HEPIX - Spring 2015 Tony Wong (BNL).  Yearly purchase cycle of hardware for RACF timed with U.S. gov’t fiscal year (October to September)  Aim for delivery.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
XenData SX-520 LTO Archive Servers A series of archive servers based on IT standards, designed for the demanding requirements of the media and entertainment.
Advertisements

Custom’s K-12 Education Technology Council Presents… Custom Computer Specialists Server Technology Solutions Designed for NYCDOE Affordable and.
Note: See the text itself for full citations. Information Technology Project Management, Seventh Edition.
Tower Dual Processor 1 x 2.13GHz Quad Core Intel Xeon E5506 1x250GB 7200RPM Drive Four open 3.5” Direct- Cabled SATA Bays 2GB 2 (1 DIMM) PC MHz.
Date: 03/05/2007 Vendor Management and Metrics. 2 A.T. Kearney X/mm.yyyy/00000 AT Kearney’s IT/Telecom Vendor Facts IT/Telecom service, software and equipment.
State Milestones Subsidized Insurance Workgroup High Level Timeline 2011 Jan 2011 Feb 2011 Mar 2011 Apr 2011 May 2011 Jun 2011 Jul 2011 Aug 2011 Sept 2011.
Napatech Acceleration Platform Powered by Dell. 2 Dell - Restricted - Confidential Accelerate Performance and Time-to-Market On October 21 st Napatech.
Project Cysera Hardware Configuration Drafted by Zoebir Bong.
Presentation Outline Background Program Requirements Orange County HPRP Plan HPRP Timeline Action Requested.
1 Comparing The Intel ® Core ™ 2 Duo Processor to a Single Core Pentium ® 4 Processor at Twice the Speed Performance Benchmarking and Competitive Analysis.
November 3, 2002CVEN349 - Maxwell1 Procurement and Materials Management Module 6.2 November 3, 2002.
Cluster Components Compute Server Disk Storage Image Server.
Corporate Partner Overview and Update September 27, 2007 Gary Crane SURA Director IT Initiatives.
1 CAPACITY BUILDING AND TRAINING ON PROCUREMENT Session 9 – The World Bank Procedures for IT Procurement September 21, 2005 by Arif Hassan.
Audit of Public Procurement
Working Group Meeting (McGrew/Toki) Discussion Items (focused on R&D software section) Goals of Simulations Simulation detector models to try Simulation.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
SET UP A SOHO SERVER AND NETWORK: THE BASICS Tony Hancock (NET 2012 Capstone. EKU) Presented by: Tony Hancock.
TMDB delay and production plan Augusto. TMDB Prototype Status The prototype boards almost fully assembled should be delivered this week ( May 5 th ) First.
PILOT ELECTION REVIEW COMMITTEE AUGUST 27, 2015 MEETING Colorado Secretary of State Elections Division.
Lydia Huber Director of Purchasing Victoria College.
Fundamentals of Information Systems, Third Edition1 Systems Design Answers the question “How will the information system do what it must do to solve a.
© Copyright 2013 TONE SOFTWARE CORPORATION New Client Turn-Up Overview.
EMS User Group Conference – 2008 PHI EMS MIGRATION TO COMMON PLATFORM PROJECT Manley Higgins Project Manager System Operations Pepco Holdings Inc. September.
Department of Commerce Information Technology Conference April 12-14, 2005 Acquisitions for the Department of Commerce Greg Crider Office of Acquisition.
Wright Technology Corp. Minh Duong Tina Mendoza Tina Mendoza Mark Rivera.
JLab Scientific Computing: Theory HPC & Experimental Physics Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Newport News, VA Sandy Philpott.
