THRIVE TO DRIVE: RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PHYSICAL FITNESS, EXECUTIVE FUNCTION, AND ADOLESCENT DRIVING SAFETY Daniel Cox and Ann Lambert

Complacency, thy name is collisions In 2007 Israel was shocked to learn they had 397 vehicular fatalities In 2009 Israel activated a national behavioral intervention that reduced their annual fatalities by 26% In the US in 2008 there were 350,000+ fatalities and 15+ million injuries annually solely in the age group, and there is no national campaign

Kudos to YouthNEX and our colleagues for taking this seriously and supporting our work! Patrick Tolan, Ph.D.Ann Lambert, Ph.D. Ron Reeves, Ph.D Joe Allen, Ph.D. Daniel Cox, Ph.D. Art Weltman, Ph.D.John Sirard,Ph.D.

Premise: Novice driver collisions are due to inexperience and poor judgment 1.Primary hypothesis: Poor judgment is equivalent to under-developed executive functioning which leads to risky and dangerous driving. 2.Secondary hypothesis: Executive functioning is, in part, driven by physical fitness.

THE PROBLEM

Teens take more risks – Automobile accidents – Binge drinking – Contraceptive use – Crime ADOLESCENTS AND RISK WHY?

Are teens more: – Irrational? – Prone to delusions of invulnerability? – Ignorant? ADOLESCENTS AND RISK

Probably not. – Logic/reasoning abilities, risk perception, risk salience of teens comparable to adults (Reyna & Farley 2006; Steinberg 2010). – Psychosocial capacities of adolescents differ: Impulse control Emotion regulation Delay of gratification Resistance to peer influence – Executive Function SOME SCIENCE BEHIND THE PROBLEM

EXECUTIVE FUNCTION “Psychologists would rather share toothbrushes than definitions of Executive Function.”

T he ability to employ parallel processing and working memory that allows us to anticipate consequences, inhibit impulses, plan ahead, problem solve, and be creative in our interaction with the world. EXECUTIVE FUNCTION

BREAKING THAT DOWN Controlled Processing – Organization and coordination of sub-processes Prefrontal Cortex = Goal Maintenance Anterior Cigulate Cortex = Error Monitoring EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS: Inhibition Planning Problem Solving

ADOLESCENT BRAIN DEVELOPMENT 30 years 7-young adulthood 1-3 years 3-5 years 0-1 years Frontal Cortex Development

BRAIN DEVELOPMENT AND FATAL CRASHES

DRIVING AND EXECUTIVE FUNCTION Geriatric populations – On-road – Driving simulation – See Bieliaukas, 2005 Adolescents – Driving simulation – Mantyla et al., 2009

EXECUTIVE FUNCTION, ADOLESCENT RISK-TAKING AND DRIVING The Perfect Storm: underdeveloped frontal cortex + presence of peers = risk/benefit analysis

EXERCISE AND EXECUTIVE FUNCTION Older Adults (Kramer & Colcombe, 2003) Children: Best 2010, Davis et al., 2011

RESEARCH GOAL Investigate the role executive function plays in general risk-taking and driving-specific risky behaviors of novice drivers, as well as the role physical activity and fitness play in the maturation of EF ability.

MODEL

RESEARCH PLAN First 6 months of independent driving with monthly text messages querying driving mishaps. Collect self-reported general risk taking and debrief. 7-days later, Assess general EF and driving-specific EF and simulator risk taking. Consent/Assent, Assess physical fitness (VO2-max) and physical activity (Distribute accelerometers) Recruit 100 adolescents from AHS with learner permits

EXERCISE Physical Fitness: – VO2-Max Physical Activity: – G-S recall – ActiGraph accelerometers

EXECUTIVE FUNCTION General EF – Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) – Operation Span (OSPAN) Driving-specific EF – Novel in-simulator test divided attention, selective attention, dual processing, response inhibition, working memory

DRIVING PERFORMANCE & MISHAPS Tactical Driving Simulation Test (during 2 nd visit) Instructor on-road ratings 1 st six months of independent driving – Text message once a month

RISK General – Youth Risk Behavior Survey – Core Alcohol and Drug Survey – Self-Reported Delinquency Driving-Specific – Cox Assessment of Risky Driving Scale (CARDS)

SUMMARY OF PREDICTIONS Physical activity and physical fitness will positively influence General EF. General EF will lead to Driving-Specific EF. General EF will predict general risk-taking. Driving-Specific EF will predict Risky Driving. Risky driving will predict future driving mishaps over the first six months. These data will serve as preliminary studies for a larger, experimentally based NIH proposal.

To follow up, contact Daniel J. Cox, Ann Lambert,