FIELD-TEST FLEXIBILITY: AN OVERVIEW October 31, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB Accountability Title III of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) Presented.
Advertisements

Developing School Improvement Plans #101
IMPLICATIONS FOR KENTUCKY’S SCHOOLS AND DISTRICTS SUPERINTENDENTS’ WEBCAST MARCH 6, 2012 NCLB Waiver Flexibility 1.
BIE Flexibility Request Summary of Key Provisions Bureau of Indian Education U.S. Department of the Interior.
ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 1 INTRODUCTION STATES LEADING REFORM States and districts have initiated groundbreaking reforms and innovations.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
1 Evaluation Reviews and Reevaluations Macomb ISD Special Education Management Services August, 2006.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
North Carolina ESEA Flexibility Request Frequently Asked Questions April 30, 2012 April 27,
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVERS Gayle Pauley Assistant Superintendent Special Programs and Federal Accountability
Subtitle Title I Federal School Accountability Office of School Improvement and Turnaround Indiana Department of Education March 2012.
WV ESEA Committee of Practitioners Stonewall Jackson Conference Center March 12, 2014 Roanoke, WV.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS December 18, 2014.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: RENEWAL PROCESS November 20, 2014.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS October 5, 2011.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Principle 1 – College & Career Ready Standards and Assessments Alaska’s Initial DRAFT Proposal August 2, 2012 Alaska Department.
Subtitle 1003(g) School Improvement Grants April 2, 2012.
Education in Delaware: ESEA Flexibility Renewal Community Town Hall Ryan Reyna, Office of Accountability.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
Title I ANNUAL MEETING McEver Arts Academy OCTOBER 16, 2014.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
STATE CONSORTIUM ON EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS September 10, 2013.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
Friday, 9/25/15 RI Department of Education Stephen Osborn, Chief of Accelerating School Performance Jillian Belanger, Coordinator of ELL Education.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Elliott Point September 15, 2015 Janet Norris.
July,  Congress hasn’t reauthorized Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA), currently known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  U.S. Department.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2013 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting State.
Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations Presentation for LEP SCASS/CCSSO May 7, 2008.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING OVERVIEW IU 5. CHAPTER 4 - STANDARDS Effective March 1, 2014 PA Core Standards English Language Arts (ELA) Mathematics Reading.
Title III, Part A: Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient (LEP) and Immigrant Students  The purpose of Title III, Part A is to help ensure.
ESEA Renewal What does it Mean for Title I? Program Improvement and Family Support Branch Title I Administrative Meeting September 17, 2015.
IDEA and NCLB Standards-Based Accountability Sue Rigney, U.S. Department of Education OSEP 2006 Project Directors’ Conference.
ESEA Flexibility: Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 1 of 8.
Pennsylvania’s ESEA Flexibility Proposal May 23, >
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: AN OVERVIEW September 26, 2011.
Council of Superintendents September Kansas State Department of Education College and Career Ready means an individual has the academic.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Fall District Test Coordinators Meeting Alexandria, LA November, 2005.
Title II, Part A, Division Improvement Procedures for Compliance with Section 2141 of Title II, Part A Virginia Department of Education.
Application for Funding for Phase II of the Education Fund under the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund Program CFDA Number:
State Practices for Ensuring Meaningful ELL Participation in State Content Assessments Charlene Rivera and Lynn Shafer Willner GW-CEEE National Conference.
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
March 30, 2012 Marriott Hotel- Charleston, WV Committee of Practitioners Developing Federal Programs of Excellence.
1 46th Annual PAFPC Conference May 5, 2015 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
North Carolina ESEA Flexibility Focus Schools 1. How are Focus Schools identified?  Title I schools with in-school gaps between the highest- achieving.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
Testing Students with Disabilities. Resources Appendix C of Test Administration Manuals – SCPASS Science and Social Studies – End-of-Course English 1.
What just happened and what’s next? Presenters: Steve Dibb, MDE Debra Landvik, MDE AYP 2011.
Diane Mugford – Federal Accountability, ADAM Russ Keglovits – Measurement and Accountability, ADAM Renewing Nevada’s ESEA Waiver Flexibility Request.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Stakeholder Input Title I Administrative Meeting: May 19, 2016.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVERS December 2, 2011 House Education Committee Bob Harmon, Assistant Superintendent
New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): Overview and Implications for New Jersey Peter Shulman & Jill Hulnick Deputy Commissioner.
ESSA = OPPORTUNITY!  After nearly 14 years of asking for less federal intrusion into the teaching and learning process, it is.
Transition to ESSA WVDE Office of Federal Programs March 8, 2016 Alternate Audio Access: #
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Accountability
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Field-test FLEXIBILITy: an overview
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Presentation transcript:

FIELD-TEST FLEXIBILITY: AN OVERVIEW October 31, 2013

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 2 FIELD-TEST FLEXIBILITY: AN OVERVIEW 2013–2014: States field test new assessments aligned to college- and career-ready standards in reading/language arts and mathematics June 18, 2013: Secretary Duncan announced that the Department would be willing to entertain requests for waivers related to “double testing” for this one year of field tests 1