UITS PO Renewals Process 2/19/14. Table of Content Contract vs. PO PO renewal PO renewal initiation Information provided to Directors Process after the.
Copyright 2009  Understand the importance of project procurement management and the increasing use of outsourcing for information technology projects.
TAOYUAN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PARK BUSINESS INVITATION SEMINAR PRESENTATION OF PREFERENTIAL MEASURE & COUNSELING ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.
Commodity Node Procurement Process Task Force: Status Stephen Wolbers Run 2 Computing Review September 13, 2005.
EU Public Procurement Learning Lab “Proposal for a Working Plan” Rome, November 28 th 2003.
KIDS FIT FOR LIFE Prepared by: Michael HelselProject Manager Lloyd WestBusiness Analyst Roger MillerHardware Engineer Daryl BasarabGraphic Designer.
Fermi Linux Server Vendor Qualification--Closeout Report 1 Fermi Linux Server Vendor Qualification Project Closeout Report April 30, 2003.
Budget Process April 2011 Linda Corva, Assistant Vice President/Controller.
Water Main Repair, Replacement and Rehabilitation (WMR3) Strategic Sourcing Team Gary Gumm, P.E., Interim Chief Operating Officer – Team Sponsor Hala Flores,
ClinicalSoftwareSolutions Patient focused.Business minded. Slide 1 Opus Server Architecture Fritz Feltner Sept 7, 2007 Director, IT and Systems Integration.
Linux IDE Disk Servers Andrew Sansum 8 March 2000.
State of Georgia Release Management Training
HP Proliant Server  Intel Xeon E3-1220v3 (3.1GHz / 4-core / 8MB / 80W).  HP 4GB Dual Rank x8 PC E (DDR3-1600) Unbuffered Memory Kit.  HP Ethernet.
IT Purchasing Policy Shirley Gifford, Supervisor.
ALPA IT CONFERENCE November 29 – December 1, 2006.
© 2008 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice ProLiant G5 to G6 Processor Positioning.
Farming Andrea Chierici CNAF Review Current situation.
Elena Saharnean, SOE Fintehinform Chisinau, June 3, 2016.
Acer Altos T110 F3 E3-1220v3 4GB 500GB: 24,900 Baht
1062m0656 between 10692m2192 DS/ICI/CIF EqualLogic PS6510E
The PowerEdge T110 was developed with a purposeful design, energy-optimized technology, basic systems management, and the reliability you need. The PowerEdge.
Project Management – PTM712S
HPE SERVER DL380 SERVERS OPTIONS YOUR LOGO
TYBIS IP-Matrix Virtualized Total Video Surveillance System Edge Technology, World Best Server Virtualization.
NEW Dell PowerEdge Tower Servers Dell PowerEdge Tower Servers
Napatech Acceleration Platform
GRANT – RECAPITALIZATION OF LIBRARY SERVICES SEPTEMBER 2009
The world’s first mini workstation designed for CAD users!
DELL HEWLETT PACKARD LENOVO SERVERS RETAIL FILE OCTOBER 2018
DELL HEWLETT PACKARD LENOVO SERVERS RETAIL FILE AUGUST 2018
NEW Dell PowerEdge Tower Servers Dell PowerEdge Tower Servers
DELL HEWLETT PACKARD LENOVO SERVERS RETAIL FILE
HP’S BEST-SELLING PERFORMANCE WORKSTATION
DELL HEWLETT PACKARD LENOVO SERVERS RETAIL FILE MAY 2018
PowerEdge Servers SPECIAL PROMO
V DELL HEWLETT PACKARD LENOVO SERVERS RETAIL FILE DECEMBER 2018
PRE-QUALIFIED AND PREFERRED SUPPLIER PROGRAM
HP’S BEST-SELLING PERFORMANCE WORKSTATION
Dell Special Promo Server Options
Dell ™ PowerEdge R320 E GB 1TB:- 57,900 Baht
Stanford Budget Cycle Chris and Supriya – 20 min.
HOME AFFAIRS IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (hanis)
IT Next – Transformation Program
Presentation transcript:

HEPIX - Spring 2015 Tony Wong (BNL)

 Yearly purchase cycle of hardware for RACF timed with U.S. gov’t fiscal year (October to September)  Aim for delivery of new equipment by end of fiscal year to maximize value for the $  Purchase cycle has taken longer to complete in recent years  12 months in FY14 and delivery spilled into FY15  All three components of the purchase cycle are to blame (evaluation, purchase and delivery)

 As late as FY 2011, the cycle was ~3 months long  The FY 2014 experience  Evaluation  Dec to Jun ~ 7 months  Purchase  Jul. to Oct ~ 3 months  Delivery  Dec ~ 2 months  Multiple hardware options to evaluate (Intel/AMD cpu’s, drive options, RAID controllers, IB, 10 GbE, etc)  Long lead times with vendor (~1-2 months) to obtain parts to change hardware configuration

 Onerous internal purchase procedure  Multi-level approval for large $ purchase  Multiple bidding cycles  RACF-external technical approval required  Frustrating back and forth with procurement dept.  Delivery delays by supplier  Required to be within 6 weeks of awarding order  Actual delivery took 11 weeks  Since FY11, delays are the norm rather than the exception

 Of the three components (evaluation, purchase and delivery), RACF only fully controls evaluation  Proposed strategy to minimize delays  Shorten evaluation process by relying on remote access  Address purchase delays internally at BNL  Address delivery delays with supplier  Purchase and delivery delays may be self- inflicted wounds – large work load near end of U.S. fiscal year

 Previous experience with remote access to special purpose servers (ie, HP’s Moonshot system – results presented at Annecy meeting)  Discussed remote evaluation goals with Dell and HP  formal agreements signed  BNL legal dept. involved  Split evaluation process in two phases  Initial (wide range of configurations – weed out uninteresting technologies)  DONE  Final (focus on specific configurations – may include physical access to systems)  in progress

 Use established VPN’s provided by supplier  Temporary account allows access over a defined period (~2 weeks)  Supplier and/or RACF installs system software  RACF installs benchmark and executes  Occasional re-configuration of hardware, re- installation of software and re-execution of benchmark

 Dell PowerEdge 430  Dual 2.6 GHz (40 logical cores)  10 x 8 GB DDR MHz  PERC H330  4 x 2 TB Seagate 7200 rpm 6.0 Gbps SATA drives  HS06  Dell PowerEdge R730xd  Dual E5-2690v3 2.6 GHz (48 logical cores)  8 x 8 GB DDR MHz  PERC H730P  5 x 2 TB Seagate 7200 rpm 6.0 Gpbs SAS drives  HS06 (462 Watts at peak load)  Dell PowerEdge R730xd  Dual E5-2660v3 2.6 GHz (40 logical cores)  16 x 6 GB DDR MHz  PERC H730  12 x 6 TB Seagate 7200 rpm 6.0 Gpbs SATA drives  HS06 (434 Watts at peak load)

 HP DL160  Dual 2.6 GHz (40 logical cores)  12 x 8 GB DDR MHz  SmartArray H240  4 x 4 TB 7200 rpm 6.0 Gbps SATA drives  HS06  HP DL180  Dual 2.6 GHz (40 logical cores)  12 x 8 GB DDR MHz  SmartArray P840  12 x 6 TB 7200 rpm 6.0 Gbps SATA drives  HS06

 Conclude hardware evaluation by March 30 th  Purchase process: April 1 st - May 31 st  Delivery of hardware by August 1 st  Seek remote evaluation agreements with other suppliers (ie, Lenovo, etc)  Make remote access a permanent feature of the evaluation process  Use remote access to complement on-site evaluation of hardware

 Do other institutions have remote access agreements?  Is it possible to leverage the effort?  Provide access to multiple institutions  Motivate suppliers with bigger demand  Legal considerations  What agreements are possible between institutions and suppliers?  Laws not uniform among countries  Institutional rules vary within a country

 In 2014, clusters were priced in July and delivered in December  Standard prices for Intel Ivybridge in July  Discounts after Haswell became available in October  Delays affected HEPN programs at BNL  Need to minimize delays to maximize purchasing power and meet deadline for deliverables  Follow-up at Fall meeting