1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Updates on APR Reporting for Early Childhood Transition (Indicators C-8 and B-12)
Advertisements

Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
Kathy T. Whaley, NECT AC Presentation for the. Regulatory Requirements IDEA Statue 2004 December 3, USC 1400 Part B Regulations August 14, 2006.
OF ECSE COMPLIANCE PRESENTATION FOR THE 2014 MO-CASE CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education September 23, 2014.
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx October 18, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
Special Education Director’s Conference Sept. 29, 2006 Prepared by Sharon Schumacher.
From Referral Through Exit
Transition from Part C to Part B in Louisiana (Session # S & 115)
Get on Top of the New Part C Regs! Changes in the 2011 IDEA Part C Regulations and the Impact on ESIT Program Policies and Procedures Anne Lucas, Joicey.
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
File Review Activity Lessons learned through monitoring: Service areas must ensure there is documentation supporting the information reported in the self-
1 Determinations EI/ECSE SPR&I Training ODE Fall 2007.
Early Childhood Transition Presenters: Kimberly Mitchell Ginger Sheppard Jessica Spataro NOVEMBER 2011.
Potpourri: Summary of Important Points to Remember Presenters: Jill Harris Laura Duos NOVEMBER 2011.
Kathy T. Whaley, NECT AC Presentation for the Utah Special Education Law Conference August 2011 UPDATED January 2012.
Megan Vinh, Sara Doutre, and Anne Lucas. Presentation adapted from presentation developed by Sharon Walsh for the IDEA Infant Toddler Coordinators Association.
Produced by NICHCY, 2013 D evelopment of the Transition Plan.
CHRISTINA SPECTOR WENDI SCHREITER ERIN ARANGO-ESCALANTE IDEA Part C to Part B Transition.
Produced by NICHCY, 2014 Procedures for the of the IFSP D evelopment R eview, E valuation & Module 5.
Special Education Update Mississippi Department of Education Office of Special Education MASS Summer Conference 2013.
Presented by the Part C- Kristie Musick, Part C Coordinator Dr. Lesly Wilson, Part C Data Manager Part B- Lori James, Part B Data Manager Part C & B March.
Understanding Transition from Early Intervention to Preschool An Overview for Families New Jersey Department of Education New Jersey Department of Health.
2014 ALACASE CONFERENCE Preschool Indicators 2014 EI Preschool Conference.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
1 Supplemental Regulations to 34 CFR Part 300 Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with.
Sarah Walters - Part C Coordinator KDHE Tiffany Smith - Part B ECSE Coordinator KSDE 1.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Results of FFY 2007 Monitoring Indicators For The Annual Performance Report & State Performance Plan.
KYLA PATTERSON, M.S. CREATING CONNECTIONS TO SHINING STARS CONFERENCE JULY 23, 2013 What If…? Understanding Part C Eligibility Determination, Assessment.
Creating Supports for Transition Ann Hains, UW-Milwaukee Sarah Hadden, UW-Eau Claire Jill Haglund, DPI Donna Miller, DHFS.
A NEW SYSTEM OF SUPPORT FOR INFANTS AND TODDLERS WITH DISABILITIES Recent Changes in the Provision of Early Intervention for Infants and Toddlers with.
Supporting Early Childhood Transition: State of the Evidence and Implications for Policy and Practice Beth Rous Caroline Gooden.
Kansas Department of Health and Environment – Infant Toddler Services Kansas Inservice Training System – KITS – KU.
Michigan State Plan for Early On ® February
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
THE NEW PART C FEDERAL REGULATIONS AND NATIONAL TRENDS IN SERVICE DELIVERY GETTING INTO THE SYSTEM.
1 McKinney-Vento and Special Education  Overview  Revocation of Consent  FAQ’s  Resources.
2005 B. Mullins, D. Scheler 1 Movin’ On Up Effective Transition from Early Intervention into Preschool (Revised May 2005)
Transition from PSEI to Kindergarten or First Grade November 17, 2011.
07/20/2007 State Performance Plan Indicators Jessica Wolf Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services Michigan.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
1 Transition: Part C to Part B Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Spring/Summer 2007.
Presented by the Early Childhood Transition Program Priority Team August 11, 2010 Updated September 2010.
THE NEW PART C FEDERAL REGULATIONS GETTING INTO THE SYSTEM.
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
Timely and Effective Transition at Age 3 David P. Lindeman, Peggy Miksch & Phoebe Rinkel Kansas Division for Early Childhood Conference Wichita, Kansas.
Early Development Network Conference June 10, 2015 Kearney, NE Amy Bunnell & Cole Johnson, NDE Julie Docter, DHHS.
Evaluation IEP Development, Review and Revision Placement
Transitioning Children from Part C to Part B Toby Long, PhD, PT, FAPTA Rachel Brady, PT, DPT, MS January 14, 2011 Office of State Superintendent of Education,
What Parents Need to Know: The New Part C Federal Regulations and National Trends in Service Delivery Lynda Cook Pletcher May 10, 2012 Region 6 Parent.
Florida’s Participation in the National Transition Initiative WHY US? Strand 3 – Collaborative Leadership Session # S3 107 &
Developing Strong Transition Protocols Infant Toddler Program, Head Start and Early Childhood Special Education Shannon Dunstan Idaho State Department.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Individualized Education Programs Evaluations and Reevaluations.
What’s New for Transition to Special Education Services? Paula E. Goff, Part C Coordinator May 23, 2013.
Understanding the Data on Preschool Child Find and Transition Annual Performance Report Indicator 12 February, 2016
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
TA Call CCBs and Child Find June 12, Welcome ! Purpose: EI Colorado and CDE Preschool Special Education Child Find staff will review changes in.
Are you smarter than the person who developed this lame quiz?
Child Find Office of Special Education Division of District Support.
ARC Chairperson Training
Eligibility Determination IFSP Meetings IFSP Service Implementation
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference
ARC Chairperson Training
Early Childhood Transition APR Indicators and National Trends
Indicator 11 Initial Evaluation Edit Checks (80 Day Timeline)
Presentation transcript:

1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)

2 Regulatory Requirements Part C Regulations July 1, CFR Part 303 Early Intervention Program for Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities Part C OSEP Policy Letter to Elder February 11, 2004 (applicable to current Part C regulations) IDEA 2004 December 3, USC 1400 Part B Regulations August 14, CFR Parts 300 and 301 Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with Disabilities

3 SPP/APR C-8: Requirements Indicator 8: Percent of all children exiting Part C who received timely transition planning to support the child’s transition to preschool and other appropriate community services by their third birthday including: A. IFSPs with transition steps and services ; B. Notification to LEA, if child potentially eligible for Part B; and C. Transition conference, if child potentially eligible for Part B. Use data from monitoring or state data system.

4 SPP/APR C-8: Measurement C-8A: Percent = [(# of children exiting Part C who have an IFSP with transition steps and services) divided by the (# of children exiting Part C)] times 100. C-8B: Percent = [(# of children exiting Part C and potentially eligible for Part B where notification to the LEA occurred) divided by the (# of children exiting Part C who were potentially eligible for Part B)] times 100.

5 SPP/APR C-8: Measurement continued C-8C: Percent = [(# of children exiting Part C and potentially eligible for Part B where the transition conference occurred) Divided by the (# of children exiting Part C who were potentially eligible for Part B)] times 100.

SPP/APR C-8: Measurement continued C-8C Exceptional Family Circumstances States are not required to include in their calculation the number of children delayed due to exceptional family circumstances. – If included in report, put in numerator and denominator. – Report on the number of delays separately in discussion 6

7 SPP/APR C-8: Measurement continued C-8C Do not include, children whose family did not provide approval to conduct the transition conference. Summary for discussion: – numbers used to determine calculation; – number of delays due to family circumstances; – number of children for whom the family did not provide approval for the conference.

8 SPP/APR B-11: Requirements Indicator 11: Percent of children who were evaluated within 60 days of receiving parental consent for initial evaluation or, if the State establishes a timeframe within which the evaluation must be conducted, within that timeframe.

