Establishing a Distance Learning Framework for the Institution (Part II) Sali Kaceli Director, Educational Technology and Distance Learning Cairn University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Diane Ruiz Cairns, MBA, Ed.S.
Advertisements

Helping L2 writers respond to writing assignments across the curriculum Part 2 Zuzana Tomaš Eastern Michigan University
Documents That Provide Basis for Professional Standards and NASP Approval and Practices in ISU SCPY Internship* 1. Ed.S. Internship Handbook 2. Internship/Practicum.
Quality Matters TM : Introduction to QM and to the Rubric The Quality Matters™ Rubric 2008 – 2010 Edition Updated July 08.
Your Logo Here An Administrative Framework for the Blackboard Academic Suite Presented By Chris J Jones University of Oklahoma HSC April 13, 2005.
Enrich Your Online Course: Complete a Course Review Center for Information Technology in Education Northwest Missouri State University.
Grad Tools Pilot Grad Tools and The Dissertation Checklist CARAT Updates Presentation March 19, 2004 Presenters: Michelle Bejian Lotia, Duderstadt Center.
Service Learning Risk Management – Process and Roles December 13, 2006 Presented by: Season Eckardt, CSU Chancellor’s Office Jeannie Kim-Han, CSU Fullerton.
Faculty Peer Mentoring Program UCCA PRESENTATION.
Developing a Successful Field Program in an Online Environment: Lessons Learned Dr. M. Sebrena Jackson, LCSW Director of Field.
Far Afield: Managing Distance Internships Carol Schneweis, Distance Coordinator Bruce Reeves, Field Director University of North Dakota Department of Social.
Quality Assurance Initiative. What is it anyway? The Quality Assurance (QA) Initiative is a faculty-centered, peer review process designed to assess the.
Online Course Observation. Objectives: 1.Articulate the steps of an online faculty observation 2.Explain the elements of the GRCC Online Course Observation.
May 18, Two Goals 1. Become knowledgeable about the QEP. 2. Consider your role in making the QEP a success.
Tools of the Trade: Using Technology in Your Course Tools of the Trade: Using Technology in Your Course 1 Ms. Darla Runyon Assistant Director/Curriculum.
The National University Special Education Internship Introduction to the Program
McWeadon Education, USA
Design and Development Awards Spring 2015 TLOS Networked Learning Design and Strategies (NLDS)
Building an Online MSW Program from the Ground Up Mary Ann Forgey Cathy Berkman.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges Western Association of Schools and Colleges December 10, 2012 Quality Distance Education.
Blackboard 201 Communication Workshop Barbara Cooper. OCC Faculty Online Coordinator.
Uncovering the Promise of Faculty Success Online Lawrence C. Ragan, Ph.D. Penn State’s World Campus NERCOMP Boston 2005.
Prince George’s Community College Online Express Training Faculty to Teach Online Mary Wells Margo Chaires Andrew Habermacher.
Faculty and Course Development for Online Degree Programs Center for Online Learning Georgia Southern University Deborah Champion, Coordinator David Lloyd,
Quality Matters and Online Courses in Sakai Brian Dashew, Instructional Designer, Marist College Dr. Reba-Anna Lee, Assistant Director for Academic Technology.
Franklin University Dr. Lewis Chongwony, Instructional Designer
Evidence Based Teaching Strategy: Applied to Student Orientation
2008 Adobe Systems Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. Developing an eLearning Strategy at a Nigerian University By Jerome Terpase Dooga, Christopher Tony.
