C.H. Montin, Berlin, OECD workshop 12 June 2012 1 OECD Berlin, 11-12 June 2012 Controlling regulatory expenditures: An over-arching concern for policy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C.H. MONTIN for TAIEX Chisinau 29 March 2007 (pm) Ministère du budget et de la réforme de lEtat Practical steps to introduce BR in Moldova Charles-Henri.
Advertisements

Czech approach to Regulatory Impact Assessment Prof. Michal Mejstřík Chairman of Regulatory Impact Assessment Board (RIAB) of the Czech Government Legislative.
Smart regulation communication HLG AB, 7 December 2010
C.H. Montin, Hsin Chu, August Hsin Chu, August 2012 Building Effective Institutions for Managing Regulatory Policy Charles-Henri Montin, Senior.
C.H. Montin, Manama 11 Manama, 20 January 2014 Regulatory Impact Assessment for Better Standards International Best Practices from OECD Charles-Henri Montin,
Regulators’ Compliance Code Zoë Dayan Secondee Ministry of Economy, Lithuania.
1 SG C Commission Communication on EU Regulatory Fitness COM (2012) 746 Working Group on Better Regulation Meeting of 4 th March, 2013 Michael Gremminger.
C.H. Montin, Erbil 6 December Erbil, 6 December 2012 Legislative stock management Illustrated legal techniques Charles-Henri Montin, Senior Regulatory.
REGULATORY POLICY AND GOVERNANCE FOR STRENGTHENING COMPETITIVENESS 15 December 2014 University of Economics, Prague Daniel Trnka Regulatory Policy Division,
C.H. MONTIN, Sciences-Po Chaire MADP, 16 janvier Strategies for Simplifying Administrative Procedures: Lessons from OECD Charles-Henri Montin Senior.
GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA CENTRAL PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM ( ): concept and results December 2007 Chisinau.
1 Evaluation of Administrative Burden reduction programmes and their impacts CUTTING RED TAPE II Lorenzo ALLIOAndrea RENDA OECD Regulatory Policy Committee.
1 DG Enterprise & Industry European Commission E.U. conference of Administrative Burden Reduction Malta, 1 February 2008 Burden Reduction in Support of.
© OECD SIGMA A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU © OECD SIGMA A joint initiative of the OECD and the.
C.H. Montin, Ankara 12 May Ankara, 12 May 2014 Further techniques to improve the design of legislation Charles-Henri Montin, Smart Regulation Consultant.
C.H. Montin, Erbil 14 July Erbil (KRG), 14 July 2012 From Sound Policy-making to Clear Legislative Drafting What governmental standards and techniques.
Ministère du budget et de la réforme de l’Etat 6/3/2015 OECD MENA 4 May 2007 C.H. MONTIN What is a regulatory reform review and why is it useful ? Experience.
1 Regulatory Impact Assessment: Methodology and Best Practices David Shortall INMETRO International Workshop on Conformity Assessment Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
C.H. Montin, 15 July 2013, Madrid 1 Administrative Simplification in France: a long-term effort Charles-Henri Montin (France)*
The Italian Institutional Design for Administrative Simplification HIGH LEVEL REGIONAL SEMINAR ON “STRATEGIES, TOOLS AND CAPACITIES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE.
Better regulation in Denmark Presentation by Flemming N. Olsen Senior Advisor, Division for Better Regulation Ministry of Finance, Denmark Conference on.
Session 3 - Plenary on implementing Principle 1 on an Explicit Policy on Regulatory Quality, Principle 3 on Regulatory Oversight, and Principle 6 on Reviewing.
Integration of Regulatory Impact Assessment into the decision making process in the Czech Republic Aleš Pecka Department of Regulatory Reform and Public.
Simple, Effective, Transparent Regulation: Best Practices in OECD countries Cesar Cordova-Novion Deputy Head of Programme Regulatory Reform, OECD.
Regulatory Impact Analysis: Experience in Norway Presentation at Third Regional Meeting of the Working Group IV on Public Service Delivery, Public-Private.
Beirut – 20 April 2011 Citizens as partners: current issues and challenges Charles-Henri Montin Senior Regulatory Adviser Ministère de l’économie et des.
C.H. Montin, 3 July New RIA in France: Impacting policy making ? Charles-Henri Montin (France)*
Adviser, Ministry for State Reform, Lebanon
1 DG Enterprise & Industry European Commission Administrative Burden Reduction and Impact Assessment Presentation by Cavan O’Connor Close European Commission.
The SCM – main issues, advantages and challenges of quantification of administrative costs Daniel Trnka Regulatory Policy Division, Directorate for Public.
1 Hsin Chu, August 2012 Regulatory Impact Assessment Charles-Henri Montin, Senior Regulatory Expert, Ministry of economy and finance, Paris
Romanian Court of Accounts years of existence.