9 SPP/APR B-11: Measurement a. # of children for whom parental consent to evaluate was received. b. # determined not eligible whose evaluations were completed within 60 days (or State established timeline). c. # determined eligible whose evaluations were completed within 60 days (or State established timeline). Account for children included in a) but not included in b) or c). Indicate range of days beyond timeline when evaluation was completed and any reasons for delays. Percent = [(b + c) divided by (a)] times 100.

10 SPP/APR B-11: Measurement continued Use data from monitoring (describe how LEAs selected for monitoring) or state data system. Base on actual, not average, number of days. Indicate if state has established a timeline for evaluations and, if so, what it is.

SPP/APR B-11: Measurement continued Exception to Timeframe for Initial Evaluation (d) Parent repeatedly fails or refuses to produce child for evaluation Child enrolls in another school after timeframe begins but before eligibility determination 11

12 SPP/APR B-12: Requirements Indicator 12: Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.

13 SPP/APR B-12: Measurement a. # of children who have been served in Part C and referred to Part B for eligibility determination b. # of those referred determined to be NOT eligible and whose eligibility was determined prior to their third birthdays c. # of those found eligible who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays. d. # of children for whom parent refusal to provide consent caused delays in evaluation or initial services e. # of children who were referred to Part C less than 90 days before their third birthday.

14 SPP/APR B-12: Measurement continued Account for children included in a, but not included in b, c, d or e. Indicate range of days beyond third birthday when eligibility was determined and IEP developed and reasons for delays. Percent = [(c) divided by (a – b – d- e)] times 100. Use data from monitoring (describe how LEA selected for monitoring) or state data system.

15 SPP/APR B-12: Measurement continued Include in discussion of data: Numbers used to determine calculation Compare results to the target of 100% Methods used to collect data Range of days for delays beyond third birthday for determining eligibility and IEP development Reasons for delays

16 APR Update Late Referral to Part C Child is referred to Part C less than 45 days before their third birthday – Part C refers child and their family to Part B under child find If steps to initial evaluation for eligibility for Part B begins the child is included in Indicator B11. They are not included in C8 or B12

17 APR Update Late Referral to Part C Child is referred to Part C between days before their third birthday – The child is included in Indicator C8A and C8B. The child is not included in C8C due to insufficient time Discuss late referrals in narrative May invite LEA to initial IFSP meeting/may serve as transition planning conference

18 Handouts  Flow chart with transition steps – Spacing of steps – Data points – Required timelines  Chart with requirements by transition steps – Part C and Part B Regulations – IDEA 2004 Requirements – OSEP Policy Letter to Elder (2004)

19 Notification to LEA for child find Notification Age 2 yrs 9 months 33 months C8b Age 2 yrs 6 months 30 months

20 Notification continued PART C REGULATIONS Part C notifies LEA that the child will shortly reach the age of eligibility OSEP POLICY LETTER TO ELDER (Texas) Part C notifies LEA that the child will shortly reach the age of eligibility at least 90 days or up to 6 months prior to the child’s 3rd birthday Part C must provide child’s name, date of birth, parent contact information Parental consent is not required but can opt-out if state has opt-policy (state opt-out policy must be on file with OSEP)

21 Transition Steps/Plan Development of Transition Plan including steps and services in IFSP Age 2 yrs 3 months Age 2 yrs 9 months 27 months 33 months C8a Parental Consent for Release of Information

22 Transition Steps/Plan continued PART C REGULATIONS ● Facilitated by service coordinator ● IFSP includes steps to support transition of child ● Discussion with parent about future options ● Procedures to prepare child and to help adjust ● Transmitting information to LEA with parent consent ● Explanation of how families will be included in Transition Plan (in Part C Application)

23 Transition Steps/Plan continued PART C REGULATIONS ● [Nothing about timing in regulations but usually done around time of transition conference] IDEA 2004 Time requirement for Transition Conference (usually when Transition Plan is developed): between 90 days (3 months) and 9 months before 3rd birthday