CA12 Assessing Online Courses Howard University November 2013.
Emporia State University Phil Bennett (Some Slides by Dr. Larry Lyman) Teacher Work Sample The Teachers College.
Managerial Role – Setting the Stage Lesson 6 Jeneen T. Chapman John Madden Facilitators.
MERLOT PRESENTATION Northeast State Technical Community College A METHOD FOR ENSURING QUALITY IN ONLINE COURSES Dr. Tom Wallace – Director of Academic.
Presented by the WVC Distance Learning Committee.
Writing Your Program’s SPA Report(s) Cynthia Conn, Ph.D., Associate Director, Office of Academic Assessment Chris Geanious, Project Director, College of.
G UIDELINES FOR COURSE SYLLABUS DESIGN B EST PRACTICES AND INTERNATIONAL TRENDS KOMAR UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (KUST) OFFICE OF QUALITY ASSURANCE.
San Joaquin Delta College Flex Calendar Program General Flex at Delta Types of Activities Administration of Program Process Filling Out the Flex Contract.
“DATA” Providing Program Accountability, Curriculum Improvement and “DATA” For Your Program Of Study NOCTI Overview November 10, 2010 Lana Ford
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
CA12 Assessing Online Courses Howard University Spring 2015.
EDUCAUSE 2005 Annual Conference October 19, 2005.
Advanced Microsoft Office Applications Online Course – Lessons Learned.
Preparing Students for an Online Learning Community Designing an Effective Online Orientation November 9, 2001.
SACS Coordinators Meeting Academic Units Wednesday, October 31, 2012 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS.
Curriculum at SCC and Role of the Senate Presented by Craig Rutan and Joyce Wagner SCC Academic Senate Fall 2013 Retreat.
1 June 10-15, 2012 Growing Community; Growing Possibilities Switching to on-line evaluations for courses at UC Berkeley Daphne Ogle, Lead Design, UC Berkeley.
Innovation Software Corporation's Cultural Awareness Training Program Presentation by:
Faculty Senate Retreat Fall Welcome Back A moment of gratitude Schedule of Events: 9:00 am - 9:15 am Welcome & Continuing Topics 9:15 am - 10:00.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
University of Florida College of Education Master’s Degree Online in Educational Leadership.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Select Slides… Spring 2013 Training Strengthening Teaching and Learning through the Results of Your Student Assessment of Instruction (SAI) For Faculty.
Dances with Faculty: Empowering Success in the Online Environment Lawrence C. Ragan, Ph.D. & Marilynne Stout, Ph.D. Penn State’s World Campus.
Trevecca MBA Online Principles of Engagement a draft Rick Mann, PhD Director of Graduate Business Programs Lametrius Daniels Director of Graduate Business.
Office of Academic Programs tracks change(s); notifies Advisement; and sends copy of approved paperwork w/effective date to Registrar Office of Academic.
CURRICULUM-CHANGE APPROVAL PROCESSES
Curriculum at SCC and Role of the Senate Presented by Craig Rutan and Joyce Wagner SCC Academic Senate Fall 2013 Retreat.
Online Teaching Conference
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Developing a Self-Paced Orientation for Online Students
Evaluation of Distance Education Curriculum
Chair: Nadine Jennings Date of Presentation: January 19, 2017
District discipline lead spring meeting agenda
With a Dash of Encouragement and a Sprinkle of Expectations
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Quality Matters Overview
Evaluation Tools for Online Courses
Presentation transcript:

Establishing a Distance Learning Framework for the Institution (Part II) Sali Kaceli Director, Educational Technology and Distance Learning Cairn University Presentation Survey:

Agenda Cairn Distance Learning Initiative

Institutional Instructional Government SARA Accreditation Faculty … Technological Distance Learning CHALLENGES

Vision & Value Control and Goals Experience Aspirations SARA Resources Minutes Regular and Substantive Interaction (Title IV) Value Factors to Be Considered Distance Learning PersonalDepartmentalInstitutionalPatronFederalAccreditation

Our Approach Approach Take technology burden off the faculty. Require only original content and provide necessary training and tools. Cairn based content.

The core of the initiative Need/Goal Structure Accreditation and Fed. Reqs. Centralized Approach Formalized Course Dev. ProcessContinuous Improvement Integrity Secure LoginAnti-plagiarism Instructor Awareness Support Faculty SupportOnline ResourcesStudent Support Provost Dean Director of DL StudentsFaculty HYBRID AND ONLINE PROGRAMS Web-Enhanced CoursesHybrid CoursesOnline Courses Q UALITY E DUCATION : A NYWHERE, A NYTIME Product Process Tools Presentation Matters | Answers in 24 hrs. | Plenty of Structure |Best Tools |Availability AsynchronousSynchronous CAIRN DISTANCE LEARNING FRAMEWORK Course/Program A bottom-up approach to the Distance Learning at Cairn University

Course Development Process SELECT Course is selected and initial paperwork completed 01 BUILD The course building is completed in two stages 03 PLAN Particular focus is placed on planning 02 REVIEW/APPROVE Multiple layers of review prior to the course going live 04 All courses are required to undergo this process and must be ready prior to the scheduled date.

Course Development Process: Course Selection SELECT Course is selected and initial paperwork completed 01 The Dean and Instructor agree to develop the course Course Development Agreement Sent to the Office of the Provost The Dean in control throughout the process

Course Development Process: Planning PLAN Particular focus is placed on planning 02 Online Instructor OrientationOnline Instructor Orientation Consultation in person or online Course Planning WorksheetCourse Planning Worksheet Lessons Learned Single Point of Contact Reminders Updates 45%

Course Development Process: Building SELECT Course is selected and initial paperwork completed 01 BUILD The course building is completed in two stages 03 PLAN Particular focus is placed on planning 02 Weeks 1-3 during deadline 2. Video cleanup and formatting and faculty involvement Keep in touch with the faculty stressing the deadlines

Course Development Process: Approval SELECT Course is selected and initial paperwork completed 01 BUILD The course building is completed in two stages 03 PLAN Particular focus is placed on planning 02 REVIEW/APPROVE Multiple layers of review prior to the course going live 04 Send worksheet to dean during stage 2 and keep dean informed of any issues.

Tools Helpful in the Development Process

Additional Policies Added

Putting it All Together

SUPPORT KEY COMPONENTS Technology Infrastructure ODL: Tools, Staffing etc. Student Support and Online Resources Faculty Support and Necessary Tools Learning Distance VISIONCOLLABORATION (Support from Administration) PROCESSES Course dev. delivery improvement COPYRIGHT TEACH Act Policy ACADEMIC INTEGRITY MARKETING Key Components INSTITUTIONIAL EFFORT Live support added Student Orientation Faculty Orientation Policies

Course Logistics Weekly Resources Feedback 2x per semester (1/3 through course and end of semester) Academic Integrity tools incorporated in various aspects of the course Intro. Video Copyright CAIRN DISTANCE LEARNING FRAMEWORK Web-Enhanced Courses Hybrid Hybrid CoursesOnline Courses D ISTANCE L EARNING C OURSE S TRUCTURE Unit welcome video (5+ minutes) Lesson minute instructional videos with assessments (3-4x) SCORM lessons as needed Forums (1-2x) Assignments Course Page First Week Topic Summary of Learning ObjectivesWeek 2 and on: Summary of Learning Objectives Hidden unless active Academic Accommodations Unit welcome video (5+ minutes) Lesson minute instructional videos with assessments (3-4x) SCORM lessons as needed Forums (1-2x); Assignments * Web conferencing (3x) Course Honor Code Agreement Technology Requirements

DC Hybrid MSOL Hybrid A few courses online MSEL MSED MBA IE MAR | OL Degree Completion Complete Development Review and Tweak / New Opportunities Our Roadmap

KEY COMPONENTS VISIT SITE PROCESSES STUDENT VERIFICATION SUPPORT SERVICES ? ACADEMIC INTEGRITY CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT MSCHE Site Visit DISTANCE LEARNING

Our Findings: Fall 2014 Only a 6% difference| 23 courses evaluated

Our Findings: Spring 2015

Our Findings

REVISE DEVELOP STUDENT FEEDBACK FACULTY FEEDBACK CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT COURSE REFRESH AND REDESIGN

Course Demo

In Conclusion Institutional approach is key Incorporate Accreditation Reqs. Faculty Buy-in Take an enabling role along with reqs.

Questions? Sali Kaceli Director, Educational Technology and Distance Learning Presentation Survey: