LW Version 1.0 August 2009 1 Supporting Schools and District Improvement in Massachusetts Building Professional Learning Communities to Improve Instruction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Self-Study Tool for Alaska Schools Winter Conference January 14, 2010 Jon Paden, EED Deborah Davis, Education Northwest/Alaska Comprehensive Center.
Using Assessment to Inform Instruction: Small Group Time
Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
The Blueprint Your SIP (School Improvement Plan) A living, breathing, document.
Secondary District Professional Development October 14, 2011 Welcome! Please put on a name tag with your name and school, find any open seat and introduce.
Welcome back! UDL Implementation: moving beyond awareness Cohort 2, Session 5 March 14, 2013.
DPS Educator Effectiveness: Stakeholder Engagement Lessons Learned February 6, 2013.
SYSTEM CHANGE: MIRACLES IN PROGRESS TEACHER INDUCTION, MENTORING AND RENEWAL November 4, 2006 Dr. Carol Rolheiser Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Administrator Information AEA 267’s Mentoring and Induction Program.
Integrating Evaluation and Curriculum, GLTS. Welcome Presenters: Lauren Jones - Lead Teacher - Carpentry/ Architectural Drafting, ILT member Paul Mears.
"Like other professionals, teachers cannot become effective by following scripts. Instead, they need to create knowledge in use as they practice... knowledge.
Building Professional Learning Communities to Improve Instructions and Raise Achievement Overview Supporting School and District Improvement in Massachusetts.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Formative Assessment in Idaho Idaho is committed to the idea that a system of assessment will yield far better information about teaching and learning.
Preparing for the CCR Regional Sessions. Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education College and career readiness means an individual.
Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Literacy Coaches in Action: Strategies for Crafting Building- Level Support.
Welcome to Project High Five: Culture Collaboration Commitment Communication Community.
Student-Centered Coaching Instructional Design and Assessment Presented by Diane Sweeney Author of: Student-Centered Coaching (Corwin, 2010), Student-
OSSE School Improvement Data Workshop Workshop #4 June 30, 2015 Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
Leadership Through An Instructional Lens Dr. Krista D. Parent Oregon Leadership Network Institute April 22, 2009.
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
School Administrators of Iowa Annual Conference August 5-6, 2014.
Grade 3-5 ELA Common Core Ambassadors August 13-17, 2012 Albany, NY.
STRATEGIC PLAN Tennessee Department of Education School Team Training Series Opening Session – Literacy June 2014.
Union Hill School Worcester, MA VideoVideo. Turnaround Practices Research: Strategies that Contribute to Successful School Turnaround CCSSO Conference.
CFI: Quality Review Institute Division of Accountability and Achievement Resources Division of School Support August-September 2009 Network Leaders’ Guide.
SOCCIAL STUDIES MATTERS New High School Social Studies Curriculum Phase 1 Implementation August 28, 2014.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 1: MSFE TEPG Rubric.
Elementary District Professional Development October 14, 2011 Welcome! Please put on a name tag with your name and school, find any open seat and introduce.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Medicine Hat School District #76 PLC’s Building Capability Through Collaborative Learning Developing tomorrow’s citizens through improved learning, living.
ISLLC Standard #2 Supporting Teacher Learning Name Workshop Facilitator.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Secondary District Professional Development October 14, 2011 Welcome! Please put on a name tag with your name and school, find any open seat and introduce.
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
Data Wise A process for working with data to improve teaching and learning.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
1 NH PACE Tier 2 Leadership PLC Session 1 September 28, 2015.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP Supporting Common Assessments (Time for Common Assessments) © AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, 2012.
Teacher Refresher Course Professional Learning Program Program 1 Learning Leaders: Jill Flack Maureen O’Rourke.
EngageNY.org Feedback on Speaking and Listening Session 4A, November 2013 NTI.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Measured Progress ©2011 Alaska Summer Leadership Institute Processes and Protocols for Learning Teams Julia Payne-Lewis- Professional Development Specialist.
 SEP Administrative Institute December 11, 2012 Professional Learning Communities & LCCI Survey Data.
Compass Points Activity EastSpeculating: Likes to look at the big picture, the possibilities, before acting. North Acting: Lets do it, likes to act, try.
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
Welcome!  Please complete the three “Do Now” posters.  There are nametags on the tables:  Please ensure that more than one district is represented at.
Calibrating Feedback A Model for Establishing Consistent Expectations of Educator Practice Adapted from the MA Candidate Assessment of Performance.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
OVEC/KDE Instructional Support Leadership Network Welcome Your facilitators are: Dr. Molly Sullivan Mr. Buddy Berry Mr. Thom Coffee Mr. Bill Hogan Mr.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
LW Version 1.0 August Supporting Schools and District Improvement in Massachusetts Building Professional Learning Communities to Improve Instruction.
Jeff McCoy, Executive Director of Academic Innovation and Technology
Supporting Schools and District Improvement in Massachusetts
Shaping a new model of inclusive education
Supporting Schools and District Improvement in Massachusetts
Secondary District Professional Development
Supporting Schools and District Improvement in Massachusetts
Introductions Introduction
Presentation transcript:

LW Version 1.0 August Supporting Schools and District Improvement in Massachusetts Building Professional Learning Communities to Improve Instruction and Raise Achievement` Summer 2013 Supporting Schools and District Improvement in Massachusetts Building Professional Learning Communities to Improve Instruction and Raise Achievement` Summer 2013

LW Version 1.0 August CCE Facilitation Team  Dan French, CCE Executive Director  Meg Maccini, PLC Consultant  Meg Robbins, PLC Consultant  Michael Brownstein, QPA Team  Richard Dubuisson, PLC Project Lead  Stacy Young, PLC Team  Mary Anne Connery-Simmons  Carlton Carter

LW Version 1.0 August Institute Goals  To create a common understanding of the PLC Expansion Project, and the support available for schools and districts  To examine the purpose, structures, and protocols for building an effective PLC  To experience and practice the work of effective PLCs  To use the PLC structures to explore individual schools/districts focus of inquiry, develop a body of work and implementation plan for key initiatives for the rest of the year.

LW Version 1.0 August Today’s Agenda - Morning  Welcome & Introductions  Connections  Overview of the PLC Initiative  PLC Video  Break  Structures of Effective PLCs – Norms  The Work of PLCs – Looking at Student Work Protocol  Morning Reflections

LW Version 1.0 August Today’s Agenda - Afternoon  Lunch  Compass Points – Identifying Preferences  PLC Self-Assessment  Debrief & Reflections  Day 1 Evaluations  Closure

LW Version 1.0 August DESE Perspective David Parker Manager for Regional Support and Intervention MA Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 75 Pleasant Street, Malden, MA 02148

LW Version 1.0 August How we work together  We use norms to create safe spaces for working together  We make use of protocols to structure discussions and keep the focus on student and teacher work as a means to improving teaching and learning  We model tools and practices for PLC implementation, group activities to promote learning from each other, gradual release of responsibility as we go through the work, and sharing of our learning through presentations and peer critique

LW Version 1.0 August How we work together  Our Norms:  Active listening  Check your assumptions  Trust the process  Respect all voices  Start and end on time  Recognize that everyone is a learner

LW Version 1.0 August Connections  Introduce your school  Talk at your tables in your school or district teams  Choose a rep who will share  Name of your school, & town plus 2 of these – Something special about your school / district or town – Something you’re hoping to take back with you at the end of the 2 days – A question you have about implementing PLCs in your school / district  Debrief

LW Version 1.0 August PLC Project Overview Goal:  To promote strong professional learning communities in districts and schools to drive instructional improvement and increase student learning and achievement. Guiding Questions:  What role do professional learning communities play in improving instruction and student achievement?  How can we leverage change in our schools and build capacity by implementing professional learning communities?

LW Version 1.0 August PLC Project Overview  The Center for Collaborative Education (CCE) has partnered with the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (ESE) to promote the building of strong professional learning communities (PLC) in districts and schools in order to drive instructional improvement and ultimately increase student learning and achievement.  During the pilot phase of this project, CCE worked with two cohorts: One cohort of districts from Western Mass and the other Cohort from Eastern Mass.  During year two of the project, we will work with cohorts of schools and districts from five different regions across the Commonwealth: Central, Western, Southeast, Northeast, and Greater Boston.

LW Version 1.0 August PLC Logic Model  Building strong professional learning communities – focused on improving instruction, curriculum, and assessment – will result in increased teacher collaboration and an increase in the use of effective instructional practices in classrooms, leading to improved student achievement. Building vibrant Professional Learning Communities (PLC) Increased school collaboration focused on improving instruction & student learning Changes in School and Classroom Practices Improved Student Outcomes

LW Version 1.0 August What PLC Work Do We Engage In?  Using structured protocols to help focus our work, we engage school and district teams in the following:  Looking at student and teacher work  Classroom, peer, and learning walk shared observations  Creating common assessments & rubrics  Data-based inquiry groups to identify causes and find solutions to instructional dilemmas  Lesson study  Text-based discussions on education research

LW Version 1.0 August Who We Are  The Center for Collaborative Education (CCE) is a nonprofit organization, established in 1994 and based in Boston, MA.  CCE partners with public schools and districts to create and sustain effective and equitable schools.  We have provided technical assistance to a multitude of public school districts in Massachusetts and beyond in all aspects of school reform – leadership development, professional learning communities, school redesign, governance, curriculum, instruction, assessment, staffing, budget, schedules, and parent engagement, among others.  CCE has worked with most of the urban school districts across the state on multiple school reform initiatives, across all grade spans.

