A Heavy-Duty Vehicle Visual Classification Scheme: Heavy-Duty Vehicle Reclassification Method for Mobile Source Emissions Inventory Development Prepared.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Statistical evaluation of model uncertainties in Copert III, by I. Kioutsioukis & S. Tarantola (JRC, I)
Advertisements

Impact of MOVES2014 on Emission Inventories from On-road Mobile Sources Alexis Zubrow, Darrell Sonntag, Harvey Michaels, David Brzezinski, Alison Eyth.
Emission Factor Modeling Graciela Lubertino, HGAC.
Fuel Tax Revenue Revenue Drivers  Miles Driven (VMT)  Fuel Efficiency.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
1 Travel Model Application for Highway Vehicle Emission Estimation Ho-Chuan Chen, Ph.D., P.E. King County Department of Transportation Seattle, Washington.
Template Emission Controls Affecting Northeast Texas Presentation to the NETAC Policy and Technical Committees Sue Kemball-Cook, Krish Vijayaraghavan,
Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine (former Ministry of Transport and Communications) State Enterprise «State Road Transport Research Institute» (SE.
California Energy Commission Medium and Heavy Vehicles and Movement of Light and Heavy Vehicles Inputs and Assumptions for Transportation Energy Demand.
MOBILE6 and Compressed Natural Gas Vehicles Janet Kremer U.S. EPA Office of Mobile Sources.
The Road Ahead for Light Duty Vehicle Fuel Demand Joanne Shore Energy Information Administration July 7, 2005.
Assessing the Effects of Freight Movement on Air Quality Talking Freight Seminar April 20, 2005.
The Composition of the Vehicle Fleet in the Metropolitan Washington Region Results of Applying a Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) Decoder to July 1,
COG DTP/DEP Staff Eulalie Lucas and Erin Morrow DTP Sunil Kumar DEP Testing of EPA’S MOVES Model Travel Management Subcommittee May 26, 2009 MOVES: Motor.
Fuel Economy in Harris County-2007 Graciela Lubertino, PhD.
COG DTP/DEP Staff Eulalie Lucas DTP Sunil Kumar DEP Testing of EPA’S MOVES Model TPB Technical Committee June 5, 2009 MOVES: Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator.
Air Quality and Conformity Issues James M. Shrouds, Director Office of Natural and Human Environment Federal Highway Administration AASHTO SCOE Meeting.
National VMT Development Procedure Highway Information Seminar October , 2012 Patrick Zhang, PE
College of Engineering Update for Agilent Impacts of Emission Changes on Air Quality and Acute Health Effects in the Southeast, 1993 – 2012 Lucas Henneman.
Regulating fuel economy of heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs) Winston Harrington Alan Krupnick For USAEE Meeting Washington, DC, October 11, 2011.
“Green” PORTAL: Adding Sustainability Performance Measures to a Transportation Data Archive Emissions Modeling.
COMPARISON OF LINK-BASED AND SMOKE PROCESSED MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS OVER THE GREATER TORONTO AREA Junhua Zhang 1, Craig Stroud 1, Michael D. Moran 1,
Keeping Tomorrow’s Air Clean: Conforming Transportation Plans with Air Quality Attainment Efforts San Joaquin Valley Transportation Planning Agencies Kern.
Transportation Commuter –Faculty/Staff –Students University Fleet Air travel –Athletic Meets –Study Abroad.
1 ON-ROAD AND NON-ROAD SOURCES Melinda Ronca-Battista and Angelique Luedeker, ITEP/TAMS Center.
Harikishan Perugu, Ph.D. Heng Wei, Ph.D. PE
HOW WILL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS BE TRANSFORMED IN OUR ENERGY FUTURE? GEORGE A. HUME April 28, 2006 Reference was made to the following internet sites in.
Igor Trpevski University of St. Cyril and Methodius Skopje,
1 MOBILE6 -Input and Modeling Guidance -SIP and Conformity Policy North American Vehicle Emission Control Conference Atlanta, April 4, 2001 Gary Dolce.
Abstract Transportation sustainability is of increasing concern to professionals and the public. This project describes the modeling and calculation of.