24 Transition Conference Parental Approval for Meeting Part C Invites LEA Transition Conference (IFSP Meeting) Age 2 yrs 3 months Age 2 yrs 9 months C8c 33 months 27 months

25 Transition Conference continued PART C REGULATIONS Approval of family to have a conference For children who may be eligible, Lead Agency convenes a conference among Lead Agency, family and LEA For children who may not be eligible, Lead Agency makes reasonable effort to convene a conference among LA, family and providers

26 Transition Conference continued IDEA 2004 Must be held at least 90 days before 3rd birthday, up to 9 months before is permitted Lead Agency must invite LEA unless family refuses PART B REGULATIONS ( ) LEA must have policies to ensure smooth transition. (c) Each affected LEA will participate in transition planning conferences arranged by Lead Agency under section 635 (a)(10) of the act

27 Initial Evaluation EVALUATION FOR PART B B11 Parental Consent for Initial Evaluation LEA provides written notice to parents # days after 60 day timeline Evaluation must be completed within 60 days of parental consent (or other state timeframe)

28 Initial Evaluation continued PART C REGULATIONS Review parental consent for necessary release of information PART B REGULATIONS Must obtain informed consent from the parent before the evaluation Must give written notice that describes any evaluation procedures a reasonable time before the evaluation Must give copy of procedural safeguards to parents at initial referral or parent request for evaluation

29 Initial Evaluation PART B REGULATIONS continued Evaluation must be conducted within 60 days of receiving parental consent or state established timeframe Evaluation must be full and individualized (in all areas of suspected disability) Evaluation must be conducted before provision of services continued

30 Additional Evaluation Requirements Related to Initial Evaluation PART B REGULATIONS Must Review Existing Evaluation Data on the Child Provided by Parents May include Observations May include Part C assessments Then team determines what additional data are needed

31 Eligibility Determination Age 2 yrs 9 months 33 mos Age 2 yrs 11 months 35 mos …no specific timeline…

32 Eligibility Determination continued PART B REGULATIONS Based on full and individual evaluation Screening cannot be considered as evaluation for eligibility Group of qualified professionals and the parent determine eligibility and education needs Copy of evaluation report and eligibility document given to parent

33 IEP Development Age 3 yrs LEA invites Part C (at parent request) IEP DEVELOPMENT IEP must be developed within 30 days of eligibility Eligibility Determination B12 # days after age 3 for IEP a

34 PART C REGULATIONS Part C has policies to review child’s program options for period of 3rd birthday through end of school year PART B REGULATIONS An invitation must, at the request of parents be sent to Part C service coordinator or other representative of Part C System (f) Must inform parent of this provision IEP Development and IEP Team continued

35 IEP Development continued PART B REGULATIONS continued Conducted within 30 days of eligibility determination IEP Team must consider IFSP content IEP includes the projected date for beginning services IEP must be developed by 3rd birthday

36 IEP in Effect/ Services Begin SERVICES BEGIN Age 3 yrs IEP Development as soon as possible after IEP development # days after age 3 for services

37 PART B REGULATIONS Obtain informed consent from parents before provision of services By 3rd birthday IEP is being implemented and FAPE is made available As soon as possible after IEP development, services are made available IEP in Effect/ Services Begin continued

38 IEP in Effect/ Services Begin continued PART C REGULATIONS Part C funds may be used for FAPE from 3rd birthday to beginning of following school year

39 IEP in Effect/ Services Begin continued PART B REGULATIONS continued No delay in implementing IEP is allowed relating to payment source If 3rd birthday is in summer, IEP Team determines date services begin IEP Team determines whether extended school year services are necessary for FAPE

40 Collaboration Opportunities for interaction/ collaboration/ coordination exist at every step in the transition process Collaboration is necessary ensure smooth transitions for children and families

41 Resources on IDEA and Transition National Early Childhood Transition Initiative SPP/APR Calendar and TA Resources NECTAC Resource Collection on Transition National Early Childhood Transition Center OSEP – IDEA Legacy Site National Early Childhood SPP/APR Calendar and NECTAC National Early Childhood OSEP –