LW Version 1.0 August Project Work  Create a set of professional development modules, facilitator guides, and Power Points that MA districts can use to launch and strengthen PLCs. Each module is focused on tools and resources for application.  Work with cohorts of districts in a coaching/capacity-building capacity to strengthen PLCs while field testing and gaining feedback on draft professional development resources that will be available statewide.  By June 2014, there will be a robust PLC website housed by ESE of modules, facilitator guides, Power Points, case studies, readings, and other resources for all districts and schools to access.

LW Version 1.0 August PLC Modules The project includes six professional development modules, along with tools (articles, protocols, videos, etc..), and facilitator’s guides to assist schools/districts in implementing PLCs. The modules are:  Module 1 “Why PLCs?”  Module 2 “Structures of PLCs”  Module 3 “How to Build Effective Teams”  Module 4 “Data-Based Inquiry”  Module 5 “Non-Evaluative Classroom Observations”  Module 6 “District -Level Professional Learning Communities”

LW Version 1.0 August District and School Support  Five days of school-year cohort Professional Development in structuring and facilitating PLCs  2-day Summer Institute, and 3 days in the fall & Spring  Dates in October, December, and February TBD  Five days of dedicated in-district CCE coaching throughout the school year  On-site coaching in a ‘train the trainer’ model and work with both District and School PLCs

LW Version 1.0 August District Commitments  Demonstrated District Leadership Support (Walk the Walk)  Common Planning Time 2-3 times a week (minimum once) for Teacher Teams  ID of lead district liaison person  Formation of active and engaged Superintendent’s PLC Leadership Team  Participation in full scope of training  District-school team for side by side DSAC training  Commitment to provide feedback to CCE on training and resource materials

LW Version 1.0 August Turn and Talk  Reflect in your journals for 2 minutes  What did you hear that resonated?  What questions were raised?  Any new ideas come up?  Turn to someone at your table and share some of your ideas, questions, and thoughts  Debrief

LW Version 1.0 August PLC Video  Find a partner at your table  Use Video Graphic Organizer as you watch video  1 person will focus on what is shown and the other will focus on what is said.  After the video each person shares for 2-3 minutes  Debrief

LW Version 1.0 August Break – 10 minutes

LW Version 1.0 August PLC Structures – Creating Norms  How can norms provide the right foundation for our PLCs?  Forming Ground Rules Protocol  Practicing creating norms with your PLC groups

LW Version 1.0 August Norms Debrief How did this process work with your group?  Can you see using this with your PLC?  What are some other ways you’ve created norms?  How do you re-visit norms and make them personally relevant for each group and each individual?  How do you maintain your norms and hold everyone accountable? What challenges are there? What learning do you have to share?

LW Version 1.0 August Looking at Student Work Protocol  Protocol at the heart of PLC work  Process:  6 small groups  Group number is on your name tag  Groups 1 & 2 stay here  Group 3 in small conference room  Groups 4 in middle conference room  Groups 5 & 6 in back conference room  Debrief

LW Version 1.0 August Morning Reflections  In your “journals” capture some of your thoughts, ideas, and questions from our work this morning.  Debrief

LW Version 1.0 August Lunch – 45mins

LW Version 1.0 August Afternoon Agenda  Compass Points  PLC Self-Assessment  Debrief & Reflections  Day 1 Evaluations  Closure

LW Version 1.0 August Compass Points  Choose your most dominant work style: o North :  Acting – “Let’s do it;” Likes to act, try things, plunge in. o South  Caring – likes to know that everyone’s feelings have been taken into consideration and that their voices have been heard before acting. o East  Speculating – likes to look at the big picture and the possibilities before acting. o West  Paying attention to detail —likes to know the who, what, when, where and why before acting.

LW Version 1.0 August PLC Self-Assessment  Within your school teams, create pairs or triads and complete the self-assessment tool together.  As you answer each question, think of the supporting evidence you would provide if asked.  Get back together as a full school or district team and compare answers  Were there any major gaps?  What strengths did we identify?  What were the growth areas?  What are the implications for our work?  Debrief

LW Version 1.0 August Final Reflections & Closing  Complete Day 1 Evaluations and turn in  HW for tomorrow, article: “Building Professional Learning Communities”  Journal--Learnings and thoughts from the day  Debrief and Reflections  Preview day 2 agenda  Thank you! See you all tomorrow!