change in placement –Error on side of evaluation if moving student into a more or less restrictive setting 20 U.S.C. § 1414; 34 C.F.R. §

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 35 Moving Between Section 504 and the IDEA Parent Rejects Section 504 Plan Scenario: –District offers Section 504 plan –Parent rejects –Parent requests IEP What should you do? cont.

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 36 Moving Between Section 504 and the IDEA Implement Section 504 plan without parent consent, if district’s policy allows, and Conduct IDEA evaluation, if this is what parent wants

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 37 Practice Pointer Determine parent’s underlying concern –Is parent requesting IEP or a special education assessment? –Discussion with parent may resolve concerns and avoid assessment process 20 U.S.C. § 1414

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 38 Moving Between Section 504 and the IDEA From IDEA to 504 scenarios: –Student no longer eligible under IDEA –Student found ineligible under IDEA –Parent revokes consent for IDEA services *Be prepared for parent request for Section 504 services

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 39 Moving Between Section 504 and the IDEA If an IEP team finds a student ineligible under the IDEA, can the same team immediately thereafter find the student eligible for Section 504 services?

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 40 Moving Between Section 504 and the IDEA YES - So long as student has a mental or physical impairment that substantially limits a major life activity Conducting consecutive IEP and Section 504 meetings is okay HOWEVER...

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 41 Moving Between Section 504 and the IDEA CAUTION: It’s better to adjourn IEP meeting and convene Section 504 meeting at later date This will avoid: –Perception of “consolation prize” –Potential for excluding necessary persons –Risk of undertaking wrong analysis to determine eligibility –Failure to properly notice Section 504 meeting Letter to Anonymous (OCR 1991)

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 42 Moving Between Section 504 and the IDEA Rejection of IDEA: Parent not required to accept initial IDEA services Parent may revoke prior consent If parent revokes, district may not continue to provide special education and related services 34 C.F.R. § (b)(4).

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 43 Moving Between Section 504 and the IDEA If the district offers a FAPE through the IDEA and the student’s parent refuses to consent to the initial provision of IDEA services or revoke consent to IDEA services, is the district required to create a Section 504 plan?

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 44 Moving Between Section 504 and the IDEA Satisfy the IDEA Districts are responsible for: –Creation of appropriate IEP Districts are not responsible for: –Obtaining parent consent to the IEP MAKE THE OFFER

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 45 Moving Between Section 504 and the IDEA Section 504 Plan? Probably not required, if parent has rejected IEP But certainly permissible

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 46 Moving Between Section 504 and the IDEA Child Find District must: –Actively seek out students eligible for Section 504 services, including those attending private schools –Conduct Section 504 evaluation, if appropriate 34 C.F.R. §§ ; (a)

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 47 Students at the Borders IDEA? Section 504? Or General Ed? SLD, ADD/ADHD, Physical Disabilities

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 48 Students at the Border SLD: IDEA Eligibility Student has: –A “disorder in one or more of the basic psychological processes involved in the understanding or in using language, spoken or written.” –Manifests in an “imperfect ability to listen, think, speak, read, write, spell, or do mathematical calculations.” Student requires special education and related services 20 U.S.C. § 1401(30)

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 49 Practice Pointer Reading Fluency The 2006 federal regulations added reading fluency skills to list of qualifying areas for eligibility determinations If district uses either RTI or discrepancy model, district must determine whether student is performing adequately for age/grade level in all qualifying areas, including reading fluency skills 34 C.F.R. §

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 50 Students at the Border SLD: Section 504 Eligibility Two Part Analysis: Physical or mental impairment –Comments to Section 504 Regulations state that SLD constitutes a physical or mental impairment Must substantially limit a major life activity 20 U.S.C. § 1401(30); 34 C.F.R. Part 104, Appendix A

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 51 Practice Pointer A student may not qualify under Section 504 if he/she is successful in the general education setting without special education supports, despite demonstrating a discrepancy between ability and performance

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 52 Students at the Border SLD: Section 504 Eligibility Facts - Fourth grade: SST team referred student for comprehensive special education assessment IQ score of 92 Achievement scores ranged from 85 to 110 Assessor concluded no severe discrepancy between ability and achievement District found student ineligible for IDEA services Student v. Tracy Joint Unified School District (OAH 2007)

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 53 Students at the Border SLD: Section 504 Eligibility Facts - Fifth grade: GPA ranged from 2.0 to 2.5 District found student ineligible for IDEA services Parent disagrees Obtained IEE that concluded student qualified as SLD due to processing disorders and a severe discrepancy in math calculations Student v. Tracy Joint Unified School District (OAH 2007) cont.

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 54 Students at the Border SLD: Section 504 Eligibility OAH Ruling: No severe discrepancy based on private and district assessments Student ineligible for IDEA services under category of SLD cont. Student v. Tracy Joint Unified School District (OAH 2007)

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 55 Students at the Border SLD: Section 504 Eligibility Eligible under Section 504? Probably not. Unlikely that there is a physical or mental impairment –Earned average grades –Failed to show discrepancy between ability and performance Student v. Tracy Joint Unified School District (OAH 2007) cont.

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 56 Students at the Border SLD: Section 504 Eligibility Facts: Student originally eligible as SLD Convened IEP meeting to review additional assessments Student skills commensurate with overall cognitive functioning Received passing grades Team concluded no severe discrepancy or processing deficiency Ineligible under category of SLD Lancaster School District v. Student (OAH 2007)

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 57 Students at the Border SLD: Section 504 Eligibility OAH Ruling: Ineligible for IDEA services under eligibility category of SLD cont. Lancaster School District v. Student (OAH 2007)

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 58 Students at the Border SLD: Section 504 Eligibility Eligible under Section 504? Probably not. Unlikely that there is a physical or mental impairment –Earned average grades –Failed to show discrepancy between ability and performance cont. Lancaster School District v. Student (OAH 2007)

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 59 Students at the Border ADD/ADHD: IDEA Eligibility Student qualifies for IDEA services under “Other Health Impaired” if he/she has: –Limited strength, vitality or alertness, including a heightened alertness to environmental stimuli, that results in limited alertness with respect to the educational environment, that is due to chronic or acute health problems, such as attention deficit disorder, or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, among others, which adversely affects a student’s educational performance Student requires special education and related services 20 U.S.C. § 1401(3); 34 C.F.R. § 300.8(c)(9)

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 60 Students at the Border ADD/ADHD: Section 504 Eligibility Two Part Analysis: Physical or mental impairment –According to OSERS, ADD and ADHD constitute a physical or mental impairment Must substantially limit a major life activity Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS 1991)

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 61 Students at the Border ADD/ADHD: Section 504 Eligibility Facts: In March 2006, parents requested special education assessment due to possible ADD or ADHD Health assessment did not show impulsive behavior In class, student showed lack of concentration Student performed at average academic level In July 2006, student obtained medical diagnosis of ADHD Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District (OAH 2006)

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 62 Students at the Border ADD/ADHD: Section 504 Eligibility OAH Ruling: Student had ADHD based on medical diagnosis However, student ineligible under IDEA because condition did not “adversely affect educational performance” Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District (OAH 2006)

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 63 Students at the Border ADD/ADHD: Section 504 Eligibility Eligible under Section 504? Probably not. Due to medical diagnosis, OSERS would consider student to have physical or mental impairment However, no showing of substantial limitation of a major life activity cont.

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 64 Students at the Border ADD/ADHD: Section 504 Eligibility Facts: Second grade –Diagnosed with ADHD –Participated in general education setting –Assessed for and placed in GATE program –Scored average or above on standardized and ability tests Fourth grade –Earned As, Bs, and Cs Student v. Bonita Unified School District (OAH 2006)

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 65 Students at the Border ADD/ADHD: Section 504 Eligibility Facts: Fifth grade –Scored “basic” and “proficient” on STAR testing –Earned all As and Bs –Promoted to middle school Sixth grade –Scored “basic” and “proficient” on STAR testing –Earned a C in English and a D in Social Studies Seventh grade –Scored “proficient” in STAR testing –Earned all Cs –Parents advised district of ADHD and anxiety disorder cont.

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 66 Students at the Border ADD/ADHD: Section 504 Eligibility OAH Ruling: Despite ADHD diagnosis, student ineligible under IDEA Failed to show need for special education and related services Poor grades were attributed to failure to complete homework, not inability to learn Student v. Bonita Unified School District (OAH 2006) cont.

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 67 Students at the Border ADD/ADHD: Section 504 Eligibility Eligible under Section 504? Possibly. Student has a physical or mental impairment Student may be able to show that the ADHD substantially limits a major life activity, such as the ability to “concentrate” or “focus” Student v. Bonita Unified School District (OAH 2006)

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 68 Students at the Borders Physical Disabilities IDEA Eligibility Qualifying physical disabilities: –Deafness –Hearing impairment –Blindness –Other visual impairments –Orthopedic impairments

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 69 Students at the Borders Physical Disabilities Section 504 Eligibility Student must have a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity –Some physical impairments may not be obvious Cannot take into account mitigating measures

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 70 Students at the Borders Physical Disabilities Section 504 Discrimination May not prevent eligible Section 504 student from participating in programs/activities due to inaccessibility to district facilities Must provide reasonable accommodations to allow student to participate in programs/activities outside of school day 34 C.F.R. §§ 104.4; ;

___________________________________________________________________________________________ Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP 71 Students at the Borders Section 504 & IDEA are safety nets. However, the best outcome is when they are not needed!

Thank you!