1 Regulatory reform, transparency and development Athens development and governance institute 21 November 2005.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU. Quality Assurance José Viegas Ribeiro IGF, Portugal SIGMA.
C.H. Montin, Hsin Chu, August Ministry of Economic Affairs Professional Training Centre 27th Academy of International Affairs Hsin Chu, August.
1 OECD Berlin, 11 June 2012 Regulatory costs in France The search for a comprehensive definition Charles-Henri Montin, Senior Regulatory Expert,
Regulatory Impact Analysis – Lebanon Working Group IV: Focus Group on Public Service Delivery, Public-Private Partnership and Regulatory Reform Amman,
Regulatory Quality & Administrative Simplification Update on developments in New Zealand Liz MacPherson Deputy Secretary NZ Ministry of Economic Development.
Communication Paper on Smart Regulation COM(2010) 543, 8 October 2010 Presentation by Savia Orphanidou 3 rd November 2010.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework “Training the Trainers” November 2008 RIA in the EU by Lydia Jørgensen, Senior.
RIA: Communication – building credibility Aleš Pecka Department of Regulatory Reform and Public Administration Quality Ministry of Interior, Czech Republic.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework “Training the Trainers” November 2008 Session 8 Standard Cost Model and RIAs.
Risk and Regulatory Policy How do systems of regulatory governance reduce societal risk? Greg Bounds, Administrator Regulatory Policy Division.
The Splendours and Miseries of Regulatory Impact Assessment in the Czech Republic Daniel Trnka Regulatory Policy Division, Directorate for Public Governance.
C.H. Montin, Hsin Chu, August Hsin Chu, August 2012 Co-ordination of public policies Why and how best coordinate between ministries ? Charles-Henri.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Strategy for Better Regulation in Romania Expert - Florin.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Better Regulation in New EU Member States Public Policy –
C.H. Montin, Hsin Chu, August Hsin Chu, August 2012 The OECD experience of Regulatory Policy Charles-Henri Montin, Senior Regulatory Expert, Ministry.
(Regulatory) Impact Assessment Introduction Zsombor Kovacsy, Ministry of Justice Hungary Regional Strategic Workshop on Impact Assessment Riga, Latvia.
ECENA Workshop on Benchmarking and Progress Monitoring in Environmental Enforcement and Compliance Szentendre, March 29-30, 2007 Assessment Tools and Methods.
C.H. Montin, Hsin Chu, August Hsin Chu, August 2012 Policy-making Charles-Henri Montin, Senior Regulatory Expert, Ministry of economy and finance,
C.H. Montin, Hsin Chu, August Hsin Chu, August 2012 From Sound Policy-making to Clear Legislative Drafting What governmental standards and techniques.
C.H. Montin, 20/1/ New RIA in France: Specific traits of a national model Charles-Henri Montin (France)*
C.H. Montin, Manama 11 Manama, 20 January 2014 Regulatory Impact Assessment for Better Standards International Best Practices from OECD Charles-Henri Montin,
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Seminar on Administrative Simplification Seminar on Administrative.
An overview of OECD Strategies for Improving Regulatory Performance Regulatory Reform and Building Governance Capacities – New Delhi 3 December 2009 Mr.
Impact analysis during the harmonisation process with the EU and effects on Lithuanian economy Giedrius Kadziauskas, Senior Policy analyst 23 rd Fabruary.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation: Possible approaches and lessons learned from member states and new member states SEVESO II transposition and.
1 Quality Indicators of Regulatory Management Systems Stéphane Jacobzone, Chang Won Choi, Claire Miguet The views are the author’s responsibility OECD.
C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 11 Tbilisi, 12 November 2014 Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Georgia Overview of the RIA process & methodology Charles-Henri.
The Splendours and Miseries of Regulatory reform in the Czech Republic
Legislative Impact Analysis of the NARS:
Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Azerbaijan
Cesar Cordova-Novion Deputy Head of Programme Regulatory Reform, OECD
Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Azerbaijan
Reducing Administrative Burdens -Initiatives-
IPSG Meeting, Paris, 25th November 2008 Reduction of Administrative Burdens: Presentation of the EU Project & French Position Denis Besnainou, Michael.
Germany Thomas Nehring Better regulation unit Federal Chancellery.
OECD good practices for setting up an RIA system Regional Capacity-Building Seminar on Regulatory Impact Assessment Istanbul, Turkey 20 November 2007.
Presentation transcript:

C.H. Montin, Berlin, OECD workshop 12 June OECD Berlin, June 2012 Controlling regulatory expenditures: An over-arching concern for policy makers (France) Charles-Henri Montin, Senior Regulatory Expert, Ministère de l’économie et des finances, Paris

C.H. Montin, Berlin, OECD workshop 12 June Features of the French strategy  Holistic: end-users have a broader sense of red tape than IOs and related costs : perceived complexity, irritation factor, overproduction of norms must be controlled  Coordinated: all actors involved in the lawmaking process, including central and local government  Balanced: scrutiny incl. benefits of legislation  Contextual: Regulatory costs important but not driving principle  Proportional: studies and measurements to stay reasonable

C.H. Montin, Berlin, OECD workshop 12 June Coordinated strategy (2011) Simplification & Regulatory Cost reductions Commissioner for simplification PMO/SGG Reform of the State (DGME) Business Ministry Parliament

C.H. Montin, Berlin, OECD workshop 12 June 2012 Integrated reduction process Select DGME surveys & website; parliament hearings Assises de la Simplification (business ministry) Design Process re-engineering (DGME as lead) Draft simplification bills / regulations, egov solutions Assess Business impact fiches (ministries) Check & calculate (Commissioner/CEGEFI - OSCAR) Enact Implement regulatory changes Review, discuss and vote simpl. bills (Parliament)

C.H. Montin, Berlin, OECD workshop 12 June Holistic definition of regulatory costs  Ex-ante: gradual strengthening of the RIA system, leading to an effective scrutiny of regulatory costs (CBA style)  Appointment of the Commissioner with a special mandate for new regulation on local authorities and business  Ex-post: widening of the notion of regulatory costs after 2008 baseline measurement –Selection based on perception of complexity by end-users –Inclusion of Legal security / uncertainty concerns –Multi-level perspective –Increased concern for compliance costs of local authorities –Communication based on reduction measures, not baseline figures, hence cost figures less conspicuous

C.H. Montin, Berlin, OECD workshop 12 June Ex post measurement techniques  : the baseline measurement of regulatory costs included: –Administrative costs of IO’s –Costs for administration –Cost of delays  : red tape surveys include: –First phase: consultation to identify burdens, irritants, sources of complexity –Second phase: re-engineering, then assessment of impact of simplification measures (including regulatory cost)

C.H. Montin, Berlin, OECD workshop 12 June Ex ante techniques  December 2007 report by Inspection Générale des Finances presents a detailed regulatory cost reduction method targeting: –One-off design cost of new legislation, including parliament and government time, length of texts, costs of consultations and publications –enactment costs, including i.a. training, IT changes, information of end-users (on the basis of IOs) See also 2004 Rapport Lasserre (“RIA and regulatory costs” p )Rapport Lasserre

C.H. Montin, Berlin, OECD workshop 12 June Centrally supported (OSCAR)  = online Tool to Simulate Administrative Costs of new legislation  Developed 2010 by DGME on basis of 2007 IGF report and baseline data; transferred to SGG 2011  Supports business impact fiche calculations for economic, financial and fiscal impacts  Encompasses one-off and recurring costs including enactment, enforcement, implementation (for administrations) and compliance (for business)

C.H. Montin, Berlin, OECD workshop 12 June Targeting business regulatory costs  Commissioner’s 2012 annual report presents new methodology for ex ante assessment : « business impact fiche (BIF)» with wide definition of regulatory impact:2012 annual report –costs for business, sorted by « operationally consistent subset of measures »: compliance, information, training, etc (p. 20 of BIF guidance) –CBA approach and legal stability concern –Implementation schemes are included –Impact assessed for various sizes of companies

C.H. Montin, Berlin, OECD workshop 12 June Targeting local authority compliance burdens  Rapport Doligé (2011) draws on comprehensive definition of regulatory costs for LA. Rapport Doligé  Committee on the evaluation of norms (CCEN) assesses economic impact of new norms for LA  Moratorium on new burdens for local authorities and their groupings Moratorium

C.H. Montin, Berlin, OECD workshop 12 June 2012 Other components of the strategy  Simplification laws (6 in 9 years)  One-in, one-out (proposed) / Moratorium on new legislation for local authorities  Common commencement dates (with tables on Légifrance)  “Smart” transposition of EU legislation  Strong ex-post evaluation institutions and tools (reports on the implementation of laws, inspectorate reports, RGPP) C.H. Montin, Berlin, OECD workshop 12 June 2012

Enforcing the new control mechanisms (to avoid “gaming”)  Strong legal basis for controlling new legislation by RIA in the Constitution  Online guidance and support; training of officials  Central unit and Commissioner (PMO + MEF) to quality check cost assessments  Technical capacity to coordinate e-gov solutions (DGME)  Efficient arbitration by PMO in case of conflict with ministry over policy

C.H. Montin, Berlin, OECD workshop 12 June 2012 Communication of the strategy  Emphasis on involving stakeholders in the selection phase: surveys, websites, Assizes  Regular policy and political government statements on containing normative inflation and reducing regulatory costs;  Frequent discussion in Parliament on the occasion of the simplification laws

C.H. Montin, Berlin, OECD workshop 12 June 2012 Regulatory Costs: reference docs (France)  Rapport Lasserre 2004 Rapport Lasserre  French SCM including costs for admins & delays French SCM  Rapport IGF 2007 “coûts administratifs de la réglementation” (not published)  Guidelines on RIA 2010 (not online)  OSCAR methodology (not online)  Rapport Warsmann 2011 Rapport Warsmann 2011  Commissioner’s annual report 2012 including the Business Impact Fiche & guidance’s annual report 2012  Rapport Doligé and fiche on new regulations for local authorities & guidance Rapport Doligé C.H. Montin, Berlin, OECD workshop 12 June 2012

15 To continue the study…  This presentation is online (including hyperlinks)  Updates on current events and trends in France: (blog) go to “France” category  Contact: finances.gouv.fr