Traffic Parameters for use with MOBILE6 in Ky. - Update by Jesse Mayes, P.E. Division of Multimodal Programs July 22, 2003.
CO 2 Emissions from Cars, Trucks & Buses in the Metropolitan Washington Region Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
Part 2 Processes and approaches associated with the FHWA method 1 1 HPMS Vehicle Summary Data.
Sunil Kumar and Eulalie Lucas MOVES Task Force Meeting MWCOG August 18, 2009 Development of Inputs, Outputs, and Procedures for EPA’s Draft MOVES2009 Model.
Emission Inventories and EI Data Sets Sarah Kelly, ITEP Les Benedict, St. Regis Mohawk Tribe.
The Clean Air Act First Clean Air Act passed in 1967: 1970 Amendments established current relationship between states and federal government and required.
Emission Inventory Basics & Collecting Data Alice Edwards & Clint Farr ADEQ Air Non-Point & Mobile Source Program.
A state and national data system consisting primarily of:
Missoula Air Quality Conformity Analysis Required by Federal and Montana Clean Air Act – Transportation-specific air quality requirements enacted in Federal.
ATA’s Sustainability Initiative Bob Pitcher V.P., State Laws American Trucking Associations.
1 Improving Air Quality in the Metro. Washington Region Phil Mendelson, Chair Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee October 19, 2006.
California Energy Commission Joint Lead Commissioner Workshop on Transportation Energy Demand Forecasts June 24, 2015 Bob McBride Demand Analysis Office.
WRAP Emission Inventory Status For the Attribution of Haze Project Workgroup Presented by Jeffrey Stocum Oregon DEQ Emissions Inventory Specialist as a.
November 28, 2006 CCOS On-Road Allocation Factors Page 1 Spatial & Temporal Allocation of On-Road Emissions CCOS Technical Committee November 28, 2006.
1999 Scott County Emission Inventory Iowa Department of Natural Resources Brian Hutchins.
O NROAD S OURCES Angelique Luedeker, ITEP. 2 Onroad Emissions Emissions from vehicles Exhaust Brake and tire wear Evaporation.
Class Project Report, May 2005 ME/ChE 449 Sustainable Air Quality Highway Transportation: Trends from 1970 to 2002 and Beyond By Scott Kaminski Instructor.
Abstract Background Methodology Methods While the project is in the data-collection and background research phase, there are several studies that utilize.
Tiffany Julien Office of Freight Management and Operations Implementation of the National Freight Network 1.
Class Project Report, May 2005 ME/ChE 449 Sustainable Air Quality Highway Transportation: Trends from 1970 to 2002 and Beyond By Scott Kaminski Instructor.
HPMS Traffic Data Review Highway Information Seminar Oct , 2012 Patrick Zhang, P.E Office of Highway Information Policy, FHWA 1.
Criteria for Secondary to Primary System Transfers Robert W. Hofrichter Assistant Administrator Transportation and Mobility Planning Division.
1 Session IV: Onroad Mobile Sources Laurel Driver US EPA.
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
Performance Measures Used in the DFW Region – How to Track and Report the M & O Investment and Results AMPO Management and Operations Work Group September.
1 Emissions Inventory Overview–Part 2 Melinda Ronca-Battista, ITEP.
1 Air Pollution Automobile Emissions: An Overview Emissions from an individual car
Office of Freight Management and Operations 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, D.C FHWA Freight Intermodal.
Kanok Boriboonsomsin, Guoyuan Wu, Peng Hao, and Matthew Barth
SMOKE-MOVES Processing
Social costs of fuel-vehicle pathways
Overview of FHWA CMAQ & System Performance Measures
Performance Measure Exploration Preparing for the 2018 RTP
Emily Wimberger California Air Resources Board TE3 Conference
Preparation of Fine Particulate Emissions Inventories
Impacts of hydrogen pathways vs
Sensitivity Analysis Update
Presented By: George Noel – Volpe Mark Glaze - FHWA 1/13/2014
George Noel and Dr. Roger Wayson
Webinar: Responding to the FHWA CMAQ & System Performance Measures:
Presentation transcript:

A Heavy-Duty Vehicle Visual Classification Scheme: Heavy-Duty Vehicle Reclassification Method for Mobile Source Emissions Inventory Development Prepared for CEE6792 Seungju Yoon

OUTLINE Background Objectives Current HDV classification schemes HDV weight regulation HDV manufacturers’ information Current methods of HDV reclassification A new HDV reclassification scheme Emissions rates analysis Uncertainties Recommendations

BACKGROUND Atlanta highly depends goods movement (60% of consumer goods) on freight trucks emitting major mobile NOX and DPM, comparing to other metropolitan areas in U.S. Air Quality agencies should develop accurate mobile source emissions inventory for regional air quality planning Current HDV reclassification method (EPA) causes loosing the find resolution of the FHWA classes HDV on HPMS database

OBJECTIVES Develop a new HDV reclassification method using GT visual HDV classification scheme and POLK data within 21 counties in Atlanta Compare pollutant emissions rates from the new HDV reclassification method to them from EPA reclassification method

EPA HDV CLASSIFICATION (1) Combination of growth vehicle weight ratings (GVWR) and fuel type (gasoline or diesel) Sixteen HDV classes  Classes 6 to 13 for gasoline vehicles  Classes 16 to 23 for diesel vehicles

EPA HDV CLASSIFICATION (2) HDV ClassesAbbreviationGVWR (1,000 lbs) 6/16HDV2b8.5 – /17HDV3 – /18HDV4 – /19HDV5 – /20HDV6 – /21HDV7 – /22HDV8a – /23HDV8b > 60.0

FHWA HDV CLASSIFICATION (1) Combination of the number of axles and tractor-trailer configurations Nine HDV classes  Single units (Class 5, two-axles, six-tires)  Single units (Classes 6 to 7)  Double units (Classes 8 to 10)  Multiple units (Classes 11 to 13)

FHWA HDV CLASSIFICATION (2)

GT VISUAL HDV CLASSIFICATION Combination of the number of axles and tractor-trailer configurations according to their horsepower ratings Four HDV classes  Class A (Single unit, two-axles)  Class B (Single unit, +two-axles)  Class C (Two units, three or four-axles)  Class D (+two units, +four-axles)

FHWA HDV GVWR REGULATIONS A single axle: 20,000 lbs A tandem axle: 34,000 lbs Two axle HDV: 40,000 lbs Three axle HDV: 60,000 lbs Four axles and more HDV: 80,000 lbs

HDV MANUFACTURERS’ INFO (1) Gasoline HDVGVWGCWAxlesTires Light (pick-ups/vans)10, Light (chassis-cabs/ cutaways) 15, Medium34,00060,00026 Heavy54,00060,0003

HDV MANUFACTURERS’ INFO (2) Diesel HDVGVWGCWAxlesTires Light (pick-ups/vans) 10, Light (chassis-cabs/ cutaways) 15, Medium 34,00060,00026 Heavy 64,00080,0003

CURRENT RECLASSIFICATION METHODS (1) EPA method  Combine all FHWA HDV classes and apportion EPA HDV classes according to these local or national VMT fractions FHWA 5 FHWA 6 FHWA 7 FHWA --- FHWA 5 FHWA 6 FHWA 7 FHWA --- EPA 6 EPA 7 EPA 17 EPA --- VMT FRACTIONS HPMS DATABASE

CURRENT RECLASSIFICATION METHODS (2) National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) method  Apply conversion factors, which were developed from the national VMT fractions of FHWA classes, for FHWA HDV classes to EPA HDV classes or vise versa

VEHICLES FRACTIONS ON POLK DATA AxleVehicle TypeEPA Vehicle Classes (1,000 lbs) >60 2Chassis-cab Incomplete VEH Incomplete P/U ,3Straight truck Tractor

NEW RECLASSIFICATION METHOD - MAPPING CLASSES USING POLK DATA POLK VehiclesEPA, GVWR (1,000 lbs) >60 Chassis-cab GT Classes A & B Incomplete VEH Incomplete P/U Straight truck TractorGT Classes C & D

MAPPING CONVRSION FACTORS GT Classes EPA Classes A & B C & D

VEHICLE VOLUE COLLECTION (1)

VEHICLE VOLUE COLLECTION (2) Daily vehicle miles traveled on Interstates and principal Arterials within 21 counties in Atlanta GT ClassesInterstatesPrincipal Arterials A & B2,653,802786,735 C & D5,165,0281,617,494

EMISSIONS RATE ESTIMATION (1) ER = emissions rate (ton/day) Er = emissions rates from Mobile6 (g/mi-veh) CF = conversion factors from POLK data Vol = Vehicle volumes RL = roadway segment lengths i = gasoline vehicles j = road segments k = diesel vehicles

EMISSIONS RATE ESTIMATION (2) PollutantsGT Method (ton/day) EPA Method (ton/day) Change (%) VOC CO NOX PM

UNCERTAINTIES Regional vehicle registration distributions from POLK data may differ from the national registration distribution The percentages of articulated straight trucks and tractors were not known FHWA Class 5 may loose EPA Class HDV2b (GVWR, 10,000 lbs)

RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH WORKS GT visual HDV classification scheme is very useful to identify the HDV classes GT visual HDV scheme is the hybrid scheme of EPA and FHWA HDV classification schemes Fine tuning GT classes to EPA classes requires field data collection (GVWR by GT vehicle classes)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Funded by Georgia Regional Transportation Authority Co-authored with Peng Zhang, James R. Pearson, Randall L. Guensler, and Michael O. Rodgers in Air Quality Laboratory, Transportation Research Group Be sent to AWMA conference in 2004