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 3 FIELD-TEST FLEXIBILITY: KEY DOCUMENTS Letter from Assistant Secretary Delisle Frequently Asked Questions Optional Request Templates flexibility/college-career-ready/index.html 2

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 4 FIELD-TEST FLEXIBILITY: WHAT IS IT? 1.Double-Testing Flexibility: Allows schools that participate in the field tests to administer only one reading/language arts and one mathematics assessment to an individual student 2.Determination Flexibility: Allows schools that participate in the field test to retain for 2014–2015 the same Federal accountability designations as they have for 2013–2014 and implement the same interventions and supports in 2014–2015 Collectively: Field-Test Flexibility 3

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 5 FIELD-TEST FLEXIBILITY: WHO CAN REQUEST IT? Any State that will field test new assessments aligned to college- and career-ready standards in reading/language arts and mathematics in 2013– 2014 can request the flexibility Not limited to States with ESEA flexibility or a grant under Race to the Top Fall testing States may request the flexibility (see A-10 in the Field-Test Flexibility FAQs) 4

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 6 FIELD-TEST FLEXIBILITY: WHICH ASSESSMENTS? Assessments aligned to a State’s college- and career-ready standards, including: General assessments, including those developed by a Race to the Top Assessment consortium (PARCC or Smarter Balanced) Alternate assessments based on alternate academic achievement standards, including those developed by a General Supervision Enhancement Grant consortium (DLM or NCSC) 5

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 7 FIELD-TEST FLEXIBILITY: PARTICIPATING IN THE FIELD TEST For purposes of the field-test flexibility, a school “participates in the field test” if at least one full classroom or course section within the school takes the full form of the assessment in one subject area during the 2013–2014 school year. (See A-6 in the Field-Test Flexibility FAQs) 6

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 8 PARTICIPATING IN THE FIELD TEST: ONE CLASSROOM/COURSE SECTION All students in the class who are required to take the assessment being field tested, for example: – Students in tested grades (if class includes multiple grades) – Students who take the general assessment (if field test is of the general assessment) For high school, all students in one period during which a course is taught (See A-11, A-12 in the Field-Test Flexibility FAQs) 7

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 9 PARTICIPATING IN THE FIELD TEST: FULL FORM OF THE ASSESSMENT “Full form of the assessment” means all items and components of the form of the field test Not just some test items May be full form of the assessment in just one subject (i.e., reading/language arts or mathematics) 8

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 10 “During 2013–2014” means completing the full form of the field test during this school year Need not be in one sitting or one test window (e.g., may be multiple testlets over the course of the year) PARTICIPATING IN THE FIELD TEST: DURING 2013–2014 9

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 11 PARTICIPATING IN THE FIELD TEST This definition is for purposes of the field-test flexibility only. A school is not prohibited from being part of a field test if it does not meet the definition. Remember: A school may get the flexibility as long as it “participates in the field test” of at least one assessment (reading or math, general or alternate). 10

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 12 PARTICIPATING IN THE FIELD TEST: AN EXAMPLE K-8 school, four classes at each grade level. One 5th-grade class takes the full form of the math field test; all other classes take the current State math test. All classes in grades 3-8 take the current State reading/language arts assessment. – The school participates in the field test for purposes of the field-test flexibility. (See A-6 in the Field-Test Flexibility FAQs) 11

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 13 DOUBLE-TESTING FLEXIBILITY Allows schools that participate in the field tests to administer, for purposes of meeting the assessment requirements in ESEA section 1111(b)(3), only one reading/language arts and one mathematics assessment in 2013–2014 to any individual student — i.e., either the current State assessment or the field test. All students must still participate in both a reading/language arts assessment and a mathematics assessment in 2013–

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 14 DOUBLE-TESTING FLEXIBILITY: WHAT DOES IT WAIVE? ESEA sections 1111(b)(1)(B) and 1111(b)(3)(C)(i) – Require an SEA to apply the same academic achievement standards, and to use the same academic assessments, for all public school children in the State – Waivers would permit any individual student to take only one assessment in each content area in 2013–2014 — i.e., either the current State assessment or the field test 13

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 15 DOUBLE-TESTING FLEXIBILITY: WHAT DOES IT WAIVE? ESEA section 1111(b)(3)(C)(xii) – Requires individual student interpretive, descriptive, and diagnostic reports that include information regarding achievement on State assessments to parents, teachers, and principals as soon as is practically possible after an assessment is given – Waiver would permit an SEA or LEA to refrain from producing or providing these individual student reports for a student’s performance on the field test – All reporting obligations must still be met for performance on the State test. 14

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 16 DETERMINATION FLEXIBILITY: WHAT DOES IT WAIVE? ESEA sections 1116(a)(1)(A) and 1116(c)(1)(A) Require an LEA and an SEA to make AYP determinations for schools and LEAs, respectively Waivers would permit an LEA to refrain from making AYP determinations for schools that participate in the field test and an SEA to refrain from making AYP determinations for one-school LEAs that participate in the field test AYP determinations must still be made for all other schools and LEAs An SEA with ESEA flexibility may already have these waivers 15

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 17 DETERMINATION FLEXIBILITY: WHAT DOES IT WAIVE? ESEA sections 1111(h)(1)(C)(ii) and 1111(h)(2)(B) Require an SEA and LEA, respectively, to report on performance against AMOs Waivers would permit SEA or LEA to refrain from reporting performance against AMOs for any school or single-school LEA that participates in the field test An SEA and its LEAs would still report performance against AMOs for: – Subject that is not part of the field test – All other schools and LEAs 16

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 18 DETERMINATION FLEXIBILITY IN A NON-ESEA FLEXIBILITY STATE No AYP determination for schools or single-school LEAs that participate in the field test Schools and single-school LEAs that participate in the field test would retain their 2013–2014 improvement status for 2014–2015 – Would not enter or exit improvement – Would not move up in the improvement timeline – Would continue same interventions in 2014–

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 19 DETERMINATION FLEXIBILITY IN AN ESEA FLEXIBILITY STATE Greater flexibility in implementing because ESEA flexibility already permits waiver of AYP and does not require annual identification of priority and focus schools Determination flexibility might affect: – Identification of reward, priority, and focus schools – Exiting focus or priority status – Annual grades or ratings – AYP determinations (if not already waived) (See D-2 in the Field-Test Flexibility FAQs) 18

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 20 DETERMINATION FLEXIBILITY AND AMAO 3 UNDER TITLE III Where possible, make AMAO 3 determinations based on the performance of English Learners within an LEA who take the current State assessment. Where not possible (i.e., because an LEA does not meet the minimum “n” because of English Learner participation in the field test or is a single school LEA participating in the field test), make Title III accountability determinations based on AMAOs 1 and 2 performance. Contact your Title III program contact with questions. 19

ESEA Flexibility Package U.S. Department of Education 21 DOUBLE-TESTING FLEXIBILITY AND DETERMINATION FLEXIBILITY DOUBLE-TESTING FLEXIBILITY Applies to all schools that participate in the field test May request for field test of either or both general or alternate assessment aligned to alternate academic achievement standards DETERMINATION FLEXIBILITY SEA may choose not to request at all or to request only for some schools that participate in the field test May request only in conjunction with the double- testing flexibility 20

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 22 REPORTING UNDER THE FIELD-TEST FLEXIBILITY An SEA or LEA need not report results from a field test. It must … Must meet all reporting obligations with respect to results on State assessments, including for students who also participate in a field test Report participation rate — total, for the field test, and for the State assessments Report against AMOs for reading if the field test is only for math and vice versa Report Federal accountability designation (even if same as the prior year) 21

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 23 FIELD-TEST FLEXIBILITY FOR ALTERNATE ASSESSMENTS (1% TESTS) Special rule for application of double-testing flexibility: Individual students who take full form of the field test of an alternate assessment based on alternate academic achievement standards in reading/language arts or mathematics during 2013–2014 may receive the benefit of this flexibility (i.e., need not be double tested) However, the full classroom or course section threshold would still have to be met for the students’ school to receive the benefit of the determination flexibility (See F-1 in the Field-Test Flexibility FAQs) 22

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 24 FIELD-TEST FLEXIBILITY AND INDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAMS (IEPs) IEP teams should determine whether a student’s IEP should be modified so that the student can participate in the field test, including modifications to address: – Accommodations available on the field test that might not previously have been available but meet the student’s needs – A student’s participation in the field test of the general assessment if the IEP indicates participation in an alternate assessment based on modified academic achievement standards (See F-2, F-3 in the Field-Test Flexibility FAQs) 23

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 25 FIELD-TEST FLEXIBILITY: OTHER CONSIDERATIONS In deciding whether to request the field-test flexibility, an SEA should consider, for example: Whether state law requires annual assessments or annual accountability determinations based on assessments Promotion, remediation, or graduation requirements Implications for the operation of the SIG program Implications for teacher and principal evaluation and support systems Implications for determining English Learner status Implications for its ability to carry out external evaluations of particular programs 24

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 26 REQUESTING THE FIELD-TEST FLEXIBILITY An SEA may, but is not required to, use the template requests posted on ED’s website Must include list of schools that will implement the flexibility Must include comments from LEAs, per the waiver requirements of ESEA section 9401 An ESEA flexibility SEA should also include an amendment request and a redline of its approved ESEA flexibility request Requests are due November 22,

Field-Test Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 27 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION … All documents related to the field-test flexibility are available on the Department’s website: flexibility/college-career-ready/index.html Contact your ESEA flexibility contact or, for non- ESEA flexibility States, Carlos Martinez at with additional questions 26